Soille, P. et al. A versatile data-intensive computing platform for information retrieval from big geospatial data. Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 81, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.007 (2018).
Google Scholar
Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 (2019) (publisher: Nature Publishing Group).
Yang, J. et al. The role of satellite remote sensing in climate change studies. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 875–883 (2013).
Google Scholar
Nakalembe, C. Urgent and critical need for sub-Saharan African countries to invest in earth observation-based agricultural early warning and monitoring systems. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 121002 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wu, Z. et al. Deep learning enables satellite-based monitoring of large populations of terrestrial mammals across heterogeneous landscape. Nat. Commun. 14, 3072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38901-y (2023) (publisher: Nature Publishing Group).
Camps-Valls, G., Tuia, D., Zhu, X. & Reichstein, M. Deep Learn. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119646181 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhu, X. X. et al. Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 5, 8–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2017.2762307 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ma, L. et al. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 152, 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015 (2019).
Google Scholar
Camps-Valls, G., Tuia, D., Zhu, X. X. & Reichstein, M. Deep Learning for the Earth Sciences: A Comprehensive Approach to Remote Sensing, Climate Science, and Geosciences (Wiley, 2021).
Zhang, L., Zhang, L. & Du, B. Deep learning for remote sensing data: A technical tutorial on the state of the art. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 4, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2016.2540798 (2016).
Google Scholar
Aleissaee, A. A. et al. Transformers in remote sensing: A survey. Remote Sens. 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071860 (2023).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539 (2015) (number: 7553 publisher: Nature Publishing Group).
Sumbul, G. & Demir, B. Generative reasoning integrated label noise robust deep image representation learning. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 32, 4529–4542 (2022).
Google Scholar
Elmes, A. et al. Accounting for training data error in machine learning applied to Earth observations. Remote Sens. 12, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061034 (2020) (number: 6 publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute).
Jiang, L., Zhou, Z., Leung, T., Li, L.-J. & Fei-Fei, L. MentorNet: Learning data-driven curriculum for very deep neural networks on corrupted labels. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2304–2313 (PMLR, 2018) (ISSN: 2640-3498).
Gawlikowski, J. et al. A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, 1513–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10562-9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tuia, D. et al. Toward a collective agenda on AI for Earth science data analysis. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 9, 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2020.3043504 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kondylatos, S. et al. Wildfire danger prediction and understanding with deep learning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099368. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099368 (2022). _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2022GL099368.
Bountos, N. I. et al. Kuro siwo: 33 billion \(m^{2}\) under the water. A global multi-temporal satellite dataset for rapid flood mapping. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Globerson, A. et al. eds.). Vol. 37. 38105–38121 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2024).
Boehm, V. et al. Deep Learning for Rapid Landslide Detection Using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Datacubes (2022). arXiv:2211.02869 [cs, eess].
Bountos, N. I. et al. Hephaestus: A large scale multitask dataset towards InSAR understanding. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). 1452–1461. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.00151 (IEEE, 2022).
Gal, Y. Uncertainty in Deep Learning (PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2016).
Kendall, A. & Gal, Y. What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’17. 5580–5590 (Curran Associates Inc., 2017).
Collier, M., Mustafa, B., Kokiopoulou, E., Jenatton, R. & Berent, J. A Simple Probabilistic Method for Deep Classification Under Input-Dependent Label Noise (2020). arXiv:2003.06778 [cs, stat].
Cordeiro, F. R. & Carneiro, G. A survey on deep learning with noisy labels: How to train your model when you cannot trust on the annotations? In 2020 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI). 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBGRAPI51738.2020.00010 (IEEE, 2020).
Tanno, R., Saeedi, A., Sankaranarayanan, S., Alexander, D. C. & Silberman, N. Learning from noisy labels by regularized estimation of annotator confusion. In CVPR. 11244–11253 (2019).
Menon, A. K., Rawat, A. S., Kumar, S. & Reddi, S. Can gradient clipping mitigate label noise? In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2020).
Wei, H., Tao, L., Xie, R. & An, B. Open-set label noise can improve robustness against inherent label noise. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS ’21 (Curran Associates Inc., 2021).
Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., Wilson, D. & Gimpel, K. Using trusted data to train deep networks on labels corrupted by severe noise. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Bengio, S. et al. eds.) . Vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2018).
Zhang, Y. & Sugiyama, M. Approximating Instance-Dependent Noise via Instance-Confidence Embedding. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.13569 (2021). arXiv:2103.13569 [cs, stat].
Yang, S. et al. Estimating instance-dependent Bayes-label transition matrix using a deep neural network. In ICML (2022).
Wang, R., Liu, T. & Tao, D. Multiclass Learning with Partially Corrupted Labels. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 29, 2568–2580. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2699783 (2018) (conference name: IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems).
Chang, H.-S., Learned-Miller, E. & McCallum, A. Active bias: Training more accurate neural networks by emphasizing high variance samples. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017).
Zhang, H., Xing, X. & Liu, L. DualGraph: A graph-based method for reasoning about label noise. In 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 9649–9658. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00953 (IEEE, 2021).
Song, H., Kim, M., Park, D., Shin, Y. & Lee, J.-G. Learning from noisy labels with deep neural networks: A survey. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 34, 8135–8153. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2022.3152527 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jiang, L., Huang, D. , Liu, M. & Yang, W. Deep learning on controlled noisy labels. In ICML, Beyond Synthetic Noise (2020).
Zhang, H., Cissé, M., Dauphin, Y. N. & Lopez-Paz, D. mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 30 – May 3, 2018, Conference Track Proceedings (OpenReview.net, 2018).
Han, B. et al. Co-teaching: robust training of deep neural networks with extremely noisy labels. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’18. 8536–8546 (Curran Associates Inc., 2018).
Detlefsen, N. S., Jørgensen, M. & Hauberg, S. Reliable Training and Estimation of Variance Networks (Curran Associates Inc., 2019).
Zhang, J., Kailkhura, B. & Han, T. Y.-J. Mix-n-match: Ensemble and compositional methods for uncertainty calibration in deep learning. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’20 (JMLR.org, 2020).
Thulasidasan, S., Chennupati, G., Bilmes, J. A., Bhattacharya, T. & Michalak, S. On mixup training: Improved calibration and predictive uncertainty for deep neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Wallach, H. et al. eds.). Vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019).
Angelopoulos, A. N. & Bates, S. A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.07511 (2022). ArXiv:2107.07511 [cs].
Malinin, A. & Gales, M. Predictive uncertainty estimation via prior networks. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’18. 7047–7058 (Curran Associates Inc., 2018).
Jospin, L. V., Laga, H., Boussaid, F., Buntine, W. & Bennamoun, M. Hands-on Bayesian neural networks-a tutorial for deep learning users. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 17, 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2022.3155327 (2022).
Google Scholar
Blundell, C., Cornebise, J., Kavukcuoglu, K. & Wierstra, D. Weight uncertainty in neural networks. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’15. Vol. 37. 1613–1622 (JMLR.org, 2015).
Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A. & Blundell, C. Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’17. 6405–6416 (Curran Associates Inc., 2017).
Ramalho, T. & Miranda, M. Density estimation in representation space to predict model uncertainty (2019). arXiv:1908.07235 [cs, stat].
Oberdiek, P., Rottmann, M. & Gottschalk, H. Classification uncertainty of deep neural networks based on gradient information. In Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition: 8th IAPR TC3 Workshop, ANNPR 2018, Siena, Italy, September 19-21, 2018, Proceedings. 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99978-4_9 (Springer, 2018).
Lee, J. & AlRegib, G. Gradients as a measure of uncertainty in neural networks. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 2416–2420. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP40778.2020.9190679 (2020).
Sensoy, M., Kaplan, L. & Kandemir, M. Evidential deep learning to quantify classification uncertainty. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Bengio, S. et al. eds.). Vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2018).
Nandy, J., Hsu, W. & Lee, M. Towards maximizing the representation gap between in-domain & out-of-distribution examples. In NeurIPS (2020).
Ayhan, M. S. & Berens, P. Test-time data augmentation for estimation of heteroscedastic aleatoric uncertainty in deep neural networks. In 1st Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (MIDL) (2018).
Wang, G. et al. Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing 338, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.103 (2019). ArXiv:1807.07356 [cs].
Rasmussen, C. E. & Williams, C. K. I. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Adaptive computation and machine learning (MIT Press, 2006). OCLC: ocm61285753.
Damianou, A. & Lawrence, N. Deep Gaussian processes. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 207–215 (2013).
Camps-Valls, G. et al. A survey on Gaussian processes for Earth-observation data analysis: A comprehensive investigation. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 4, 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2015.2510084 (2016).
Google Scholar
Camps-Valls, G., Sejdinovic, D., Runge, J. & Reichstein, M. A perspective on Gaussian processes for Earth observation. Natl. Sci. Rev. 6, 616–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz028 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mateo-Sanchis, A., Munoz-Mari, J., Campos-Taberner, M., Garcia-Haro, J. & Camps-Valls, G. Gap filling of biophysical parameter time series with multi-output Gaussian processes. In IGARSS 2018 – 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 4039–4042. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8519254 (IEEE, 2018).
