Machine learning in the prediction of human wellbeing

Machine Learning


  • Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Tay, L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nat. Human Behav. 2(4), 253–260 (2018).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2020a). How’s Life? 2020: Measuring Well-being.

  • ONS. (2021). Well-being – Office for National Statistics.

  • Cheung, F. & Lucas, R. E. Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Qual. Life Res. 23(10), 2809–2818 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tov, W., Keh, J.S., Tan, Y.Q., Tan, Q.Y.J., & Aziz, I.A.S.B. (2022). Assessing subjective well-being: A review of common measures. in Handbook of Positive Psychology Assessment.

  • OECD. (2013a). Methodological considerations in the measurement of subjective well-being (tech. rep.). OECD. Paris.

  • Diener, E., Inglehart, R. & Tay, L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Res. 112(3), 497–527 (2013).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, D. J., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M. S. & Rees-Jones, A. Can marginal rates of substitution be inferred from happiness data? Evidence from residency choices. Am. Econ. Rev. 104(11), 3498–3528 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Charpentier, C. J., De Neve, J.-E., Li, X., Roiser, J. P. & Sharot, T. Models of affective decision making: How do feelings predict choice?. Psychol. Sci. 27(6), 763–775 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, C. & Oswald, A. J. The scientific value of numerical measures of human feelings. PNAS 119(42), e2210412119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Clark, A. E., Cornaglia, F., Powdthavee, N. & Vernoit, J. What predicts a successful life? A life-course model of well-being. Econ. J. 124(580), F720–F738 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. J. Personality Social Psychol. 92, 717–730 (2007).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. J. & Powdthavee, N. Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges. J. Public Econ. 92(5), 1061–1077 (2008).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y. & Diener, E. Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychol. Sci. 15(1), 8–13 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassenboehmer, S. C. & Haisken-DeNew, J. P. You’re fired! the causal negative effect of entry unemployment on life satisfaction. Econ. J. 119(536), 448–462 (2009).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G. & Oswald, A. J. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J. Public Econ. 88(7–8), 1359–1386 (2004).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer, J. M., Richter, D., Brümmer, M., Wagner, G. G. & Schmukle, S. C. Successfully striving for happiness: Socially engaged pursuits predict increases in life satisfaction. Psychol. Sci. 29(8), 1291–1298 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, C. J. Understanding fixed effects in human well-being. J. Econ. Psychol. 31(1), 1–16 (2010).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, C. J. & Wood, A. M. Personality prior to disability determines adaptation: Agreeable individuals recover lost life satisfaction faster and more completely. Psychol. Sci. 22(11), 1397–1402 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J. & Wood, J. K. Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 146, 279–323 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, E. & Deci, R. M. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 141–166 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. & White, M. Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J. Econ. Psychol. 29(1), 94–122 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E. Four decades of the economics of happiness: Where next?. Rev. Income Wealth 64(2), 245–269 (2018).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, F. et al. Examining gray matter structures associated with individual differences in global life satisfaction in a large sample of young adults. Social Cognit. Affect. Neurosci. 10, 952–960 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolova, M. & Graham, C. The economics of happiness. In Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics (ed. Zimmermann, K. F.) 1–33 (Springer International Publishing, 2022).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, P. & Beatton, T. The mystery of the U-shaped relationship between happiness and age. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 82(2–3), 525–542 (2012).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T. C., Powdthavee, N. & Oswald, A. J. Longitudinal evidence for a midlife nadir in human well-being: Results from four data sets. Econ. J. 127(599), 126–142 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, C., Wiencierz, A., Schwarze, J. & Küchenhoff, H. Well-being over the life span: Semiparametric evidence from British and German longitudinal data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95(1), 154–167 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Deaton, A. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. PNAS 107(38), 16489–93 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., Diener, E. & Oishi, S. Happiness, income satiation and turning points around the world. Nat. Human Behav. 2(1), 33–38 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B. & Wolfers, J. Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation?. Am. Econ. Rev. 103(3), 598–604 (2013).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M. A. Experienced well-being rises with income, even above §75,000 per year. PNAS 118(4), e2016976118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, M., Otterbach, S. & Sousa-Poza, A. Using machine learning to uncover the relation between age and life satisfaction. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 5263 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, S., Elder, J., Hughes, B., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2021). What are the most important predictors of subjective well-being? Insights from machine learning and linear regression approaches on the MIDUS datasets (tech. rep.). PsyArXiv.

