Duval, A. et al. A hitchhiker’s guide to geometric GNNs for 3D atomic systems. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07511 (2023).
Bihani, V. et al. Egraffbench: Evaluating equivariant graph neural network force fields for atomistic simulations. digit. Discob. 3759–768 (2024).
Bhattatia, I. et al. Basic model of atomic materials chemistry. J. Chem. Physics. 163184110 (2025).
Musaelian, A. et al. Learning locally equivariant representations for large-scale nuclear science. nut. common. 14579 (2023).
Fu, X. et al. Force alone is not enough: Benchmarking and critical evaluation of machine learning force fields with molecular simulations. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07237 (2023).
Miret, S., Lee, KLK, Gonzales, C., Nassar, M. & Spellings, M. Open MatSci ML Toolkit: A flexible framework for machine learning in materials science. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17484 (2023).
Saal, JE, Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. High-throughput density functional theory materials design and discovery: Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD). JOM 651501–1509 (2013).
Hautier, G., Jain, A. & Ong, SP From the computer to the laboratory: Materials discovery and design using ab initio calculations. J. Mater. Science. 477317–7340 (2012).
Merchant, A. et al. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. nature 62480–85 (2023).
Axelrod, S. and more: Materials design using machine learning and atomic simulation. Compliant meter. resolution 3343–357 (2022).
Formerly, EC-Y. Others. Fundamental model for atomistic simulation of chemistry and materials. nut. Rev. Chem. 10212–230 (2026).
Schmidt, J. et al. Improving machine learning models in materials science through large datasets. meter. Today is physics. 48101560 (2024).
Lee, KLK et al. MatSciML: An extensive multitasking benchmark for solid-state materials modeling. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05934 (2023).
Deringer, VL, Caro, MA & Csányi, G. Interatomic potentials for machine learning as a new tool in materials science. Advanced meter. 311902765 (2019).
Friederich, P., Häse, F., Proppe, J., Aspuru-Guzik, A. The potential of machine learning for next generation materials simulation. nut. meter. 20750–761 (2021).
Zeni, C. et al. Generative models for inorganic materials design. nature 639624–632 (2025).
Deng, B. et al. CHGNet is a pre-trained universal neural network with the potential for atomistic modeling based on charge information. nut. Mach. intelligence. 51031–1041 (2023).
Chen, C. & Ong, SP Universal graph deep learning interatomic potentials for the periodic table. nut. Calculate. Science. 2718–728 (2022).
Yang, H et al. MatterSim: Deep learning atomistic models across elements, temperature, and pressure. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04967 (2024).
Park, Y., Kim, J., Hwang, S. & Han, S. A scalable parallel algorithm for interatomic potential of graph neural networks in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Theoretical calculation. 204857–4868 (2024).
Neumann, M. et al. ORB: The potential of fast, scalable neural networks. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22570 (2024).
Barroso-Luque, L. et al. Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic materials dataset and models. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12771 (2024).
Levine, DS et al. Open Molecules 2025 (OMol25) dataset, evaluation, and models. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08762 (2025).
Chanusot, L. et al. Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) dataset and community challenges. ACS Catalog. 116059–6072 (2021).
Liebesel, J. et al. A framework for evaluating crystal stability prediction by machine learning. nut. Mach. intelligence. 7836–847 (2025).
Miret, S., Lee, KLK, Gonzales, C., Mannan, S. & Krishnan, NM DFT orbital energy and force regression is not sufficient for universal machine learning interatomic potentials. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03660 (2025).
Wood, B.M. et al. UMA: Family of universal models of atoms. Advanced neural information processes. system. 38129391–129427 (2026).
Google Scholar
Chiang, Y. et al. MLIP Arena: Improving the fairness and transparency of machine learning interatomic potentials through an open and accessible benchmarking platform. Advanced neural information processes. system. 38 (2026).
Fu, X. et al. Force alone is not enough: Benchmarking and critical evaluation of machine learning force fields with molecular simulations. (2023).
Fu, X. et al. Learn smooth and expressive interatomic potentials for predicting physical properties. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12147 (2025).
Zaki, M., Mausam, J. & Krishnan, NMA MaScQA: Exploring materials science knowledge about large-scale language models. digit. Discob. 3313–327 (2024).
Miret, S. & Krishnan, NMA Enabling large-scale language models for real-world materials discovery. nut. Mach. intelligence. 7991–998 (2025).
Arampara, N. et al. Exploring the limitations of multimodal language models in chemistry and materials research. nut. Calculate. Science. 5952–961 (2025).
Gonzales, C., Fuemmeler, E., Tadmor, EB, Martiniani, S. & Miret, S. A universal machine learning interatomic potential benchmark for structural relaxation. open review https://openreview.net/pdf?id=fNyXCCZ0g6 (2024).
Tran, R. et al. Open Catalyst 2022 (OC22) dataset and challenges for oxide electrocatalysts. ACS Catalog. 133066–3084 (2023).
Warford, T., Thiemann, FL & Csányi, G. Better without U: The impact of selective Hubbard U correction on basic MLIP. Mach. learn. 7035033 (2026).
Google Scholar
Gangan, AS, Cubuk, ED, Schoenholz, SS, Bauchy, M. & Krishnan, NMA End-to-end differentiable atomistic simulation force field optimization. J. Chem. Theoretical calculation. twenty one5867–5879 (2025).
Thaler, S. & Zavadlav, J. Learning neural network likelihoods from experimental data by weighting differentiable trajectories. nut. common. 126884 (2021).
Downs, RT & Hall-Wallace, M. American Mineralogist’s Crystal Structure Database. morning. mineral. 88247–250 (2003).
Google Scholar
T. Hahn, U. Shmueli, JCW Arthur international crystallography table Vol. 1 (Leidel Dordrecht, 1983).
Vaclav, H. & Zimmermann, H. Hermann Morgan Symbol (Wiley Online Library, 2016).
Arroyo, Michigan International Crystallography Table: Crystallographic Symmetries (John Wiley & Sons, 2021).
Larsen, AH et al. Atomic Simulation Environment – A Python library for manipulating atoms. J. Phys. Condense. Case 29273002 (2017).
Material Properties Open Database (MPOD). MPOD http://mpod.cimav.edu.mx/ (accessed August 1, 2025).
Bitzek, E., Koskinen, P., Gähler, F., Moseler, M., Gumbsch, P. Structural relaxation made simple. Physics. Pastor Rhett. 97170201 (2006).
Berendsen, HJC, van Postma, JPM, Van Gunsteren, WF, DiNola, ARHJ & Haak, JR Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bus. J. Chem. Physics. 813684–3690 (1984).
Matsumoto, Y. Overview of Morse Theory Vol. 208 (Mathematical Association of America, 2002).
Mannan, S. et al. Evaluation of universal machine learning force fields for experimental measurements [Dataset]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16733258 (2026).
Mannan, S., Bihani, V., Gonzales, C., Maheshwar, A. M3RG-IITD/UniFFBench: UniFFBench-v1.0.1 (v1.0.1). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20165458 (2026).
