Tian, Y. et al. Promises and challenges of next-generation ‘Beyond Li-ion’ batteries for electric vehicles and grid decarbonization. Chem. Rev. 121, 1623–1669 (2021).
Google Scholar
Grey, C. P. & Hall, D. S. Prospects for lithium-ion batteries and beyond — a 2030 vision. Nat. Commun. 11, 6279 (2020).
Google Scholar
Frith, J. T., Lacey, M. J. & Ulissi, U. A non-academic perspective on the future of lithium-based batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 420 (2023).
Google Scholar
Famprikis, T., Canepa, P., Dawson, J. A., Islam, M. S. & Masquelier, C. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Nat. Mater. 18, 1278–1291 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., Stalin, S., Zhao, C.-Z. & Archer, L. A. Designing solid-state electrolytes for safe, energy-dense batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 229–252 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bachman, J. C. et al. Inorganic solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: mechanisms and properties governing ion conduction. Chem. Rev. 116, 140–162 (2016).
Google Scholar
Usiskin, R. et al. Fundamentals, status and promise of sodium-based batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1020–1035 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. et al. Understanding interface stability in solid-state batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 105–126 (2020).
Google Scholar
Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. Challenges in speeding up solid-state battery development. Nat. Energy 8, 230–240 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jain, A., Shin, Y. & Persson, K. A. Computational predictions of energy materials using density functional theory. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 15004 (2016).
Google Scholar
Van der Ven, A., Deng, Z., Banerjee, S. & Ong, S. P. Rechargeable alkali-ion battery materials: theory and computation. Chem. Rev. 120, 6977–7019 (2020).
Google Scholar
Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O. & Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559, 547–555 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jun, K., Chen, Y., Wei, G., Yang, X. & Ceder, G. Diffusion mechanisms of fast lithium-ion conductors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 887–905 (2024).
Google Scholar
Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat. Energy 1, 16141 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. New horizons for inorganic solid state ion conductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1945–1976 (2018).
Google Scholar
Franco, A. A. et al. Boosting rechargeable batteries R&D by multiscale modeling: myth or reality? Chem. Rev. 119, 4569–4627 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wan, T. H. & Ciucci, F. Electro-chemo-mechanical modeling of solid-state batteries. Electrochim. Acta 331, 135355 (2020).
Google Scholar
Melander, M. M., Wu, T., Weckman, T. & Honkala, K. Constant inner potential DFT for modelling electrochemical systems under constant potential and bias. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 5 (2024).
Google Scholar
Song, Z. et al. A reflection on polymer electrolytes for solid-state lithium metal batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 4884 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, K. et al. Computational and data-driven modelling of solid polymer electrolytes. Digit. Discov. 2, 1660–1682 (2023).
Google Scholar
Prasanth S, R., Prasannavenkadesan, V., Katiyar, V. & Achalkumar, A. S. Polymer electrolytes: evolution, challenges, and future directions for lithium-ion batteries. RSC Appl. Polym. 3, 499–531 (2025).
Google Scholar
Porz, L. et al. Mechanism of lithium metal penetration through inorganic solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1701003 (2017).
Google Scholar
Busche, M. R. et al. Dynamic formation of a solid–liquid electrolyte interphase and its consequences for hybrid-battery concepts. Nat. Chem. 8, 426–434 (2016).
Google Scholar
Huo, H. & Janek, J. Solid-state batteries: from ‘all-solid’ to ‘almost-solid’. Natl Sci. Rev. 10, nwad098 (2023).
Google Scholar
Woolley, H. M. & Vargas-Barbosa, N. M. Hybrid solid electrolyte–liquid electrolyte systems for (almost) solid-state batteries: why, how, and where to? J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 1083–1097 (2023).
Google Scholar
Thangadurai, V., Narayanan, S. & Pinzaru, D. Garnet-type solid-state fast Li ion conductors for Li batteries: critical review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 4714–4727 (2014).
Google Scholar
Han, X. et al. Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries. Nat. Mater. 16, 572–579 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, C. et al. Garnet-type solid-state electrolytes: materials, interfaces, and batteries. Chem. Rev. 120, 4257–4300 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yu, S. & Siegel, D. J. Grain boundary contributions to Li-ion transport in the solid electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO). Chem. Mater. 29, 9639–9647 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hofstetter, K., Samson, A. J., Narayanan, S. & Thangadurai, V. Present understanding of the stability of Li-stuffed garnets with moisture, carbon dioxide, and metallic lithium. J. Power Sources 390, 297–312 (2018).
Google Scholar
Inaguma, Y. et al. High ionic conductivity in lithium lanthanum titanate. Solid. State Commun. 86, 689–693 (1993).
Google Scholar
Stramare, S., Thangadurai, V. & Weppner, W. Lithium lanthanum titanates: a review. Chem. Mater. 15, 3974–3990 (2003).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. & Daemen, L. L. Superionic conductivity in lithium-rich anti-perovskites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15042–15047 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dawson, J. A., Famprikis, T. & Johnston, K. E. Anti-perovskites for solid-state batteries: recent developments, current challenges and future prospects. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 18746–18772 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ma, C. et al. Atomic-scale origin of the large grain-boundary resistance in perovskite Li-ion-conducting solid electrolytes. Energy Env. Sci. 7, 1638–1642 (2014).
Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. et al. Electrolyte melt infiltration for scalable manufacturing of inorganic all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Mater. 20, 984–990 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lu, X., Xia, G., Lemmon, J. P. & Yang, Z. Advanced materials for sodium-beta alumina batteries: status, challenges and perspectives. J. Power Sources 195, 2431–2442 (2010).
Google Scholar
Fertig, M. P. et al. From high- to low-temperature: the revival of sodium-beta alumina for sodium solid-state batteries. Batter. Supercaps 5, e202100131 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bay, M.-C. et al. Impact of liquid phase formation on microstructure and conductivity of Li-stabilized Na-β″-alumina ceramics. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 687–693 (2019).
Google Scholar
Anantharamulu, N. et al. A wide-ranging review on Nasicon type materials. J. Mater. Sci. 46, 2821–2837 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ouyang, B. et al. Synthetic accessibility and stability rules of NASICONs. Nat. Commun. 12, 5752 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Liu, Y., You, Y., Vinu, A. & Mai, L. NASICONs-type solid-state electrolytes: the history, physicochemical properties, and challenges. Interdiscip. Mater. 2, 91–110 (2023).
Chen, S. et al. Sulfide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries: structure, conductivity, stability and application. Energy Storage Mater. 14, 58–74 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wu, J., Liu, S., Han, F., Yao, X. & Wang, C. Lithium/sulfide all-solid-state batteries using sulfide electrolytes. Adv. Mater. 33, 2000751 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kamaya, N. et al. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat. Mater. 10, 682–686 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Lee, T., Char, K., Kim, K. J. & Choi, J. W. Issues and advances in scaling up sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 3390–3402 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, K. J., Balaish, M., Wadaguchi, M., Kong, L. & Rupp, J. L. M. Solid-state Li–metal batteries: challenges and horizons of oxide and sulfide solid electrolytes and their interfaces. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2002689 (2021).
Google Scholar
Auvergniot, J. et al. Interface stability of argyrodite Li6PS5Cl toward LiCoO2, LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2, and LiMn2O4 in bulk all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 29, 3883–3890 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kraft, M. A. et al. Inducing high ionic conductivity in the lithium superionic argyrodites Li6+xP1–xGexS5I for all-solid-state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 16330–16339 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, S. et al. High-entropy lithium argyrodite solid electrolytes enabling stable all-solid-state batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202314155 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L., Minafra, N., Zeier, W. G. & Nazar, L. F. Innovative approaches to Li-argyrodite solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 2717–2728 (2021).
Google Scholar
Park, J.-S., Jo, C.-H. & Myung, S.-T. Comprehensive understanding on lithium argyrodite electrolytes for stable and safe all-solid-state lithium batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 61, 102869 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. Anomalous high ionic conductivity of nanoporous β-Li3PS4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 975–978 (2013).
Google Scholar
Yamane, H. et al. Crystal structure of a superionic conductor, Li7P3S11. Solid. State Ion. 178, 1163–1167 (2007).
Google Scholar
Kato, Y. et al. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors. Nat. Energy 1, 16030 (2016).
Google Scholar
Han, G. et al. Superionic lithium transport via multiple coordination environments defined by two-anion packing. Science 383, 739–745 (2024).
Google Scholar
Han, G. et al. Enhancement of low temperature superionic conductivity by suppression of Li site ordering in Li7Si2–xGexS7I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202409372 (2024).
Google Scholar
de Klerk, N. J. J. & Wagemaker, M. Diffusion mechanism of the sodium-ion solid electrolyte Na3PS4 and potential improvements of halogen doping. Chem. Mater. 28, 3122–3130 (2016).
Google Scholar
Famprikis, T. et al. Under pressure: mechanochemical effects on structure and ion conduction in the sodium-ion solid electrolyte Na3PS4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 18422–18436 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hayashi, A. et al. A sodium-ion sulfide solid electrolyte with unprecedented conductivity at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 10, 5266 (2019).
Google Scholar
Moon, C. K. et al. Vacancy-driven Na+ superionic conduction in new Ca-doped Na3PS4 for all-solid-state Na-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 2504–2512 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chu, I.-H. et al. Room-temperature all-solid-state rechargeable sodium-ion batteries with a Cl-doped Na3PS4 superionic conductor. Sci. Rep. 6, 33733 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. Na11Sn2PS12: a new solid state sodium superionic conductor. Energy Env. Sci. 11, 87–93 (2018).
Google Scholar
Asano, T. et al. Solid halide electrolytes with high lithium-ion conductivity for application in 4 V class bulk-type all-solid-state batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803075 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Air-stable Li3InCl6 electrolyte with high voltage compatibility for all-solid-state batteries. Energy Env. Sci. 12, 2665–2671 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Precise tailoring of lithium-ion transport for ultralong-cycling dendrite-free all-solid-state lithium metal batteries. Adv. Mater. 36, 2302647 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liang, J. et al. Site-occupation-tuned superionic LixScCl3 + x halide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7012–7022 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L. et al. A new halospinel superionic conductor for high-voltage all solid state lithium batteries. Energy Env. Sci. 13, 2056–2063 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L. et al. High areal capacity, long cycle life 4 V ceramic all-solid-state Li-ion batteries enabled by chloride solid electrolytes. Nat. Energy 7, 83–93 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yin, Y.-C. et al. A LaCl3-based lithium superionic conductor compatible with lithium metal. Nature 616, 77–83 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mao, X. & Dawson, J. A. Optimizing Li-ion transport in LaCl3-xBrx solid electrolytes through anion mixing. EcoMat 7, e70006 (2025).
Google Scholar
Schlem, R., Banik, A., Eckardt, M., Zobel, M. & Zeier, W. G. Na3–xEr1–xZrxCl6 — a halide-based fast sodium-ion conductor with vacancy-driven ionic transport. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 10164–10173 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Design principles for sodium superionic conductors. Nat. Commun. 14, 7615 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cohen, A. J., Mori-Sánchez, P. & Yang, W. Challenges for density functional theory. Chem. Rev. 112, 289–320 (2012).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S. & Marques, M. A. L. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 83 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yao, N., Chen, X., Fu, Z.-H. & Zhang, Q. Applying classical, ab initio, and machine-learning molecular dynamics simulations to the liquid electrolyte for rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 122, 10970–11021 (2022).
Google Scholar
Walsh, A., Sokol, A. & Catlow, R. Computational Approaches to Energy Materials (eds Walsh, A. et al.) (Wiley, 2013).
Jones, R. O. Density functional theory: its origins, rise to prominence, and future. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 897–923 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nolan, A. M., Zhu, Y., He, X., Bai, Q. & Mo, Y. Computation-accelerated design of materials and interfaces for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Joule 2, 2016–2046 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gorai, P., Famprikis, T., Singh, B., Stevanović, V. & Canepa, P. Devil is in the defects: electronic conductivity in solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 33, 7484–7498 (2021).
Google Scholar
Squires, A. G., Scanlon, D. O. & Morgan, B. J. Native defects and their doping response in the lithium solid electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12. Chem. Mater. 32, 1876–1886 (2020).
Google Scholar
Squires, A. G. et al. Low electronic conductivity of Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes from first principles. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 85401 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, W. et al. Recent progress of theoretical research on inorganic solid state electrolytes for Li metal batteries. J. Power Sources 561, 232720 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xia, L., Liu, H. & Pei, Y. Theoretical calculations and simulations power the design of inorganic solid-state electrolytes. Nanoscale 16, 15481–15501 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mouvet, F., Villard, J., Bolnykh, V. & Rothlisberger, U. Recent advances in first-principles based molecular dynamics. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 221–230 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brenner, D. W. The art and science of an analytic potential. Phys. Status Solidi 217, 23–40 (2000).
Google Scholar
Müser, M. H., Sukhomlinov, S. V. & Pastewka, L. Interatomic potentials: achievements and challenges. Adv. Phys. X 8, 2093129 (2023).
Unke, O. T. et al. Machine learning force fields. Chem. Rev. 121, 10142–10186 (2021).
Google Scholar
Deringer, V. L. et al. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules. Chem. Rev. 121, 10073–10141 (2021).
Google Scholar
Frenkel, D. & Smit, B. Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications 2nd edn (Elsevier, 2002).
He, X., Zhu, Y., Epstein, A. & Mo, Y. Statistical variances of diffusional properties from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 18 (2018).
Google Scholar
de Klerk, N. J. J., van der Maas, E. & Wagemaker, M. Analysis of diffusion in solid-state electrolytes through MD simulations, improvement of the Li-Ion conductivity in β-Li3PS4 as an example. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1, 3230–3242 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fujimura, K. et al. Accelerated materials design of lithium superionic conductors based on first-principles calculations and machine learning algorithms. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 980–985 (2013).
Google Scholar
Meredig, B. et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 89, 94104 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M. & Fazzio, A. From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science — a review. J. Phys. Mater. 2, 032001 (2019).
Google Scholar
Deringer, V. L., Caro, M. A. & Csányi, G. Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902765 (2019).
Google Scholar
Deringer, V. L. Modelling and understanding battery materials with machine-learning-driven atomistic simulations. J. Phys. Energy 2, 041003 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, A. Y.-T. et al. Machine learning for materials scientists: an introductory guide toward best practices. Chem. Mater. 32, 4954–4965 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, C. et al. A critical review of machine learning of energy materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903242 (2020).
