Zibulewsky, J. Defining disaster: The emergency department perspective. In Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings (Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 144–149). Taylor & Francis. (2001).
Cameron, I. et al. Process Hazard Analysis, Hazard Identification and Scenario Definition: Are the Conventional Tools Sufficient, or Should and Can We Do much Better??11053–70 (Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017).
Mühlhofer, E., Koks, E. E., Kropf, C. M., Sansavini, G. & Bresch, D. N. A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 234, 109194 (2023).
Bahr, N. J. System Safety Engineering and Risk Assessment: a Practical Approach (CRC, 2014).
Men, J., Chen, G., Yang, Y. & Reniers, G. An event-driven probabilistic methodology for modeling the spatial-temporal evolution of natural hazard-induced domino chain in chemical industrial parks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 226, 108723 (2022).
Yousefi, S. et al. A machine learning framework for multi-hazards modeling and mapping in a mountainous area. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 12144 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gallina, V. et al. A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 168, 123–132 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kappes, M. S., Keiler, M., von Elverfeldt, K. & Glade, T. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat. Hazards. 64, 1925–1958 (2012).
Mazumdar, J. & Paul, S. K. Socioeconomic and infrastructural vulnerability indices for cyclones in the Eastern coastal States of India. Nat. Hazards. 82, 1621–1643 (2016).
Medina, V., Hürlimann, M., Guo, Z., Lloret, A. & Vaunat, J. Fast physically-based model for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at regional scale. Catena 201, 105213 (2021).
Sheikh, V., Kornejady, A. & Ownegh, M. Application of the coupled TOPSIS–Mahalanobis distance for multi-hazard-based management of the target districts of the Golestan province, Iran. Nat. Hazards. 96, 1335–1365 (2019).
Do, C. & Kuleshov, Y. Tropical cyclone multi-hazard risk mapping for queensland, Australia. Nat. Hazards. 116 (3), 3725–3746 (2023).
Becher, O., Pant, R., Verschuur, J., Mandal, A., Paltan, H., Lawless, M., & Hall, J. A Multi-Hazard Risk Framework to Stress‐Test Water Supply Systems to Climate‐Related Disruptions. Earth’s Future 11(1), e2022EF002946. (2023)
Wang, J., He, Z. & Weng, W. A review of the research into the relations between hazards in multi-hazard risk analysis. Nat. Hazards. 104, 2003–2026 (2020).
Ghaffarian, S., Taghikhah, F. R. & Maier, H. R. Explainable artificial intelligence in disaster risk management: achievements and prospective futures. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 98, 104123 (2023).
López-Saavedra, M. & Martí, J. Reviewing the multi-hazard concept. Application to volcanic Islands. Earth Sci. Rev. 236, 104286 (2023).
He, Z., Shen, K., Lan, M. & Weng, W. The Effects of Dynamic multi-hazard Risk Assessment on Evacuation Strategies in Chemical Accidents110044 (Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2024).
Ward, P. J., Daniell, J., Duncan, M., Dunne, A., Hananel, C., Hochrainer-Stigler,S., & De Ruiter, M. C. Invited perspectives: A research agenda towards disaster risk management pathways in multi-(hazard-) risk assessment (2022).
Nachappa, T. G., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Gholamnia, K. & Blaschke, T. Multi-hazard exposure mapping using machine learning for the state of salzburg, Austria. Remote Sens. 12 (17), 2757 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sekhri, S., Kumar, P., Fürst, C. & Pandey, R. Mountain specific multi-hazard risk management framework (MSMRMF): assessment and mitigation of multi-hazard and climate change risk in the Indian Himalayan region. Ecol. Ind. 118, 106700 (2020).
Wang, Q., Guo, Y., Li, W., He, J. & Wu, Z. Predictive modeling of landslide hazards in Wen county, Northwestern China based on information value, weights-of-evidence, and certainty factor. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk. 10 (1), 820–835 (2019).
Thiery, Y. et al. Improvement of landslide hazard assessments for regulatory zoning in france: STATE–OF–THE-ART perspectives and considerations. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 47, 101562 (2020).
Mir, R. A., Habib, Z., Kumar, A. & Bhat, N. A. Landslide susceptibility mapping and risk assessment using total estimated susceptibility values along NH44 in Jammu and Kashmir, Western Himalaya. Natural Hazards 1–40. (2024).
Guo, Z., Wang, H., He, J., Huang, D., Song, Y., Wang, T., & Ferrer, J. V. PSLSA v2. 0: An automatic Python package integrating machine learning models for regional landslide susceptibility assessment. Environ. Model. Softw. 106367 (2025).
Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Choi, S. M. Spatial modeling of asthma-prone areas using remote sensing and ensemble machine learning algorithms. Remote Sens. 13 (16), 3222 (2021a).
