Chen, Z. et al. Machine learning on neutron and x-ray scattering and spectroscopies. Chem. Phys. Rev. 2, 031301 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kochkov, D. Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101784118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chitturi, S. Capturing dynamical correlations using implicit neural representations. Nat. Commun. 14, 5852 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620, 47–60 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, J. & Lopez, S. A. Machine learning accelerated photodynamics simulations. Chem. Phys. Rev. 4, 031309 (2023).
Google Scholar
Plumley, R. On ultrafast X-ray scattering methods for magnetism. Adv. Phys. X 9, 2423935 (2024).
Li, H. Machine learning-accelerated discovery of heat-resistant polysulfates for electrostatic energy storage. Nat. Energy 10, 90–100 (2025).
Google Scholar
Yamawaki, M., Ohnishi, M., Ju, S. & Shiomi, J. Multifunctional structural design of graphene thermoelectrics by Bayesian optimization. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4192 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lookman, T., Balachandran, P. V., Xue, D. & Yuan, R. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 21 (2019).
Google Scholar
McMichael, R. D., Dushenko, S. & Blakley, S. M. Sequential Bayesian experiment design for adaptive Ramsey sequence measurements. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 144401 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ament, S. Autonomous materials synthesis via hierarchical active learning of nonequilibrium phase diagrams. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg4930 (2021).
Google Scholar
MacLeod, B. P. A self-driving laboratory advances the pareto front for material properties. Nat. Commun. 13, 995 (2022).
Google Scholar
Szymanski, N. J. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials. Nature 624, 86–91 (2023).
Google Scholar
Teixeira Parente, M. Active learning-assisted neutron spectroscopy with log-gaussian processes. Nat. Commun. 14, 2246 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. Bayesian experimental design and parameter estimation for ultrafast spin dynamics. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 4, 045056 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. Implicit neural representations for experimental steering of advanced experiments. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 6, 102333 (2025).
Google Scholar
Chu, T., Estrada, J. B. & Bryngelson, S. H. Bayesian optimal design accelerates discovery of soft material properties from bubble dynamics. Comput. Mech. 76, 431–447 (2025).
Google Scholar
Nair, A. S. & Foppa, L. A critical examination of active learning workflows in materials science. Digit. Discov. https://doi.org/10.1039/D6DD00081A (2026).
Google Scholar
Karpovich, C., Pan, E. & Olivetti, E. A. Deep reinforcement learning for inverse inorganic materials design. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 287 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yotsumoto, Y., Nakajima, Y., Takamoto, R., Takeichi, Y. & Ono, K. Autonomous robotic experimentation system for powder X-ray diffraction. Digit. Discov. 3, 2523–2532 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bloor, M. Control-informed reinforcement learning for chemical processes. Ind. Eng Chem. Res. 64, 4966–4978 (2025).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. M. & Truong, T. N. Inverse design using goal-conditioned reinforcement learning for organic semiconductor materials from benzene and thiophene-based polycyclic aromatic compounds. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 372 (2025).
Google Scholar
Masina, S. Automated high-throughput high-resolution X-ray diffraction capabilities at SSRL BL 2-1. Struct. Dyn. 12, A243 (2025).
Google Scholar
Crain, C. A. et al. Design of a robot-automated flat plate/reflection geometry X-ray diffraction setup for accelerated materials discovery and structural screening. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 96, 023904 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. A comprehensive survey of scientific large language models and their applications in scientific discovery. In Proc. 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Al-Onaizan, Y. et al.) 8783–8817 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Miami, 2024); https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.498
Ghafarollahi, A. & Buehler, M. J. ProtAgents: protein discovery via large language model multi-agent collaborations combining physics and machine learning. Digit. Discov. 3, 1389–1409 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lei, G., Docherty, R. & Cooper, S. J. Materials science in the era of large language models: a perspective. Digit. Discov. 3, 1257–1272 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schmidgall, S. et al. Agent laboratory: using LLM agents as research assistants. in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 (eds Christodoulopoulos, C., Chakraborty, T., Rose, C. & Peng, V.) 5977–6043 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Suzhou, China, 2025); https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.320
Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B. & Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624, 570–578 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dai, T. Autonomous mobile robots for exploratory synthetic chemistry. Nature 635, 890–897 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fushimi, K. Development of the autonomous lab system to support biotechnology research. Sci. Rep. 15, 6648 (2025).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. Zero-shot autonomous microscopy for scalable and intelligent characterization of 2D materials. ACS Nano 19, 35493–35502 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. A multimodal robotic platform for multi-element electrocatalyst discovery. Nature 647, 390–396 (2025).
Google Scholar
Qu, Y. et al. CRISPR-GPT for agentic automation of gene-editing experiments. Nat. Biomed. Eng 10, 245–258 (2026).
Google Scholar
Song, T. A multiagent-driven robotic ai chemist enabling autonomous chemical research on demand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 12534–12545 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tom, G. Self-driving laboratories for chemistry and materials science. Chem. Rev. 124, 9633–9732 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ramos, M. C., Collison, C. J. & White, A. D. A review of large language models and autonomous agents in chemistry. Chem. Sci. 16, 2514–2572 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kim, M. J. et al. OpenVLA: an open-source vision-language-action model. In Proc. 8th Conference on Robot Learning (eds Agrawal, P. et al.) 2679–2713 (PMLR, 2025); https://proceedings.mlr.press/v270/kim25c.html
Ruan, Y. An automatic end-to-end chemical synthesis development platform powered by large language models. Nat. Commun. 15, 10160 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mon-Williams, R., Li, G., Long, R., Du, W. & Lucas, C. G. Embodied large language models enable robots to complete complex tasks in unpredictable environments. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 592–601 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wei, J. et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 24824–24837 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yao, S. et al. Tree of thoughts: deliberate problem solving with large language models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 11809–11822 (2023).
Google Scholar
Singh, I. et al. ProgPrompt: generating situated robot task plans using large language models. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10161317
Yao, S. et al. ReAct: synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The 11th International Conference on Learning Representations (2023); https://openreview.net/forum?id=WE_vluYUL-X
Minaee, S. et al. Large language models: a survey. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06196 (2024).
Hou, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, S. & Wang, H. Model context protocol (MCP): landscape, security threats, and future research directions. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng Methodol. https://doi.org/10.1145/3796519 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ma, Y. et al. SciAgent: tool-augmented language models for scientific reasoning. In Proc. 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Al-Onaizan, Y. et al.) 15701–15736 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024); https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.880
Wu, J., Zhu, J., Liu, Y., Xu, M. & Jin, Y. Agentic reasoning: a streamlined framework for enhancing LLM reasoning with agentic tools. In Proc. 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vol. 1 (eds Che, W. et al.) 28489–28503 (2025); https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1383
Corrao, A. A. et al. A modular framework for collaborative human-AI, multi-modal and multi-beamline synchrotron experiments. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22959 (2025).
Ding, L. & Do, C. SasAgent: multi-agent AI system for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Cryst. 59, 578–585 (2026).
Google Scholar
Yao, L. et al. Operationalizing serendipity: multi-agent AI workflows for enhanced materials characterization with theory-in-the-loop. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06569 (2025).
Hellert, T., Bertwistle, D., Leemann, S. C., Sulc, A. & Venturini, M. Agentic artificial intelligence for multistage physics experiments at a large-scale user facility particle accelerator. Phys. Rev. Res. 8, L012017 (2026).
Google Scholar
Vriza, A., Prince, M. H., Zhou, T., Chan, H. & Cherukara, M. J. Operating advanced scientific instruments with AI agents that learn on the job. npj Comput. Mater. 12, 160 (2026).
Google Scholar
Kotani, A. & Shin, S. Resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectra for electrons in solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 203 (2001).
Google Scholar
Ihee, H., Wulff, M., Kim, J. & Adachi, S. I. Ultrafast X-ray scattering: structural dynamics from diatomic to protein molecules. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 29, 453–520 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bostedt, C. et al. Linac coherent light source: the first five years. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015007 (2016).
Google Scholar
Meisburger, S. P., Thomas, W. C., Watkins, M. B. & Ando, N. X-ray scattering studies of protein structural dynamics. Chem. Rev. 117, 7615–7672 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mühlbauer, S. et al. Magnetic small-angle neutron scattering. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015004 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. N. Trace doping of multiple elements enables stable battery cycling of LiCoO2 at 4.6 V. Nat. Energy 4, 594–603 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cao, C. Emerging X-ray imaging technologies for energy materials. Mater. Today 34, 132–147 (2020).
