Winsche, W. E., Hoffman, K. C. & Salzano, F. J. Hydrogen: its future role in the nation’s energy economy. Science 180, 1325–1332 (1973).
Google Scholar
Ouyang, L., Jiang, J., Chen, K., Zhu, M. & Liu, Z. Hydrogen production via hydrolysis and alcoholysis of light metal-based materials: a review. Nanomicro Lett. 13, 134 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yap, J. & McLellan, B. Evaluating the attitudes of Japanese society towards the hydrogen economy: A comparative study of recent and past community surveys. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.174 (2023).
Kim, C. et al. Review of hydrogen infrastructure: The current status and roll-out strategy. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 48, 1701–1716 (2023).
Peng, Z. et al. Overview of hydrogen compression materials based on a three-stage metal hydride hydrogen compressor. J. Alloy. Compd. 895, 162465 (2022).
Elvira, K. et al. Hydrogen technology for supply chain sustainability: The Mexican transportation impacts on society. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47, 29999–30011 (2022).
Liu, J. et al. A comprehensive review on hydrogen permeation barrier in the hydrogen transportation pipeline: Mechanism, application, preparation, and recent advances. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 101, 504–528 (2025).
Yu, H. et al. Hydrogen embrittlement as a conspicuous material challenge─comprehensive review and future directions. Chem. Rev. 124, 6271–6392 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Review of the hydrogen embrittlement and interactions between hydrogen and microstructural interfaces in metallic alloys: Grain boundary, twin boundary, and nano-precipitate. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 72, 74–109 (2024).
Meda, U. S., Bhat, N., Pandey, A., Subramanya, K. N. & Lourdu Antony Raj, M. A. Challenges associated with hydrogen storage systems due to the hydrogen embrittlement of high strength steels. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 48, 17894–17913 (2023).
Sun, B. et al. Current challenges and opportunities toward understanding hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms in advanced high-strength steels: a review. Acta Metall. Sin. 34, 741–754 (2021).
Pramuanjaroenkij, A. & Kakaç, S. The fuel cell electric vehicles: The highlight review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 48, 9401–9425 (2023).
Sasaki, K. et al. Hydrogen energy engineering. (Springer, 2016).
Hirth, J. P. Effects of hydrogen on the properties of iron and steel. Metall. Trans. A 11, 861–890 (1980).
Ordin, P. M. Safety Standard for Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems Guidelines for Hydrogen System Design, Materials Selection, Operations, Storage and Transportation. NASA Technical Report (1997).
Gangloff, R. P. & Somerday, B. P. Gaseous hydrogen embrittlement of materials in energy technologies: mechanisms, modelling and future developments. (Elsevier, 2012).
Nagumo, M. Fundamentals of hydrogen embrittlement. Vol. 921 (Springer, 2016).
Jemblie, L. et al. Safe pipelines for hydrogen transport. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.309 (2024).
Okuno, K. & Takai, K. Extraction of reversible hydrogen trapped on prior austenite grain boundaries and promoting intergranular fracture in the elastic region of tempered martensitic steel by utilizing frozen-in hydrogen distribution at −196°C. Acta Mater. 259, 119291 (2023).
Rodoni, E., Claeys, L., Depover, T. & Iannuzzi, M. Effect of nickel on the hydrogen diffusion, trapping and embrittlement properties of tempered ferritic-martensitic dual-phase low alloy steels. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 98, 418–428 (2025).
Li, H., Lee, C., Venezuela, J., Kim, H.-J. & Atrens, A. Hydrogen diffusion and hydrogen embrittlement of a 1500 MPa hot-stamped steel 22MnB5 in different austenitizing conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 897, 146349 (2024).
Park, H. et al. Impact of hydrogen embrittlement on the tensile-shear property of resistance spot-welded advanced high-strength martensitic steels. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 71, 319–333 (2024).
Matsunaga, H., Yamabe, J., Takakuwa, O., Ogawa, Y. & Matsuoka, S. Hydrogen Gas Embrittlement: Mechanisms, Mechanics, and Design. (Elsevier, 2024).
Matsuoka, S., Yamabe, J. & Matsunaga, H. Criteria for determining hydrogen compatibility and the mechanisms for hydrogen-assisted, surface crack growth in austenitic stainless steels. Eng. Fract. Mech. 153, 103–127 (2016).
