Efficient learning of accurate surrogates for simulation of complex systems

Machine Learning


  • Barros, V. et al. (Eds.) Climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability in 2014 (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

  • Wigley, P. et al. Fast machine learning online optimization of ultracold atom experiments. Science.Member of Parliament 625890 (2016).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Scheinker, A. & Gessner, S. Adaptive method for electron bunch profile prediction. Physics. Pastor Axel.beam 18102801 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Noack, M. et al. A Kriging-based approach to autonomous experiments with application to X-ray scattering. Science.Member of Parliament 911809 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Coveney, PV, Boon, JP & Succi, S. Bridging the gap at the interface of physics, chemistry, and biology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Sir. A 37420160335 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • Hu, SX et al. First-principles thermal conductivity of warm, dense deuterium plasmas in inertial confinement fusion applications. Physics. Rev.E 89043105 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Stanton, LG, Glosli, JN & Murillo, MS Multiscale molecular dynamics models of heterogeneously charged systems. Physics. Rev.X 8021044 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Brown, EW, Clark, BK, DuBois, JL, Ceperley, DM Path integral Monte Carlo simulation of a warm, dense, homogeneous electron gas. Physics. Pastor Rhett. 110146405 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, J., Marques, M., Botti, S., Marques, M. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. NPJ Computing. meter. Five83 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Liu, Y., Zhao, T., Ju, W., Shi, S. Materials discovery and design using machine learning. J. Materialomics 3159–177 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Lubbers, N. et al. Modeling and scale bridging using machine learning: Nanoconfinement effects in porous media. Science.Member of Parliament Ten13312 (2020).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Diaw, A. et al. Multiscale simulation of plasma flow using active learning. Physics. Rev.E 102023310 (2020).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Roehm, D. et al. Distributed Database Kriging for Adaptive Sampling (D2 dregs). Calculate. Physics. common. 192138–147 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Coulomb, J.-L., Kobetski, A., Caldora Costa, M., Maréchal, Y., Jonsson, U. Comparison of radial basis function approximation methods. COMPEL – Internal J. Compute. Math. Electrical. electronic.engineering twenty two616–629 (2003).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Wu, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, B., Du, K.-L. Using radial basis function networks for function approximation and classification. ISRN application. Math. year 2012324194 (2012).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

  • Park, J. & Sandberg, IW Universal approximation using radial basis function networks. neural computing. 3246–257 (1991).

    Article Google Scholar

  • McKerns, M., Hung, P. & Aivazis, M. mystic: highly constrained nonconvex optimization and UQ. PyPI http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mystic (2009).

  • McKerns, M., Strand, L., Sullivan, TJ, Fang, A. & Aivazis, M. Building a framework for predictive science.in Procedures 10th Python in Science Conference (Eds. S. van der Walt and J. Millman) 67–78 (SciPy, 2011).

  • Rastrizine, Louisiana external control system (Mir, 1974) [in Russian].

  • Rosenbrock, H. An automatic method for finding the maximum or minimum value of a function. Calculate. J. 3175–184 (1960).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

  • Dixon, L. & Zego, G. Towards overall optimization 2 (Dixon, LC, Sego, GP eds.) 1–15 (North Holland, 1978).

  • Mihalewicz, Z. Genetic algorithm + data structure = evolutionary program (Springer-Verlag, 1992).

  • Iasum, E. Survey of global optimization techniques. Master of Engineering Dissertation University of Louisville (1990).

  • Lonardoni, D., Tews, I., Gandolfi, S. & Carlson, J. Nuclear and neutron star matter from local chiral interactions. Physics. Rev.Res. 2022033 (2020).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Annala, E., Gorda, T., Kurkela, A., Nättilä, J. & Vuorinen, A. Evidence for quark matter cores in massive neutron stars. nut. Physics. 16907–910 (2020).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Baym, G. et al. From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review. Progressive member. Physics. 81056902 (2018).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

