Yang, C. et al. Big Earth Data analytics: a survey. Big Earth Data 3, 83–107 (2019).
Google Scholar
Baldocchi, D. et al. FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 2415–2434 (2001).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Social sensing: a new approach to understanding our socioeconomic environments. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 105, 512–530 (2015).
Google Scholar
Whitcraft, A. K. et al. No pixel left behind: toward integrating Earth observations for agriculture into the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals framework. Remote Sens. Environ. 235, 111470 (2019).
Google Scholar
Graham, M. & Shelton, T. Geography and the future of Big Data, Big Data and the future of geography. Dialogues Hum. Geogr. 3, 255–261 (2013).
Google Scholar
Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model. Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hey, T., Tansley, S., Tolle, K. & Gray, J. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery (Microsoft Research, 2009).
Kitchin, R. Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data Soc. 1, 2053951714528481 (2014).
Google Scholar
Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019). Provides a comprehensive overview of deep learning for Earth system science.
Google Scholar
Grieves, M. Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White Paper 1, 1–7 (2014).
Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E. & Fogli, D. A survey on digital twin: definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE Access. 7, 167653–167671 (2019).
Google Scholar
Raj, P. in Advances in Computers Vol. 121, 267–283 (Elsevier, 2021).
Rasheed, A., San, O. & Kvamsdal, T. Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access. 8, 21980–22012 (2020).
Google Scholar
Abdeen, F. N. & Sepasgozar, S. M. E. City digital twin concepts: a vision for community participation. Environ. Sci. Proc. 12, 19 (2022).
Liu, Y. K., Ong, S. K. & Nee, A. Y. C. State-of-the-art survey on digital twin implementations. Adv. Manuf. 10, 1–23 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A. & Nee, A. Y. C. Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 15, 2405–2415 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bauer, P., Stevens, B. & Hazeleger, W. A digital twin of Earth for the green transition. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 80–83 (2021). Provided a conceptual framework of the digital twin of Earth.
Google Scholar
Voosen, P. Europe builds ‘digital twin’ of Earth to hone climate forecasts. Science 370, 16–17 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bauer, P. et al. The digital revolution of Earth-system science. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 104–113 (2021). Discussed the revolution in digital Earth systems and proposed the concept of an efficient software infrastructure for the Earth-system digital twin.
Google Scholar
Latif, M. The roadmap of climate models. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 536–538 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schellnhuber, H. J. ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution. Nature 402, C19–C23 (1999).
Google Scholar
Steffen, W. et al. The emergence and evolution of Earth system science. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 54–63 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S. & Teh, Y.-W. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 18, 1527–1554 (2006).
Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E. & Salakhutdinov, R. R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313, 504–507 (2006).
Google Scholar
Mnih, V. et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518, 529–533 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L. & Moore, A. W. Reinforcement learning: a survey. J. Artif. Int. Res. 4, 237–285 (1996).
Mousavi, S. M. & Beroza, G. C. Deep-learning seismology. Science 377, eabm4470 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bergen, K. J., Johnson, P. A., de Hoop, M. V. & Beroza, G. C. Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience. Science 363, eaau0323 (2019). Gave a comprehensive overview of the state of machine learning in the solid Earth geosciences and solutions to broaden and accelerate these capabilities.
Google Scholar
Herman, L. et al. A comparison of monoscopic and stereoscopic 3D visualizations: Effect on spatial planning in digital twins. Remote Sens. 13, 2976 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiang, P. et al. Digital twin Earth — Coasts: developing a fast and physics-informed surrogate model for coastal floods via neural operators. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.07100 (2021).
Tao, F. et al. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with Big Data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94, 3563–3576 (2018).
Google Scholar
Keith, D. W. Geoengineering. Nature 409, 420–420 (2001).
Google Scholar
Lawrence, M. G. et al. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Nat. Commun. 9, 3734 (2018).
Google Scholar
Parson, E. A. Geoengineering: symmetric precaution. Science 374, 795–795 (2021).
Google Scholar
Armstrong McKay, D. I. et al. Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377, eabn7950 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).
Google Scholar
Oza, N. et al. NASA Earth Science Technology for Earth System Digital Twins (ESDT) https://essopenarchive.org/doi/full/10.1002/essoar.10509965.1 (ESS Open Archive, 2022).
Yang, C., Raskin, R., Goodchild, M. & Gahegan, M. Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: past, present and future. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 34, 264–277 (2010).
