Psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students | BMC Medical Education

AI Basics


  • Sit C, Srinivasan R, Amrani A, Muthuswamy K, Azam A, Monzon L, and others. British medical students’ attitudes and perceptions of artificial intelligence and radiology: a multicentre survey. Imaging Insights. 2020; 11:1–6.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • van der Niet AG, Bleakley A. Where medical education meets artificial intelligence: “Is technology relevant?”. Med Educ. 2021;55(1):30–6.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Topol EJ. High performance medicine: the fusion of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Hainc N, Federau C, Stieltjes B, Blatow M, Bink A, Stippich C. A bright future for artificial intelligence-enhanced neuroimaging reading. front new roll. 2017; 8:489.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Wang D, Khosla A, Garugeya R, Irshad H, Beck AH. Deep learning to identify metastatic breast cancer. arXiv preprint arXiv:160605718. 2016.

  • Kelly M, Ellaway R, Scherpbier A, King N, Dornan T. Physical education: embodied learning for health professionals. Med Educ. 2019;53(10):967–77.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Siegersma K, Leiner T, Chew D, Appelman Y, Hofstra L, Verjans J. Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging: state-of-the-art technology and its impact on imaging cardiologists. Ness Hart J. 2019;27:403–13.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Bedi G, Carrillo F, Czechki GA, Slezak DF, Sigman M, Mota NB, Automated Analysis of Other Free Speech Predicts Psychotic Onset in High-Risk Youth. npj schizophrenia. 2015; 1(1):1–7.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Anirvan P, Meher D, Singh SP. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy in resource-constrained settings: a reality check. European J liver gastrointestinal roll. 2020;10(2):92–7.

    Google scalar

  • Kassahun Y, Yu B, Tibebu AT, Stoyanov D, Giannarou S, Metzen JH, et al. Surgical Robotics Beyond Advanced Dexterity Instruments: Exploring Machine Learning Technologies and Their Role in Intelligent, Autonomous Surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016;11:553–68.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Lindkwister AL, Hassanpur S, Lewis PJ, Singh JM. AI-RADS: Artificial intelligence curriculum for residents. Acado Radiol. 2021;28(12):1810–6.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Liu DS, Sawyer J, Luna A, Aoun J, Wang J, Boachie L, et al. US medical students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence in medicine: A mixed-methods research study. JMIR Medical Education. 2022;8(4):e38325.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Meskó B, Hetényi G, Győrffy Z. Can artificial intelligence solve the workforce crisis in healthcare? BMC Institute of Health Services 2018;18(1):1–4.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Milena VZ, Petra PP. A cognitive constructivist method for teaching scientific and technical content. Int J Cogn Res Sci Eng Educ. 2021;9(1):23–36.

    Google scalar

  • Mota-Valtierra G, Rodríguez-Reséndiz J, Herrera-Ruiz G. A constructivist methodology for teaching artificial intelligence topics with a focus on sustainable development. sustainability. 2019;11(17):4642.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Binder T, Sandmann A, Sures B, Friege G, Theyssen H, Schmiemann P. Assessment of prior knowledge type as a predictor of academic performance during the introduction phase of biology and physics study programs using logistic regression. International J STEM Education 2019;6:1–14.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Guskey TR, McTighe J. Pre-assessment: commitment and caution. education leader. 2016;73(7):38.

    Google scalar

  • Guskey TR. Do pre-assessments work? Education Leader. 2018; 75(5).

  • Hockett JA, Dube KJ. Turn on the lights: what you can do with pre-assessment. education leader. 2014;71(4):50–4.

    Google scalar

  • Sapti AH, Sapti HA. Artificial Intelligence Teaching and Tools for Medical and Health Informatics Students: A Systematic Review. JMIR Medical Education. 2020;6(1):e19285.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Park CJ, Paul HY, Siegel EL. A medical student’s perspective on the impact of artificial intelligence in medical practice. Current radiol diagnosis. 2021;50(5):614–9.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Yüzbaşıoğlu E. Attitudes and perceptions of dental students towards artificial intelligence. J Dent Education. 2020.

  • Gray K, Slavotinek J, Dimaguila GL, Choo D. Artificial Intelligence Education for Healthcare Professionals: An Expert Survey of Approaches and Needs. JMIR Medical Education. 2022;8(2):e35223.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Karaca O, Çalışkan SA, Demir K. Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students (MAIRS-MS) – a study of development, validity and reliability. BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21:1–9.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Koller I, Levenson MR, Glück J. What do you think you are measuring? Mixed-method procedures for assessing test item content adequacy and theory-based scaling. front cycle. 2017; 8:126.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Salajegheh M, Hekmat SN, Malekpour-Afshar R. Identifying alternative topics to diversify medical, dental and pharmaceutical student papers: mixed methods research. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):110.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translating, adapting, and validating instruments and scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: clear and user-friendly guidelines. J Eval Clinic Practice. 2011;17(2):268–74.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Wilson FR, Pan W, Shumsky DA. Recalculate the critical value of Lawshe’s content validity rate. Measurement Evaluation Couns Dev. 2012;45(3):197–210.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Wind CA, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content effectiveness. West J Nursing Association 2003;25(5):508–18.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: Assessing Power, Bias, and Validity of Solutions. Educate psychometrics. 2013;73(6):913–34.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Tabachenik D, Fidel J. Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. J bus resolution method. 2012; 6:1–55.

    Google scalar

  • Kilic S. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2016;6(1):47.

    Google scalar

  • Laupichler MC, Hadizadeh DR, Wintergerst MW, von der Emde L, Paech D, Dick EA, et al. Effects of a Flipped Classroom Course in Developing Her AI Literacy in a Medical Imaging-Focused Medical Student: A Single-Group Pre- and Post-Test Study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):1–9.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Abo al-Shamat K, Al-Fuzari R, Alaryani A, Al-Sharif S, Kad H, Al-Matrafi R and others. Medical and dental professionals are preparing artificial intelligence for Saudi Vision 2030. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2022;11(4).

  • Pan Yi Xuan MIFF, Muhammad Imran bin Al Nazir, Hussein NTJ, and Sujata Kovragadeh. Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe, Soe Moe, Mila Nu Nu, Htay. Artificial intelligence readiness of medical students in Malaysia. Journal of Medical Education. 2023.

  • Boillat T, Nawaz FA, Rivas H. Readiness to embrace artificial intelligence among physicians and students: a questionnaire-based study. JMIR Medical Education. 2022;8(2):e34973.

    Articles Google Scholar

  • Doumat G, Daher D, Ghanem NN, Khater B. Lebanese medical students’ knowledge and attitudes towards artificial intelligence: a national survey study. Front Artif Intel. 2022;5(1015418):1–9.

    Google scalar

  • Jha N, Shankar PR, Al-Betar MA, Mukhia R, Hada K, Palaian S. Knowledge and perception of artificial intelligence in medicine among medical students and interns. Advances in medical education and practice. 2022:927–37.



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *