Wolpaw, J. R. & McFarland, D. J. Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (51) 17849–17854. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403504101
Birbaumer, N. & Cohen, L. G. Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J. Physiol. 579 (Pt 3), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633 (2007).
Google Scholar
Yamamoto, T. Recent advancement of technologies and the transition to new concepts in epilepsy surgery. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). 60 (12), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2020-0197 (2020).
Google Scholar
Youngerman, B. E., Khan, F. A. & McKhann, G. M. Stereoelectroencephalography in epilepsy, cognitive neurophysiology, and psychiatric disease: safety, efficacy, and place in therapy. Neuropsychiatr Dis. Treat. 15, 1701–1716. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S177804 (2019).
Google Scholar
Herff, C., Krusienski, D. J. & Kubben, P. The potential of Stereotactic-EEG for Brain-Computer interfaces: current progress and future directions. Front. Neurosci. 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00123 (2020).
Vadera, S., Marathe, A. R., Gonzalez-Martinez, J. & Taylor, D. M. Stereoelectroencephalography for continuous two-dimensional cursor control in a brain-machine interface. Neurosurg. Focus. 34 (6), E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS1373 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zumsteg, D. & Wieser, H. G. Presurgical evaluation: current role of invasive EEG. Epilepsia 41 (Suppl 3), S55–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01535.x (2000).
Google Scholar
Cassidy, M. et al. Movement-related changes in synchronization in the human basal ganglia. Brain 125 (Pt 6), 1235–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf135 (2002).
Google Scholar
Miller, K. J. et al. Spectral changes in cortical surface potentials during motor movement. J. Neurosci. 27 (9), 2424–2432. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3886-06.2007 (2007).
Google Scholar
Joundi, R. A., Jenkinson, N., Brittain, J. S., Aziz, T. Z. & Brown, P. Driving oscillatory activity in the human cortex enhances motor performance. Curr. Biol. 22 (5), 403–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.024 (2012).
Google Scholar
Engelhard, B., Ozeri, N., Israel, Z., Bergman, H. & Vaadia, E. Inducing γ oscillations and precise Spike synchrony by operant conditioning via brain-machine interface. Neuron 77 (2), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.015 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jensen, M. A. et al. A motor association area in the depths of the central sulcus. Nat. Neurosci. 26 (7), 1165–1169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01346-z (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. The combination of brain-computer interfaces and artificial intelligence: applications and challenges. Annals Translational Med. 8 (11), 712–712. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.11.109 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pandarinath, C. et al. Latent factors and dynamics in motor cortex and their application to Brain–Machine interfaces. J. Neurosci. 38 (44), 9390–9401. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1669-18.2018 (2018).
Google Scholar
Churchland, M. M. et al. Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature 487 (7405), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11129 (2012).
Google Scholar
Aghagolzadeh, M. & Truccolo, W. Inference and decoding of motor cortex Low-Dimensional dynamics via latent State-Space models. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 24 (2), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2470527 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, G. et al. A preliminary study towards prosthetic hand control using human stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) signals. In: 8th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). 375–378. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2017.8008368
Johnson, G. W. et al. Localizing seizure onset zones in surgical epilepsy with neurostimulation deep learning. Published Online September 23 https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.8.JNS221321 (2022).
Nieto Ramos, A. et al. Epileptic network identification: insights from dynamic mode decomposition of sEEG data. J. Neural Eng. 21 (4), 046061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad705f (2024).
Google Scholar
Wu, X., Wellington, S., Fu, Z. & Zhang, D. Speech decoding from stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) signals using advanced deep learning methods. J. Neural Eng. 21 (3), 036055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad593a (2024).
Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. B., Kettner, R. E. & Georgopoulos, A. P. Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three- dimensional space. I. Relations between single cell discharge and direction of movement. J. Neurosci. 8 (8), 2913–2927. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-08-02913.1988 (1988).
Google Scholar
Kakei, S., Hoffman, D. S. & Strick, P. L. Muscle and movement representations in the primary motor cortex. Science 285 (5436), 2136–2139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5436.2136 (1999).
Google Scholar
Musallam, S., Corneil, B. D., Greger, B., Scherberger, H. & Andersen, R. A. Cognitive control signals for neural prosthetics. Science 305 (5681), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097938 (2004).
Google Scholar
Mulliken, G. H., Musallam, S. & Andersen, R. A. Decoding trajectories from posterior parietal cortex ensembles. J. Neurosci. 28 (48), 12913–12926. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1463-08.2008 (2008).
Google Scholar
Augustine, J. R. Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 22 (3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0173(96)00011-2 (1996).
Google Scholar
Criaud, M. & Boulinguez, P. Have we been asking the right questions when assessing response Inhibition in go/no-go tasks with fMRI? A meta-analysis and critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav Rev. 37 (1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.003 (2013).
Google Scholar
Indovina, I. et al. Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex. Science 308 (5720), 416–419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107961 (2005).
Google Scholar
Rousseau, C. et al. Direction-dependent activation of the insular cortex during vertical and horizontal hand movements. Neuroscience 325, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.039 (2016).
Google Scholar
Berret, B. et al. The inactivation principle: mathematical solutions minimizing the absolute work and biological implications for the planning of arm movements. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4 (10), e1000194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000194 (2008).
Google Scholar
White, O. et al. Altered gravity highlights central pattern generator mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 100 (5), 2819–2824. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90436.2008 (2008).
Google Scholar
Gaveau, J., Berret, B., Angelaki, D. E. & Papaxanthis, C. Direction-dependent arm kinematics reveal optimal integration of gravity cues. Elife 5, e16394. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16394 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gehrlach, D. A. et al. A whole-brain connectivity map of mouse insular cortex. Wassum KM, Livneh Y, eds. eLife. 9 e55585. (2020). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55585
Cauda, F. et al. Functional connectivity of the Insula in the resting brain. Neuroimage 55 (1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.049 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mutschler, I. et al. Functional organization of the human anterior insular cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 457 (2), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.101 (2009).
Google Scholar
Rousseau, C., Barbiero, M., Pozzo, T., Papaxanthis, C. & White, O. Actual and imagined movements reveal a dual role of the insular cortex for motor control. Cereb. Cortex. 31 (5), 2586–2594. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa376 (2021).
Google Scholar
Murphy, B. A., Miller, J. P., Gunalan, K. & Ajiboye, A. B. Contributions of subsurface cortical modulations to discrimination of executed and imagined Grasp forces through stereoelectroencephalography. PLoS ONE. 11 (3), e0150359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150359 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, G. et al. Detection of human white matter activation and evaluation of its function in movement decoding using stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG). J. Neural Eng. 18 (4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac160e (2021).
Caria, A. et al. Regulation of anterior insular cortex activity using real-time fMRI. Neuroimage 35 (3), 1238–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.018 (2007).
Google Scholar
Chang, L. J., Yarkoni, T., Khaw, M. W. & Sanfey, A. G. Decoding the role of the Insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. Cereb. Cortex. 23 (3), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs065 (2013).
Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. B. How do you feel–now? The anterior Insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10 (1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2555 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kobak, D. et al. Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data. van Rossum MC, ed. eLife. 5 e10989. (2016). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10989
Staudemeyer, R. C. & Morris, E. R. Understanding LSTM — a tutorial into long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. Published online September 12, 2019. Accessed October 23, (2024). http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.09586
Martín-Chinea, K. et al. Effect of time windows in LSTM networks for EEG-based BCIs. Cogn. Neurodyn. 17 (2), 385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-022-09832-z (2022).
Google Scholar
Averbeck, B. B. & Seo, M. The statistical neuroanatomy of frontal networks in the macaque. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4 (4), e1000050. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000050 (2008).
Google Scholar
Gogolla, N. The insular cortex. Curr. Biol. 27 (12), R580–R586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.010 (2017).
Google Scholar
Perri, R. L. et al. Awareness of perception and sensory–motor integration: erps from the anterior Insula. Brain Struct. Funct. 223 (8), 3577–3592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1709-y (2018).
Google Scholar
Karnath, H. O. & Baier, B. Right Insula for our sense of limb ownership and self-awareness of actions. Brain Struct. Funct. 214 (5–6), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0250-4 (2010).
Google Scholar
Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Ohman, A. & Dolan, R. J. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1176 (2004).
Google Scholar
Kenzie, J. M. et al. Localization of impaired kinesthetic processing Post-stroke. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00505 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kerezoudis, P. et al. The human insula encodes somatotopic representation of motor execution with an effector-specific connectomic map to primary motor cortex. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.19.653527
Tinaz, S. et al. Insula as the interface between body awareness and movement: A Neurofeedback-Guided kinesthetic motor imagery study in parkinson’s disease. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00496 (2018).
