Given, D. et al. Revised Technical Implementation Plan For the ShakeAlert System—An Earthquake Early Warning System for the West Coast of the United States. Open-File Report No. 2018-1155 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2018).
Böse, M., Heaton, T. H. & Hauksson, E. Real-time finite fault rupture detector (FinDer) for large earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int. 191, 803–812 (2012).
Google Scholar
Böse, M. et al. FinDer v.2: Improved real-time ground-motion predictions for M2–M9 with seismic finite-source characterization. Geophys. J. Int. 212, 725–742 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kuyuk, H. S. & Allen, R. M. A global approach to provide magnitude estimates for earthquake early warning alerts. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 6329–6333 (2013).
Google Scholar
Chung, A. I., Henson, I. & Allen, R. M. Optimizing earthquake early warning performance: ElarmS-3. Seismol. Res. Lett. 90, 727–743 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kohler, M. et al. Earthquake early warning ShakeAlert 2.0: public rollout. Seismol. Res. Lett. 91, 1763–1775 (2020).
Google Scholar
Williamson, A., Lux, A. & Allen, R. Improving out-of-network earthquake locations using prior seismicity for use in earthquake early warning. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 113, 0120220159 (2023).
Google Scholar
McGuire, J. J. et al. Fiber optic sensing for earthquake hazards research, monitoring, and early warning. Seismol. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250067 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lux, A. I. et al. Status and performance of the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system: 2019–2023. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 114, 3041–3062 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. et al. Earthquake and Tsunami Early Warning on the Cascadia Subduction Zone: A Feasibility Study for an Offshore Geophysical Monitoring Network (University of Washington, 2019).
Ide, S., Araki, E. & Matsumoto, H. Very broadband strain-rate measurements along a submarine fiber-optic cable off Cape Muroto, Nankai subduction zone, Japan. Earth Planets Space 73, 63 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lior, I. et al. Strain to ground motion conversion of distributed acoustic sensing data for earthquake magnitude and stress drop determination. Solid Earth 12, 1421–1442 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lior, I. et al. Magnitude estimation and ground motion prediction to harness fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing for earthquake early warning. Sci. Rep. 13, 424 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cole, J. H., Johnson, R. L. & Bhuta, P. G. Fiber optic detection of sound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62, 1136 (1977).
Google Scholar
Zhan, Z. Distributed acoustic sensing turns fiber-optic cables into sensitive seismic antennas. Seismol. Res. Lett. 91, 1–15 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lindsey, N. J. & Martin, E. R. Fiber-optic seismology. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 49, 309–336 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fernández-Ruiz, M. R. et al. Seismic monitoring with distributed acoustic sensing from the near-surface to the deep oceans. J. Lightwave Technol. 40, 1453–1463 (2022).
Google Scholar
McGuire, J. J. et al. ShakeAlert® Version 3: expected performance in large earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 115, 533–561 (2025).
Farghal, N. S., Saunders, J. K. & Parker, G. A. The potential of using fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) in earthquake early warning applications. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 112, 1416–1435 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yin, J. et al. Real-data testing of distributed acoustic sensing for offshore earthquake early warning. Seismic Rec. 3, 269–277 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gou, Y., Allen, R. M., Zhu, W., Taira, T. & Chen, L.-W. Leveraging submarine DAS arrays for offshore earthquake early warning: a case study in Monterey Bay, California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 115, 516–532 (2025).
Google Scholar
Gou, Y., Nof, R. N., Pardini, B. & Allen, R. M. Integrating fiber-optic seismic arrays into earthquake early warning systems with the dEPIC framework. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30568-3 (2026).
Google Scholar
McGuire, J. et al. The GorDAS distributed acoustic sensing experiment above the Cascadia Locked Zone and Subducted Gorda Slab. Seismol. Res. Lett. 96, 2489–2503 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S. I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proc. 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS ’17) 4765–4774 (NIPS, 2017).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’16) 785–794 (NIPS, 2016).
U.S. Geological Survey & Earthquake Hazards Program. Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) comprehensive catalog of earthquake events and products: various. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7MS3QZH (2017).
U.S. Geological Survey. ANSS Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog (ComCat) documentation. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc75095651/finite-fault (2024).
Pollitz, F. F., Guns, K. A. & Yoon, C. E. Rupture process of the Mw7.0 December 5, 2024 Offshore Cape Mendocino earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2025GL115613 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lomax, A., Michelini, A. & Jozinović, D. An investigation of rapid earthquake characterization using single-station waveforms and a convolutional neural network. Seismol. Res. Lett. 90, 517–529 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mousavi, S. M. & Beroza, G. C. A machine-learning approach for earthquake magnitude estimation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085976 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lara, P., Bletery, Q., Ampuero, J.-P., Inza, A. & Tavera, H. Earthquake early warning starting from 3 s of records on a single station with machine learning. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 128, e2023JB026575 (2023).
Google Scholar
Joshi, A. et al. Application of XGBoost model for early prediction of earthquake magnitude from waveform data. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 133, 5 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. Spectrum feature extraction method combining Allan variance, VMD, and PSD. Sci. Rep. 14, 10990 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, H. et al. A rapid DAS signal classification algorithm based on VMD and IMF power spectrum Gaussian fitting. Sci. Rep. 15, 35356 (2025).
Google Scholar
Licciardi, A. et al. Instantaneous tracking of earthquake growth with elastogravity signals. Nature 606, 319–324 (2022).
Google Scholar
Juhel, K. et al. Earthquake early warning using future generation gravity strainmeters. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 10,889–10,902 (2018).