Takakuwa, O., Yamabe, J., Matsunaga, H., Furuya, Y. & Matsuoka, S. Comprehensive understanding of ductility loss mechanisms in various steels with external and internal hydrogen. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48, 5717–5732 (2017).
Sezgin, J.-G., Takakuwa, O., Matsunaga, H. & Yamabe, J. Simulation of the effect of internal pressure on the integrity of hydrogen pre-charged BCC and FCC steels in SSRT test conditions. Eng. Fract. Mech. 216, 106505 (2019).
San Marchi, C. et al. Effect of microstructural and environmental variables on ductility of austenitic stainless steels. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46, 12338–12347 (2021).
Takaki, S. et al. Determination of hydrogen compatibility for solution-treated austenitic stainless steels based on a newly proposed nickel-equivalent equation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41, 15095–15100 (2016).
Hughes, L. A., Somerday, B. P., Balch, D. K. & San Marchi, C. Hydrogen compatibility of austenitic stainless steel tubing and orbital tube welds. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39, 20585–20590 (2014).
San Marchi, C., Michler, T., Nibur, K. A. & Somerday, B. P. On the physical differences between tensile testing of type 304 and 316 austenitic stainless steels with internal hydrogen and in external hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35, 9736–9745 (2010).
Zhang, L., Wen, M., Imade, M., Fukuyama, S. & Yokogawa, K. Effect of nickel equivalent on hydrogen gas embrittlement of austenitic stainless steels based on type 316 at low temperatures. Acta Mater. 56, 3414–3421 (2008).
Michler, T., Yukhimchuk, A. A. & Naumann, J. Hydrogen environment embrittlement testing at low temperatures and high pressures. Corros. Sci. 50, 3519–3526 (2008).
Cho, H.-J., Cho, Y. & Kim, S.-J. Hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of Cu bearing cost-effective austenitic stainless steels. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 60, 1–10 (2024).
An, X. et al. Mechanisms of hydrogen embrittlement resistances in FCC concentrated solid solution alloys. Corros. Sci. 229, 111894 (2024).
Wada, K. et al. Hydrogen-induced degradation of SUS304 austenitic stainless steel at cryogenic temperatures. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 927, 147988 (2025).
Ito, T. et al. Role of solute hydrogen on mechanical property enhancement in Fe–24Cr–19Ni austenitic steel: An in situ neutron diffraction study. Acta Mater. 287, 120767 (2025).
Ogawa, Y. et al. Hydrogen, as an alloying element, enables a greater strength-ductility balance in an Fe-Cr-Ni-based, stable austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 199, 181–192 (2020).
Claeys, L., Deconinck, L., Verbeken, K. & Depover, T. Effect of additive manufacturing and subsequent heat and/or surface treatment on the hydrogen embrittlement sensitivity of 316L austenitic stainless steel. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 48, 36142–36157 (2023).
Álvarez, G., Harris, Z., Wada, K., Rodríguez, C. & Martínez-Pañeda, E. Hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: Influence of post-processing, printing direction, temperature and pre-straining. Addit. Manuf. 78, 103834 (2023).
Yamabe, J., Takakuwa, O., Matsunaga, H., Itoga, H. & Matsuoka, S. Hydrogen diffusivity and tensile-ductility loss of solution-treated austenitic stainless steels with external and internal hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42, 13289–13299 (2017).
Marchi, C. S., Somerday, B. P. & Robinson, S. L. Permeability, solubility and diffusivity of hydrogen isotopes in stainless steels at high gas pressures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 32, 100–116 (2007).
Omura, T., Yamamura, M., Ito, K., Yamabe, J. & Matsunaga, H. Effects of alloying-element addition on hydrogen diffusion and hydrogen absorption in Ni. ISIJ Int. 65, 1402–1409 (2025).
Ito, K., Yamamura, M., Omura, T., Yamabe, J. & Matsunaga, H. Effects of Cr, Mn, and Fe on the hydrogen solubility of Ni in high-pressure hydrogen environments and their electronic origins: An experimental and first-principles study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 50, 148–164 (2024).
Wimmer, E. et al. Temperature-dependent diffusion coefficients from ab initio computations: Hydrogen, deuterium, and tritium in nickel. Phys. Rev. B 77, 134305 (2008).
