Kershaw, J. C. & Mattes, R. D. Nutrition and taste and smell dysfunction. World J. Otorhinolaryngol.—Head. Neck Surg. 4, 3–10 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pallante, L. et al. On the human taste perception: molecular-level understanding empowered by computational methods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 116, 445–459 (2021).
Google Scholar
Töle, J. C., Behrens, M. & Meyerhof, W. Taste receptor function. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 164, 173–185 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lim, J. & Pullicin, A. J. Oral carbohydrate sensing: beyond sweet taste. Physiol. Behav. 202, 14–25 (2019).
Google Scholar
Behrens, M. & Meyerhof, W. Bitter taste receptors and human bitter taste perception. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63, 1501–1509 (2006).
Google Scholar
Neta, E. R. D. C., Johanningsmeier, S. D. & McFeeters, R. F. The chemistry and physiology of sour taste—a review. J. Food Sci. 72, R33–R38 (2007).
Roper, S. D. The taste of table salt. Pflug. Arch. 467, 457–463 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wang, W., Zhou, X. & Liu, Y. Characterization and evaluation of umami taste: A review. TrAC—Trends Anal. Chem. 127, 115876 (2020).
Google Scholar
Breslin, P. A. S. An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste. Curr. Biol. 23, R409–R418 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tan, S. Y. & Tucker, R. M. Sweet taste as a predictor of dietary intake: a systematic review. Nutrients 11, 94 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kinnamon, S. C. Taste receptor signalling—from tongues to lungs. Acta Physiol. 204, 158–168 (2012).
Google Scholar
Servant, G., Kenakin, T., Zhang, L., Williams, M. & Servant, N. The function and allosteric control of the human sweet taste receptor. Adv. Pharmacol. 88, 59–82 (2020).
Google Scholar
Malavolta, M. et al. A survey on computational taste predictors. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 248, 2215–2235 (2022).
Google Scholar
Huang, W. et al. BitterX: a tool for understanding bitter taste in humans. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–8 (2016).
Dagan-Wiener, A. et al. Bitter or not? BitterPredict, a tool for predicting taste from chemical structure. Sci. Rep. 7, 12074 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zheng, S. et al. e-Bitter: bitterant prediction by the consensus voting from the machine-learning methods. Front. Chem. 6, 82 (2018).
Google Scholar
Charoenkwan, P. et al. iBitter-SCM: Identification and characterization of bitter peptides using a scoring card method with propensity scores of dipeptides. Genomics 112, 2813–2822 (2020).
Google Scholar
Charoenkwan, P., Nantasenamat, C., Hasan, M. M., Manavalan, B. & Shoombuatong, W. BERT4Bitter: a bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT)-based model for improving the prediction of bitter peptides. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab133 (2021).
Google Scholar
Charoenkwan, P. et al. iBitter-Fuse: a novel sequence-based bitter peptide predictor by fusing multi-view features. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8958 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rojas, C. et al. A QSTR-based expert system to predict sweetness of molecules. Front. Chem. 5, 1–12 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zheng, S., Chang, W., Xu, W., Xu, Y. & Lin, F. e-Sweet: a machine-learning based platform for the prediction of sweetener and its relative sweetness. Front. Chem. 7, 35 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bouysset, C., Belloir, C., Antonczak, S., Briand, L. & Fiorucci, S. Novel scaffold of natural compound eliciting sweet taste revealed by machine learning. Food Chem. 324, 126864 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Song, B. S., Chung, Y. K., Jang, J. H. & Huh, J. BoostSweet: learning molecular perceptual representations of sweeteners. Food Chem. 383, 132435 (2022).
Google Scholar
Banerjee, P. & Preissner, R. BitterSweetForest: a random forest based binary classifier to predict bitterness and sweetness of chemical compounds. Front. Chem. 6, 93 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tuwani, R., Wadhwa, S. & Bagler, G. BitterSweet: building machine learning models for predicting the bitter and sweet taste of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 9, 7155 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bo, W. et al. Prediction of bitterant and sweetener using structure-taste relationship models based on an artificial neural network. Food Res. Int. 153, 110974 (2022).
Google Scholar
Maroni, G. et al. Informed classification of sweeteners/bitterants compounds via explainable machine learning. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 5, 2270–2280 (2022).
Google Scholar
Charoenkwan, P., Yana, J., Nantasenamat, C., Hasan, M. M. & Shoombuatong, W. IUmami-SCM: a novel sequence-based predictor for prediction and analysis of umami peptides using a scoring card method with propensity scores of dipeptides. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 6666–6678 (2020).
Google Scholar
Charoenkwan, P. et al. UMPred-FRL: a new approach for accurate prediction of umami peptides using feature representation learning. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 13124 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pallante, L. et al. Toward a general and interpretable umami taste predictor using a multi-objective machine learning approach. Sci. Rep. 12, 21735 (2022).
Google Scholar
Qi, L. et al. Umami-MRNN: deep learning-based prediction of umami peptide using RNN and MLP. Food Chem. 405, 134935 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Umami-BERT: an interpretable BERT-based model for umami peptides prediction. Food Res. Int. 172, 113142 (2023).
Google Scholar
Eberly, L. E. Multiple linear regression. Methods Mol. Biol. (Clifton, N. J.) 404, 165–187 (2007).
