Whittingham, M. S. Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem. Rev. 104, 4271–4302 (2004).
Google Scholar
Ritchie, A. & Howard, W. Recent developments and likely advances in lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 162, 809–812 (2006).
Google Scholar
Whittingham, M. S. Ultimate limits to intercalation reactions for lithium batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11414–11443 (2014).
Google Scholar
Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).
Google Scholar
Guo, Y., Li, H. & Zhai, T. Reviving lithium-metal anodes for next-generation high-energy batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700007 (2017).
Lin, D., Liu, Y. & Cui, Y. Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 194–206 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C.-Z. & Zhang, Q. Toward safe lithium metal anode in rechargeable batteries: a review. Chem. Rev. 117, 10403–10473 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liu, D.-H. et al. Developing high safety Li-metal anodes for future high-energy Li-metal batteries: strategies and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 5407–5445 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chandrashekar, S. et al. 7Li MRI of Li batteries reveals location of microstructural lithium. Nat. Mater. 11, 311–315 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, R. et al. In situ NMR observation of the formation of metallic lithium microstructures in lithium batteries. Nat. Mater. 9, 504–510 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wood, K. N. et al. Dendrites and pits: untangling the complex behavior of lithium metal anodes through operando video microscopy. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 790–801 (2016).
Google Scholar
Tripathi, A. M., Su, W.-N. & Hwang, B. J. In situ analytical techniques for battery interface analysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 736–851 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. Revealing principles for design of lean-electrolyte lithium metal anode via in situ spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2012–2022 (2020).
Google Scholar
Aurbach, D. & Cohen, Y. The Application of Atomic Force Microscopy for the Study of Li deposition processes. J. Electrochem Soc. 143, 3525 (1996).
Google Scholar
Wu, Q., McDowell, M. T. & Qi, Y. Effect of the electric double layer (EDL) in multicomponent electrolyte reduction and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation in lithium batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 2473–2484 (2023).
Google Scholar
Reed, S. K., Lanning, O. J. & Madden, P. A. Electrochemical interface between an ionic liquid and a model metallic electrode. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 084704 (2007).
Google Scholar
Siepmann, J. I. & Sprik, M. Influence of surface topology and electrostatic potential on water/electrode systems. J. Chem. Phys. 102, 511–524 (1995).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Yang, Y., Olmsted, D. L., Asta, M. & Laird, B. B. Evaluation of the constant potential method in simulating electric double-layer capacitors. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 184102 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mortier, W. J., Ghosh, S. K. & Shankar, S. Electronegativity-equalization method for the calculation of atomic charges in molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 4315–4320 (1986).
Rappe, A. K. & Goddard, W. A. Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 95, 3358–3363 (1991).
Senftle, T. P. et al. The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions. npj Comput Mater. 2, 15011 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liang, T. et al. Reactive potentials for advanced atomistic simulations. Annu Rev. Mater. Res. 43, 109–129 (2013).
Google Scholar
Aktulga, H. M., Pandit, S. A., van Duin, A. C. T. & Grama, A. Y. Reactive molecular dynamics: numerical methods and algorithmic techniques. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34, C1–C23 (2012).
Google Scholar
Onofrio, N. & Strachan, A. Voltage equilibration for reactive atomistic simulations of electrochemical processes. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 054109 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yang, P.-Y. & Pao, C.-W. Molecular simulations of the microstructure evolution of solid electrolyte interphase during cyclic charging/discharging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 5017–5027 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lee, H. G., Kim, S. Y. & Lee, J. S. Dynamic observation of dendrite growth on lithium metal anode during battery charging/discharging cycles. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 103 (2022).
Google Scholar
Goodpaster, J. D., Bell, A. T. & Head-Gordon, M. Identification of possible pathways for C–C bond formation during electrochemical reduction of CO2: new theoretical insights from an improved electrochemical model. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1471–1477 (2016).
Google Scholar
Melander, M. M., Kuisma, M. J., Christensen, T. E. K. & Honkala, K. Grand-canonical approach to density functional theory of electrocatalytic systems: Thermodynamics of solid-liquid interfaces at constant ion and electrode potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 041706 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sundararaman, R., Goddard, W. A. & Arias, I. I. I. TA. Grand canonical electronic density-functional theory: algorithms and applications to electrochemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 114104 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xia, Z. & Xiao, H. Grand canonical ensemble modeling of electrochemical interfaces made simple. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 5168–5175 (2023).
Google Scholar
Unke, O. T. et al. Machine learning force fields. Chem. Rev. 121, 10142–10186 (2021).
