President Trump is scheduled to announce his AI “plan of action” on Wednesday, and reportedly outlines how the US can win in developing artificial intelligence by promoting a handoff-regulated approach to technology.
Media reports suggest that the document is likely to mark a split from Biden Administration Policies. This supported restrictions on AI chip exports and procedures to ensure that AI is not used to spread misinformation.
The White House could discuss ways to export AI technology overseas and reduce barriers to US development, according to a Reuters report citing a summary of its draft action plan.
This can include everything from allowing AI data centers to be quickly built, to more use of AI in the Pentagon, identifying which federal regulations slow AI and withholding federal funds from states that already have difficult AI laws in place.
Trump will discuss the topic in a speech entitled “AI Race Wins,” hosted by White House AI, Crypto Czar David Sacks and his co-hosts on the “All-in” podcast.
The announcement of the strategy from the White House was the result of an order signed by Trump in his first week, calling for an AI plan of action that would “maintain and strengthen America's global AI domination to promote human prosperity, economic competition and national security.”
President Trump holds an executive order signed to AI in his White House's oval office on January 23rd (Reuters/Kevin Lamarck/File Photo) ・Reuters/Reuters
Several executive orders are expected this week, according to Axios and The Wall Street Journal. This will encourage the export of chips and AI technologies to countries considered US friendly.
According to the Wall Street Journal, there may be orders targeting “awakening AI.” AI developers target what administrators think they will create freely biased algorithms and block services as federal contractors.
The White House did not respond to requests for comment.
Two constitutional scholars who spoke to Yahoo Finance said it was doubtful that the “wake AI” measure would withstand legal scrutiny.
“When sanctioning software that is liberal but not conservative, the challenge is that the executive order is content-based discrimination,” said Rory Little, a professor at UC San Francisco Law.
AI and President Trump will sack at the White House Digital Assets Summit on March 7th. ・Washington Post by Getty Images
“I don't even know how to communicate whether the software is liberal or conservative,” Little said, adding that the initial amendment protects intellectual property as a form of speech the government may not be single because of punishment.
However, the constitutional viability of the order may not be important in the short term for companies like Amazon (AMZN), Anthropic (Anth.Pvt), Google (GOOG), OpenAI (Opai.Pvt), Microsoft (MSFT), and Prperxity (PEAI.PVT).
Even if the order is met with legal challenges, AI developers may not have time to wait for a court solution.
“As a lot of people are trying to make a deal with the Trump administration, these executive orders are viewed as bids that are initiating negotiations, not law,” Little said.
“If you're an AI company like Google, you'll probably do your best to negotiate something that allows you to move forward,” he added. “And as long as you're making money with your software, you couldn't care much about what atmospheric politics would look like.”
Openai CEO Sam Altman said Tuesday at the Federal Reserve Bank meeting in Washington, D.C. that his company is currently working in government.
Openai CEO Sam Altman will speak during discussions in the Federal Reserve on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) ・Associated Press
“We are working with the government to provide services to more and more government officials,” Altman said.
If such an AI order is issued and subsequently challenged, the court battle could be similar to multiple ongoing lawsuits against two other DEI-focused executive orders issued in the first days of Trump taking office.
These previous orders directed that all federal contractors prove that they do not operate the DEI program in violation of the Anti-Discrimination Act. They also closed government offices and employment positions focused on DEI.
David Kohl, partner of law firm Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegman, said the executive order would enter an area known as the “unconstitutional condition” doctrine.
“this [type of] The proposal is overreaching,” Kore said, explaining that combining eligibility with liberal bias in AI presents a “severe first-fix issue.”
Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow alexis with x @AlexiskWeed.
Click here for the latest technology news that will affect the stock market
Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance
