Dong, J. & Zhong, J. Recent advances in symbolic regression. ACM Comput. Surv. 57, 37 (2025). Dong & Zhong provide a thorough review of foundational and contemporary symbolic regression techniques, discussing their history, how they function, their strengths and weaknesses, relevant software tools, and examples of where they see use.
Google Scholar
Angelis, D., Sofos, F. & Karakasidis, T. E. Artificial intelligence in physical sciences: symbolic regression trends and perspectives. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 30, 3845–3865 (2023).
Google Scholar
Aldeia, G. S. I. & de França, F. O. Interpretability in symbolic regression: a benchmark of explanatory methods using the Feynman data set. Genet. Program. Evolable Mach. 23, 309–349 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ennab, M. & Mcheick, H. Enhancing interpretability and accuracy of AI models in healthcare: a comprehensive review on challenges and future directions. Front. Robot. AI 11, 1444763 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lemos, P., Jeffrey, N., Cranmer, M., Ho, S. & Battaglia, P. Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learning. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 4, 045002 (2023).
Google Scholar
Morales-Alvarado, M., Conde, D., Bendavid, J., Sanz, V. & Ubiali, M. Symbolic regression for precision LHC physics. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.07839 (2024).
Shojaee, P. et al. LLM-SRBench: a new benchmark for scientific equation discovery with large language models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.10415 (2025).
LaCava, W. et al. Contemporary symbolic regression methods and their relative performance. In Proc. Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) Track on Datasets and Benchmarks Vol 1 (NeurIPS, 2021).
Sotiropoulos, D. N., Koronakos, G. & Solanakis, S. V. Evolving transparent credit risk models: a symbolic regression approach using genetic programming. Electronics 13, 4324 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. Advancing symbolic regression for earth science with a focus on evapotranspiration modeling. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci. 7, 321 (2024).
Google Scholar
Abdellaoui, I. A. & Mehrkanoon, S. Symbolic regression for scientific discovery: an application to wind speed forecasting. In Proc. IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 01–08 https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI50451.2021.9659860 (2021).
Franca, F. O. et al. Interpretable symbolic regression for data science: analysis of the 2022 competition. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.01117 (2023).
Cranmer, M. Interpretable machine learning for science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01582 (2023).
Wang, L., Wu, Z., Sun, K., Li, Z. & Cheng, R. EvoGP: a GPU-accelerated framework for tree-based genetic programming. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.17168 (2025).
Petersen, B. K. et al. Deep symbolic regression: recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.04871 (2021).
Tian, Y. et al. Interactive symbolic regression with co-design mechanism through offline reinforcement learning. Nat. Commun. 16, 3930 (2025).
Google Scholar
Shojaee, P., Meidani, K., Barati Farimani, A. & Reddy, C. Transformer-based planning for symbolic regression. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 45907–45919 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alaa, A. M. & van der Schaar, M. Demystifying black-box models with symbolic metamodels. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Wallach, H. et al.) Vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019).
Jin, Y., Fu, W., Kang, J., Guo, J. & Guo, J. Bayesian symbolic regression. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.08892 (2020).
Landajuela, M. et al. A unified framework for deep symbolic regression. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 33985–33998 (2022).
Google Scholar
Albano, G., Giorno, V., Román-Román, P. & Torres-Ruiz, F. Study of a general growth model. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00882v1 (2024).
Goethals, S., Martens, D. & Evgeniou, T. Manipulation risks in explainable AI: the implications of the disagreement problem. In Proc. Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (eds Meo, R. & Silvestri, F.) 185–200 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74633-8_12 (Springer Nature, 2025).
Krishna, S. et al. The disagreement problem in explainable machine learning: a practitioner’s perspective. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.01602 (2024).
Breiman, L. Statistical modeling: the two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author). Stat. Sci. 16, 199–231 (2001).
Google Scholar
Liu, J. & Rudin, C. User-Guided Interpretable Models: Rashomon Effect, Interaction, and Computation. Harv. Data Sci. Rev. 7, 3 (2025).
Wilstrup, C. & Kasak, J. Symbolic regression outperforms other models for small data sets. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.15147 (2021).
Eichhorn, S., Mohapatra, A. & Goebel, C. PISR: physics-informed symbolic regression for predicting power system voltage. In Proc. 16th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems 92–107 https://doi.org/10.1145/3679240.3734622 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2025).
Cho, S., Kim, D. & Hazlett, C. Inference at the Data’s Edge: Gaussian Processes for Estimation and Inference in the Face of Extrapolation Uncertainty. Political Analysis 1–20 https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2026.10032 (2026).
Ziyin, L., Hartwig, T. & Ueda, M. Neural networks fail to learn periodic functions and how to fix it. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 33, 1583–1594 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2020).
Li, W. et al. A neural-guided dynamic symbolic network for exploring mathematical expressions from data. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.13705 (2024).
Sahoo, S., Lampert, C. & Martius, G. Learning equations for extrapolation and control. In Proc. 35th International Conference on Machine Learning 4442–4450 (PMLR, 2018).
Ferrari, D., Guidetti, V., Wang, Y. & Curcin, V. Multi-objective symbolic regression to generate data-driven, non-fixed structure and intelligible mortality predictors using EHR: binary classification methodology and comparison with state-of-the-art. In AMIA’s Annual Symposium Proceedings Vol. 2022, 442–451 (AMIA, 2023)
Russeil, E. et al. Multi-view symbolic regression. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.04298 (2024).
Hasanzadeh, F. et al. Bias recognition and mitigation strategies in artificial intelligence healthcare applications. NPJ Digit. Med. 8, 154 (2025).
Google Scholar
Imai Aldeia, G. S. et al. Call for action: towards the next generation of symbolic regression benchmark. in Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion 2529–2538 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2025). Aldeia et al. use modified benchmark problems to provide an objective overview of a wide range of state-of-the-art SR algorithms.
Radwan, Y. A., Kronberger, G. & Winkler, S. A comparison of recent algorithms for symbolic regression to genetic programming. In Proc. Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2024 (eds Quesada-Arencibia, A., Affenzeller, M. & Moreno-Díaz, R.) 157–171 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82949-9_15 (Springer Nature, 2025).
Sun, C., Shen, S., Tao, W., Xue, D. & Zhou, Z. Noise-resilient symbolic regression with dynamic gating reinforcement learning. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 39, 20690–20698 (AAAI, 2025).
Wang, X., Zhao, H., Zhao, Q. & Jiang, B. Deep reinforcement learning-based symbolic regression for PDE discovery using spatio-temporal rewards. In Proc. IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) 3256–3261 https://doi.org/10.1109/CASE59546.2024.10711602 (2024).
Cao, X. & Yousefzadeh, R. Extrapolation and AI transparency: why machine learning models should reveal when they make decisions beyond their training. Big Data Soc. 10, 20539517231169731 (2023).
Google Scholar
Epperson, J. F. On the runge example. Am. Math. Mon. 94, 329–341 (1987).
Google Scholar
Kammerer, L., Kronberger, G. & Winkler, S. Bias and variance analysis of contemporary symbolic regression methods. Appl. Sci. 14, 11061 (2024).
Google Scholar
Boulesteix, A.-L. Ten simple rules for reducing overoptimistic reporting in methodological computational research. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004191 (2015).
Google Scholar
DeCamp, M. & Tilburt, J. C. Why we cannot trust artificial intelligence in medicine. Lancet Digit. Health 1, e390 (2019).
Google Scholar
Arbelaez Ossa, L. et al. Re-focusing explainability in medicine. Digit. Health 8, 20552076221074488 (2022).
Google Scholar
La Cava, W. G. et al. A flexible symbolic regression method for constructing interpretable clinical prediction models. NPJ Digit. Med. 6, 1–14 (2023). La Cava et al. conduct the first study utilizing SR for EHR prediction modeling and perform a thorough scientific analysis to demonstrate the viability of their approach.
Google Scholar
Arina, P. et al. Mortality prediction after major surgery in a mixed population through machine learning: a multi-objective symbolic regression approach. Anaesthesia 80, 551–560 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ferrari, D. et al. Using interpretable machine learning to predict bloodstream infection and antimicrobial resistance in patients admitted to ICU: early alert predictors based on EHR data to guide antimicrobial stewardship. PLoS Digit. Health 3, e0000641 (2024).
Google Scholar
Afzal, W. Search-based Approaches to Software Fault Prediction and Software Testing, Licentiate of Engineering thesis, Mälardalen University (2009).
Sorour, S. S., Saleh, C. A. & Shazly, M. Integrating machine learning and symbolic regression for predicting damage initiation in hybrid FRP bolted connections. Sci. Rep. 15, 18564 (2025).
Google Scholar
de Rooij, M., van Riel, N. A. W. & O’Donovan, S. D. Conditional universal differential equations capture population dynamics and interindividual variation in c-peptide production. NPJ Syst. Biol. Appl. 11, 84 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hossain, M. A., Elmoselhi, H., Elshorbagy, A. A. & Shoker, A. The Sask formula to estimate glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant patients. Nephron Clin. Pract. 117, c135–c150 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fong, K. S. & Motani, M. Symbolic regression for discovery of medical equations: a case study on glomerular filtration rate estimation equations. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) 1373–1379 https://doi.org/10.1109/CAI59869.2024.00245 (2024).
Hidalgo, J. I. et al. Modeling glycemia in humans by means of grammatical evolution. Appl. Soft Comput. 20, 40–53 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chiavegatto Filho, A., Batista, A. F. D. M. & dos Santos, H. G. Data leakage in health outcomes prediction with machine learning. Comment on “prediction of incident hypertension within the next year: prospective study using statewide electronic health records and machine learning”. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e10969 (2021).
Google Scholar
Han, L. Addressing distribution shift for robust and trustworthy prediction and causal inference in clinical AI settings. JAMA Netw. Open 8, e2513705 (2025).
Google Scholar
Subasri, V. et al. Detecting and remediating harmful data shifts for the responsible deployment of clinical AI models. JAMA Netw. Open 8, e2513685 (2025).
Google Scholar
Warraich, H. J., Tazbaz, T. & Califf, R. M. FDA perspective on the regulation of artificial intelligence in health care and biomedicine. JAMA 333, 241–247 (2025).
Google Scholar
Shah, N. H., Pfeffer, M. A. & Ghassemi, M. The need for continuous evaluation of artificial intelligence prediction algorithms. JAMA Netw. Open 7, e2433009 (2024).
Google Scholar