Madariaga, R., Ruiz, S., Rivera, E., Leyton, F. & Baez, J. C. Near-Field Spectra of Large Earthquakes (Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2018).
Luo, B., Jin, G. & Stanek, F. Near-field strain in distributed acoustic sensing-based microseismic observation. Geophysics 86, P49–P60 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nayak, A., Correa, J. & Ajo-Franklin, J. Seismic magnitude estimation using low-frequency strain amplitudes recorded by DAS arrays at far-field distances. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 114, 1818–1838 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y. On the urgent earthquake detection and alarm system (UrEDAS). In 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 673-678 (IAEE, 1988).
Kanamori, H. Real-time seismology and earthquake damage mitigation. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 33, 195–214 (2005).
Google Scholar
Wang, W., Ni, S., Chen, Y. & Kanamori, H. Magnitude estimation for early warning applications using the initial part of P waves: a case study on the 2008 Wenchuan sequence. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038678 (2009).
McGuire, J. J., Simons, F. J. & Collins, J. A. Analysis of seafloor seismograms of the 2003 Tokachi-Oki earthquake sequence for earthquake early warning. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033986 (2008).
Crowell, B. W., Melgar, D., Bock, Y., Haase, J. S. & Geng, J. Earthquake magnitude scaling using seismogeodetic data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 6089–6094 (2013).
Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. E. et al. Model for GNSS Peak ground displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 111, 2393–2407 (2021).
Google Scholar
Thakoor, K., Andrews, J., Hauksson, E. & Heaton, T. From earthquake source parameters to ground-motion warnings near you: the ShakeAlert earthquake information to ground-motion (eqInfo2GM) method. Seismol. Res. Lett. 90, 1243–1257 (2019).
Google Scholar
Saunders, J. K., Baltay, A. S., Minson, S. E. & Böse, M. Uncertainty in ground-motion-to-intensity conversions significantly affects earthquake early warning alert regions. Seismic Rec. 4, 121–130 (2024).
Google Scholar
McGuire, J. J. et al. Expected Warning Times from the ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning System for Earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest (ver. 1.1, March 24, 2021). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2021–1026 (USGS, 2021).
Thompson, M., Hartog, J. R. & Wirth, E. A. A population-based performance evaluation of the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system for M9 megathrust earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 114, 1103–1123 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ajo-Franklin, J. et al. The Imperial Valley Dark Fiber Project: toward seismic studies using DAS and telecom infrastructure for geothermal applications. Seismol. Res. Lett. 93, 2906–2919 (2022).
Google Scholar
van den Ende, M., Trabattoni, A., Baillet, M. & Rivet, D. An analysis of the dynamic range of distributed acoustic sensing for earthquake early warning. Seismica https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v4i1.1371 (2024).
Google Scholar
Viens, L. et al. Nonlinear earthquake response of marine sediments with distributed acoustic sensing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL100122 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lindsey, N. J., Rademacher, H. & Ajo-Franklin, J. B. On the broadband instrument response of fiber-optic DAS arrays. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125, e2019JB018145 (2020).
Google Scholar
Williams, E. F. et al. Surface gravity wave interferometry and ocean current monitoring with ocean-bottom DAS. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 127, e2021JC018375 (2022).
Google Scholar
Song, Z. et al. Near real-time in situ monitoring of nearshore ocean currents using distributed acoustic sensing on submarine fiber-optic cable. Earth Space Sci. 11, e2024EA003572 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hou, B., Zhou, Y., Li, S., Wei, Y. & Song, J. Real-time earthquake magnitude estimation via a deep learning network based on waveform and text mixed modal. Earth Planets Space 76, 2005 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhu, J., Li, S. & Song, J. Multimodal deep learning network for fast seismic discrimination and magnitude classification. Geosci. Lett. 12, 12 (2025).
Google Scholar
Barbour, A. J., Langbein, J. O. & Farghal, N. S. Earthquake magnitudes from dynamic strain. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 111, 1325–1346 (2021).
Google Scholar
McGuire, J. J. et al. Spring 2022 Arcata to Eureka, California, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) experiment: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9NYAT5Z (2022).
McGuire, J.J. et al. Arcata, California, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) experiment: 2022 M6.4 Ferndale aftershock sequence (ver. 3.0, February 2026): U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P1V7CKGA (2024).
Shelly, D. R. et al. Subduction intraslab-interface fault interactions in the 2022 Mw 6.4 Ferndale, California, earthquake sequence. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl1226 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yoon, C. E. & Shelly, D. R. Distinct yet adjacent earthquake sequences near the Mendocino Triple Junction: 20 December 2021 Mw 6.1 and 6.0 Petrolia, and 20 December 2022 Mw 6.4 Ferndale. Seismic Rec. 4, 81–92 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhu, W. et al. Seismic arrival-time picking on distributed acoustic sensing data using semi-supervised learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 8192 (2023).
Google Scholar
EarthScope Consortium. Plate Boundary Observatory borehole strainmeter network (PB). Data services provided by the NSF NGF data archive. https://www.earthscope.org/data (2016).
Gladwin, M. T. High-precision multicomponent borehole deformation monitoring. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 55, 2011–2016 (1984).
Google Scholar
Lee, G. R., Gommers, R., Wasilewski, F., Wohlfahrt, K. & O’Leary, A. PyWavelets: a Python package for wavelet analysis. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1237 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bennett, J. & Lanning, S. The Netflix prize. In Proc. KDD Cup Workshop 2007 3–6 (ACM, 2007).