Google Scholar
Dax, G., Nagarajan, S., Li, H. & Werner, M. Compression supports spatial deep learning. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 16, 702–713 (2023).
Google Scholar
Reed, D. A. & Dongarra, J. Exascale computing and Big Data. Commun. ACM 58, 56–68 (2015).
Google Scholar
Mystakidis, S. Metaverse. Encyclopedia 2, 486–497 (2022).
Google Scholar
Guo, H., Chen, F., Sun, Z., Liu, J. & Liang, D. Big Earth Data: a practice of sustainability science to achieve the sustainable development goals. Sci. Bull. 66, 1050–1053 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, X., Liu, F. & Fang, M. Harmonizing models and observations: data assimilation in Earth system science. Sci. China Earth Sci 63, 1059–1068 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gettelman, A. et al. The future of Earth system prediction: advances in model–data fusion. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn3488 (2022).
Google Scholar
Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L. & Evensen, G. Data assimilation in the geosciences: an overview of methods, issues, and perspectives. WIREs Clim. Change 9, e535 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hewitt, H., Fox-Kemper, B., Pearson, B., Roberts, M. & Klocke, D. The small scales of the ocean may hold the key to surprises. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 496–499 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schneider, T. et al. Climate goals and computing the future of clouds. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 3–5 (2017).
Google Scholar
Stevens, B. et al. DYAMOND: the DYnamics of the Atmospheric general circulation modeled on non-hydrostatic domains. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 6, 61 (2019).
Google Scholar
Miyoshi, T., Kondo, K. & Imamura, T. The 10,240-member ensemble kalman filtering with an intermediate agcm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5264–5271 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ruiz, J., Lien, G.-Y., Kondo, K., Otsuka, S. & Miyoshi, T. Reduced non-Gaussianity by 30 s rapid update in convective-scale numerical weather prediction. Nonlinear Process Geophys. 28, 615–626 (2021).
Google Scholar
Honda, T. et al. Development of the real-time 30-s-update Big Data assimilation system for convective rainfall prediction with a phased array weather radar: description and preliminary evaluation. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2021MS002823 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mass, C. F. & Madaus, L. E. Surface pressure observations from smartphones: a potential revolution for high-resolution weather prediction? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 1343–1349 (2014).
Google Scholar
Li, R. et al. Smartphone pressure data: quality control and impact on atmospheric analysis. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 14, 785–801 (2021).
Google Scholar
Avellaneda, P. M., Ficklin, D. L., Lowry, C. S., Knouft, J. H. & Hall, D. M. Improving hydrological models with the assimilation of crowdsourced data. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2019WR026325 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sawada, Y. & Hanazaki, R. Socio-hydrological data assimilation: analyzing human–flood interactions by model–data integration. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 4777–4791 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barendrecht, M. H. et al. The value of empirical data for estimating the parameters of a sociohydrological flood risk model. Water Resour. Res. 55, 1312–1336 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jonathan, W., Evans, A. J. & Malleson, N. S. Dynamic calibration of agent-based models using data assimilation. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 150703 (2016).
Google Scholar
Boukabara, S.-A. et al. Outlook for exploiting artificial intelligence in the Earth and environmental sciences. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 102, 1–53 (2021).
Google Scholar
Geer, A. J. Learning earth system models from observations: machine learning or data assimilation? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 379, 20200089 (2021).
Google Scholar
Buizza, C. et al. Data learning: integrating data assimilation and machine learning. J. Comput. Sci. 58, 101525 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pathiraja, S., Moradkhani, H., Marshall, L., Sharma, A. & Geenens, G. Data-driven model uncertainty estimation in hydrologic data assimilation. Water Resour. Res. 54, 1252–1280 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. et al. A dynamic data-driven method for dealing with model structural error in soil moisture data assimilation. Adv. Water Resour. 132, 103407 (2019).
Google Scholar
King, F., Erler, A. R., Frey, S. K. & Fletcher, C. G. Application of machine learning techniques for regional bias correction of snow water equivalent estimates in Ontario, Canada. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 4887–4902 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barthélémy, S., Brajard, J., Bertino, L. & Counillon, F. Super-resolution data assimilation. Ocean Dyn. 72, 661–678 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cheng, S. et al. Generalised latent assimilation in heterogeneous reduced spaces with machine learning surrogate models. J. Sci. Comput. 94, 11 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cheng, S. et al. Data-driven surrogate model with latent data assimilation: application to wildfire forecasting. J. Comput. Phys. 464, 111302 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. Designing chaotic models. J. Atmos. Sci. 62, 1574–1587 (2005).
Google Scholar
Bonavita, M. et al. Machine learning for Earth system observation and prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 102, E710–E716 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kong, Q. et al. Machine learning in seismology: turning data into insights. Seismol. Res. Lett. 90, 3–14 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lary, D. J., Alavi, A. H., Gandomi, A. H. & Walker, A. L. Machine learning in geosciences and remote sensing. Geosci. Front. 7, 3–10 (2016).
Google Scholar
Tahmasebi, P., Kamrava, S., Bai, T. & Sahimi, M. Machine learning in geo- and environmental sciences: from small to large scale. Adv. Water Resour. 142, 103619 (2020).
Google Scholar
Feng, M. & Li, X. Land cover mapping toward finer scales. Sci. Bull. 65, 1604–1606 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yu, S. & Ma, J. Deep learning for geophysics: current and future trends. Rev. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021RG000742 (2021).
Google Scholar
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning (MIT Press, 2016).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hochreiter, S. & Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780 (1997).
Google Scholar
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60, 84–90 (2017).
Google Scholar
Goodfellow, I. et al. Generative adversarial networks. Commun. ACM 63, 139–144 (2020).
Google Scholar
Scher, S. Toward data-driven weather and climate forecasting: approximating a simple general circulation model with deep learning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 616–12,622 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ma, L. et al. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: a meta-analysis and review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 152, 166–177 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ravuri, S. et al. Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar. Nature 597, 672–677 (2021). Proposed a deep generative adversarial network model for faster and more accurate precipitation nowcasting from historical radar data.
Google Scholar
Zhong, Y. et al. WHU-Hi: UAV-borne hyperspdectral with high spatial resolution (H2) benchmark datasets and classifier for precise crop identification based on deep convolutional neural network with CRF. Remote Sens. Environ. 250, 112012 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hong, D. et al. More diverse means better: multimodal deep learning meets remote sensing imagery classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 59, 4340–4354 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, L., Luo, J., Lin, Z., Niu, F. & Liu, L. Using deep learning to map retrogressive thaw slumps in the Beiluhe region (Tibetan Plateau) from CubeSat images. Remote Sens. Environ. 237, 111534 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chi, J., Kim, H., Lee, S. & Crawford, M. M. Deep learning based retrieval algorithm for Arctic sea ice concentration from AMSR2 passive microwave and MODIS optical data. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111204 (2019).
Google Scholar
Crane-Droesch, A. Machine learning methods for crop yield prediction and climate change impact assessment in agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 114003 (2018).
Google Scholar
Korup, O. & Stolle, A. Landslide prediction from machine learning. Geol. Today 30, 26–33 (2014).
Google Scholar
Shen, C. A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its relevance for water resources scientists. Water Resour. Res. 54, 8558–8593 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kochanski, K., Mohan, D., Horrall, J., Rountree, B. & Abdulla, G. Deep learning predictions of sand dune migration. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.10798 (2019).
Leinonen, J., Nerini, D. & Berne, A. Stochastic super-resolution for downscaling time-evolving atmospheric fields with a generative adversarial network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 59, 7211–7223 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, Z., Meier, M.-A., Hauksson, E., Zhan, Z. & Andrews, J. Machine learning seismic wave discrimination: application to earthquake early warning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 4773–4779 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, B., Zhang, N., Lu, W. & Wang, J. Deep-learning-based seismic data interpolation: a preliminary result. Geophysics 84, V11–V20 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, N., Zhang, D., Chang, H. & Li, H. Deep learning of subsurface flow via theory-guided neural network. J. Hydrol. 584, 124700 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Z.-H. A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning. Natl Sci. Rev. 5, 44–53 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M. & Hinton, G. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In Proc. of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning 1597–1607 (ICML, 2020).
Chen, Y. & Bruzzone, L. Self-supervised change detection in multi-view remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–12 (2022).
Jung, H., Oh, Y., Jeong, S., Lee, C. & Jeon, T. Contrastive self-supervised learning with smoothed representation for remote sensing. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 19, 1–5 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vidal, R., Bruna, J., Giryes, R. & Soatto, S. Mathematics of deep learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.04741 (2017).
Rackauckas, C. et al. Universal differential equations for scientific machine learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.04385 (2021).
Marcus, G. Deep learning: a critical appraisal. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.00631 (2018).