  • Adam, J. et al. Nonmonotonic energy dependence of net proton number fluctuations. Physics. Pastor Rhett. 126092301 (2021).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Busza, W., Rajagopal, K. & van der Schee, W. Heavy ion collisions: The big picture and big questions. Anne. Pastor Nucl. part. Science. 68339–376 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Braun-Munzinger, P., Koch, V., Schafer, T. & Stachel, J. Properties of hot and dense materials by relativistic heavy ion collisions. Physics.Member of Parliament 62176–126 (2016).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

  • Raaijmakers, G. et al. Constraints on the equation of state of dense matter and the properties of neutron stars obtained from the mass radius estimation of psr j0740+6620 and multimessenger observations by nicer. Astrophy. J.Lett. 918L29 (2021).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Capano, CD et al. Strict constraints on the radius of neutron stars based on multi-messenger observations and nuclear theory. nut. Astron. Four625–632 (2020).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Dietrich, T. et al. Multimessenger constraints on the equation of state and Hubble constant for neutron stars. science 3701450–1453 (2020).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

  • Reilly, TE et al psr j0030+0451 easy to understand diagram: millisecond pulsar parameter estimation. Astrophy. J. 887L21 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Miller, M.C. et al. The mass and radius of Psr j0030+0451 come from better data and effects on the properties of neutron star material. Astrophy. J. 887L24 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Dexheimer, V. Tabular equation of state for a neutron star modeled within a chiral mean-field model. Publication. Astron. Society August. https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2017.61 (2017).

  • Abbott, B. et al. Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star. Physics. Pastor Rhett. 119161101 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Typel, S., Oertel, M. & Klähn, T. CompOSE Reconciling nuclear physics and astrophysics CompStar online supernova equation of state compose.obspm.fr. Physics. part. Nucl. 46633–664 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Schneider, AS, Constantinou, C., Muccioli, B. & Prakash, M. Akmal–Pandaripande–Ravenhall equation of state for simulations of supernovae, neutron stars, and binary star mergers. Physics. Rev.C 100025803 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Raithel, CA, Özel, F. & Psaltis, D. Finite temperature extension of the equation of state for cold neutron stars. Astrophy. J. 87512 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  • glendenning, north carolina Compact stars: nuclear physics, particle physics, general relativity (Springer, 1997).

  • Hempel, M., Pagliara, G. & Schaffner-Bielich, J. Conditions for phase equilibrium in supernovae, protoneutrons, and neutron stars. Physics. Rev.D 80125014 (2009).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Fisher, T. et al. A nuclear collapse supernova explosion caused by a quark-hadron phase transition in the early stages after the bounce. Astrophy. J. Suppl. Sir. 19439 (2011).

    Article Google Scholar

  • McClellan L. & Reddy S. Quachonic matter and neutron stars. Physics. Pastor Rhett. 122122701 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Chodos, A., Jaffe, RL, Johnson, K., Thorn, CB & Weisskopf, VF A new extended model of hadrons. Physics. Rev.D 93471–3495 (1974).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

  • Schertler, K., Greiner, C., Schaffner-Bielich, J. & Thoma, MH Quark phase in neutron stars and the third family of compact stars as a feature of phase transitions. Nucl. Physics.a 677463–490 (2000).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Rocha, H. On the selection of the most appropriate radial basis functions. applied mathematics. model. 331573–1583 (2009).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Rummelhart, DE, Hinton, GA, and Williams, Joseph. Parallel distributed processing: Exploring the fine structure of cognition (DE, Rumelhart, JL, McClelland, and PDP Research Group (eds.) (MIT Press, 1987).

  • Schaback, R. & Wendland, H. Adaptive greedy techniques for approximate solutions of large-scale RBF systems. numbers.algorithm twenty four239–254 (2000).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

  • Dorvlo, AS, Jervase, JA & Al-Lawati, A. Solar radiation estimation using artificial neural networks. applied energy 71307–319 (2002).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Diaw, A., McKerns, M., Sagert, I., Stanton, LG, Murillo, MS Directed Sampling Dataset. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10908462 (2024).

  • Diaw, A., McKerns, M., Sagert, I., Stanton, LG & Murillo, MS Efficient learning of accurate surrogates for simulation of complex systems. code ocean https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.1152070.v1 (2024).



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *