The impact of AI on modern oncology from early detection to personalized cancer treatment

Machine Learning


  • Upadhyay, A. Cancer: An unknown territory; rethinking before going ahead. Genes Dis. 8, 655–661 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, A. et al. Barriers to cancer treatment for people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage in high-income countries: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 24, 670 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 74, 229–263 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Majérus, M.-A. The cause of cancer: The unifying theory. Adv. Cancer Biol.—Metastasis 4, 100034 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Q., Merajver, S. D. & Li, J. Z. Cancer classification in the genomic era: five contemporary problems. Hum. Genom. 9, 27 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geéron A. Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn and Tensor Flow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems (E-book, O’Reilly, 2017).

  • Basu, K., Sinha, R., Ong, A. & Basu, T. Artificial intelligence: how is it changing medical sciences and its future? Indian J. Dermatol. 65, 365–370 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence: a powerful paradigm for scientific research. Innovation 2, 100179 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O. & Topol, E. J. AI in health and medicine. Nat. Med. 28, 31–38 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, K., Wang, Y., Shao, Y. & Xiao, T. Gene Instability-Related lncRNA Prognostic Model of Melanoma Patients via Machine Learning Strategy. J Oncol 2021, 5582920 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L. et al. Random-forest algorithm based biomarkers in predicting prognosis in the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 20, 251 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajpurkar, P. et al. Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists. PLoS Med 15, e1002686 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, A. M. & Peter, D. Artificial intelligence in cancer research: trends, challenges and future directions. Life 12, 1991 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alowais, S. A. et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med. Educ. 23, 689 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillum, R. F. From papyrus to the electronic tablet: a brief history of the clinical medical record with lessons for the digital age. Am. J. Med. 126, 853–857 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, A. R., Burningham, Z. & Halwani, A. S. Electronic Health Record data in Cancer Learning Health Systems: challenges and opportunities. JCO Clin. Cancer Inf 6, e2100158 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. et al. A CT-based radiomics nomogram for prediction of lung adenocarcinomas and granulomatous lesions in patient with solitary sub-centimeter solid nodules. Cancer Imaging 20, 45 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beig, N. et al. Perinodular and intranodular radiomic features on lung CT images distinguish adenocarcinomas from granulomas. Radiology 290, 783–792 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardila, D. et al. End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography. Nat. Med. 25, 954–961 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. R. et al. External validation of a convolutional neural network artificial intelligence tool to predict malignancy in pulmonary nodules. Thorax 75, 306–312 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, H. R. et al. Improving computer-aided detection using convolutional neural networks and random view aggregation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35, 1170–1181 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spadaccini, M. et al. Discovering the first US FDA-approved computer-aided polyp detection system. Future Oncol 18, 1405–1412 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. M., Wang, Y. J. & Zhang, S. T. Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dig. Dis. 22, 318–328 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baik, Y. S., Lee, H., Kim, Y. J., Chung, J. W. & Kim, K. G. Early detection of esophageal cancer: evaluating AI algorithms with multi-institutional narrowband and white-light imaging data. PLoS ONE 20, e0321092 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bera, K., Schalper, K. A., Rimm, D. L., Velcheti, V. & Madabhushi, A. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology—new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 16, 703–715 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebib, R. et al. Randomized controlled trial of a 12-week digital care program in improving low back pain. NPJ Digit. Med. 2, 1 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz, J. et al. Spatial organization and molecular correlation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes using deep learning on pathology images. Cell Rep. 23, 181–93.e7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva, A. et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542, 115–118 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, L., Chen, H., Dou, Q., Qin, J. & Heng, P. A. Automated melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images via very deep residual networks. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36, 994–1004 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasaikar, S. V., Straub, P., Wang, J. & Zhang, B. LinkedOmics: analyzing multi-omics data within and across 32 cancer types. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D956–d63 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Su, H., Lu, Y. & Li, H. Regulatory Role of Fatty Acid Metabolism-Related Long Noncoding RNA in Prostate Cancer: A Computational Biology Study Analysis. J Oncol 2023, 9736073 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S. et al. Harnessing synthetic lethality to predict the response to cancer treatment. Nat. Commun. 9, 2546 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. et al. Deep learning sequence-based ab initio prediction of variant effects on expression and disease risk. Nat. Genet. 50, 1171–1179 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. J. et al. Pan-cancer transcriptional signatures predictive of oncogenic mutations reveal that Fbw7 regulates cancer cell oxidative metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5462–5467 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaganathan, K. et al. Predicting splicing from primary sequence with deep learning. Cell 176, 535–48.e24 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. A. et al. Impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in healthcare sector: a critical evaluation of both sides of the coin. Clin. Pathol. 17, 2632010×241226887 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezgin, E., Huang, Y., Ramtekkar, U. & Lin, S. Readiness for voice assistants to support healthcare delivery during a health crisis and pandemic. NPJ Digit. Med. 3, 122 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, T. M., Munoz, L. & Miller, R. J. Siri, Alexa, and other digital assistants: a study of customer satisfaction with artificial intelligence applications. In The Role of Smart Technologies in Decision Making (eds. Eleonora P. and Francesca S.) 35–70 (Routledge, 2022).

  • Woodman, R. J. & Mangoni, A. A. A comprehensive review of machine learning algorithms and their application in geriatric medicine: present and future. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 35, 2363–2397 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiesch, C., Zschech, P. & Heinrich, K. Machine learning and deep learning. Electron. Mark. 31, 685–695 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taye, M. M. Understanding of machine learning with deep learning: architectures, workflow, applications and future directions. Computers 12, 91 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, S. et al. Reviewing the role of artificial intelligence in cancer. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Biol. 5, 189–199 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeskops, P. et al. (eds) Deep learning for multi-task medical image segmentation in multiple modalities. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention (Springer, 2016).

  • Al Sharkawy M. et al. Breast cancer detection using support vector machine technique applied on extracted electromagnetic waves. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 292–301 (2012).

  • Li, M., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y. & Zhu, H. Medical image analysis using deep learning algorithms. Front. Public Health 11, 1273253 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J., Horwitz, M. M., Zhou, L. & Toh, S. Using machine learning to identify health outcomes from electronic health record data. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 5, 331–342 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Varghese, P., Stephenson, E., Tu, K. & Gronsbell, J. Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 30, 367–381 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Pratap Singh, R., Suman, R. & Rab, S. Significance of machine learning in healthcare: features, pillars and applications. Int. J. Intell. Netw. 3, 58–73 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayefi, M. et al. Challenges and opportunities beyond structured data in analysis of electronic health records. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 13, e1549 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngiam, K. Y. & Khor, I. W. Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery. Lancet Oncol 20, e262–e273 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan, M. M., Luna, S. A. & Siddique, Z. Machine-learning-based disease diagnosis: a comprehensive review. Healthcare (Basel) 10, 541 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qasrawi, R. et al. The role of machine learning in infectious disease early detection and prediction in the MENA region: a systematic review. Inform. Med. Unlocked 56, 101651 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, J. & Majumdar, A. Rodeo: robust de-aliasing autoencoder for real-time medical image reconstruction. Pattern Recognit 63, 499–510 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary, K. et al. Recent advances and applications of deep learning methods in materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 59 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzubaidi, L. et al. Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. J. Big Data 8, 53 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. F. et al. Deep learning modelling techniques: current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, 13521–13617 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengio, Y., Courville, A. & Vincent, P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 1798–1828 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erfanian, N. et al. Deep learning applications in single-cell genomics and transcriptomics data analysis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 165, 115077 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainio, O. & Klén, R. Convolutional neural networks for tumor segmentation by cancer type and imaging modality: a systematic review. Netw. Model. Anal. Health Inform. Bioinform. 14, 58 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gull, S., Akbar, S. & Khan, H. U. Automated detection of brain tumor through magnetic resonance images using convolutional neural network. BioMed. Res. Int. 2021, 3365043 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alqazzaz, S. et al. Combined features in region of interest for brain tumor segmentation. J. Digit. Imaging 35, 938–946 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbarzadeh, R., Zarbakhsh, P., Caputo, A., Tirkolaee, E. B. & Bendechache, M. Brain tumor segmentation based on optimized convolutional neural network and improved chimp optimization algorithm. Comput. Biol. Med. 168, 107723 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-W. et al. 3D brain tumor segmentation using a two-stage optimal mass transport algorithm. Sci. Rep. 11, 14686 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Schuetz, A., Stewart, W. F. & Sun, J. Using recurrent neural network models for early detection of heart failure onset. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 24, 361–370 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raval, D. & Undavia, J. N. A Comprehensive assessment of Convolutional Neural Networks for skin and oral cancer detection using medical images. Healthc. Anal. 3, 100199 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., Stewart, W. F., Sun, J., Ng, K. & Yan, X. Recurrent neural networks for early detection of heart failure from longitudinal Electronic Health Record data: implications for temporal modeling with respect to time before diagnosis, data density, data quantity, and data type. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 12, e005114 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, J., Båth, M. & Ivarsson, J. Generative adversarial networks in medical image reconstruction: a systematic literature review. Comput. Biol. Med. 191, 110094 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhlouf, A., Maayah, M., Abughanam, N. & Catal, C. The use of generative adversarial networks in medical image augmentation. Neural Comput. Appl. 35, 24055–24068 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alajaji, S. A. et al. Generative adversarial networks in digital histopathology: current applications, limitations, ethical considerations, and future directions. Mod. Pathol. 37, 100369 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshino, K. et al. Narrative review of generative adversarial networks in medical and molecular imaging. Ann. Transl. Med. 9, 821 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawab, K., Ramsey, G. & Schreiber, R. Natural language processing to extract meaningful information from patient experience feedback. Appl. Clin. Inf. 11, 242–252 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleki Varnosfaderani, S. & Forouzanfar, M. The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: transforming healthcare in the 21st century. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) 11, 337 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, D., Koli, A., Khatter, K. & Singh, S. Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimed. Tools Appl. 82, 3713–3744 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Supriyono, W., Suyono, A. P. & Kurniawan, F. Advancements in natural language processing: implications, challenges, and future directions. Telemat. Inform. Rep. 16, 100173 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Guerrero, J., Bani-Doumi, M., Chiclana, F., Romero, F. P. & Olivas, J. A. How satisfied are patients with nursing care and why? A comprehensive study based on social media and opinion mining. Inf. Health Soc. Care 49, 14–27 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharkow, M. Thematic content analysis using supervised machine learning: an empirical evaluation using German online news. Qual. Quant. 47, 761–773 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Buchem, M. M. et al. Analyzing patient experiences using natural language processing: development and validation of the Artificial Intelligence Patient Reported Experience Measure (AI-PREM). BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 22, 183 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P. & Ahmed, M. Computer vision to enhance healthcare domain: an overview of features, implementation, and opportunities. Intell. Pharm. 2, 792–803 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Oraiqat, A. M. et al. Method for determining treated metal surface quality using computer vision technology. Sensors 22, 6223 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbs, A. A. et al. The advances in computer vision that are enabling more autonomous actions in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 22, 4918 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, P. et al. Sensor-level computer vision with pixel processor arrays for agile robots. Sci. Robot. 7, eabl7755 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, H. et al. Review and classification of AI-enabled COVID-19 CT imaging models based on computer vision tasks. Comput. Biol. Med. 141, 105123 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., Chen, Y., Zhao, B., Kang, X. & Ding, Y. Review of weed detection methods based on computer vision. Sensors 21, 3647 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. O., Zhou, H. Y., Berzin, T. M., Sodickson, D. K. & Rajpurkar, P. Multimodal generative AI for interpreting 3D medical images and videos. NPJ Digit. Med. 8, 273 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rani, K., Kumar, A., Kumar, S., Gupta, A. & Singh, A. Medical imaging using machine learning, computer vision and applications. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Emerg. Technol. 11, 260–268 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. et al. Computer vision based healthcare system for identification of diabetes & its types using AI. Meas. Sens. 27, 100751 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Awwad, S., Tarvade, S., Piccardi, M. & Gattas, D. J. The use of privacy-protected computer vision to measure the quality of healthcare worker hand hygiene. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 31, 36–42 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. et al. Real world validation of an AI-based CT hemorrhage detection tool. Front. Neurol. 14, 1177723 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buaka, E. S. D. & Moid, M. Z. I. AI and medical imaging technology: evolution, impacts, and economic insights. J. Technol. Transf. 49, 2260–2272 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, H., Mohsen, F. & Shah, Z. Improving diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer using vision transformers: a scoping review. BMC Med. Imaging 23, 129 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran, U. & Khang, A. Artificial intelligence (AI)-aided computer vision (CV) in healthcare system. In Computer Vision and AI-Integrated IoT Technologies in the Medical Ecosystem (eds. Alex K., Vugar A., Olena H. and Arvind K. S.) 125–137 (CRC Press, 2024).