  • Prati, G. Correlates of quality of life, happiness and life satisfaction among European adults older than 50 years: A machine-learning approach. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 103, 104791 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukart, J., Weis, S., Genon, S. & Eickhoff, S. B. Towards increasing the clinical applicability of machine learning biomarkers in psychiatry. Nat. Human Behav. 5(4), 431–432 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. Random forests. Machine Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H., & Friedman, J.H. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Vol. 2. (Springer, 2009).

  • Friedman, J.H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 1189–1232.

  • Natekin, A., & Knoll, A. (2013). Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Front. Neurorobot. 7, Article 21.

  • Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B (Methodol.) 58(1), 267–288 (1996).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz-Ziv, R. & Armon, A. Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need. Inform. Fusion 81, 84–90 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Borisov, V., Leemann, T., Seßler, K., Haug, J., Pawelczyk, M., & Kasneci, G. (2022). Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey. arXiv:2110.01889 [cs].

  • OECD. (2013b). OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being.

  • Fudenberg, D., Kleinberg, J., Liang, A. & Mullainathan, S. Measuring the completeness of economic models. J. Political Econ. 130(4), 956–990 (2022).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B. & Schkade, D. A. The reliability of subjective well-being measures. J. Public Econ. 92(8–9), 1833–1845 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., Flèche, S., Layard, R., Powdthavee, N. & Ward, G. The Origins of Happiness (Princeton University Press, 2018).

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, I., Baron, D. & Shahaf, S. Probabilistic random forest: A machine learning algorithm for noisy data sets. Astron. J. 157(1), 16 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. & Frijters, P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?. Econ. J. 114(497), 641–659 (2004).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Proto, E. & Zhang, A. COVID-19 and mental health of individuals with different personalities. PNAS 118(37), e2109282118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2020b). Education at a Glance 2020.

  • Gorry, A., Gorry, D. & Slavov, S. N. Does retirement improve health and life satisfaction?. Health Econ. 27(12), 2067–2086 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, M., Huxhold, O. & Tesch-Römer, C. Transition into retirement affects life satisfaction: Short- and long-term development depends on last labor market status and education. Social Indicators Res. 125(3), 991–1009 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D.H., & Macready, W.G. (1995). No Free Lunch Theorems for Search (tech. rep.). Technical Report SFI-TR-95-02-010, Santa Fe Institute.

  • Mehta, P. et al. A high-bias, low-variance introduction to machine learning for physicists. Phys. Rep. 810, 1–124 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wager, S. & Athey, S. Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 113(523), 1228–1242 (2018).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • van Agteren, J. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing. Nat. Human Behav. 5(5), 631–652 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J.F., Wang, S., Huang, H., & Norton, M. (2022). in Happiness, Benevolence, and Trust During COVID-19 and Beyond (World Happiness Report), 15–52.

  • McGuire, J., Kaiser, C. & Bach-Mortensen, A. M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of cash transfers on subjective well-being and mental health in low- and middle-income countries. Nat. Human Behav. 6(3), 359–370 (2022).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. Classification and Regression Trees (Routledge, 1984).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Machine Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H. The Pattern of Human Concerns (Rutgers University Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • SOEP. (2021). SOEP-Core v36 (tech. rep.). SOEP Survey Papers.

  • UKHLS. (2021). United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Study Understanding Society: Waves 1-10, 2009-2019 and Harmonised BHPS: Waves 1-18, 1991-2009.

  • Ahrens, A., Hansen, C. B. & Schaffer, M. E. Lassopack: Model selection and prediction with regularized regression in Stata. Stata J. 20(1), 176–235 (2020).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M. & Mullainathan, S. Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(2), 67–72 (2001).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oparina, E. & Srisuma, S. Analyzing subjective well-being data with misclassification. J. Business Econ. Stat. 40(2), 730–743 (2022).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, A. J. Test-retest correlations and the reliability of copy testing. J. Marketing Res. 14(4), 476 (1977).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammann, R. & Flett, R. Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness. Austr. J. Psychol. 35(2), 259–265 (1983).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable Machine Learning. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *