Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H., Furr, J. R. & Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 935–949 (2004).
Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. L. Predicting promiscuity. Nature 462, 167–168 (2009).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. TransformerCPI: improving compound–protein interaction prediction by sequence-based deep learning with self-attention mechanism and label reversal experiments. Bioinformatics 36, 4406–4414 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jiang, M. et al. Drug–target affinity prediction using graph neural network and contact maps. RSC Adv. 10, 20701–20712 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bagherian, M. et al. Machine learning approaches and databases for prediction of drug–target interaction: a survey paper. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 247–269 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, S. et al. Structure-aware interactive graph neural networks for the prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity. In Proc. 27th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 975–985 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).
Dhakal, A., McKay, C., Tanner, J. J. & Cheng, J. Artificial intelligence in the prediction of protein–ligand interactions: recent advances and future directions. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbab476 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lu, W. et al. TANKBind: trigonometry-aware neural networks for drug–protein binding structure prediction. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 7236–7249 (2022).
Bai, P., Miljković, F., John, B. & Lu, H. Interpretable bilinear attention network with domain adaptation improves drug–target prediction. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 126–136 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ng, H. W. et al. Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists. BMC Bioinf. 15, S4 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rodríguez, D., Gao, Z.-G., Moss, S. M., Jacobson, K. A. & Carlsson, J. Molecular docking screening using agonist-bound GPCR structures: probing the A2A adenosine receptor. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55, 550–563 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kooistra, A. J., Leurs, R., de Esch, I. J. P. & de Graaf, C. Structure-based prediction of G-protein-coupled receptor ligand function: a β-adrenoceptor case study. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55, 1045–1061 (2015).
Google Scholar
Cai, T., Abbu, K. A., Liu, Y. & Xie, L. DeepREAL: a deep learning powered multi-scale modeling framework for predicting out-of-distribution ligand-induced GPCR activity. Bioinformatics 38, 2561–2570 (2022).
Google Scholar
Michel, M., Menéndez Hurtado, D. & Elofsson, A. PconsC4: fast, accurate and hassle-free contact predictions. Bioinformatics 35, 2677–2679 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rao, R., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Ovchinnikov, S. & Rives, A. Transformer protein language models are unsupervised structure learners. In Proc. 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2020).
Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jiang, M. et al. Sequence-based drug-target affinity prediction using weighted graph neural networks. BMC Genomics 23, 449 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, P. et al. Structure-aware multimodal deep learning for drug–protein interaction prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 1308–1317 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gainza, P. et al. Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning. Nat. Methods 17, 184–192 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wong, F. et al. Benchmarking AlphaFold‐enabled molecular docking predictions for antibiotic discovery. Mol. Syst. Biol. 18, e11081 (2022).
Google Scholar
He, X. et al. AlphaFold2 versus experimental structures: evaluation on G protein-coupled receptors. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 44, 1–7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. et al. GraphDTA: predicting drug–target binding affinity with graph neural networks. Bioinformatics 37, 1140–1147 (2021).
Google Scholar
Corso, G., Stärk, H., Jing, B., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. S. DiffDock: diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2020).
Somnath, V. R., Bunne, C. & Krause, A. Multi-scale representation learning on proteins. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 25244–25255 (2021).
Corso, G., Cavalleri, L., Beaini, D., Liò, P. & Veličković, P. Principal neighbourhood aggregation for graph nets. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 13260–13271 (2020).
Rarey, M. & Dixon, J. S. Feature trees: a new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 12, 471–490 (1998).
Google Scholar
Jin, W., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. Junction tree variational autoencoder for molecular graph generation. In Proc. 35th International Conference on Machine Learning 2323–2332 (PMLR, 2018).
Bianchi, F. M., Grattarola, D. & Alippi, C. Spectral clustering with graph neural networks for graph pooling. In Proc. 37th International Conference on Machine Learning 874–883 (PMLR, 2020).
Su, M. et al. Comparative assessment of scoring functions: the CASF-2016 update. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 895–913 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stärk, H., Ganea, O., Pattanaik, L., Barzilay, D. R. & Jaakkola, T. EquiBind: geometric deep learning for drug binding structure prediction. In Proc. 39th International Conference on Machine Learning 20503–20521 (PMLR, 2022).
Huang, K., Xiao, C., Glass, L. M. & Sun, J. MolTrans: molecular interaction transformer for drug–target interaction prediction. Bioinformatics 37, 830–836 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zitnik, M., Sosič, R., Maheshwari, S. & Leskovec, J. BioSNAP Datasets: Stanford Biomedical Network Dataset Collection (Stanford Univ., 2018); https://snap.stanford.edu/biodata
Liu, T., Lin, Y., Wen, X., Jorissen, R. N. & Gilson, M. K. BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein–ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D198–D201 (2007).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database. Bioinformatics 31, 405–412 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sun, J. et al. ExCAPE-DB: an integrated large scale dataset facilitating big data analysis in chemogenomics. J. Cheminform. 9, 17 (2017).
Google Scholar
Béquignon, O. J. M. et al. Papyrus: a large-scale curated dataset aimed at bioactivity predictions. J. Cheminform. 15, 3 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cortellis Drug Discovery Intelligence (Clarivate, 2023); https://www.cortellis.com/drugdiscovery/
Lin, H. et al. Discovery of potent and selective covalent protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitors. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 10, 1033–1038 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rusere, L. N. et al. HIV-1 protease inhibitors incorporating stereochemically defined P2′ ligands to optimize hydrogen bonding in the substrate envelope. J. Med. Chem. 62, 8062–8079 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yilmaz, N. K., Swanstrom, R. & Schiffer, C. A. Improving viral protease inhibitors to counter drug resistance. Trends Microbiol. 24, 547–557 (2016).
Google Scholar
Draper-Joyce, C. J. et al. Structure of the adenosine-bound human adenosine A1 receptor–Gi complex. Nature 558, 559–563 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mendez, D. et al. ChEMBL: towards direct deposition of bioassay data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D930–D940 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bento, A. P. et al. An open source chemical structure curation pipeline using RDKit. J. Cheminform. 12, 51 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, A. T. N. et al. Extracellular loop 2 of the adenosine A1 receptor has a key role in orthosteric ligand affinity and agonist efficacy. Mol. Pharmacol. 90, 703–714 (2016).
Google Scholar
Roth, B. L., Sheffler, D. J. & Kroeze, W. K. Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 353–359 (2004).
Google Scholar
Harding, S. D. et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1438–D1449 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jacobson, K. A. & Gao, Z.-G. Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 247–264 (2006).
Google Scholar
Perreira, M. et al. “Reversine” and its 2-substituted adenine derivatives as potent and selective A3 adenosine receptor antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 48, 4910–4918 (2005).
Google Scholar
Glukhova, A. et al. Structure of the adenosine A1 receptor reveals the basis for subtype selectivity. Cell 168, 867–877.e13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Deng, Z., Chuaqui, C. & Singh, J. Structural Interaction Fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein−ligand binding interactions. J. Med. Chem. 47, 337–344 (2004).
Google Scholar
Thal, D. M. et al. Recent advances in the determination of G protein-coupled receptor structures. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 51, 28–34 (2018).
Google Scholar
Draper-Joyce, C. J. et al. Positive allosteric mechanisms of adenosine A1 receptor-mediated analgesia. Nature 597, 571–576 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jeffrey Conn, P., Christopoulos, A. & Lindsley, C. W. Allosteric modulators of GPCRs: a novel approach for the treatment of CNS disorders. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 8, 41–54 (2009).
Google Scholar
Freitas, R. Fde & Schapira, M. A systematic analysis of atomic protein–ligand interactions in the PDB. MedChemComm 8, 1970–1981 (2017).
Google Scholar
Krivák, R. & Hoksza, D. P2Rank: machine learning based tool for rapid and accurate prediction of ligand binding sites from protein structure. J. Cheminform. 10, 39 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cai, T. et al. GraphNorm: a principled approach to accelerating graph neural network training. In Proc. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning 1204–1215 (PMLR, 2021).
Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2015).
Loshchilov, I. & Hutter, F. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In Proc. 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2018).
Khazanov, N. A. & Carlson, H. A. Exploring the composition of protein–ligand binding sites on a large scale. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003321 (2013).
Google Scholar
Baltos, J.-A. et al. Quantification of adenosine A1 receptor biased agonism: implications for drug discovery. Biochem. Pharmacol. 99, 101–112 (2016).
Google Scholar
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
Google Scholar
The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D523–D531 (2023).
Google Scholar
Béquignon, O. J. M. et al. Accompanying data – Papyrus – a large scale curated dataset aimed at bioactivity predictions. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10943207 (2024).
Koh, H. Y., Nguyen, A. T. N., Pan, S., May, L. T. & Webb, G. I. Datasets for “Physicochemical graph neural network for learning protein–ligand interaction fingerprints from sequence data”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10901712 (2024).
Koh, H. Y. huankoh/PSICHIC: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10901685 (2024).
Stepniewska-Dziubinska, M. M., Zielenkiewicz, P. & Siedlecki, P. Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction. Bioinformatics 34, 3666–3674 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zheng, L., Fan, J. & Mu, Y. OnionNet: a multiple-layer intermolecular-contact-based convolutional neural network for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction. ACS Omega 4, 15956–15965 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jiang, D. et al. InteractionGraphNet: a novel and efficient deep graph representation learning framework for accurate protein–ligand interaction predictions. J. Med. Chem. 64, 18209–18232 (2021).
Google Scholar
Koes, D. R., Baumgartner, M. P. & Camacho, C. J. Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53, 1893–1904 (2013).
Google Scholar
McNutt, A. T. et al. GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning. J. Cheminform. 13, 43 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sverrisson, F., Feydy, J., Correia, B. E. & Bronstein, M. M. Fast end-to-end learning on protein surfaces. In Proc. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 15272–15281 (IEEE, 2021).
Roy, K. et al. Some case studies on application of “rm2” metrics for judging quality of quantitative structure–activity relationship predictions: emphasis on scaling of response data. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 1071–1082 (2013).
Google Scholar
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N. & Großberger, L. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 861 (2018).
Google Scholar
Adasme, M. F. et al. PLIP 2021: expanding the scope of the protein–ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W530–W534 (2021).
Google Scholar