Google Scholar
Friederich, P., Häse, F., Proppe, J. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Machine-learned potentials for next-generation matter simulations. Nat. Mater. 20, 750–761 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lombardo, T. et al. Artificial intelligence applied to battery research: hype or reality? Chem. Rev. 122, 10899–10969 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lv, C. et al. Machine learning: an advanced platform for materials development and state prediction in lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2101474 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yao, Z. et al. Machine learning for a sustainable energy future. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 202–215 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Discrepancies and error evaluation metrics for machine learning interatomic potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 174 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zheng, Z., Zhou, J. & Zhu, Y. Computational approach inspired advancements of solid-state electrolytes for lithium secondary batteries: from first-principles to machine learning. Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 3134–3166 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gao, A. & Remsing, R. C. Self-consistent determination of long-range electrostatics in neural network potentials. Nat. Commun. 13, 1572 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shaidu, Y., Pellegrini, F., Küçükbenli, E., Lot, R. & de Gironcoli, S. Incorporating long-range electrostatics in neural network potentials via variational charge equilibration from shortsighted ingredients. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 47 (2024).
Google Scholar
Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).
Google Scholar
Chmiela, S. et al. Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603015 (2024).
Google Scholar
Shapeev, A. V. Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Sim. 14, 1153–1173 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sendek, A. D. et al. Holistic computational structure screening of more than 12 000 candidates for solid lithium-ion conductor materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 306–320 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sendek, A. D. et al. Machine learning-assisted discovery of solid Li-ion conducting materials. Chem. Mater. 31, 342–352 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sendek, A. D., Cheon, G., Pasta, M. & Reed, E. J. Quantifying the search for solid Li-ion electrolyte materials by anion: a data-driven perspective. J. Phys. Chem. C. 124, 8067–8079 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hargreaves, C. J. et al. A database of experimentally measured lithium solid electrolyte conductivities evaluated with machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Machine learning-assisted property prediction of solid-state electrolyte. Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2304480 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hu, Q. et al. Speeding up the development of solid state electrolyte by machine learning. Energy 5, 100159 (2024).
Wang, J. et al. Design principles for NASICON super-ionic conductors. Nat. Commun. 14, 5210 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dutra, A. C. C. & Dawson, J. A. Computational design of antiperovskite solid electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 127, 18256–18270 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gu, G. H., Jang, J., Noh, J., Walsh, A. & Jung, Y. Perovskite synthesizability using graph neural networks. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 71 (2022).
Google Scholar
Guo, X., Wang, Z., Yang, J.-H. & Gong, X.-G. Machine-learning assisted high-throughput discovery of solid-state electrolytes for Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 12, 10124–10136 (2024).
Google Scholar
Huo, H. et al. Machine-learning rationalization and prediction of solid-state synthesis conditions. Chem. Mater. 34, 7323–7336 (2022).
Google Scholar
Catlow, C. R. A. Computer simulation studies of transport in solids. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 16, 517–548 (1986).
Google Scholar
Adams, S. & Rao, R. P. Ion transport and phase transition in Li7−xLa3(Zr2−xMx)O12 (M = Ta5+, Nb5+, x = 0, 0.25). J. Mater. Chem. 22, 1426–1434 (2012).
Google Scholar
Xu, M. et al. Mechanisms of Li+ transport in garnet-type cubic Li3+xLa3M2O12 (M = Te, Nb, Zr). Phys. Rev. B 85, 52301 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jalem, R. et al. Concerted migration mechanism in the Li ion dynamics of garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12. Chem. Mater. 25, 425–430 (2013).
Google Scholar
Miara, L. J. et al. Effect of Rb and Ta doping on the ionic conductivity and stability of the garnet Li7+2x–y(La3–xRbx)(Zr2–yTay)O12 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.375, 0 ≤ y ≤ 1) superionic conductor: a first principles investigation. Chem. Mater. 25, 3048–3055 (2013).
Google Scholar
Meier, K., Laino, T. & Curioni, A. Solid-state electrolytes: revealing the mechanisms of Li-ion conduction in tetragonal and cubic LLZO by first-principles calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118, 6668–6679 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gu, W., Ezbiri, M., Prasada Rao, R., Avdeev, M. & Adams, S. Effects of penta- and trivalent dopants on structure and conductivity of Li7La3Zr2O12. Solid. State Ion. 274, 100–105 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jalem, R. et al. Effects of gallium doping in garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 27, 2821–2831 (2015).
Google Scholar
He, X., Zhu, Y. & Mo, Y. Origin of fast ion diffusion in super-ionic conductors. Nat. Commun. 8, 15893 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yeandel, S. R., Chapman, B. J., Slater, P. R. & Goddard, P. Structure and lithium-ion dynamics in fluoride-doped cubic Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) garnet for Li solid-state battery applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 27811–27819 (2018).
Google Scholar
García Daza, F. A., Bonilla, M. R., Llordés, A., Carrasco, J. & Akhmatskaya, E. Atomistic insight into ion transport and conductivity in Ga/Al-substituted Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 753–765 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kahle, L., Musaelian, A., Marzari, N. & Kozinsky, B. Unsupervised landmark analysis for jump detection in molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 55404 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kuganathan, N. et al. Self-diffusion in garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Sci. Rep. 11, 451 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cortés, H. A. et al. A data-mining approach to understanding the impact of multi-doping on the ionic transport mechanism of solid electrolytes materials: the case of dual-doped Ga0.15/ScyLi7La3Zr2O12. J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 5181–5193 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mo, Y., Ong, S. P. & Ceder, G. First principles study of the Li10GeP2S12 lithium super ionic conductor material. Chem. Mater. 24, 15–17 (2012).
