The in-game use of AI-generated assets has already sparked controversy in the video game industry, but so far it doesn’t appear to be widespread. The most notable example so far is High on Life, which used his AI art for in-game posters and some of his AI voice acting. However, outside of video games, in the entertainment industry we’ve most recently had Marvel’s Secret Wars with an entirely AI-generated opening using his credits.
Steam, the gatekeeper of the PC industry, appears to have taken at least a temporary stance on the issue. A rather old reddit post from 3 weeks ago is now going viral via tweets from: Simon Curless. In it, the developer posted on the /aigamedev subreddit that he had Valve rejected the game for using some AI art assets. The message read:
“As a result of our research, we have identified the following intellectual property. [Game Name Here] Anything believed to belong to one or more third parties. especially, [Game Name Here] Contains art assets that appear to rely on copyrighted material owned by third parties, generated by artificial intelligence. Due to the ambiguity of legal ownership of such AI-generated art, unless you can affirmatively confirm that you own the rights to all IP used in the data sets that trained your game, you may not use this AI You cannot ship your game with generated assets. AI that creates in-game assets.
Your build has failed, so you have one chance to remove all content you don’t have rights to from your build.
If we are unable to remove all such content, we will not be able to ship the game on Steam and this app will be banned. ”
The developer said he had “improved” the parts by hand so that they were clearly not AI-generated, but was again denied.
If this is an actual policy that Steam has not announced publicly, it would be a significant moment in the use of AI for creative work in the video game industry. While the move has been celebrated by many game developers and artists, AI proponents believe Steam is battling the inevitable, ditching the early mid-journey six-fingered monster. Given that it’s evolved beyond, I’m wondering how I can consistently discover AI assets. early days. Artists may know, but do Steam game reviewers?
The issue of copyright is indeed vague at this point. It’s fairly common knowledge that generative AI is trained on millions of images, most of which were taken without permission from artists. However, the final product cannot be said to be a direct reproduction of a specific artist or image, unless the image uses a copyrighted character, such as a superhero. However, Valve has stated that it is not accepting games with AI assets, or at least discoverable AI assets, due to total opacity at this time.
We’ll see how this policy evolves and whether Valve has anything specific to say about it. Valve previously banned Web3/crypto/blockchain games when the trend was on the rise, but it seems to have solidified what it believes is right and wrong in game development.
follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram. Subscribe to our free weekly content roundup newsletter. god roll.
take my science fiction hero killer series and earthborn trilogy.