Svendsen, D. H., Morales-Álvarez, P., Ruescas, A. B., Molina, R. & Camps-Valls, G. Deep Gaussian processes for biogeophysical parameter retrieval and model inversion. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 166, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.014 (2020).
Google Scholar
Morales-Alvarez, P., Perez-Suay, A., Molina, R. & Camps-Valls, G. Remote sensing image classification with large-scale gaussian processes. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 56, 1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2758922 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gal, Y. & Ghahramani, Z. Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (Balcan, M. F. & Weinberger, K. Q. eds.). Vol. 48. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. 1050–1059 (PMLR, 2016).
Martínez-Ferrer, L. et al. Quantifying uncertainty in high resolution biophysical variable retrieval with machine learning. Remote Sens. Environ. 280, 113199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113199 (2022).
Google Scholar
Asadi, N., Scott, K. A., Komarov, A. S., Buehner, M. & Clausi, D. A. Evaluation of a neural network with uncertainty for detection of ice and water in SAR imagery. In IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2992454 (2020).
Kampffmeyer, M., Salberg, A. & Jenssen, R. Semantic segmentation of small objects and modeling of uncertainty in urban remote sensing images using deep convolutional neural networks. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2016.90 (2016) (ISSN: 2160-7516).
Dechesne, C., Lassalle, P. & Lefèvre, S. Bayesian U-Net: Estimating uncertainty in semantic segmentation of Earth observation images. Remote Sens. 13, 3836. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193836 (2021) (number: 19 publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute).
He, X., Chen, Y. & Huang, L. Bayesian deep learning for hyperspectral image classification with low uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 61, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3257865 (2023).
Google Scholar
Joshaghani, M., Davari, A., Hatamian, F. N., Maier, A. & Riess, C. Bayesian convolutional neural networks for limited data hyperspectral remote sensing image classification. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 20, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2023.3287504 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Zhang, Z., Kang, Y. & Özdoğan, M. Corn yield prediction and uncertainty analysis based on remotely sensed variables using a Bayesian neural network approach. Remote Sens. Environ. 259, 112408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112408 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Yan, S. & Gong, J. Quantifying uncertainty in soil moisture retrieval using a Bayesian neural network framework. Comput. Electron. Agric. 215, 108414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108414 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, C. et al. SelectSeg: Uncertainty-based selective training and prediction for accurate crack segmentation under limited data and noisy annotations. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 259, 110909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.110909 (2025).
Google Scholar
He, Q., Qin, K., Cohen, J. B., Li, D. & Kim, J. Quantifying uncertainty in ML-derived atmosphere remote sensing: Hourly surface NO2 estimation with GEMS. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL110468. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110468 (2024). _eprint: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2024GL110468.
Singh, G. et al. Uncertainty quantification for probabilistic machine learning in earth observation using conformal prediction. Sci. Rep. 14, 16166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65954-w (2024) (publisher: Nature Publishing Group).
Ferchichi, A., Chihaoui, M., Toujani, R., Ferchichi, A. & Hendaoui, F. Evidential uncertainty quantification with multiple deep learning architectures for spatiotemporal drought forecasting. Neural Comput. Appl. 37, 8773–8797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-025-11026-7 (2025).
Google Scholar
Schreck, J. S. et al. Evidential deep learning: Enhancing predictive uncertainty estimation for earth system science applications. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 3, 230093. https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-23-0093.1 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. Quantification of model uncertainty and variability for landslide displacement prediction based on Monte Carlo simulation. Gondwana Res. 123, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.03.006 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Fernndez-Torres, M.-A., Cohrs, K.-H. & Camps-Valls, G. Calibration and uncertainty quantification for deep learning-based drought detection. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 140, 104563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104563 (2025).
Yu, W. et al. A probabilistic approach to wildfire spread prediction using a denoising diffusion surrogate model. EGUsphere. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2836 (2025) (publisher: Copernicus GmbH).
Finn, T. S. et al. Generative diffusion for regional surrogate models from sea-ice simulations. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 16, e2024MS004395. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004395 (2024). _eprint: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2024MS004395.
Tu, S. et al. Satellite observations guided diffusion model for accurate meteorological states at arbitrary resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 28071–28080 (2025).
Sinha, S. et al. Variational autoencoder anomaly-detection of Avalanche deposits in satellite SAR imagery. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Climate Informatics, CI2020. 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/3429309.3429326 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).
