Penic, RJ, Vlasic, T., Huber, RG, Wan, Y. & Sikic, M. RiNALMo: A general-purpose RNA language model can successfully generalize structure prediction tasks. nut. common. 165671 (2025).
Akiyama, M. & Sakebara, Y. Informative RNA base embeddings for RNA structure alignment and clustering by deep representation learning. NAR Genome. Bioinform. 44 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lin, Z. et al. Predicting the evolutionary scale of atomic-level protein structures using language models. science 3791123–1130 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gong, T. & Bu, D. Language models enable zero-shot prediction of RNA secondary structure, including pseudoknots. BioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.27.577533v1 (2024).
De Laharte, AA et al. Diverse databases and machine learning models to narrow the generalization gap in RNA structure prediction. Science. advanced. 12eadz4967 (2024).
Wang, N. et al. Versatile RNA language modeling with motif-aware pretraining and type-guided fine-tuning. nut. Mach. intelligence. 6548–557 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yu, H., et al. Interpretable RNA-based models for exploring functional RNA motifs in plants. nut. Mach. intelligence. 61616–1625 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zou, S. et al. Large-scale infrastructure models for predicting RNA function and structure. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625345 (2024).
Kazuya Sato, Masato Akiyama, Yuko Sakakibara RNA secondary structure prediction using deep learning with thermodynamic integration. nut. common. 12941 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fu, L. et al. UFold: Fast and accurate RNA secondary structure prediction using deep learning. Nucl.Acid resolution. 50e14–e14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shin, J. et al. Improving prediction of RNA secondary structure and tertiary base pairing using evolutionary profiles, mutational coupling, and two-dimensional transfer learning. bioinformatics 372589–2600 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sato, K. & Hamada, M. Recent trends in RNA informatics: An overview of machine learning and deep learning for RNA secondary structure prediction and RNA drug discovery. Easy. Bioinform. twenty fourbbad186 (2023).
Google Scholar
Da Silva, PT et al. Nucleotide-dependent analysis of DNA language models reveals functional elements of the genome. nut. Genet. 572589–2602 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rivas, E., Clements, J. & Eddy, SR Statistical tests of conserved RNA structure show a lack of evidence for the structure of lncRNAs. nut. method 1445–48 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. Three models for describing language. IRE transformer. information theory 2113–124 (1956).
Google Scholar
Dowell, RD & Eddy, SR Evaluation of several lightweight probabilistic context-free grammars for RNA secondary structure prediction. BMC Bioinform. 571 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bradbury, J. et al. JAX: Composable transformation of Python+NumPy programs. http://github.com/google/jax (2018).
Rabiner, LR A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. procedure IEEE 77257–286 (1989).
Google Scholar
Eddy, SR and Durbin, R. RNA-seq analysis using covariance models. Nucl.Acid resolution. twenty two2079–2088 (1994).
Google Scholar
Rivas, E., Lang, R. & Eddy, SR A suite of complex probabilistic models for RNA secondary structure prediction, including the nearest neighbor model. RNA 18193–212 (2012).
Google Scholar
Knudsen, B. & Hein, J. Pfold: RNA secondary structure prediction using probabilistic context-free grammars. Nucl.Acid resolution. 313423–3428 (2003).
Google Scholar
Justyna, M., Antczak, M., Szachniuk, M. Machine learning for RNA 2D structure prediction benchmarked on experimental data. Easy. Bioinform. twenty four1–9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lari, K. & Young, SJ Estimating probabilistic context-free grammars using an inside-outside algorithm. Calculate. speech lang. 435–56 (1990).
Google Scholar
Lari, K. & Young, SJ Applications of probabilistic context-free grammars using inside-outside algorithms. Calculate. speech lang. 5237–257 (1991).
Google Scholar
McCaskill, JS Equilibrium partition functions and base pairing probabilities of RNA secondary structure. biopolymer 291105–19 (1990).
Google Scholar
Zuker, M. Mfold Web Server for Hydrogenation Prediction of Nucleic Acid Folding. Nucleic acid research institute 313406–3415 (2003).
Google Scholar
Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithm Mol. Biol. 61748–7188 (2011).
Google Scholar
Reuter, JS & Mathews, DH RNA Structure: Software for the prediction and analysis of RNA secondary structure. BMC Bioinform. 1110 (2010).
Google Scholar
Rivas, E. Four components of single-sequence RNA secondary structure prediction: A unifying perspective. RNA Biol. 101185–1196 (2013).
Google Scholar
Eisner, J. The inside-outside and forward-backward algorithms are just backprops (tutorial paper). In the process. First Workshop on Structured Prediction for NLP (edited by Balsubramanian, VN et al.) 1–17 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016).
Matthies, MC, Krueger, R., Torda, AE & Ward, M. Differentiable partition function calculations for RNA. NAR 52e14 (2024).
Google Scholar
Krueger, RK & Ward, M. JAX-RNAfold: Scalable differentiable folding. bioinformatics 41btaf203 (2025).
Krueger, RK, Aviran, S., Mathews, DH, Zuber, J. & Ward, M. Differentiable folding for nearest neighbor model optimization. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09085 (2025).
Brown, JW Ribonuclease P Database. Nucl.Acid resolution. 27314 (1999).
Google Scholar
Szikszai, M., Wise, M., Datta, A., Ward, M. & Mathews, DH Deep learning models for RNA secondary structure prediction (probably) do not generalize across families. bioinformatics 383892–3899 (2022).
Google Scholar
Szikszai, M. et al. Deep learning for RNA secondary structure determination: assessing generalizability and expanding the scope of traditional methods. RNA 32428–442 (2026).
Cocco, S., Monasson, R. & Weigt, M. From principal components of protein coevolution to direct conjugation analysis: Structure prediction requires low eigenvalue modes. PLoS Computing. Biol. 9e1003176 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gao, W., Yang, A. & Rivas, E. 13 questionable methods for detecting conserved structural RNAs. IUBMB Life 75471–492 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rivas, E. RNA structure prediction using positive and negative evolutionary information. PLOS Computing. Biol. 16e1008387 (2020).
Google Scholar
Karan, A. & Rivas, E. All-at-once RNA folding with evolution-informed 3D motif prediction. nut. method twenty two2094–2106 (2025).
Google Scholar
Danay, P. et al. bpRNA: Large-scale automatic annotation and analysis of RNA secondary structure. NNucleic acid resolution 465381–5394 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sloma, MF & Mathews, DH Precise calculation of loop formation probabilities identifies folding motifs in RNA secondary structure. RNA twenty two1808–1818 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wheeler, TJ & Eddy, SR nmmer: DNA homology search using profile HMMs. bioinformatics 292487–2489 (2013).
Google Scholar