Google Scholar
Allen, A. J. Selected advances in small-angle scattering and applications they serve in manufacturing, energy and climate change. J. Appl. Cryst. 56, 787–800 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hamdalla, T. A. Synchrotron-based operando X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy study of LiCo0.5Fe0.5PO4 mixed d-metal olivine cathode. Sci. Rep. 13, 2169 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Oang, K. Y., Kim, D. & Ihee, H. A comparative review of time-resolved X-ray and electron scattering to probe structural dynamics. Struct. Dyn. 11, 031301 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sun, T. et al. Pinpointing chemomechanical origins of Na cathode degradation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 21375–21384 (2025).
Google Scholar
Galayda, J. N. et al. The LCLS-II: a high power upgrade to the LCLS. In 9th International Particle Accelerator Conference (eds Koscielniak, S. et al.) 18–23 (JACoW, 2018); https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2018-MOYGB2
Zhang, H. The linac coherent light source ii photoinjector laser infrastructure. High Power Laser Sci. Eng 12, e51 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kerby, J. The advanced photon source upgrade: a brighter future for X-ray science. Synchrotron Radiat. News 36, 26–27 (2023).
Google Scholar
Harrington, G. F. & Santiso, J. Back-to-basics tutorial: X-ray diffraction of thin films. J. Electroceram. 47, 141–163 (2021).
Google Scholar
You, H. Angle calculations for a ‘4S + 2D’ six-circle diffractometer. Appl. Crystallogr. 32, 614–623 (1999).
Google Scholar
Certified scientific software SPEC—X-ray diffraction software. Certified Scientific Software https://www.certif.com/content/spec/ (2017).
Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 1877–1901 (2020).
Dong, Q. et al. A survey on in-context learning. In Proc. 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Al-Onaizan, Y. et al.) 1107–1128 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024); https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64
Weihrich, R., Anusca, I. & Zabel, M. Half-antiperovskites: structure and type-antitype relations of shandites M3/2AS (M: Co, Ni; A: In, Sn). Zeitschrift Fur Anorganische Und Allgemeine Chemie 631, 1463–1470 (2005).
Google Scholar
Kanagaraj, M., Ning, J. & He, L. Topological Co3Sn2S2 magnetic weyl semimetal: from fundamental understanding to diverse fields of study. Rev. Phys. 8, 100072 (2022).
Google Scholar
Horton, M. K. et al. Accelerated data-driven materials science with the Materials Project. Nat. Mater. 24, 1522–1532 (2025).
Google Scholar
Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
Google Scholar
Introducing Claude 4. Anthropic https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-4 (2025).
Comanici, G. et al. Gemini 2.5: pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06261 (2025).
Vaqueiro, P. & Sobany, G. G. A powder neutron diffraction study of the metallic ferromagnet Co3Sn2S2. Solid State Sci. 11, 513–518 (2009).
Google Scholar
Gražulis, S. Crystallography open database (COD): an open-access collection of crystal structures and platform for world-wide collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D420–D427 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lewis, P. et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 9459–9474 (2020).
Luo, H. et al. Beyond context limits: subconscious threads for long-horizon reasoning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16784 (2025).
Granade, C. E., Ferrie, C., Wiebe, N. & Cory, D. G. Robust online Hamiltonian learning. New J. Phys. 14, 103013 (2012).
Google Scholar
Huan, X. & Marzouk, Y. M. Simulation-based optimal Bayesian experimental design for nonlinear systems. J. Comput. Phys. 232, 288–317 (2013).
Google Scholar
McMichael, R. D. & Blakley, S. M. Simplified algorithms for adaptive experiment design in parameter estimation. Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 054001 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ong, S. P. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source Python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).
Google Scholar
De Graef, M. & McHenry, M. E. Structure of Materials: An Introduction to Crystallography, Diffraction and Symmetry (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051637
Introducing the Model Context Protocol. Anthropic https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-context-protocol (2024).
Avila, D. et al. LibreChat. GitHub https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat (2025).
Chen, Z. et al. Data for an agentic artificially intelligent X-ray scientist. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20017861 (2026).
Chen, Z. et al. Code for an agentic artificially intelligent X-ray scientist. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20017991 (2026).