Yadav, R., Nascetti, A., Azizpour, H. & Ban, Y. Unsupervised flood detection on SAR time series using variational autoencoder. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 126, 103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103635 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lazaro-Gredilla, M., Titsias, M. K., Verrelst, J. & Camps-Valls, G. Retrieval of biophysical parameters with heteroscedastic Gaussian processes. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 11, 838–842. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2013.2279695 (2014).
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Zhang, Y. & Zhu, Z. Learning deep networks under noisy labels for remote sensing image scene classification. In IGARSS 2019 – 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 3025–3028. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8900497 (2019) (ISSN: 2153-7003).
Jiang, J., Ma, J., Wang, Z., Chen, C. & Liu, X. Hyperspectral image classification in the presence of noisy labels. In IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Vol. 57. 851–865. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2861992 (2019) (conference name: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing).
Li, P. et al. An improved categorical cross entropy for remote sensing image classification based on noisy labels. Expert Syst. Appl. 205, 117296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117296 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xu, Y. et al. Dual-channel residual network for hyperspectral image classification with noisy labels. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3057689 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cortés-Andrés, J., Fernández-Torres, M.-A. & Camps-Valls, G. Deep learning with noisy labels for spatiotemporal drought detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 62, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3504340 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, Q., Chen, Y. & Ghamisi, P. Complementary learning-based scene classification of remote sensing images with noisy labels. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 19, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3112960 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aksoy, A. K., Ravanbakhsh, M. & Demir, B. Multi-label noise robust collaborative learning for remote sensing image classification. In IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3209992 (2022). Conference name: IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
Mirpulatov, I., Illarionova, S., Shadrin, D. & Burnaev, E. Pseudo-labeling approach for land cover classification through remote sensing observations with noisy labels. IEEE Access 11, 82570–82583. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3300967 (2023).
Google Scholar
Snow, R., O’Connor, B., Jurafsky, D. & Ng, A. Cheap and fast – But is it good? Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 254–263 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008).
Raykar, V. C. et al. Learning from crowds. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 1297–1322 (2010).
Google Scholar
Prapas, I. et al. Deep Learning Methods for Daily Wildfire Danger Forecasting (2021). ArXiv:2111.02736 [cs].
Sumbul, G., Charfuelan, M., Demir, B. & Markl, V. Bigearthnet: A large-scale benchmark archive for remote sensing image understanding. In IGARSS 2019 – 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 5901–5904. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8900532 (IEEE, 2019).
Büttner, G. CORINE land cover and land cover change products. In Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in Europe: Practices & Trends, Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing (Manakos, I. & Braun, M. eds.). 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7969-3_5 (Springer, 2014).
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 770–778 (2016).
Zhou, Z., Siddiquee, M. M. R., Tajbakhsh, N. & Liang, J. UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation (2018). arXiv:1807.10165 [cs, eess, stat].
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L. & Weinberger, K. Q. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4700–4708 (2017).
Hochreiter, S. & Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 (1997).
Google Scholar
Mukhoti, J. & Gal, Y. Evaluating Bayesian deep learning methods for semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.12709 (2019).
Haynes, K., Lagerquist, R., McGraw, M., Musgrave, K. & Ebert-Uphoff, I. Creating and evaluating uncertainty estimates with neural networks for environmental-science applications. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 2, 220061 (2023).
Ståhl, N., Falkman, G., Karlsson, A. & Mathiason, G. Evaluation of uncertainty quantification in deep learning. In Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (Lesot, M.-J. et al. eds.). 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50146-4_41 (Springer, 2020).
Palmer, S. C., Kutser, T. & Hunter, P. D. Remote sensing of inland waters: Challenges, progress and future directions. Remote Sens. Environ. 157, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.021 (2015). Special issue: Remote Sensing of Inland Waters.
Giannaros, T. M. et al. Meteorological analysis of the 2021 extreme wildfires in Greece: Lessons learned and implications for early warning of the potential for pyroconvection. Atmosphere 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030475 (2022).
Kondylatos, S., Prapas, I., Camps-Valls, G. & Papoutsis, I. Mesogeos: A multi-purpose dataset for data-driven wildfire modeling in the Mediterranean. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 50661–50676 (2023).
Farahani, A., Voghoei, S., Rasheed, K. & Arabnia, H. R. A brief review of domain adaptation. In Advances in Data Science and Information Engineering (Stahlbock, R. et al. eds.). 877–894 (Springer, 2021).
Settles, B. Active learning literature survey. In Technical Report, University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Computer Sciences (2009). Accepted 15 Mar 2012.
Engelen, J. E. & Hoos, H. H. A survey on semi-supervised learning. Mach. Learn. 109, 373–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rolf, E., Klemmer, K., Robinson, C. & Kerner, H. Mission critical–satellite data is a distinct modality in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01444 (2024).