Zhou, X.-Y. et al. Machine learning assisted design of FeCoNiCrMn high-entropy alloys with ultra-low hydrogen diffusion coefficients. Acta Mater. 224, 117535 (2022).
Shuang, F. et al. Decoding the hidden dynamics of super-Arrhenius hydrogen diffusion in multi-principal element alloys via machine learning. Acta Mater. 289, 120924 (2025).
Torres, E., Pencer, J. & Radford, D. D. Atomistic simulation study of the hydrogen diffusion in nickel. Comput. Mater. Sci. 152, 374–380 (2018).
Shiihara, Y. et al. Artificial neural network molecular mechanics of iron grain boundaries. Scr. Mater. 207, 114268 (2022).
Mortazavi, B. Recent advances in machine learning-assisted multiscale design of energy materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 15, 2403876 (2025).
Wang, F. et al. Atomic-scale simulations in multi-component alloys and compounds: A review on advances in interatomic potential. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 165, 49–65 (2023).
Behler, J. Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials. Chem. Rev. 121, 10037–10072 (2021).
Google Scholar
Unke, O. T. et al. Machine Learning Force Fields. Chem. Rev. 121, 10142–10186 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gong, X., Li, Z., Pattamatta, A. S. L. S., Wen, T. & Srolovitz, D. J. An accurate and transferable machine learning interatomic potential for nickel. Commun. Mater. 5, 157 (2024).
Fellman, A., Byggmästar, J., Granberg, F., Nordlund, K. & Djurabekova, F. Fast and accurate machine-learned interatomic potentials for large-scale simulations of Cu, Al and Ni. Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 053807 (2025).
Wang, J. et al. Efficient moment tensor machine-learning interatomic potential for accurate description of defects in Ni-Al Alloys. Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 053805 (2025).
Zhang, S., Meng, F., Fu, R. & Ogata, S. Highly efficient and transferable interatomic potentials for α-iron and α-iron/hydrogen binary systems using deep neural networks. Comput. Mater. Sci. 235, 112843 (2024).
Meng, F.-S. et al. A highly transferable and efficient machine learning interatomic potentials study of α-Fe–C binary system. Acta Mater. 281, 120408 (2024).
Zhang, L., Csányi, G., van der Giessen, E. & Maresca, F. Atomistic fracture in bcc iron revealed by active learning of Gaussian approximation potential. Npj Comput. Mater. 9, 217 (2023).
Pitike, K. C. & Setyawan, W. Accurate Fe–He machine learning potential for studying He effects in BCC-Fe. J. Nucl. Mater. 574, 154183 (2023).
Kotykhov, A. S. et al. Constrained DFT-based magnetic machine-learning potentials for magnetic alloys: a case study of Fe–Al. Sci. Rep. 13, 19728 (2023).
Google Scholar
Meng, F.-S. et al. General-purpose neural network interatomic potential for the $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-iron and hydrogen binary system: Toward atomic-scale understanding of hydrogen embrittlement. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 113606 (2021).
Sun, H. et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of Fe-Si alloys using a neural network machine learning potential. Phys. Rev. B 107, 224301 (2023).
Dragoni, D., Daff, T. D., Csányi, G. & Marzari, N. Achieving DFT accuracy with a machine-learning interatomic potential: Thermomechanics and defects in bcc ferromagnetic iron. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 013808 (2018).
Mori, H. & Ozaki, T. Neural network atomic potential to investigate the dislocation dynamics in bcc iron. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 040601 (2020).
Ito, K., Yokoi, T., Hyodo, K. & Mori, H. Machine learning interatomic potential with DFT accuracy for general grain boundaries in α-Fe. Npj Comput. Mater. 10, 255 (2024).
Ito, K. & Tabata, S. -i First-principles predictions of transition metal alloying effects on cohesive energy of prior austenite grain boundaries in high-strength steels. Mater. Today Commun. 46, 112890 (2025).
Meng, F.-S. et al. General-purpose neural network interatomic potential for the α-iron and hydrogen binary system: Toward atomic-scale understanding of hydrogen embrittlement. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 113606 (2021).