  • Najar Najafi, N., Hajihassani, H. & Azimzadeh Irani, M. The impact of artificial intelligence on cancer diagnosis and treatment: a review. Cancer Inform 24, 11769351251371273 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Surur, F. M. et al. Unlocking the power of machine learning in big data: a scoping survey. Data Sci. Manag. 8, 519–535 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taherdoost, H. Deep learning and neural networks: decision-making implications. Symmetry 15, 1723 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, J., Zeng, H., Li, A. & Ngai, E. W. T. Deep learning in computer vision: a critical review of emerging techniques and application scenarios. Mach. Learn. Appl. 6, 100134 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, M. et al. Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: computer-aided detection of missed lung cancers. Radiology 281, 279–288 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi, W. L. et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69, 127–157 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi, D. et al. Deep learning-integrated MRI brain tumor analysis: feature extraction, segmentation, and survival prediction using replicator and volumetric networks. Sci. Rep. 15, 1437 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. et al. Deep bone oncology diagnostics: computed tomography based Machine learning for detection of bone tumors from breast cancer metastasis. J. Bone Oncol. 48, 100638 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, X. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence for image-based lung cancer classification and prognostic evaluation. npj Precis. Oncol. 9, 300 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, I. Z., Dong, M. & Hwang, W. Y. K. Deep learning applications in clinical cancer detection: a review of implementation challenges and solutions. Mayo Clin. Proc.: Digit. Health 3, 100253 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., Dey, M. K., Devireddy, R. & Gartia, M. R. Biomarkers in cancer detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. Sensors 24, 37 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusanov, B. et al. Guidance on selecting and evaluating AI auto-segmentation systems in clinical radiotherapy: insights from a six-vendor analysis. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 48, 301–316 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., Teo, P. T. & Abazeed, M. E. Deep learning for automated, motion-resolved tumor segmentation in radiotherapy. npj Precis. Oncol. 9, 173 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. et al. Application of artificial intelligence in medical imaging for tumor diagnosis and treatment: a comprehensive approach. Discov. Oncol. 16, 1625 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountzilas, E., Pearce, T., Baysal, M. A., Chakraborty, A. & Tsimberidou, A. M. Convergence of evolving artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in precision oncology. npj Digit. Med. 8, 75 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Shi, H. & Wang, H. Machine learning and AI in cancer prognosis, prediction, and treatment selection: a critical approach. J. Multidiscip. Health 16, 1779–1791 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, A. A. et al. A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories. Med. Phys. 45, 314–321 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arieno, A., Chan, A. & Destounis, S. V. A review of the role of augmented intelligence in breast imaging: from automated breast density assessment to risk stratification. Am. J. Roentgenol. 212, 259–270 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yala, A., Lehman, C., Schuster, T., Portnoi, T. & Barzilay, R. A deep learning mammography-based model for improved breast cancer risk prediction. Radiology 292, 60–66 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembrower, K. et al. Comparison of a deep learning risk score and standard mammographic density score for breast cancer risk prediction. Radiology 294, 265–272 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Boulc’h, M. et al. Comparison of breast density assessment between human eye and automated software on digital and synthetic mammography: Impact on breast cancer risk. Diagn. Int. Imaging 101, 811–819 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G., Bajestani, N., Pracha, N., Chen, C. & Makary, M. S. Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance strategies: major guidelines and screening advances. Cancers (Basel) 16, 3933 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, S. M. et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577, 89–94 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembrower, K. et al. Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study. Lancet Digit. Health 2, e468–e474 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox-Chhugani, N., Chen, Y., Pearson, V., Trzcinski, B. & James, J. Women’s attitudes to the use of AI image readers: a case study from a national breast screening programme. BMJ Health Care Inform 28, e100293 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisemann, N. et al. Nationwide real-world implementation of AI for cancer detection in population-based mammography screening. Nat. Med. 31, 917–924 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., Edwards, A. V. & Newstead, G. M. Artificial intelligence applied to breast MRI for improved diagnosis. Radiology 298, 38–46 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Q., Liu, Z. & Chen, C. L. P. Broad and deep neural network for high-dimensional data representation learning. Inf. Sci. 599, 127–146 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Z. & Grindrod, P. Mappings, dimensionality and reversing out of deep neural networks. IMA J. Appl. Math. 89, 2–11 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, I. H. Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2, 420 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Javid, A. M., Venkitaraman, A., Skoglund, M. & Chatterjee, S. High-dimensional neural feature design for layer-wise reduction of training cost. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2020, 40 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R., Wu, W., Wang, G. & Kalra, M. K. Artificial intelligence in image reconstruction: the change is here. Phys. Med. 79, 113–125 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L., Zhao, W. & Xing, L. Patient-specific reconstruction of volumetric computed tomography images from a single projection view via deep learning. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 880–888 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkadesh, K. V. et al. Deep learning for malignancy risk estimation of pulmonary nodules detected at low-dose screening CT. Radiology 300, 438–447 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniep, H. C. et al. Radiomics of brain MRI: utility in prediction of metastatic tumor type. Radiology 290, 479–487 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, S. et al. Computed tomography-based radiomic features could potentially predict microsatellite instability status in stage II colorectal cancer: a preliminary study. Acad. Radiol. 26, 1633–1640 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, L. J., Matsuyama, A. & MacDonald-Dickinson, V. Histology: the gold standard for diagnosis? Can. Vet. J. 64, 389–391 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aljehani, M. R. et al. The importance of histopathological evaluation in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Int. J. Health Sci. 7, 3614–3623 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. et al. A foundation model for generalizable cancer diagnosis and survival prediction from histopathological images. Nat. Commun. 16, 2366 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. N., Tandon, A. & Jayasankar, P. Strength, weakness, opportunities and challenges (SWOC) experience of histopathology image analysis, enhanced by artificial intelligence. J. Oral. Biol. Craniofacial Res. 15, 1057–1063 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatima, G. et al. Transforming diagnostics: a comprehensive review of advances in digital pathology. Cureus 16, e71890 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, G. et al. Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nat. Med. 25, 1301–1309 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, V. S., Toro, P., Corredor, G., Mukhopadhyay, S. & Madabhushi, A. The state of the art for artificial intelligence in lung digital pathology. J. Pathol. 257, 413–429 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eloy, C. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies. Virchows Arch 482, 595–604 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A. N. N. et al. Current developments of artificial intelligence in digital pathology and its future clinical applications in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancers (Basel) 14, 3780 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvi, M., Acharya, U. R., Molinari, F. & Meiburger, K. M. The impact of pre- and post-image processing techniques on deep learning frameworks: a comprehensive review for digital pathology image analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 128, 104129 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehteshami Bejnordi, B. et al. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. JAMA 318, 2199–2210 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oiseth, S. J. & Aziz, M. S. Cancer immunotherapy: a brief review of the history, possibilities, and challenges ahead. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 3, 250–61 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirinukunwattana, K. et al. Gland segmentation in colon histology images: the glas challenge contest. Med. Image Anal. 35, 489–502 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. et al. Detecting cancer metastases on gigapixel pathology images. arXiv preprint arXiv:170302442 (2017).

  • Wang, H. et al. Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features. J. Med. Imaging (Bellingham) 1, 034003 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliman, A., Li, Z. & Parwani, A. V. Artificial intelligence’s impact on breast cancer pathology: a literature review. Diagn. Pathol. 19, 38 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandbank, J. et al. Validation and real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence algorithm for breast cancer detection in biopsies. NPJ Breast Cancer 8, 129 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannala, R. et al. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy. VideoGIE 5, 598–613 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. et al. Improved breast cancer histological grading using deep learning. Ann. Oncol. 33, 89–98 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantrala, S. et al. Concordance in breast cancer grading by artificial intelligence on whole slide images compares with a multi-institutional cohort of breast pathologists. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 146, 1369–1377 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y. et al. What makes for good views for contrastive learning? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 6827–6839 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdulrazzaq, M. M. et al. Consequential advancements of self-supervised learning (SSL) in deep learning contexts. Mathematics 12, 758 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Espis, A., Marzi, C. & Diciotti, S. Comparative analysis of supervised and self-supervised learning with small and imbalanced medical imaging datasets. Sci. Rep. 15, 32345 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T., Bahrami, M., Xia, Y., Fischer, D. S. & Theis, F. J. Delineating the effective use of self-supervised learning in single-cell genomics. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 68–78 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penarrubia, C., Valero-Mas, J. J. & Calvo-Zaragoza, J. Self-supervised learning for text recognition: a critical survey. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 133, 6221–6250 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. & Han, L. A generic self-supervised learning (SSL) framework for representation learning from spectral–spatial features of unlabeled remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens 15, 5238 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciga, O., Xu, T. & Martel, A. L. Self supervised contrastive learning for digital histopathology. Mach. Learn. Appl. 7, 100198 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, X., Li, D. & Sun, R. Nanotechnology and natural killer cell immunotherapy: synergistic approaches for precise immune system adjustment and targeted cancer treatment in gastrointestinal tumors. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 12, 1647737 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, F. B., Alam, S. M. & Sakib, S. M. Enhancing breast cancer classification via histopathological image analysis: leveraging self-supervised contrastive learning and transfer learning. Heliyon 10, e24094 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A. et al. The diagnosis and management of small and indeterminate lymph nodes in papillary thyroid cancer: preoperatively and intraoperatively. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 15, 1484838 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Q. et al. Preoperative MRI and CA19-9 for predicting occult lymph node metastasis in small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (≤2 cm). BMC Med. Imaging 25, 318 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. C. et al. Deep neural network trained on gigapixel images improves lymph node metastasis detection in clinical settings. Nat. Commun. 13, 3347 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Gu, Y., Zhang, T. & Yang, J. Fast cancer metastasis location based on dual magnification hard example mining network in whole-slide images. Comput. Biol. Med. 158, 106880 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Challa, B. et al. Artificial intelligence-aided diagnosis of breast cancer lymph node metastasis on histologic slides in a digital workflow. Mod. Pathol. 36, 100216 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldonazzi, N. et al. Value of artificial intelligence in evaluating lymph node metastases. Cancers (Basel) 15, 2491 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, D. F. et al. Impact of deep learning assistance on the histopathologic review of lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 42, 1636–1646 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence-based breast cancer nodal metastasis detection: insights into the black box for pathologists. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 143, 859–868 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bándi, P. et al. Continual learning strategies for cancer-independent detection of lymph node metastases. Med. Image Anal. 85, 102755 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhinder, B., Gilvary, C., Madhukar, N. S. & Elemento, O. Artificial intelligence in cancer research and precision medicine. Cancer Discov 11, 900–915 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Satam, H. et al. Next-generation sequencing technology: current trends and advancements. Biology (Basel) 12, (2023).

