As such chatbots become more and more popular among students, it is becoming difficult for teachers and professors at school and university level to tackle chatbots, and the indiscriminate use of technology is becoming a problem for students. I was afraid that it might impair my analytical skills.
Professor Sucharita Sen of Jawaharlal Nehru University said, “Recently, the answers to the economic geography challenges I gave were correct, but they were identical and had no uniqueness. , students admitted to using ChatGPT, apparently they didn’t think much when preparing for assignments.”
If AI is here to stay, it will be, said Debraj Mookerjee, associate professor of English at Ramjas College. “AI can be a useful tool in education, much like a calculator, which has removed basic math from the learning process. is.”
In this spirit, teachers should ask questions such as: Is there a way to redesign the challenges in light of technological changes?” said Sudha Acharya, Principal of his ITL Public His School in Dwarka. -Learning process. “
Many students are already using the new technology, said Divya Bhatia, principal of Saket’s Amity International School. “Understandably, there are growing concerns about plagiarism, ethics and misinformation,” she said. “Intensive teacher training is now required. For example, assignments must be more innovative to incorporate the use of AI tools as academic resources.”
Embracing the use of AI tools in education, says Yardi School of artificial intelligenceIIT-Delhi said, “Change the nature of assignments to make ChatGPT tolerable, or encourage all students to use chatbots to shorten tasks associated with accomplishing larger tasks.” could mean ”.
At IIT-D, when some computer professor recently conducted an experiment and allowed students to use the platform, improving ChatGPT prompts and debugging their mistakes was less of a hassle than writing code from scratch. It turns out that there is.
“Experiences in departments other than computer science may be different,” says Mausam. “Thanks to ChatGPT’s prodigious writing skills, responses can feel quite sophisticated and can even be mistakenly perceived as making strong arguments. In sociology and philosophy there is not always one right, hence the need to emphasize teaching students how to analyze situations and make persuasive arguments. there is.”
At the Delhi Institute of Technology, Professor Dinesh Vishwakarma, Head of the Information Technology Department, had a similar view. “ChatGPT and its ilk are more useful to those with little understanding, and we encourage people with some expertise to use such platforms because they limit innovative thinking.” Is not.
Rather than blocking access to ChatGPT, as some schools in New York and Seattle have done, academics here feel the way they are evaluated needs to change. “Even the country’s education policy wants systems to adapt to disruptive technologies like AI,” said Professor SK Naqvi, director of his FTK Center for Information Technology at Jamia Millia Islamia. pointed out. “Yes, anti-plagiarism tools can detect assignments generated on such platforms, but there are also different ways of evaluating student work. A verbal component can be incorporated for the understanding of the topics taught.”
Many teachers refuse to demonize AI technology and recognize how to use it constructively. His Gurpreet Singh Tuteja, Mathematics Professor at Zakir Hussain Delhi College, advises teachers and students to learn from these platforms and use technology ethically. His Bhatia of Amity International said:
Mortham is more specific about this. “Imagine a student with poor English but otherwise excellent reasoning skills. For such an individual, a platform like ChatGPT with impeccable language skills could Drafts can be drafted and reorganized and the impact of their work greatly improved as a result, I feel that way, most of us non-native English speakers We need to encourage its use in countries like,” said the IIT-D teacher.