Google Scholar
Adams, S. & Prasada Rao, R. Structural requirements for fast lithium ion migration in Li10GeP2S12. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 7687–7691 (2012).
Google Scholar
Xu, M., Ding, J. & Ma, E. One-dimensional stringlike cooperative migration of lithium ions in an ultrafast ionic conductor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 031901 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Design principles for solid-state lithium superionic conductors. Nat. Mater. 14, 1026–1031 (2015).
Google Scholar
Marcolongo, A. & Marzari, N. Ionic correlations and failure of Nernst–Einstein relation in solid-state electrolytes. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 025402 (2017).
Google Scholar
Huang, J. et al. Deep potential generation scheme and simulation protocol for the Li10GeP2S12-type superionic conductors. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 094703 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dawson, J. A. & Islam, M. S. A nanoscale design approach for enhancing the Li-ion conductivity of the Li10GeP2S12 solid electrolyte. ACS Mater. Lett. 4, 424–431 (2022).
Google Scholar
Winter, G. & Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Simulations with machine learning potentials identify the ion conduction mechanism mediating non-Arrhenius behavior in LGPS. J. Phys. Energy 5, 024004 (2023).
Google Scholar
Du, Y. A. & Holzwarth, N. A. W. Li ion diffusion mechanisms in the crystalline electrolyte γ-Li3PO4. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, A999 (2007).
Google Scholar
Deng, Y. et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into fast lithium-ion conduction in Li4SiO4–Li3PO4 solid electrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 9136–9145 (2015).
Google Scholar
Deng, Y. et al. Enhancing the lithium ion conductivity in lithium superionic conductor (LISICON) solid electrolytes through a mixed polyanion effect. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 7050–7058 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gill, D., Kumar, M., Basera, P. & Bhattacharya, S. Understanding the ionic diffusivity in the (meta)stable (un)doped solid-state electrolyte from first-principles: a case study of LISICON. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 17485–17493 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gilardi, E. et al. Li4–xGe1–xPxO4, a potential solid-state electrolyte for all-oxide microbatteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 9910–9917 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kang, J., Chung, H., Doh, C., Kang, B. & Han, B. Integrated study of first principles calculations and experimental measurements for Li-ionic conductivity in Al-doped solid-state LiGe2(PO4)3 electrolyte. J. Power Sources 293, 11–16 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhu, L. et al. Enhancing ionic conductivity in solid electrolyte by relocating diffusion ions to under-coordination sites. Sci. Adv. 8, eabj7698 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. Correlated migration invokes higher Na+-ion conductivity in NaSICON-type solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1902373 (2019).
Google Scholar
Deng, Z. et al. Fundamental investigations on the sodium-ion transport properties of mixed polyanion solid-state battery electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 13, 4470 (2022).
Google Scholar
Deng, Y. et al. Crystal structures, local atomic environments, and ion diffusion mechanisms of scandium-substituted sodium superionic conductor (NASICON) solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 30, 2618–2630 (2018).
Google Scholar
He, Y., Scivally, E., Shaji, A., Ouyang, B. & Zeng, Y. Unraveling the fast ionic conduction in NASICON-type materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 15, 2403877 (2025).
Google Scholar
Pecher, O. et al. Atomistic characterisation of Li+ mobility and conductivity in Li7−xPS6−xIx argyrodites from molecular dynamics simulations, solid-state NMR, and impedance spectroscopy. Chem. Eur. J. 16, 8347–8354 (2010).
Google Scholar
de Klerk, N. J. J., Rosłoń, I. & Wagemaker, M. Diffusion mechanism of Li argyrodite solid electrolytes for Li-ion batteries and prediction of optimized halogen doping: the effect of Li vacancies, halogens, and halogen disorder. Chem. Mater. 28, 7955–7963 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yu, C. et al. Unravelling Li-ion transport from picoseconds to seconds: bulk versus interfaces in an argyrodite Li6PS5Cl–Li2S all-solid-state Li-ion battery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11192–11201 (2016).
Google Scholar
Stamminger, A. R., Ziebarth, B., Mrovec, M., Hammerschmidt, T. & Drautz, R. Ionic conductivity and its dependence on structural disorder in halogenated argyrodites Li6PS5X (X = Br, Cl, I). Chem. Mater. 31, 8673–8678 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yu, C. et al. Superionic conductivity in lithium argyrodite solid-state electrolyte by controlled Cl-doping. Nano Energy 69, 104396 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gautam, A. et al. Engineering the site-disorder and lithium distribution in the lithium superionic argyrodite Li6PS5Br. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003369 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, P. et al. Fast ion conduction and its origin in Li6–xPS5–xBr1+x. Chem. Mater. 32, 3833–3840 (2020).
Google Scholar
Morgan, B. J. Mechanistic origin of superionic lithium diffusion in anion-disordered Li6PS5X argyrodites. Chem. Mater. 33, 2004–2018 (2021).
Google Scholar
Patel, S. V. et al. Tunable lithium-ion transport in mixed-halide argyrodites Li6–xPS5–xClBrx: an unusual compositional space. Chem. Mater. 33, 1435–1443 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chien, P.-H. et al. Promoting fast ion conduction in Li-argyrodite through lithium sublattice engineering. Chem. Mater. 36, 382–393 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schwietert, T. K. et al. Understanding the role of aliovalent cation substitution on the Li-ion diffusion mechanism in Li6+xP1−xSixS5Br argyrodites. Mater. Adv. 5, 1952–1959 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kim, J. H. et al. Highly reliable and large-scale simulations of promising argyrodite solid-state electrolytes using a machine-learned moment tensor potential. Nano Energy 124, 109436 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lavrinenko, A. K. et al. Optimizing ionic transport in argyrodites: a unified view on the role of sulfur/halide distribution and local environments. J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 26596–26611 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y. et al. Enhanced ionic conductivity and lack of paddle-wheel effect in pseudohalogen-substituted Li argyrodites. Matter 5, 4379–4395 (2022).
Google Scholar
Walker, J. R. & Catlow, C. R. A. The structure and energetics of the conduction plane in Naβ Al2O3. Nature 286, 473–474 (1980).
Google Scholar
Walker, J. R. & Catlow, C. R. A. Structure and transport in non-stoichiometric β Al2O3. J. Phys. C 15, 6151 (1982).
Google Scholar
Zendejas, M. A. & Thomas, J. O. A molecular dynamics simulation study of long-range ionic distributions in Na + β″-alumina. Solid State Ion. 28–30, 46–52 (1988).
Google Scholar
Zendejas, M. A. & Thomas, J. O. Conduction mechanisms in solid electrolytes: Na+ beta-alumina. Phys. Scr. 1990, 235 (1990).
Google Scholar
Edvardsson, S., Ojamae, L. & Thomas, J. O. A study of vibrational modes in Na+ beta -alumina by molecular dynamics simulation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6, 1319 (1994).
Google Scholar
Hafskjold, B. & Li, X. Molecular dynamics simulations of the Mg2+-stabilized Na+– beta″-alumina. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 7, 2949 (1995).
Google Scholar
Poletayev, A. D., Dawson, J. A., Islam, M. S. & Lindenberg, A. M. Defect-driven anomalous transport in fast-ion conducting solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 21, 1066–1073 (2022).
Google Scholar
Poletayev, A. D. et al. The persistence of memory in ionic conduction probed by nonlinear optics. Nature 625, 691–696 (2024).
Google Scholar
Katsumata, T., Inaguma, Y., Itoh, M. & Kawamura, K. Influence of covalent character on high Li ion conductivity in a perovskite-type Li ion conductor: prediction from a molecular dynamics simulation of La0.6Li0.2TiO3. Chem. Mater. 14, 3930–3936 (2002).
Google Scholar
Qian, D. et al. Lithium lanthanum titanium oxides: a fast ionic conductive coating for lithium-ion battery cathodes. Chem. Mater. 24, 2744–2751 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. Q. et al. An integrated approach for structural characterization of complex solid state electrolytes: the case of lithium lanthanum titanate. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 2418–2426 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. Lithium lanthanum titanate perovskite as an anode for lithium ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 11, 3490 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Wu, N. & Bai, P. Temperature-dependent Li-ion transport in lithium lanthanum titanate electrolytes. Chem. Commun. 60, 8844–8847 (2024).
Google Scholar
Emly, A., Kioupakis, E. & Van der Ven, A. Phase stability and transport mechanisms in antiperovskite Li3OCl and Li3OBr superionic conductors. Chem. Mater. 25, 4663–4670 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mouta, R., Melo, M. Á. B., Diniz, E. M. & Paschoal, C. W. A. Concentration of charge carriers, migration, and stability in Li3OCl solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 26, 7137–7144 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dawson, J. A., Chen, H. & Islam, M. S. Composition screening of lithium- and sodium-rich anti-perovskites for fast-conducting solid electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 23978–23984 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yu, Y., Wang, Z. & Shao, G. Theoretical tuning of Ruddlesden–Popper type anti-perovskite phases as superb ion conductors and cathodes for solid sodium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 10483–10493 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jalem, R., Tateyama, Y., Takada, K. & Nakayama, M. First-principles DFT study on inverse Ruddlesden–Popper tetragonal compounds as solid electrolytes for all-solid-state Li+-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 33, 5859–5871 (2021).
Google Scholar
Coutinho Dutra, A. C., Rudman, G. E., Johnston, K. E. & Dawson, J. A. Defect chemistry and ion transport in low-dimensional-networked Li-rich anti-perovskites as solid electrolytes for solid-state batteries. Energy Adv. 2, 653–666 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dawson, J. A. et al. Elucidating lithium-ion and proton dynamics in anti-perovskite solid electrolytes. Energy Env. Sci. 11, 2993–3002 (2018).
Google Scholar
Song, A.-Y. et al. Understanding Li-ion dynamics in lithium hydroxychloride (Li2OHCl) solid state electrolyte via addressing the role of protons. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903480 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fang, H. & Jena, P. Li-rich antiperovskite superionic conductors based on cluster ions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11046–11051 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tsai, P.-C. et al. Double paddle-wheel enhanced sodium ion conduction in an antiperovskite solid electrolyte. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203284 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gao, S. et al. Hydride-based antiperovskites with soft anionic sublattices as fast alkali ionic conductors. Nat. Commun. 12, 201 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Lithium chlorides and bromides as promising solid-state chemistries for fast ion conductors with good electrochemical stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8039–8043 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Wang, S., Nolan, A. M., Ling, C. & Mo, Y. Tailoring the cation lattice for chloride lithium-ion conductors. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2002356 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Z., Tang, H., Qi, J., Li, X.-G. & Ong, S. P. Design principles for cation-mixed sodium solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003196 (2021).
Google Scholar
Quirk, J. A. & Dawson, J. A. Design principles for grain boundaries in solid-state lithium-ion conductors. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2301114 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jun, K. et al. Lithium superionic conductors with corner-sharing frameworks. Nat. Mater. 21, 924–931 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. Unlocking Li superionic conductivity in face-centred cubic oxides via face-sharing configurations. Nat. Mater. 23, 535–542 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zeng, Y. et al. High-entropy mechanism to boost ionic conductivity. Science 378, 1320–1324 (2022).
Google Scholar
He, X. et al. Crystal structural framework of lithium super-ionic conductors. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1902078 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. & Nazar, L. F. Exploiting the paddle-wheel mechanism for the design of fast ion conductors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 389–405 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, R. et al. Computation-guided synthesis of new garnet-type solid-state electrolytes via an ultrafast sintering technique. Adv. Mater. 32, 2005059 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jang, S.-H., Tateyama, Y. & Jalem, R. High-throughput data-driven prediction of stable high-performance Na-ion sulfide solid electrolytes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2206036 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bartel, C. J. et al. A critical examination of compound stability predictions from machine-learned formation energies. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 97 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sun, W. et al. The thermodynamic scale of inorganic crystalline metastability. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600225 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kim, K. et al. Exploring the synthesis of alkali metal anti-perovskites. Chem. Mater. 34, 947–958 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kim, K. & Siegel, D. J. Correlating lattice distortions, ion migration barriers, and stability in solid electrolytes. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 3216–3227 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sjølin, B. H. et al. Accelerated workflow for antiperovskite-based solid state electrolytes. Batter. Supercaps 6, e202300041 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jalem, R., Tateyama, Y., Takada, K. & Jang, S. H. Multiobjective solid electrolyte design of tetragonal and cubic inverse-perovskites for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries by high-throughput density functional theory calculations and AI-driven methods. J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 17307–17323 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ohta, S., Kobayashi, T. & Asaoka, T. High lithium ionic conductivity in the garnet-type oxide Li7−X La3(Zr2−X, NbX)O12 (X = 0–2). J. Power Sources 196, 3342–3345 (2011).
Google Scholar
Schwietert, T. K. et al. Clarifying the relationship between redox activity and electrochemical stability in solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 19, 428–435 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zheng, F., Kotobuki, M., Song, S., Lai, M. O. & Lu, L. Review on solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 389, 198–213 (2018).
Google Scholar
Boulineau, S., Courty, M., Tarascon, J. M. & Viallet, V. Mechanochemical synthesis of Li-argyrodite Li6PS5X (X = Cl, Br, I) as sulfur-based solid electrolytes for all solid state batteries application. Solid. State Ion. 221, 1–5 (2012).
Google Scholar
Han, F., Zhu, Y., He, X., Mo, Y. & Wang, C. Electrochemical stability of Li10GeP2S12 and Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501590 (2016).
Google Scholar
Schwöbel, A., Hausbrand, R. & Jaegermann, W. Interface reactions between LiPON and lithium studied by in-situ X-ray photoemission. Solid. State Ion. 273, 51–54 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Origin of outstanding stability in the lithium solid electrolyte materials: insights from thermodynamic analyses based on first-principles calculations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 23685–23693 (2015).
Google Scholar
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C. & Ceder, G. Interface stability in solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 28, 266–273 (2016).
Google Scholar
Schwietert, T. K., Vasileiadis, A. & Wagemaker, M. First-principles prediction of the electrochemical stability and reaction mechanisms of solid-state electrolytes. JACS Au 1, 1488–1496 (2021).
Google Scholar
Butler, K. T., Sai Gautam, G. & Canepa, P. Designing interfaces in energy materials applications with first-principles calculations. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 19 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dawson, J. A. Going against the grain: atomistic modeling of grain boundaries in solid electrolytes for solid-state batteries. ACS Mater. Au 4, 1–13 (2024).
Google Scholar
Leung, K. DFT modelling of explicit solid–solid interfaces in batteries: methods and challenges. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 10412–10425 (2020).
Google Scholar
Carrasco, J. A theoretical perspective on solid-state ionic interfaces. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 382, 20230313 (2024).
Google Scholar
Woodahl, C. et al. Probing lithium mobility at a solid electrolyte surface. Nat. Mater. 22, 848–852 (2023).
Google Scholar
Canepa, P. et al. Particle morphology and lithium segregation to surfaces of the Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte. Chem. Mater. 30, 3019–3027 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tian, H.-K., Xu, B. & Qi, Y. Computational study of lithium nucleation tendency in Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) and rational design of interlayer materials to prevent lithium dendrites. J. Power Sources 392, 79–86 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wu, M. et al. First-principles study on the structural, electronic, and Li-ion mobility properties of anti-perovskite superionic conductor Li3OCl (100) surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 510, 145394 (2020).
Google Scholar
D’Amore, M. et al. From symmetry breaking in the bulk to phase transitions at the surface: a quantum-mechanical exploration of Li6PS5Cl argyrodite superionic conductor. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 22978–22986 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Huang, L. & Gu, X. Failure mechanism of solid-state electrolyte Li10GeP2S12 in a moist atmosphere: a first-principles study. Mater. Adv. 3, 3143–3150 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q. et al. Designing lithium halide solid electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 15, 1050 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dawson, J. A., Canepa, P., Famprikis, T., Masquelier, C. & Islam, M. S. Atomic-scale influence of grain boundaries on Li-Ion conduction in solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 362–368 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lee, H. J. et al. Li-ion conductivity in Li2OHCl1−xBrx solid electrolytes: grains, grain boundaries and interfaces. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 11574–11586 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gao, B., Jalem, R. & Tateyama, Y. Atomistic insight into the dopant impacts at the garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte grain boundaries. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 10083–10091 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lee, T. et al. Atomic-scale origin of the low grain-boundary resistance in perovskite solid electrolyte Li0.375Sr0.4375Ta0.75Zr0.25O3. Nat. Commun. 14, 1940 (2023).
Google Scholar
Symington, A. R. et al. Elucidating the nature of grain boundary resistance in lithium lanthanum titanate. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 6487–6498 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dawson, J. A. et al. Toward understanding the different influences of grain boundaries on ion transport in sulfide and oxide solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 31, 5296–5304 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yu, S. & Siegel, D. J. Grain boundary softening: a potential mechanism for lithium metal penetration through stiff solid electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 38151–38158 (2018).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. Local electronic structure variation resulting in Li ‘filament’ formation within solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 20, 1485–1490 (2021).
Google Scholar
Han, X. et al. Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries. Nat. Mater. 16, 572 (2016).
Google Scholar
Du, M. et al. Smart construction of an intimate lithium | garnet interface for all-solid-state batteries by tuning the tension of molten lithium. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2101556 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cheng, T., Merinov, B. V., Morozov, S. & Goddard, W. A. I. I. I. Quantum mechanics reactive dynamics study of solid Li-electrode/Li6PS5Cl-electrolyte interface. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 1454–1459 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chaney, G., Golov, A., van Roekeghem, A., Carrasco, J. & Mingo, N. Two-step growth mechanism of the solid electrolyte interphase in argyrodyte/Li-metal contacts. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 24624–24630 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fan, X. et al. Fluorinated solid electrolyte interphase enables highly reversible solid-state Li metal battery. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau9245 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Panchal, A. A., Sai Gautam, G. & Canepa, P. The resistive nature of decomposing interfaces of solid electrolytes with alkali metal electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 19732–19742 (2022).
Google Scholar
Haruyama, J., Sodeyama, K., Han, L., Takada, K. & Tateyama, Y. Space–charge layer effect at interface between oxide cathode and sulfide electrolyte in all-solid-state lithium-ion battery. Chem. Mater. 26, 4248–4255 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gao, B., Jalem, R. & Tateyama, Y. Surface-dependent stability of the interface between garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 and the Li metal in the all-solid-state battery from first-principles calculations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 16350–16358 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gao, B., Jalem, R., Ma, Y. & Tateyama, Y. Li+ transport mechanism at the heterogeneous cathode/solid electrolyte interface in an all-solid-state battery via the first-principles structure prediction scheme. Chem. Mater. 32, 85–96 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zahiri, B. et al. Revealing the role of the cathode–electrolyte interface on solid-state batteries. Nat. Mater. 20, 1392–1400 (2021).
Google Scholar
Golov, A., Lian, J. X. & Carrasco, J. Interface stability and reaction mechanisms of Li3YCl5Br with high-voltage cathodes and Li metal anode: insights from ab initio simulations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 57870–57877 (2024).
Google Scholar
Holekevi Chandrappa, M. L., Qi, J., Chen, C., Banerjee, S. & Ong, S. P. Thermodynamics and kinetics of the cathode–electrolyte interface in all-solid-state Li–S batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18009–18022 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yu, C. et al. Tailoring Li6PS5Br ionic conductivity and understanding of its role in cathode mixtures for high performance all-solid-state Li–S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 10412–10421 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yu, C. et al. Tuning ionic conductivity and electrode compatibility of Li3YBr6 for high-performance all solid-state Li batteries. Nano Energy 77, 105097 (2020).
Google Scholar
Morales, D. et al. Transport studies of NaPF6 carbonate solvents-based sodium ion electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 377, 138062 (2021).
Google Scholar