  • Sahoo, O. S. et al. Role of next-generation sequencing in revolutionizing healthcare for cancer management. MedComm–Future Med. 3, e70001 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashisht, V., Vashisht, A., Mondal, A. K., Woodall, J. & Kolhe, R. From genomic exploration to personalized treatment: next-generation sequencing in oncology. Current Issues Mol. Biol 46, 12527–12549 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap, T. A., Stadler, Z. K., Stout, L. A. & Schneider, B. P. Aligning germline cancer predisposition with tumor-based next-generation sequencing for modern oncology diagnosis, interception, and therapeutic development. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 43, e390738 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y. et al. Systematic Investigation of Tumor Microenvironment and Antitumor Immunity With IOBR. Med Research 1, 136–140 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Li, H., Tao, W. & Zhou, J. GseaVis: An R Package for Enhanced Visualization of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis in Biomedicine. Med Research 1, 131–135 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Djuric, U., Zadeh, G., Aldape, K. & Diamandis, P. Precision histology: how deep learning is poised to revitalize histomorphology for personalized cancer care. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 1, 22 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre, F. et al. Genomics to select treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Nature 610, 343–348 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, S. et al. Real-world data from a molecular tumor board demonstrates improved outcomes with a precision N-of-One strategy. Nat. Commun. 11, 4965 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. et al. Applications of multi-omics analysis in human diseases. MedComm 4, e315 (2023). (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa-Aguila, R., Alonso-Pupo, N. & Hernández-Rodríguez, E. W. Multi-omics data integration approaches for precision oncology. Mol. Omics 18, 469–479 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Escaramís, G., Docampo, E. & Rabionet, R. A decade of structural variants: description, history and methods to detect structural variation. Brief. Funct. Genom. 14, 305–314 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. et al. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature 578, 112–121 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. S., Urban, A. E. & Mills, R. E. Structural variation in the sequencing era. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 171–189 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pös, O. et al. Copy number variation: methods and clinical applications. Appl. Sci. 11, 819 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosugi, S. & Terao, C. Comparative evaluation of SNVs, indels, and structural variations detected with short- and long-read sequencing data. Hum. Genome Var. 11, 18 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. A practical guide for structural variation detection in the human genome. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 107, e103 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, M. et al. Structural variant calling: the long and the short of it. Genome Biol 20, 246 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlaino, M. et al. An integrative approach to predicting the functional effects of small indels in non-coding regions of the human genome. BMC Bioinform 18, 442 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garraway, L. A. & Lander, E. S. Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell 153, 17–37 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horak, P. et al. Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): Joint recommendations of Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC). Genet. Med. 24, 986–998 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessa, C. et al. Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann. Oncol. 34, 33–47 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, A., Von Arx, C., Tafuti, A., Pensabene, M. & De Laurentiis, M. Prevention, diagnosis and clinical management of hereditary breast cancer beyond BRCA1/2 genes. Cancer Treat. Rev. 129, 102785 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekar, P. et al. Somatic selection distinguishes oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Bioinformatics 36, 1712–1717 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakal, T. C. et al. Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes: functions and roles in cancers. MedComm 5, e582 (2024). (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. R. et al. Exploring the genetic orchestra of cancer: the interplay between oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes. Cancer 17, 1082 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, K. & Tischkowitz, M. Clinical implications of germline mutations in breast cancer: TP53. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 167, 417–423 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. A. et al. Explainable AI-based skin cancer detection using CNN, particle swarm optimization and machine learning. J. Imaging 10, 332 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilhekar, R. S. & Rawekar, A. Artificial Intelligence in Genetics. Cureus 16, e52035 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashayeri, H. et al. Transfer learning in cancer genetics, mutation detection, gene expression analysis, and syndrome recognition. Cancers (Basel) 16, 2138 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, A., Mishra, S. & Kuo, T.-R. Current AI technologies in cancer diagnostics and treatment. Mol. Cancer 24, 159 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q. & Hu, P. Extendable and explainable deep learning for pan-cancer radiogenomics research. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 66, 102111 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y., Zhao, T. & Han, M. The application of radiomics in predicting gene mutations in cancer. Eur. Radiol. 32, 4014–4024 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodalal, Z., Trebeschi, S., Nguyen-Kim, T. D. L., Schats, W. & Beets-Tan, R. Radiogenomics: bridging imaging and genomics. Abdom. Radiol. 44, 1960–1984 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M. R. et al. Recent applications of artificial intelligence from histopathologic image-based prediction of microsatellite instability in solid cancers: a systematic review. Cancers 14, 2590 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kather, J. N. et al. Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations. Nat. Cancer 1, 789–799 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y. et al. Pan-cancer computational histopathology reveals mutations, tumor composition and prognosis. Nat. Cancer 1, 800–810 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J. M. et al. U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro. Nat. Commun. 11, 1 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coudray, N. et al. Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nat. Med. 24, 1559–1567 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B. H. et al. The clinicopathological relevance of uniform CD56 expression in anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis of 18 cases. Diagn. Pathol. 16, 1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kather, J. N. et al. Deep learning can predict microsatellite instability directly from histology in gastrointestinal cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 1054–1056 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. W. K., Howell, S. E. L., Brady, M., Xu, X. & McNeil, K. Anomalous collapses of Nares Strait ice arches leads to enhanced export of Arctic sea ice. Nat. Commun. 12, 1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirinukunwattana, K. et al. Image-based consensus molecular subtype (imCMS) classification of colorectal cancer using deep learning. Gut 70, 544–554 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrede, O. J. et al. Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study. Lancet 395, 350–360 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Y. et al. Recommendations for pathologic practice using digital pathology: consensus report of the Korean Society of Pathologists. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 54, 437–452 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Štorkánová, H. et al. Plasma Hsp90 levels in patients with systemic sclerosis and relation to lung and skin involvement: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Sci. Rep. 11, 1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waarts, M. R., Stonestrom, A. J., Park, Y. C. & Levine, R. L. Targeting mutations in cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 132, e154943 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendiratta, G. et al. Cancer gene mutation frequencies for the U.S. population. Nat. Commun. 12, 5961 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafieh, R. Artificial Intelligence in Cancer, Biology and Oncology (MDPI—Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2024).