Rice, L., Wong, E. & Kolter, J. Z. Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning. In Proc. of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning 8093–8104 (ICML, 2020).
Karniadakis, G. E. et al. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021). Provides a comprehensive overview for embedding physics-based knowledge into machine learning.
Google Scholar
Karpatne, A. et al. Theory-guided data science: a new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 2318–2331 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kashinath, K. et al. Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 379, 20200093 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhao, W. L. et al. Physics-constrained machine learning of evapotranspiration. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 14496–14507 (2019).
Google Scholar
Huanfeng, S. & Liangpei, Z. Mechanism-learning coupling paradigms for parameter inversion and simulation in Earth surface systems. Sci. China Earth Sci. 66, 568–582 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jia, X. et al. Physics-guided machine learning for scientific discovery: an application in simulating lake temperature profiles. ACM/IMS Trans. Data Sci. 2, 1–20 (2021).
Google Scholar
Daw, A., Karpatne, A., Watkins, W., Read, J. & Kumar, V. Physics-guided neural networks (PGNN): an application in lake temperature modeling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.11431 (2021).
Sturm, P. O. & Wexler, A. S. Conservation laws in a neural network architecture: enforcing the atom balance of a Julia-based photochemical model (v0.2.0). Geosci. Model. Dev. 15, 3417–3431 (2022).
Google Scholar
Beucler, T. et al. Enforcing analytic constraints in neural networks emulating physical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 098302 (2021).
Google Scholar
Read, J. S. et al. Process-guided deep learning predictions of lake water temperature. Water Resour. Res. 55, 9173–9190 (2019).
Google Scholar
Karniadakis, G. E. et al. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021).
Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. Correlations genuine and spurious in Pearson and Pule. Stat. Sci. 10, 364–376 (1995).
Google Scholar
Altman, N. & Krzywinski, M. Association, correlation and causation. Nat. Methods 12, 899–900 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schölkopf, B. in Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl Vol. 36, 765–804 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2022).
Pearl, J. The seven tools of causal inference, with reflections on machine learning. Commun. ACM 62, 54–60 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cui, P. & Athey, S. Stable learning establishes some common ground between causal inference and machine learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 110–115 (2022).
Google Scholar
Runge, J. et al. Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences. Nat. Commun. 10, 2553 (2019).
Google Scholar
van Nes, E. H. et al. Causal feedbacks in climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 445–448 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhang, K., Schölkopf, B., Spirtes, P. & Glymour, C. Learning causality and causality-related learning: Some recent progress. Natl Sci. Rev. 5, 26–29 (2018).
Google Scholar
Salvucci, G. D., Saleem, J. A. & Kaufmann, R. Investigating soil moisture feedbacks on precipitation with tests of Granger causality. Adv. Water Resour. 25, 1305–1312 (2002).
Google Scholar
Tuttle, S. E. & Salvucci, G. D. Confounding factors in determining causal soil moisture–precipitation feedback. Water Resour. Res. 53, 5531–5544 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jiang, B., Liang, S. & Yuan, W. Observational evidence for impacts of vegetation change on local surface climate over northern China using the Granger causality test. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 1–12 (2015).
Google Scholar
Papagiannopoulou, C. et al. A non-linear Granger-causality framework to investigate climate–vegetation dynamics. Geosci. Model. Dev. 10, 1945–1960 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kretschmer, M. et al. Quantifying causal pathways of teleconnections. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 102, E2247–E2263 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kretschmer, M., Coumou, D., Donges, J. F. & Runge, J. Using causal effect networks to analyze different arctic drivers of midlatitude winter circulation. J. Clim. 29, 4069–4081 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sugihara, G. et al. Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Science 338, 496–500 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yang, A. C., Peng, C.-K. & Huang, N. E. Causal decomposition in the mutual causation system. Nat. Commun. 9, 3378 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, J.-Y., Kuo, T.-C. & Hsieh, C. Causal effects of population dynamics and environmental changes on spatial variability of marine fishes. Nat. Commun. 11, 2635 (2020).
Google Scholar
An, W., Beauvile, R. & Rosche, B. Causal network analysis. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 48, 23–41 (2022).
Google Scholar
Moraffah, R. et al. Causal inference for time series analysis: problems, methods and evaluation. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 63, 3041–3085 (2021).