Ito, K., Otaki, T., Hyodo, K., Yokoi, T. & Mori, H. Machine-learning potential reveals the origin of hydrogen embrittlement at general grain boundaries in α-Fe. 18 July 2025, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7113724/v1 (2025).
Sun, C. et al. A high-throughput molecular dynamics study with a machine-learning method on predicting diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in α-iron grain boundaries. Mater. Today Commun. 44, 111997 (2025).
Angeletti, A. et al. Hydrogen diffusion in magnesium using machine learning potentials: a comparative study. Npj Comput. Mater. 11, 85 (2025).
Kwon, H., Shiga, M., Kimizuka, H. & Oda, T. Accurate description of hydrogen diffusivity in bcc metals using machine-learning moment tensor potentials and path-integral methods. Acta Mater. 247, 118739 (2023).
Yu, F., Xiang, X., Zu, X. & Hu, S. Hydrogen diffusion in zirconium hydrides from on-the-fly machine learning molecular dynamics. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 56, 1057–1066 (2024).
Szlachta, W. J., Bartók, A. P. & Csányi, G. Accuracy and transferability of Gaussian approximation potential models for tungsten. Phys. Rev. B 90, 104108 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. DP-GEN: A concurrent learning platform for the generation of reliable deep learning based potential energy models. Comput. Phys. Commun. 253, 107206 (2020).
Matsumura, N. et al. Generator of neural network potential for molecular dynamics: constructing robust and accurate potentials with active learning for nanosecond-scale simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 3832–3846 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 4441–4451 (Curran Associates Inc., Montréal, Canada, 2018).
Chen, C. & Ong, S. P. A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 718–728 (2022).
Google Scholar
Deng, B. et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1031–1041 (2023).
Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).
Google Scholar
Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019).
Shapeev, A. V. Moment Tensor Potentials: A Class of Systematically Improvable Interatomic Potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153–1173 (2016).
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).
Google Scholar
Thompson, A. P., Swiler, L. P., Trott, C. R., Foiles, S. M. & Tucker, G. J. Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials. J. Comput. Phys. 285, 316–330 (2015).
Yoshimoto, Y., Matsumura, N., Iwasaki, Y., Nakao, H. & Sakai, Y. Large-Scale, Long-Time Atomistic Simulations of Proton Transport in Polymer Electrolyte Membranes Using a Neural Network Interatomic Potential. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20412 (2025).
Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).
Henkelman, G. & Jónsson, H. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978–9985 (2000).
Katz, L., Guinan, M. & Borg, R. J. Diffusion of H2, D2 and T2 in single-crystal Ni and Cu. Phys. Rev. B 4, 330–341 (1971).
Völkl, J. & Alefeld, G. in Hydrogen in Metals I: Basic Properties (eds Alefeld, G. & Völkl, J.) 321–348 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1978).
Zunger, A., Wei, S. H., Ferreira, L. G. & Bernard, J. E. Special quasirandom structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 353–356 (1990).
Google Scholar
Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Model. Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).
van de Walle, A., Asta, M. & Ceder, G. The alloy theoretic automated toolkit: A user guide. Calphad 26, 539–553 (2002).
van de Walle, A. et al. Efficient stochastic generation of special quasirandom structures. Calphad 42, 13–18 (2013).
Yang, S., Wang, Y., Liu, Z.-K. & Zhong, Y. Ab initio simulations on the pure Cr lattice stability at 0K: Verification with the Fe-Cr and Ni-Cr binary systems. Calphad 75, 102359 (2021).
Zeng, J. et al. DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models. J. Chem. Phys. 159, 054801 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, X.-Y. et al. Deep neural network potential for simulating hydrogen blistering in tungsten. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 093601 (2023).
Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).
Narayan, A., Berger, B. & Cho, H. Assessing single-cell transcriptomic variability through density-preserving data visualization. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 765–774 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Google Scholar
Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).
Methfessel, M. & Paxton, A. T. High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys. Rev. B 40, 3616–3621 (1989).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Crystal structure and pair potentials: a molecular-dynamics study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1196–1199 (1980).
Togo, A., Chaput, L., Tadano, T. & Tanaka, I. Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py. J. Condens. Matter Phys. 35, 353001 (2023).
Togo, A. First-principles Phonon Calculations with Phonopy and Phono3py. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2022).
