Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 109, 21–29 (2015).
Satpathy, A. T. et al. Massively parallel single-cell chromatin landscapes of human immune cell development and intratumoral T cell exhaustion. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 925–936 (2019).
Preissl, S. et al. Single-nucleus analysis of accessible chromatin in developing mouse forebrain reveals cell-type-specific transcriptional regulation. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 432–439 (2018).
Gehring, J., Hwee Park, J., Chen, S., Thomson, M. & Pachter, L. Highly multiplexed single-cell RNA-seq by DNA oligonucleotide tagging of cellular proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 35–38 (2020).
Almanzar, N. et al. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas characterizes ageing tissues in the mouse. Nature 583, 590–595 (2020).
Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).
Tran, H. T. N. et al. A benchmark of batch-effect correction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 21, 12 (2020).
Chazarra-Gil, R., van Dongen, S., Kiselev, V. Y. & Hemberg, M. Flexible comparison of batch correction methods for single-cell RNA-seq using BatchBench. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e42–e42 (2021).
Chen, S. et al. RA3 is a reference-guided approach for epigenetic characterization of single cells. Nat. Commun. 12, 2177 (2021).
Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A. & Satija, R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nat. Methods 18, 1333–1341 (2021).
Ashuach, T., Reidenbach, D. A., Gayoso, A. & Yosef, N. PeakVI: a deep generative model for single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. Cell Rep. Methods 2, 100182 (2022).
Kopp, W., Akalin, A. & Ohler, U. Simultaneous dimensionality reduction and integration for single-cell atac-seq data using deep learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 162–168 (2022).
Xiong, L. et al. Online single-cell data integration through projecting heterogeneous datasets into a common cell-embedding space. Nat. Commun. 13, 6118 (2022).
Yuan, H. & Kelley, D. R. scBasset: sequence-based modeling of single-cell ATAC-seq using convolutional neural networks. Nat. Methods 19, 1088–1096 (2022).
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426 (2020).
Traag, V. A., Waltman, L. & van Eck, N. J. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci. Rep. 9, 5233 (2019).
Luecken, M. D. et al. Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics. Nat. Methods 19, 41–50 (2022).
Grandi, F. C., Modi, H., Kampman, L. & Corces, M. R. Chromatin accessibility profiling by ATAC-seq. Nat. Protoc. 17, 1518–1552 (2022).
Lareau, C. A. et al. Droplet-based combinatorial indexing for massive-scale single-cell chromatin accessibility. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 916–924 (2019).
Domcke, S. et al. A human cell atlas of fetal chromatin accessibility. Science 370, eaba7612 (2020).
Wang, A. et al. Single-cell multiomic profiling of human lungs reveals cell-type-specific and age-dynamic control of SARS-CoV2 host genes. eLife 9, e62522 (2020).
Yuan, W. et al. Temporally divergent regulatory mechanisms govern neuronal diversification and maturation in the mouse and marmoset neocortex. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1049–1058 (2022).
Wilcoxon, F., Katti, S. K. & Wilcox, R. A. in Critical Values and Probability Levels for the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, Vol. 1. 171–259 (American Cyanamid, 1963).
Chen, Y. T. & Zou, J. GenePT: a simple but hard-to-beat foundation model for genes and cells built from chatgpt. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.16.562533 (2024).
Danese, A. et al. EpiScanpy: integrated single-cell epigenomic analysis. Nat. Commun. 12, 5228 (2021).
Abdelaal, T. et al. A comparison of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 20, 194 (2019).
Li, Z. et al. Chromatin-accessibility estimation from single-cell ATAC-seq data with scOpen. Nat. Commun. 12, 6386 (2021).
Kiselev, V. Y., Yiu, A. & Hemberg, M. scmap: projection of single-cell RNA-seq data across data sets. Nat. Methods 15, 359–362 (2018).
Slowikowski, K., Hu, X. & Raychaudhuri, S. SNPsea: an algorithm to identify cell types, tissues and pathways affected by risk loci. Bioinformatics 30, 2496–2497 (2014).
Manz, M. G. & Boettcher, S. Emergency granulopoiesis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 302–314 (2014).
Rock, J. R. & Hogan, B. L. Epithelial progenitor cells in lung development, maintenance, repair, and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 493–512 (2011).
Fonsatti, E., Altomonte, M., Nicotra, M. R., Natali, P. G. & Maio, M. Endoglin (CD105): a powerful therapeutic target on tumor-associated angiogenetic blood vessels. Oncogene 22, 6557–6563 (2003).
