light, AGC The Oxford Handbook of the Five-Factor Model (TA Widiger, ed.) 217–242 (Oxford University Press, 2017).
Cutler, A. & Condon, DM The deep vocabulary hypothesis: Identifying personality structure in natural language. J. Pers. social psychology. 125173–197 (2023).
Huang, LV et al. Beyond analogical reasoning and idiomatic reasoning: Towards a systematization of personality research approaches. EUR. J. Pers. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070241301633 (2025).
Hussey, I., Alsalti, T., Bosco, F., Elson, M. & Arslan, R. An unusually high Cronbach’s alpha value of .70. Practicing advanced methods. Psychol. Science. 825152459241287123 (2025).
Revelle, W., Dworak, EM & Condon, DM Exploring the person: The power of items in understanding personality structure. Perth. Individual. different. 169109905 (2021).
Mõttus, R., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R. & McCrae, RR Personality traits under the facets: Consensus validity, long-term stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. J. Pers. social psychology. 112474 (2017).
Ringwald, WR, Manuck, SB, Marsland, AL & Wright, AGC Psychometric evaluation of the Big 5 personality state scale for an intensive longitudinal study. evaluation 291301–1319 (2022).
Stachl, C. et al. Predicting personality from behavioral patterns collected with smartphones. National Academy of Procedures. Science. united states of america 11717680–17687 (2020).
Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. National Academy of Procedures. Science. united states of america 1121036–1040 (2015).
McAdams, D.P. The Psychology of Life Stories. General Psychol. 5100–122 (2001).
Eichstedt, JC et al. Closed and open vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations. Psychol. method 26398 (2021).
Park, G. et al. Automatic personality assessment using social media language. J. Pers. social psychology. 108934–952 (2015).
Kulkarni, V. et al. Human latent traits in social media language: An open vocabulary approach. PLoS ONE 13e0201703 (2018).
Rathje, S. et al. GPT is an effective tool for multilingual psychological text analysis. National Academy of Procedures. Science. united states of america 121e2308950121 (2024).
Peters, H. & Matz, SC Large-scale language models can infer social media users’ psychological tendencies. PNAS Nexus 3pgae231 (2024).
Fournier, JC et al. Separation of personality and acute psychotic symptoms in depressed patients and community samples. Clin. Psychol. Science. 7566–581 (2019).
Hur, JK, Heffner, J., Feng, GW, Joormann, J. & Rutledge, RB Verbal affect predicts change in depression symptoms. National Academy of Procedures. Science. united states of america 121e2321321121 (2024).
Shin, D., Kim, H., Lee, S., Cho, Y. & Jung, W. Detecting depression from user-generated diary text data using large-scale language models as a new approach in digital mental health screening: An instrument validation study. J.Med.Internet resolution 26e54617 (2024).
Ganesan, AV et al. use mechanistic behavior analysis to illustrate the GPT-4 depression schema. Preprint available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.13800 (2024).
Connelly, BS & Ones, DS Alternative perspectives on personality: A meta-analytic synthesis of observer accuracy and predictive validity. Psychol. Bull. 1361092–1122 (2010).
Bainbridge, TF, Ludeke, SG & Smillie, LD Evaluating the Big Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological trait scales. J. Pers. social psychology. 122749–777 (2022).
kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F. & Watson, D. Associations between “big” personality traits and anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 136768–821 (2010).
Ones, D.S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., Judge, T.A. Supporting personality assessment in organizational settings. Perth. Psychol. 60995–1027 (2007).
Roberts, BW, Kuncel, NR, Shiner, R., Caspi, A. & Goldberg, LR The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive abilities for predicting important life outcomes. perspective. Psychol. Science. 2313–345 (2007).
Digman, J.M. Personality structure: The emergence of a five-factor model. Anne. Pastor Psychol. 41417–440 (1990).
Radford, A. et al. Robust speech recognition with large-scale weak supervision. in International conference on machine learning 28492–28518 (PMLR, 2023).
Costa, PT Jr & McCrae, RR Routine personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychol. evaluation. 45–13 (1992).
Girard, JM & Cohn, JF An introduction to observational measurement. evaluation twenty three404–413 (2016).
Johnson, JA Measuring 30 aspects of the five-factor model using a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. J. Res. Perth. 5178–89 (2014).
Wright, AGC & Sims, LJ On the trait structure of personality disorders: A combined analysis of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Perth. hindrance. Deals with theoretical research. 543–54 (2014).
Google Scholar
JW Pennebaker, RJ Booth, RL Boyd & Francis of Main. Language exploration and vocabulary: LIWC2015 (Pennebaker Conglomerate, 2015).
Schwartz, HA et al. Personality, gender, and age in social media language: An open vocabulary approach. PLoS ONE 8e73791 (2013).
Fleeson, W. & Gallagher, P. The meaning of the big five for the distribution of trait expression in behavior: 15 experience sampling studies and a meta-analysis. J. Pers. social psychology. 971097–1114 (2009).
Samuel, DB & Widiger, TA Convergence of narcissism is measured in terms of general personality functioning. evaluation 15364–374 (2008).
Wright, AGC et al. Individual-focused personality assessment: Modeling general, shared, and person-specific processes in personality and psychopathology. Psychol. evaluation. 32502–515 (2019).
Beck, ED & Jackson, JJ Idiomatic traits: A return to an allportian approach to personality. car. Director Psychol. Science. 29301–308 (2020).
Nielsen, SR & Wright, AGC The construct of identity dysfunction in self-report measures. J. Pers. evaluation. 10712–27 (2025).
Ashton, MC & Lee, K. Self and observer reports of personality. Anne. Pastor Psychol. 76771–795 (2025).
Vasile, S. What can we know about people? Self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. J. Pers. social psychology. 98281–300 (2010).
Wright, A.G.C., Pincus, A. & Hopwood, C.J. Contemporary integrative interpersonal theory: Integrating structure, dynamics, time scales, and levels of analysis. J. Psychopathol. Clin. Science. 132263–276 (2023).
Conmy, A., Mavor-Parker, A., Lynch, A., Heimersheim, S. & Garriga-Alonso, A. Towards automatic circuit discovery for mechanistic interpretability. Advanced neural information processes. system. 3616318–16352 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rai, D., Zhou, Y., Feng, S., Saparov, A. & Yao, Z. A practical review of mechanistic interpretability of transformer-based language models. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02646 (2024).
Fraser. Reinforcement learning for privacy: Training local models on the anonymization frontier. https://www.freysa.ai/blueprint/reinforcement-learning-for-privacy-training-local-models-on-the-anonymization-frontier (2025).
Ringwald, W.R. et al. The structure of pathological personality traits through the lens of the CAT-PD model. evaluation 302276–2295 (2023).
Soldz, S., Budman, S., Demby, A. & Merry, J. A short form of the Cyclic Scale Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. evaluation 253–63 (1995).
First, MB, Williams, JB, Karg, RS & Spitzer, RL. SCID-5-CV Structured Clinical Interview User Guide for DSM-5® Disorders: Clinical Edition (American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., 2016).
Pfohl, B., Blum, N., Zimmerman, M. DSM-IV Personality Structured Interview: SIDP-IV (American Psychiatric Press, 1997).
Woods, WC et al. Psychometric evaluation of a visual interpersonal analog scale. Psychol. evaluation. 35311–324 (2023).