Google Scholar
Runge, J. et al. Identifying causal gateways and mediators in complex spatio-temporal systems. Nat. Commun. 6, 8502 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bareinboim, E. & Pearl, J. Causal inference and the data-fusion problem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7345–7352 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rubin, D. B. Causal inference using potential outcomes: design, modeling, decisions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100, 322–331 (2005).
Google Scholar
Crutzen, P. J. Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim. Change 77, 211 (2006).
Google Scholar
Gupta, V. & Jain, M. K. Unravelling the teleconnections between ENSO and dry/wet conditions over India using nonlinear Granger causality. Atmos. Res. 247, 105168 (2021).
Google Scholar
Silva, F. N. et al. Detecting climate teleconnections with granger causality. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL094707 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wallace, J. M. & Gutzler, D. S. Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere winter. Mon. Weather. Rev. 109, 784–812 (1981).
Google Scholar
Runge, J., Nowack, P., Kretschmer, M., Flaxman, S. & Sejdinovic, D. Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau4996 (2019). Ilustrated the capabilities of multivariate causal discovery techniques in a large-scale analysis of the nonlinear global climatic system.
Google Scholar
Hannart, A., Pearl, J., Otto, F. E. L., Naveau, P. & Ghil, M. Causal counterfactual theory for the attribution of weather and climate-related events. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 99–110 (2016).
Google Scholar
Nowack, P., Runge, J., Eyring, V. & Haigh, J. D. Causal networks for climate model evaluation and constrained projections. Nat. Commun. 11, 1415 (2020).
Google Scholar
Luo, Y., Peng, J. & Ma, J. When causal inference meets deep learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 426–427 (2020).
Google Scholar
Degai, T. S. & Petrov, A. N. Rethinking Arctic sustainable development agenda through indigenizing UN sustainable development goals. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 28, 518–523 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schrittwieser, J. et al. Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model. Nature 588, 604–609 (2020).
Google Scholar
Silver, D. et al. Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature 550, 354–359 (2017).
Google Scholar
Silver, D. et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529, 484–489 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sun, W., Bocchini, P. & Davison, B. D. Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management. Nat. Hazards 103, 2631–2689 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sun, A. Y. Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning. Appl. Energy 278, 115660 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wu, J., Tao, R., Zhao, P., Martin, N. F. & Hovakimyan, N. Optimizing nitrogen management with deep reinforcement learning and crop simulations. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops 1711–719 (CVPRW, 2022).
Alibabaei, K., Gaspar, P. D., Assunção, E., Alirezazadeh, S. & Lima, T. M. Irrigation optimization with a deep reinforcement learning model: case study on a site in Portugal. Agric. Water Manag. 263, 107480 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, M. et al. A reinforcement learning approach to irrigation decision-making for rice using weather forecasts. Agric. Water Manag. 250, 106838 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhou, N. Intelligent control of agricultural irrigation based on reinforcement learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1601, 052031 (2020).
Google Scholar
Strnad, F. M., Barfuss, W., Donges, J. F. & Heitzig, J. Deep reinforcement learning in World-Earth system models to discover sustainable management strategies. Chaos 29, 123122 (2019). Demonstrated the first attempt to identify sustainable management strategies by combining deep reinforcement learning with Earth system models.
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Efficient reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.03822 (2020).
Mullapudi, A., Lewis, M. J., Gruden, C. L. & Kerkez, B. Deep reinforcement learning for the real time control of stormwater systems. Adv. Water Resour. 140, 103600 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tian, W., Liao, Z., Zhi, G., Zhang, Z. & Wang, X. Combined sewer overflow and flooding mitigation through a reliable real-time control based on multi-reinforcement learning and model predictive control. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2021WR030703 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gronauer, S. & Diepold, K. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 55, 895–943 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hernandez-Leal, P., Kartal, B. & Taylor, M. E. A survey and critique of multiagent deep reinforcement learning. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 33, 750–797 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, N. D. & Nahavandi, S. Deep reinforcement learning for multiagent systems: a review of challenges, solutions, and applications. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 50, 3826–3839 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hung, F. & Yang, Y. C. E. Assessing adaptive irrigation impacts on water scarcity in nonstationary environments — a multi-agent reinforcement learning approach. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR029262 (2021).
Google Scholar
Galesic, M. et al. Human social sensing is an untapped resource for computational social science. Nature 595, 214–222 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shmueli, E., Singh, V. K., Lepri, B. & Pentland, A. Sensing, understanding, and shaping social behavior. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 1, 22–34 (2014).