Finucane, H. K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015).
Dendrou, C. A., Fugger, L. & Friese, M. A. Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 545–558 (2015).
Friese, M. A. & Fugger, L. Pathogenic CD8+ T cells in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 66, 132–141 (2009).
Lu, L. et al. Regulation of activated CD4+ T cells by NK cells via the Qa-1–NKG2A inhibitory pathway. Immunity 26, 593–604 (2007).
McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495–501 (2010).
Chatzileontiadou, D. S., Sloane, H., Nguyen, A. T., Gras, S. & Grant, E. J. The many faces of CD4+ T cells: Immunological and structural characteristics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 73 (2020).
Zhu, J., Yamane, H. & Paul, W. E. Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 445–489 (2009).
Sakaguchi, S., Yamaguchi, T., Nomura, T. & Ono, M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 133, 775–787 (2008).
Smith-Garvin, J. E., Koretzky, G. A. & Jordan, M. S. T cell activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 591–619 (2009).
Gordon, S. & Taylor, P. R. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 953–964 (2005).
Wang, Y. et al. The essential role of transcription factor Pitx3 in preventing mesodiencephalic dopaminergic neurodegeneration and maintaining neuronal subtype identities during aging. Cell Death Dis. 12, 1008 (2021).
Pei, J. et al. Integrated analysis reveals FLI1 regulates the tumor immune microenvironment via its cell-type-specific expression and transcriptional regulation of distinct target genes of immune cells in breast cancer. BMC Genomics 25, 250 (2024).
Goodnight, A. V. et al. Chromatin accessibility and transcription dynamics during in vitro astrocyte differentiation of Huntington’s Disease Monkey pluripotent stem cells. Epigenet. Chromatin 12, 67 (2019).
Demetci, P., Santorella, R., Sandstede, B., Noble, W. S. & Singh, R. SCOT: single-cell multi-omics alignment with optimal transport. J. Comput. Biol. 29, 3–18 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cang, Z. & Nie, Q. Inferring spatial and signaling relationships between cells from single cell transcriptomic data. Nat. Commun. 11, 2084 (2020).
Cao, K., Hong, Y. & Wan, L. Manifold alignment for heterogeneous single-cell multi-omics data integration using Pamona. Bioinformatics 38, 211–219 (2021).
Cao, K., Gong, Q., Hong, Y. & Wan, L. A unified computational framework for single-cell data integration with optimal transport. Nat. Commun. 13, 7419 (2022).
Samaran, J., Peyré, G. & Cantini, L. scConfluence: single-cell diagonal integration with regularized inverse optimal transport on weakly connected features. Nat. Commun. 15, 7762 (2024).
Villani, C. Optimal Transport: Old and New vol. 338 (Springer, 2009).
Peyré, G. & Cuturi, M. Computational optimal transport. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 11, 355–607 (2019).
Fefferman, C., Mitter, S. & Narayanan, H. Testing the manifold hypothesis. J. Am. Math. Soc. 29, 983–1049 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jost, J. Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis (Springer, 2017).
Tenenbaum, J. B., De Silva, V. & Langford, J. C. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290, 2319–2323 (2000).
Reuter, M., Biasotti, S., Giorgi, D., Patanè, G. & Spagnuolo, M. Discrete Laplace–Beltrami operators for shape analysis and segmentation. Comput. Graph. 33, 381–390 (2009).
Belkin, M. & Niyogi, P. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Comput. 15, 1373–1396 (2003).
Cui, Z., Chang, H., Shan, S. & Chen, X. Generalized unsupervised manifold alignment. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Ghahramani, Z., Welling, M., Cortes, C., Lawrence, N. & Weinberger, K. Q.) 27, 2429–2437 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2014).
Perrot, M., Courty, N., Flamary, R. & Habrard, A. Mapping estimation for discrete optimal transport. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Lee, D., Sugiyama, M., Luxburg, U., Guyon, I. & Garnett, R.) 29, 4197–4205 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2016).
Zhou, P. et al. Towards theoretically understanding why SGD generalizes better than ADAM in deep learning. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 21285–21296 (2020).
Fatras, K., Sejourne, T., Flamary, R. & Courty, N. Unbalanced minibatch optimal transport: applications to domain adaptation. Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 139, 3186–3197 (2021).
Hendrycks, D. & Gimpel, K. Gaussian error linear units (GELUs). Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08415 (2016).
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).
Zhu, S., Hua, H. & Chen, S. Rigorous integration of single-cell ATAC-seq data using regularized barycentric mapping. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14924285 (2025).