Bensmaia, S. J. & Miller, L. E. Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15 (5), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3724 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ottenhoff, M. C. et al. Executed and imagined grasping movements can be decoded from lower dimensional representation of distributed non-motor brain areas. Published Online July. 4 https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.04.498676 (2022).
Li, G. et al. Assessing differential representation of hand movements in multiple domains using stereo-electroencephalographic recordings. NeuroImage 250, 118969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118969 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kurth, F., Zilles, K., Fox, P. T., Laird, A. R. & Eickhoff, S. B. A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human Insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Struct. Funct. 214 (5–6), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0255-z (2010).
Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13 (4), 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00090-4 (2003).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Logothetis, N. K. & Liang, H. Decoding a bistable percept with integrated time–frequency representation of single-trial local field potential. J. Neural Eng. 5 (4), 433. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/008 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hammer, J. et al. Predominance of movement speed over direction in neuronal population signals of motor cortex: intracranial EEG data and A simple explanatory model. Cereb. Cortex. 26 (6), 2863–2881. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw033 (2016).
Google Scholar
Miller, K. J., Hermes, D. & Staff, N. P. The current state of electrocorticography-based brain–computer interfaces. NeuroSurg. Focus. 49 (1), E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.4.FOCUS20185 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, F. et al. Deep learning for neural decoding in motor cortex. J. Neural Eng. 19 (5), 056021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac8fb5 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hosman, T. et al. BCI decoder performance comparison of an LSTM recurrent neural network and a Kalman filter in retrospective simulation. In: 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) 1066–1071. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2019.8717140
Tortora, S., Ghidoni, S., Chisari, C., Micera, S. & Artoni, F. Deep learning-based BCI for gait decoding from EEG with LSTM recurrent neural network. J. Neural Eng. 17 (4), 046011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab9842 (2020).
Google Scholar
Perge, J. A. et al. Intra-day signal instabilities affect decoding performance in an intracortical neural interface system. J. Neural Eng. 10 (3), 036004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036004 (2013).
Google Scholar
Borra, D., Mondini, V., Magosso, E. & Müller-Putz, G. R. Decoding movement kinematics from EEG using an interpretable convolutional neural network. Comput. Biol. Med. 165, 107323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107323 (2023).
Google Scholar
Degenhart, A. D. et al. Stabilization of a brain–computer interface via the alignment of low-dimensional spaces of neural activity. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4 (7), 672–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-0542-9 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lebedev, M. A. & Nicolelis, M. A. L. Brain-Machine interfaces: from basic science to neuroprostheses and neurorehabilitation. Physiol. Rev. 97 (2), 767–837. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00027.2016 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dabagia, M., Kording, K. P. & Dyer, E. L. Comparing high-dimensional neural recordings by aligning their low-dimensional latent representations. Published online May 17, 2022. (Accessed October 23, 2024). http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08413
Milekovic, T. et al. Volitional control of single-electrode high gamma local field potentials by people with paralysis. J. Neurophysiol. 121 (4), 1428–1450. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00131.2018 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schalk, G. & Leuthardt, E. C. Brain-computer interfaces using electrocorticographic signals. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2011.2172408 (2011).
Google Scholar
Liu, D. et al. Intracranial brain-computer interface spelling using localized visual motion response. NeuroImage 258, 119363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119363 (2022).
Google Scholar
Silva, G. A. A new frontier: the convergence of nanotechnology, brain machine interfaces, and artificial intelligence. Front. Neurosci. 12, 843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00843 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shao, X. et al. Beta-band desynchronization in the human hippocampus during movement preparation in a delayed reach task. Exp. Brain Res. 243 (7), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07124-6 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sundaram, S. et al. Beta-band power modulation in the human amygdala during a delayed reach task. J. Clin. Neurosci. 135, 111151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111151 (2025).
Google Scholar
Psychtoolbox-3 – Overview. Accessed January 16. (2025). http://psychtoolbox.org/
De Cheveigné, A. & ZapLine A simple and effective method to remove power line artifacts. NeuroImage 207, 116356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116356 (2020).
Google Scholar
Williams, A. H. et al. Discovering precise temporal patterns in large-scale neural recordings through robust and interpretable time warping. Neuron 105 (2), 246–259e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.020 (2020).
Google Scholar
Paszke, A. et al. PyTorch: an Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library.