Google Scholar
An, L. Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: review of agent-based models. Ecol. Model. 229, 25–36 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhu, R., Hou, Z., Guo, Z. & Wan, B. Summary of “The past, present and future of the habitable Earth: development strategy of Earth science”. Chin. Sci. Bull. 66, 4485–4490 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhu, R., Zhao, G., Xiao, W., Chen, L. & Tang, Y. Origin, accretion, and reworking of continents. Rev Geophys. 59, e2019RG000689 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fan, J. et al. A high-resolution summary of Cambrian to Early Triassic marine invertebrate biodiversity. Science 367, 272 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, C. et al. The deep-time digital Earth program: data-driven discovery in geosciences. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwab027 (2021). A review of the current fundamental challenges of data-driven discoveries in the understanding of Earth’s evolution in deep time.
Google Scholar
Lewis, S. L. & Maslin, M. A. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519, 171–180 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ritchie, P. D. L., Clarke, J. J., Cox, P. M. & Huntingford, C. Overshooting tipping point thresholds in a changing climate. Nature 592, 517–523 (2021).
Google Scholar
Keys, P. W. et al. Anthropocene risk. Nat. Sustain. 2, 667–673 (2019).
Google Scholar
Otto, I. M. et al. Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2354–2365 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guo, H. et al. Measuring and evaluating SDG indicators with Big Earth Data. Sci. Bull. 67, 1792–1801 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fu, B. & Li, Y. Bidirectional coupling between the Earth and human systems is essential for modeling sustainability. Natl Sci. Rev. 3, 397–398 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317, 1513–1516 (2007).
Google Scholar
Cheng, G. & Li, X. Integrated research methods in watershed science. Sci. China Earth Sci 58, 1159–1168 (2015).
Google Scholar
DeFries, R. & Nagendra, H. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science 356, 265–270 (2017).
Google Scholar
Grundmann, R. Climate change as a wicked social problem. Nat. Geosci. 9, 562–563 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, X., Zheng, D., Feng, M. & Chen, F. Information geography: the information revolution reshapes geography. Sci. China Earth Sci 65, 379–382 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973).
Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Youtie, J., Porter, A. L. & Wang, X. How does national scientific funding support emerging interdisciplinary research: a comparison study of Big Data research in the US and China. PLoS ONE 11, e0154509 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bojer, C. S. & Meldgaard, J. P. Kaggle forecasting competitions: an overlooked learning opportunity. Int. J. Forecast. 37, 587–603 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cannon, M., Kelly, A. & Freeman, C. Implementing an Open & FAIR data sharing policy — a case study in the Earth and environmental sciences. Learned Publ. 35, 56–66 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Boosting geoscience data sharing in China. Nat. Geosci. 14, 541–542 (2021).
Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research (National Academies Press, 2018).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Miyoshi, T. et al. “Big Data assimilation” revolutionizing severe weather prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 1347–1354 (2016). Exemplified the ability of Big Data assimilation for faster weather prediction with ultrahigh spatial–temporal resolution.
Google Scholar
Fan, J., Han, F. & Liu, H. Challenges of Big Data analysis. Natl Sci. Rev. 1, 293–314 (2014).
Google Scholar
Guo, H. Big Earth Data: A new frontier in Earth and information sciences. Big Earth Data 1, 4–20 (2017).
Google Scholar
Guo, H. et al. Big Earth Data: a new challenge and opportunity for digital Earth’s development. Int. J. Digital Earth 10, 1–12 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liang, J. & Gamarra, J. G. P. The importance of sharing global forest data in a world of crises. Sci. Data 7, 424 (2020).
Google Scholar
Klopper, K. B., de Witt, R. N., Bester, E., Dicks, L. M. T. & Wolfaardt, G. M. Biofilm dynamics: linking in situ biofilm biomass and metabolic activity measurements in real-time under continuous flow conditions. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 6, 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar
Madaan, A., Sharma, V., Pahwa, P., Das, P. & Sharma, C. in Big Data Analytics (eds. Aggarwal, V. B. et al.) 47–54 (Springer, 2018).
Li, J. et al. Social media: new perspectives to improve remote sensing for emergency response. Proc. IEEE 105, 1900–1912 (2017).
Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Qi, H., Kang, C., Su, Y. & Liu, Y. An ensemble learning approach for urban land use mapping based on remote sensing imagery and social sensing data. Remote Sens. 12, 3254 (2020).
Google Scholar