  • Shao, X. et al. Transfer learning-based PET/CT three-dimensional convolutional neural network fusion of image and clinical information for prediction of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. BMC Med. Imaging 24, 54 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dammak, S., Cecchini, M. J., Breadner, D. & Ward, A. D. Using deep learning to predict tumor mutational burden from scans of H&E-stained multicenter slides of lung squamous cell carcinoma. J. Med. Imaging 10, 017502 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, C. W., Fang, P. W., Huang, H. Y. & Lo, C. M. Deep convolutional neural networks detect tumor genotype from pathological tissue images in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancers 13, 5787 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, R. et al. Development and interpretation of a pathomics-based model for the prediction of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Theranostics 10, 11080–11091 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y. et al. Application of BERT to enable gene classification based on clinical evidence. BioMed. Res. Int. 2020, 5491963 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aburass, S., Dorgham, O. & Al Shaqsi, J. A hybrid machine learning model for classifying gene mutations in cancer using LSTM, BiLSTM, CNN, GRU, and GloVe. Syst. Soft Comput. 6, 200110 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. et al. Identification of 12 cancer types through genome deep learning. Sci. Rep. 9, 17256 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. et al. Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures. J. Cancer 8, 3261–3267 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiao, S. P. K., Grayson, J., Lie, A. & Yu, C. H. Personalized nutrition—genes, diet, and related interactive parameters as predictors of cancer in multiethnic colorectal cancer families. Nutrients 10, 795 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, X. et al. EBT: a statistic test identifying moderate size of significant features with balanced power and precision for genome-wide rate comparisons. Bioinformatics 33, 2631–2641 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H.-J., Lee, S., Ji, Y. G. & Lee, D. H. Association of specific gene mutations derived from machine learning with survival in lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 13, e0207204 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, E., Nabhen, J. J., Dacoregio, M. I., Batalini, F. & Moraes, F. Y. An overview of artificial intelligence in oncology. Futur. Sci. OA 8, Fso787 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Passaro, A. et al. Cancer biomarkers: emerging trends and clinical implications for personalized treatment. Cell 187, 1617–1635 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufail, M., Jiang, C.-H. & Li, N. Wnt signaling in cancer: from biomarkers to targeted therapies and clinical translation. Mol. Cancer 24, 107 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forghani, R. Precision digital oncology: emerging role of radiomics-based biomarkers and artificial intelligence for advanced imaging and characterization of brain tumors. Radiol. Imaging Cancer 2, e190047 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, F.-Y. & Yen, Y. Imaging biomarkers for clinical applications in neuro-oncology: current status and future perspectives. Biomark. Res. 11, 35 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. M. et al. Artificial intelligence in oncologic imaging. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 9, 100441 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, P., Mayank, K. & Sharma, S. (eds) Bio-Marker Cancer Prediction System Using Artificial Intelligence. 2023 International Conference on Integration of Computational Intelligent System (ICICIS), 1–4 November 2023 (2023).

  • Quddusi, D. M. & Bajcinca, N. Identification of genomic biomarkers and their pathway crosstalks for deciphering mechanistic links in glioblastoma. IET Syst. Biol. 17, 143–161 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. H., Jin, H. Q. & Liu, H. P. Identification of T-cell exhaustion-related gene signature for predicting prognosis in glioblastoma multiforme. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 27, 3503–3513 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Zeng, Z. Y. & Li, L. Progress of artificial intelligence in gynecological malignant tumors. Cancer Manag. Res. 12, 12823–12840 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kourou, K., Exarchos, T. P., Exarchos, K. P., Karamouzis, M. V. & Fotiadis, D. I. Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13, 8–17 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami, E. et al. Application of artificial intelligence for preoperative diagnostic and prognostic prediction in epithelial ovarian cancer based on blood biomarkers. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 3006–3015 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv, J., Liu, G., Dong, W., Ju, Y. & Sun, Y. ACDB: An Antibiotic Combination DataBase. Front. Pharm. 13, 869983 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarvepalli, S. & Vadarevu, S. Role of artificial intelligence in cancer drug discovery and development. Cancer Lett 627, 217821 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassey, G. E., Daniel, E. A., Okesina, K. B. & Odetayo, A. F. Transformative role of artificial intelligence in drug discovery and translational medicine: innovations, challenges, and future prospects. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 19, 7493–7502 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, X. et al. Artificial intelligence and anti-cancer drugs’ response. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 15, 3355–3371 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abou Hajal, A. & Al Meslamani, A. Z. Insights into artificial intelligence utilisation in drug discovery. J. Med. Econ. 27, 304–308 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, D. R. et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in drug discovery and drug delivery: revolutionizing personalized medicine. Pharmaceutics 16, 1328 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. L. & Groom, C. R. The druggable genome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 727–730 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Q., Tam, P. K. & Tang, C. S. Artificial intelligence-based approaches for the detection and prioritization of genomic mutations in congenital surgical diseases. Front. Pediatr. 11, 1203289 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Liu, X., Zhang, S. & Chen, S. Artificial intelligence for drug discovery: resources, methods, and applications. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 31, 691–702 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, X., Li, H., Ver Steeg, G. & Godzik, A. Advances in AI for protein structure prediction: implications for cancer drug discovery and development. Biomolecules 14, 339 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, C. et al. DrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank knowledgebase for 2024. Nucleic Acids Res 52, D1265–D1275 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv, J., Liu, G., Ju, Y., Huang, H. & Sun, Y. AADB: a manually collected database for combinations of antibiotics with adjuvants. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 20, 2827–2836 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. et al. PubChem 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res 53, D1516–d25 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahimian, G., Zahiri, J., Arab, S. S. & Sajedi, R. H. RepCOOL: computational drug repositioning via integrating heterogeneous biological networks. J. Transl. Med. 18, 375 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. et al. Discovery of novel glycogen synthase kinase-3α inhibitors: structure-based virtual screening, preliminary SAR and biological evaluation for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 171, 221–234 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. et al. Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery. Mol. Divers. 25, 1315–1360 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueñas, M. E. et al. Advances in high-throughput mass spectrometry in drug discovery. EMBO Mol. Med. 15, e14850 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Q. et al. DeepDrug: a general graph-based deep learning framework for drug–drug interactions and drug–target interactions prediction. Quant. Biol. 11, 260–274 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhavoronkov, A. et al. Deep learning enables rapid identification of potent DDR1 kinase inhibitors. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1038–1040 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, X., Du, G., Hu, J. & Cai, Y. Graph-DTI: a new model for drug-target interaction prediction based on heterogenous network graph embedding. Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 20, 1013–1024 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, L. et al. HGDTI: predicting drug-target interaction by using information aggregation based on heterogeneous graph neural network. BMC Bioinform 23, 126 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K., Bai, H., Ouyang, Q., Lai, L. & Tang, C. Finding multiple target optimal intervention in disease-related molecular network. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 228 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, F. et al. Prediction of drug–target interactions and drug repositioning via network-based inference. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002503 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campillos, M., Kuhn, M., Gavin, A.-C., Jensen, L. J. & Bork, P. Drug target identification using side-effect similarity. Science 321, 263–266 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Z. et al. MHADTI: predicting drug–target interactions via multiview heterogeneous information network embedding with hierarchical attention mechanisms. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac434 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadaqat, M. et al. Advanced network pharmacology study reveals multi-pathway and multi-gene regulatory molecular mechanism of Bacopa monnieri in liver cancer based on data mining, molecular modeling, and microarray data analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 161, 107059 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, C. H. et al. Improving target assessment in biomedical research: the GOT-IT recommendations. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 64–81 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiriiri, G., Njogu, P. & Mwangi, A. Exploring different approaches to improve the success of drug discovery and development projects: a review. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 6, 1–12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, N. L., Kim, H., Shin, C. H., Ko, E. & Oh, S. J. Artificial intelligence-driven new drug discovery targeting serine/threonine kinase 33 for cancer treatment. Cancer Cell Int 23, 321 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Albani, F. G., Alghamdi, S. S., Almutairi, M. M. & Alqahtani, T. Artificial intelligence-driven innovations in oncology drug discovery: transforming traditional pipelines and enhancing drug design. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 19, 5685–5707 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, X. et al. Chromosome instability functions as a potential therapeutic reference by enhancing chemosensitivity to BCL-XL inhibitors in colorectal carcinoma. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 45, 2420–2431 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. et al. Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data reveals a pan-cancer stemness signature predicting immunotherapy response. Genome Med 14, 45 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, T. et al. A Deep Learning Approach to Discover Cyclin-dependent Kinases 12 (CDK12) Inhibitors in Breast Cancer (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022).

  • Huang, A., Garraway, L. A., Ashworth, A. & Weber, B. Synthetic lethality as an engine for cancer drug target discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 23–38 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. et al. KG4SL: knowledge graph neural network for synthetic lethality prediction in human cancers. Bioinformatics 37, i418–i425 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, C., Dong, G., Miao, Z., Zhang, W. & Wang, W. State-of-the-art strategies for targeting protein–protein interactions by small-molecule inhibitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 8238–8259 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C. et al. Systemic evolutionary chemical space exploration for drug discovery. J. Cheminform. 14, 19 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuo, N. & Sekijima, M. Improved method of structure-based virtual screening via interaction-energy-based learning. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 1050–1061 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Gupta, H., Sharma, P. & Sahi, S. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted approaches in drug screening. Artif. Intell. Chem. 2, 100039 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raies, A. et al. DrugnomeAI is an ensemble machine-learning framework for predicting druggability of candidate drug targets. Commun. Biol. 5, 1291 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailleux, C., Gal, J., Chamorey, E., Mograbi, B. & Milano, G. Artificial intelligence and anticancer drug development—keep a cool head. Pharmaceutics 16, 211 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, R. et al. Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 115, 365–374 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Azenkot, T., Rivera, D. R., Stewart, M. D. & Patel, S. P. Artificial intelligence and machine learning innovations to improve design and representativeness in oncology clinical trials. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 45, e473590 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, L. et al. Machine learning to predict the individual risk of treatment-relevant toxicity for patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant systemic treatment. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform 8, e2400010 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabellini, N. et al. Thirty-day unplanned hospital readmissions in patients with cancer and the impact of social determinants of health: a machine learning approach. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform 7, e2200143 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, H. & Munro, J. Trends in clinical success rates and therapeutic focus. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 495–496 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. et al. In silico prediction of human organ toxicity via artificial intelligence methods. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 36, 1044–1054 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R. et al. Evaluating eligibility criteria of oncology trials using real-world data and AI. Nature 592, 629–633 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, Y., Hao, Y., Wang, X. & Guo, D. Advances of artificial intelligence in clinical application and scientific research of neuro-oncology: current knowledge and future perspectives. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 209, 104682 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Xiong, J., Li, D. & Zhang, Y. Clinical trials of nanoparticle-enhanced CAR-T and NK cell therapies in oncology: overcoming translational and clinical challenges – a mini review. Front Med (Lausanne) 12, 1655693 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra et al. Revolutionizing clinical trials: the role of AI in accelerating medical breakthroughs. Int J. Surg. 109, 4211–4220 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, P. L. et al. Integrating artificial intelligence in healthcare: applications, challenges, and future directions. Future Sci. OA 11, 2527505 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H., Nguyen, P. N., Park, J., Lee, M. & Ahn, S. AI-guided chemotherapy optimization in lung cancer using genomic and survival data. J. Pers. Med. 15, 218 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, J. et al. Artificial intelligence assists precision medicine in cancer treatment. Front. Oncol. 12, 998222 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • AlSamhori, J. F. et al. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer: implications for diagnosis and management. J. Med. Surg. Public Health 3, 100120 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, C., Steckelberg, A. & Rebitschek, F. G. Benefits and harms associated with the use of AI-related algorithmic decision-making systems by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Lancet Reg. Health—Eur 48, 101145 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Y. et al. Beyond the hype: navigating bias in AI-driven cancer detection. Oncotarget 15, 764–766 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Forero, A., Rueda, L. J., Herrera, R., Bassetto, S. & Coatanea, E. Predictive representativity: uncovering racial bias in AI-based skin cancer detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:250714176 (2025).

  • Ganta, T. et al. Fairness in predicting cancer mortality across racial subgroups. JAMA Netw. Open 7, e2421290 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Preetam, S. et al. Next-gen diagnostics: artificial intelligence-powered imaging in breast cancer care. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 11, 29 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derraz, B. et al. New regulatory thinking is needed for AI-based personalised drug and cell therapies in precision oncology. npj Precis. Oncol. 8, 23 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J., Parker, L., Carter, S., Nickel, B. & Carroll, S. Radiation oncology patients’ perceptions of artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer care: a multi-centre cross-sectional study. Radiother. Oncol. 207, 110891 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamouni, G. et al. Ethical and legal concerns in artificial intelligence applications for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: a scoping review. Front. Public Health 13, 1663298 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. S. et al. Clinical prediction models using machine learning in oncology: challenges and recommendations. BMJ Oncol 4, e000914 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeoye, J., Akinshipo, A., Koohi-Moghadam, M., Thomson, P. & Su, Y. X. Construction of machine learning-based models for cancer outcomes in low and lower-middle income countries: a scoping review. Front. Oncol. 12, 976168 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, H. D. J. et al. Stakeholder perspectives of clinical artificial intelligence implementation: systematic review of qualitative evidence. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e39742 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, T. & Zhang, L. International partnerships in AI-driven healthcare: opportunities and challenges for advancing the UN Sustainable Development Goals—a perspective. Healthcare 13, 2053 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roppelt, J. S., Kanbach, D. K. & Kraus, S. Artificial intelligence in healthcare institutions: a systematic literature review on influencing factors. Technol. Soc. 76, 102443 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleki Varnosfaderani, S. & Forouzanfar, M. The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: transforming healthcare in the 21st century. Bioengineering 11, 337 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, S. et al. Challenges in implementing artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening programs: systematic review and framework for safe adoption. J. Med. Internet Res. 27, e62941 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, C. & Zenklusen, J. C. The Cancer Genome Atlas: creating lasting value beyond its data. Cell 173, 283–285 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K. N. & Hamouda, A. M. Re-thinking data strategy and integration for artificial intelligence: concepts, opportunities, and challenges. Appl. Sci. 13, 7082 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, S. et al. Role of artificial intelligence in radiogenomics for cancers in the era of precision medicine. Cancers (Basel) 14, 2860 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uwimana, A., Gnecco, G. & Riccaboni, M. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection and its health technology assessment: a scoping review. Comput. Biol. Med. 184, 109391 (2025).

    Google Scholar 



  • Source link