Adobe's Firefly AI has two big selling points compared to other best AI art generators. First, it enhances tools that are practical for creative workflows and integrated into existing software such as Photoshop and Illustrator. Second, it is advertised as commercially safe. But it turns out there are some skeletons in the closet, or rather in the training data.
Adobe has emphasized that Firefly was trained using public domain materials and images from Adobe Stock, its own library of licensed assets. In theory, it's more ethical than an AI image generator trained by scraping the entire web and sucking up the work of artists and photographers without their permission. So reports that Firefly was also trained on his Midjourney images are a bit embarrassing for the software giant.
I would also like to point out that many of the images generated by Adobe Stock are used to train Firefly and include metadata like the artist name that was included in the original prompt. This includes artists who are plaintiffs in Andersen v. Stability AI. Co., Ltd. https://t.co/KPX1SUkfi1April 12, 2024
see next
An article by Rachel Metz in Bloomberg revealed that Firefly's training data included images generated by AI, including models such as Midjourney. This report does not suggest that Adobe scraped these images. The company accepts Adobe's claim that it used Adobe Stock as a source of training data. The problem is that Adobe Stock itself includes his AI-generated images posted by contributors.
Adobe believes that approximately 5% of the images used to train Firefly were generated by AI. All images accepted for inclusion in Adobe Stock must “contain a small subset of AI-generated images,” “contain no IP, trademarks, recognizable text or logos, or reference artists.” The company emphasizes that it has undergone a “rigorous moderation process” to ensure that 'name. ” However, several artists are questioning this after discovering AI-generated images on the platform showing up in searches for their name.
Adobe: firefly is only trained on licensed Adobe Stock Q: How much of that is from the journey? Adobe: pic.twitter.com/1UDOL2UL4BApril 12, 2024
see next
Perhaps the news will not surprise us. Adobe began accepting AI-generated content on Adobe Stock in 2022, and there are now over 50 million images tagged as AI-generated. However, Adobe could have excluded these if they wanted. After all, they are tagged as being generated by AI.
Anonymous Adobe sources cited by Bloomberg said there was internal controversy over this, with some questioning the ethics of using AI-generated images. However, the article mentions a message from Adobe Stock's “contributor evangelist” Matt Heyward in his Discord, claiming that AI-generated images “enhance training models in datasets.” I am. Hayward also said that Adobe Stock contributors who submitted AI-generated images would be eligible for Adobe. “Firefly Bonuses” paid to contributors whose content is used to train the first public version of an AI model.
Is Firefly commercially safe?
So, is Firefly AI safe to use commercially? Adobe claims so, and is so convinced of it that its Enterprise plan allows you to use content created by the company. Indemnification is provided in case a user is sued. This new revelation probably changes nothing in this sense, as Firefly's own output has twice removed him from the original copyright material.
Daily design news, reviews, how-tos, and more, chosen by our editors.
However, Adobe's claims that Firefly is different aren't necessarily good ones. The tech giant may not have trained his AI image generator on unlicensed images, but on images produced by licensed generators. Some call it “synthetic laundering” or “AI incest.”
For Metz, the most controversial aspect is that it contradicts the way Adobe presented Firefly. “This is not a data pollution issue; this company made the conscious choice to include AI-generated images from Adobe Stock in its own dataset, while also owning the tools used to create those AI-generated images. It is publicly positioning itself as a very different company,” she wrote in a reply to X.
Adobe Firefly powers standalone generators as well as integrated tools such as Photoshop's Generative Fill. (Image credit: Adobe)
The reality is that Adobe Firefly remains the most ethically sound option when using AI image generation (if such a thing exists). In addition to ensuring the provenance of training materials, Adobe is actively developing tools to help track the delivery of AI-generated images, including adding content credentials to Adobe Firefly content. This makes it easier to identify AI-generated content.
The company is currently working on an AI video generator and appears to be taking the approach of using licensed contributions here as well. They even pay artists to create materials just to train their models, and the prices are far from generous. Bloomberg reports that the company is offering him about $3 a minute for footage that can be used forever without credit.
Meanwhile, Adobe continues to improve Firefly, adding tools like Structure Reference and bringing AI-powered tools to other programs like Adobe Substance 3D.
Media and entertainment leaders appear to be largely optimistic about how AI will impact their fields. In his 2024 State of Design and Make report for Autodesk, executive ranks cite “the ability to use AI” as a priority skill for future employees.
This website uses cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. OkRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