Google Scholar
Shanmugasundar, G. et al. A comparative study of linear, random forest and adaboost regressions for modeling non-traditional machining. Processes 9, 2015 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tiryaki, S. & Aydin, A. An artificial neural network model for predicting compression strength of heat treated woods and comparison with a multiple linear regression model. Constr. Build. Mater. 62, 102–108 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bolaños, M., Ferrà, A. & Radeva, P. Food ingredients recognition through multi-label learning. Lect. Notes Computer Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinforma.) 10590, 394–402 (2017).
Cappellin, L. et al. Multiclass methods in the analysis of metabolomic datasets: the example of raspberry cultivar volatile compounds detected by GC-MS and PTR-MS. Food Res. Int. 54, 1313–1320 (2013).
Google Scholar
Reda, A., Fakharany, E. & Hazman, M. Early prediction of wheat diseases using SVM multiclass. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 639, 257–269 (2018).
Google Scholar
Saha, P., Ghorai, S., Tudu, B., Bandyopadhyay, R. & Bhattacharyya, N. Multi-class support vector machine for quality estimation of black tea using electronic nose. In: Proc. International Conference on Sensing Technology, ICST 571–576 (IEEE, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSensT.2012.6461744.
Damarla, S. & Kundu, M. Classification of tea samples using learning vector quantization neural network. In: Proc. 2020 IEEE Applied Signal Processing Conference, ASPCON 2020 99–103 (IEEE, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPCON49795.2020.9276662.
Monforte, A. R., Martins, S. I. F. S. & Silva Ferreira, A. C. Discrimination of white wine ageing based on untarget peak picking approach with multi-class target coupled with machine learning algorithms. Food Chem. 352, 129288 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tsakanikas, P., Karnavas, A., Panagou, E. Z. & Nychas, G. J. A machine learning workflow for raw food spectroscopic classification in a future industry. Sci. Rep. 10, 11212 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kruskal, W. H. & Wallis, W. A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583–621 (1952).
Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. & Wilk, M. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 691–611 (2007).
Ferreira, J. A. & Zwinderman, A. H. On the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Ann. Stat. 34, 1827–1849 (2006).
Google Scholar
Hasan, M. M., Manavalan, B., Shoombuatong, W., Khatun, M. S. & Kurata, H. i6mA-Fuse: improved and robust prediction of DNA 6 mA sites in the Rosaceae genome by fusing multiple feature representation. Plant Mol. Biol. 103, 225–234 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hasan, M. M. et al. Meta-i6mA: an interspecies predictor for identifying DNA N 6-methyladenine sites of plant genomes by exploiting informative features in an integrative machine-learning framework. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 1–16 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mota-Merlo, M. & Martos, V. Use of machine learning to establish limits in the classification of hyperaccumulator plants growing on serpentine, gypsum and dolomite soils. Mediterr. Bot. 42, e67609 (2021).
Google Scholar
Michelucci, U., Sperti, M., Piga, D., Venturini, F. & Deriu, M. A. A model-agnostic algorithm for bayes error determination in binary classification. Algorithms 14, 301 (2021).
Google Scholar
Venturini, F. et al. Exploration of Spanish olive oil quality with a miniaturized low-cost fluorescence sensor and machine learning techniques. Foods 10, 1010 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ahmad, A., Ordoñez, J., Cartujo, P. & Martos, V. Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) in agriculture: a pursuit of sustainability. Agronomy 11, 7 (2020).
Google Scholar
Martos, V., Ahmad, A., Cartujo, P. & Ordoñez, J. Ensuring agricultural sustainability through remote sensing in the era of agriculture 5.0. Appl. Sci. 11, 5911 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fu, B. et al. Three novel umami peptides derived from the alcohol extract of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas): identification, characterizations and interactions with T1R1/T1R3 taste receptors. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 13, 146–153 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fritz, F., Preissner, R. & Banerjee, P. VirtualTaste: a web server for the prediction of organoleptic properties of chemical compounds. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W679–W684 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rojas, C. et al. ChemTastesDB: a curated database of molecular tastants. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 4, 100090 (2022).
Google Scholar
Landrum, G. RDKit Documentation. Read. Writ. 1, 4 (2013).
Yu, Z. et al. Taste, umami-enhance effect and amino acid sequence of peptides separated from silkworm pupa hydrolysate. Food Res. Int. 108, 144–150 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Zhao, M., Su, G. & Lin, L. Identification and taste characteristics of novel umami and umami-enhancing peptides separated from peanut protein isolate hydrolysate by consecutive chromatography and UPLC–ESI–QTOF–MS/MS. Food Chem. 278, 674–682 (2019).
Google Scholar
Minkiewicz, P., Iwaniak, A. & Darewicz, M. BIOPEP-UWM database of bioactive peptides: current opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5978 (2019).
Google Scholar
Burdock, G. A. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients (CRC Press, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420037876.
Rojas, C. et al. Quantitative structure–activity relationships to predict sweet and non-sweet tastes. Theor. Chem. Acc. 135, 1–13 (2016).
Google Scholar
ToxNet.
Bento, A. P. et al. An open source chemical structure curation pipeline using RDKit. J. Cheminformatics 12, 51 (2020).
Google Scholar
Moriwaki, H., Tian, Y. S., Kawashita, N. & Takagi, T. Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator. J. Cheminformatics 10, 4 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, S. Nearest neighbor selection for iteratively kNN imputation. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 2541–2552 (2012).
Google Scholar
InSyBio – Biomarkers.
CAO, Y., MIAO, Q.-G., LIU, J.-C. & GAO, L. Advance and prospects of AdaBoost algorithm. Acta Autom. Sin. 39, 745–758 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. & Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1705.07874 (2017).