Google Scholar
Behler, J. Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials. Chem. Rev. 121, 10037–10072 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kang, P.-L., Shang, C. & Liu, Z.-P. Large-scale atomic simulation via machine learning potentials constructed by global potential energy surface exploration. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 2119–2129 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hu, T. et al. Impact of amorphous LiF coating layers on cathode-electrolyte interfaces in solid-state batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2402993 (2024).
Hu, T., Dai, F.-z, Zhou, G., Wang, X. & Xu, S. Unraveling the dynamic correlations between transition metal migration and the oxygen dimer formation in the highly delithiated LixCoO2 cathode. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 3677–3684 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hu, T. et al. Impact of the local environment on Li ion transport in inorganic components of solid electrolyte interphases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 1327–1333 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fu, F. et al. Unraveling the atomic-scale mechanism of phase transformations and structural evolutions during (de)lithiation in Si anodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2303936 (2023).
Deng, B. et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1031–1041 (2023).
Yao, N., Chen, X., Fu, Z.-H. & Zhang, Q. Applying classical, ab initio, and machine-learning molecular dynamics simulations to the liquid electrolyte for rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 122, 10970–11021 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhou J, Fu Y, Liu L, Liu C. Constant-Potential Machine Learning Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal Potential-Regulated Cu Cluster Formation on MoS2. J Phys Chem C 129, 6414–6422 (2025).
Chen, X. et al. Atomistic learning in the electronically grand-canonical ensemble. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 73 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ko, T. W., Finkler, J. A., Goedecker, S. & Behler, J. General-purpose machine learning potentials capturing nonlocal charge transfer. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 808–817 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ghasemi, S. A., Hofstetter, A., Saha, S. & Goedecker, S. Interatomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network. Phys. Rev. B 92, 045131 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ko, T. W., Finkler, J. A., Goedecker, S. & Behler, J. A fourth-generation high-dimensional neural network potential with accurate electrostatics including non-local charge transfer. Nat. Commun. 12, 398 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gong S, et al. A predictive machine learning force-field framework for liquid electrolyte development. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 543–552 (2025).
Unke, O. T. et al. SpookyNet: learning force fields with electronic degrees of freedom and nonlocal effects. Nat. Commun. 12, 7273 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kabylda A. et al. Molecular simulations with a pretrained neural network and universal pairwise force fields. ChemRxiv https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-bdfr0 (2025).
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).
Google Scholar
Ballenegger, V., Arnold, A. & Cerdà, J. J. Simulations of non-neutral slab systems with long-range electrostatic interactions in two-dimensional periodic boundary conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 094107 (2009).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Han, J., Wang, H. & Car, R. Deep potential molecular dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 143001 (2018).
Google Scholar
Choyal, V., Sagar, N. & Sai Gautam, G. Constructing and evaluating machine-learned interatomic potentials for Li-based disordered rocksalts. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 4844–4856 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhou, R., Luo, K., Martin, S. W. & An, Q. Insights into lithium sulfide glass electrolyte structures and ionic conductivity via machine learning force field simulations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 18874–18887 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, P., Shang, C., Liu, Z., Yang, J.-H. & Gong, X.-G. Origin of performance degradation in high-delithiation LixCoO2: insights from direct atomic simulations using global neural network potentials. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 5370–5379 (2023).
Holekevi Chandrappa, M. L., Qi, J., Chen, C., Banerjee, S. & Ong, S. P. Thermodynamics and kinetics of the cathode–electrolyte interface in all-solid-state Li–S batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18009–18022 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hirshfeld, F. L. Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities. Theor. Chim. Acta 44, 129–138 (1977).
Marenich, A. V., Jerome, S. V., Cramer, C. J. & Truhlar, D. G. Charge model 5: an extension of Hirshfeld population analysis for the accurate description of molecular interactions in gaseous and condensed phases. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 527–541 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sanville, E., Kenny, S. D., Smith, R. & Henkelman, G. Improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. J. Comput. Chem. 28, 899–908 (2007).
Google Scholar
Tang, W., Sanville, E. & Henkelman, G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 084204 (2009).
Google Scholar
Lu, T. A comprehensive electron wavefunction analysis toolbox for chemists, Multiwfn. J. Chem. Phys. 161, 082503 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).
Google Scholar
Choudhuri, I. & Truhlar, D. G. Calculating and characterizing the charge distributions in solids. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 5884–5892 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zeng, J. et al. ReacNetGenerator: an automatic reaction network generator for reactive molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 683–691 (2020).
Google Scholar
Leung, K. Electronic Structure Modeling of Electrochemical Reactions at Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces in Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 1539–1547 (2013).
Wu, H., Jia, H., Wang, C., Zhang, J.-G. & Xu, W. Recent progress in understanding solid electrolyte interphase on lithium metal anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003092 (2021).
Google Scholar
Onuki, M. et al. Identification of the Source of Evolved Gas in Li-ion batteries using #2#1 -labeled solvents. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, A794 (2008).
Wu, J., Ihsan-Ul-Haq, M., Chen, Y. & Kim, J.-K. Understanding solid electrolyte interphases: Advanced characterization techniques and theoretical simulations. Nano Energy 89, 106489 (2021).
Takenaka, N., Bouibes, A., Yamada, Y., Nagaoka, M. & Yamada, A. Frontiers in theoretical analysis of solid electrolyte interphase formation mechanism. Adv. Mater. 33, 2100574 (2021).
Wang, A., Kadam, S., Li, H., Shi, S. & Qi, Y. Review on modeling of the anode solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) for lithium-ion batteries. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 15 (2018).
Google Scholar
Xu, K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-Ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11503–11618 (2014).
Google Scholar
Peled, E. & Menkin, S. Review—SEI: past, present and future. J. Electrochem Soc. 164, A1703–A1719 (2017).
Verma, P., Maire, P. & Novák, P. A review of the features and analyses of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 55, 6332–6341 (2010).
Liang, L. et al. Surface/Interface structure degradation of Ni-rich layered oxide cathodes toward lithium-ion batteries: fundamental mechanisms and remedying strategies. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7, 1901749 (2020).
Tan Y.-H. et al. Inorganic composition modulation of solid electrolyte interphase for fast charging lithium metal batteries. Adv. Mater. 36, 2404815 (2024).
Gubler, M., Finkler, J. A., Schäfer, M. R., Behler, J. & Goedecker, S. Accelerating fourth-generation machine learning potentials using quasi-linear scaling particle mesh charge equilibration. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 7264–7271 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. DMFF: an open-source automatic differentiable platform for molecular force field development and molecular dynamics simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 5897–5909 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, P. et al. Large-scale ab initio simulations based on systematically improvable atomic basis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 112, 503–517 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chen, M., Guo, G. C. & He, L. Systematically improvable optimized atomic basis sets for ab initio calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 445501 (2010).
Google Scholar
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Google Scholar
Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).
Google Scholar
Lin, P., Ren, X. & He, L. Strategy for constructing compact numerical atomic orbital basis sets by incorporating the gradients of reference wavefunctions. Phys. Rev. B 103, 235131 (2021).
Google Scholar
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hjorth Larsen, A. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).
Google Scholar
Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).
Google Scholar
Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).
Google Scholar
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Strain fluctuations and elastic constants. J. Chem. Phys. 76, 2662–2666 (1982).
Google Scholar
Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
Google Scholar
Martínez, L., Andrade, R., Birgin, E. G. & Martínez, J. M. PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2157–2164 (2009).
Google Scholar
Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS—a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
Zhang, Y. et al. DP-GEN: a concurrent learning platform for the generation of reliable deep learning based potential energy models. Comput. Phys. Commun. 253, 107206 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Zhang, L. & Han, J. E W. DeePMD-kit: a deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 228, 178–184 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zeng, J. et al. DeePMD-kit v2: a software package for deep potential models. J. Chem. Phys. 159, 054801 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kingma D. P., Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1412.6980 (2014).
Zeng, J., Cao, L., Xu, M., Zhu, T. & Zhang, J. Z. H. Complex reaction processes in combustion unraveled by neural network-based molecular dynamics simulation. Nat. Commun. 11, 5713 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Wang, H. & Zhu, T. Exploring the chemical space of linear alkane pyrolysis via deep potential GENerator. Energy Fuels 35, 762–769 (2021).
Dajnowicz, S. et al. High-dimensional neural network potential for liquid electrolyte simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 126, 6271–6280 (2022).
Google Scholar
Magdău, I.-B. et al. Machine learning force fields for molecular liquids: ethylene carbonate/ethyl methyl carbonate binary solvent. npj Comput Mater. 9, 146 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hu T. et al. Source Dada for “Observation of dendrite formation at Li metal-electrolyte interface by a machine- learning enhanced constant potential framework”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15778962 (2025).
Hu T. et al. Dataset for “Observation of dendrite formation at Li metal-electrolyte interface by a machine- learning enhanced constant potential framework”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15776510 (2025).
Hu T. et al. Software for “Observation of dendrite formation at Li metal-electrolyte interface by a machine- learning enhanced constant potential framework”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15788838 (2025).
Hu T. et al. Models for “Observation of dendrite formation at Li metal-electrolyte interface by a machine- learning enhanced constant potential framework”.). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15778975 (2025).
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).
Google Scholar