Google Scholar
Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M. A., Hoffmann, M. J. & Deadman, P. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 93 (2), 314–337 (2003).
Farahani, M., Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Choi, S. M. People’s olfactory perception potential mapping using a machine learning algorithm: A Spatio-temporal approach. Sustainable Cities Soc. 93, 104472 (2023).
Marfai, M. A. & King, L. Tidal inundation mapping under enhanced land subsidence in semarang, central Java Indonesia. Nat. Hazards. 44, 93–109 (2008).
Merghadi, A., Yunus, A. P., Dou, J., Whiteley, J., ThaiPham, B., Bui, D. T., & Abderrahmane, B. Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance. Earth-Sci. Rev. 207, 103225 (2020).
De Angeli, S. et al. A multi-hazard framework for spatial-temporal impact analysis. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 73, 102829 (2022).
Woldesellasse, H. & Tesfamariam, S. Consequence assessment of gas pipeline failure caused by external pitting corrosion using an integrated bayesian belief network and GIS model: application with Alberta pipeline. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 240, 109573 (2023).
Aksha, S. K., Resler, L. M., Juran, L. & Carstensen, L. W. Jr A Geospatial analysis of multi-hazard risk in dharan, nepal. Geomatics. Nat. Hazards Risk. 11 (1), 88–111 (2020).
Chen, C., Liu, Y., Sun, X., Di Cairano-Gilfedder, C. & Titmus, S. An integrated deep learning-based approach for automobile maintenance prediction with GIS data. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 216, 107919 (2021).
Dong, A., Dou, J., Fu, Y., Zhang, R. & Xing, K. Unraveling the evolution of landslide susceptibility: a systematic review of 30-years of strategic themes and trends. Geocarto Int. 38 (1), 2256308 (2023).
Google Scholar
Martino, L., Ulivieri, C., Jahjah, M. & Loret, E. Remote sensing and GIS techniques for natural disaster monitoring. Space Technol. Benefit Hum. Soc. Earth, 331–382. (2009).
Farhangi, F., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Razavi-Termeh, S. V. & Choi, S. M. Evaluation of tree-based machine learning algorithms for accident risk mapping caused by driver lack of alertness at a National scale. Sustainability 13 (18), 10239 (2021).
Janizadeh, S., Avand, M., Jaafari, A., Phong, T. V., Bayat, M., Ahmadisharaf, E., & Lee, S. Prediction success of machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility mapping in the Tafresh watershed, Iran. Sustainability 11(19), 5426 (2019).
Van Westen, C. J. Remote sensing and GIS for natural hazards assessment and disaster risk management. Treatise Geomorphology. 3 (15), 259–298 (2013).
Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Choi, S. M. A new approach based on biology-inspired metaheuristic algorithms in combination with random forest to enhance the flood susceptibility mapping. J. Environ. Manage. 345, 118790 (2023a).
Google Scholar
Heydari Alamdarloo, E., Khosravi, H., Nasabpour, S. & Gholami, A. Assessment of drought hazard, vulnerability and risk in Iran using GIS techniques. J. Arid Land. 12, 984–1000 (2020).
Hejazi, S. J., Sharifi, A. & Arvin, M. Assessment of social vulnerability in areas exposed to multiple hazards: a case study of the Khuzestan province, Iran. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 78, 103127 (2022).
Pourghasemi, H. R., Gayen, A., Panahi, M., Rezaie, F. & Blaschke, T. Multi-hazard probability assessment and mapping in Iran. Sci. Total Environ. 692, 556–571 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yanar, T., Kocaman, S. & Gokceoglu, C. Use of Mamdani fuzzy algorithm for multi-hazard susceptibility assessment in a developing urban settlement (Mamak, ankara, Turkey). ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information. 9 (2), 114 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dou, J., Yunus, A. P., Merghadi, A., Shirzadi, A., Nguyen, H., Hussain, Y., & Yamagishi, H. Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning. Sci. Total Environ. 720, 137320 (2020).
Nhu, V. H., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Singh, S. K., Al-Ansari, N., Clague, J. J., & Ahmad, B. B. Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, naïve bayes tree, artificial neural network,and support vector machine algorithms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(8), 2749 (2020).
Bathrellos, G. D., Skilodimou, H. D., Chousianitis, K., Youssef, A. M. & Pradhan, B. Suitability Estimation for urban development using multi-hazard assessment map. Sci. Total Environ. 575, 119–134 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kaur, H., Gupta, S., Parkash, S. & Thapa, R. Application of Geospatial technologies for multi-hazard mapping and characterization of associated risk at local scale. Ann. GIS. 24 (1), 33–46 (2018).
Skilodimou, H. D., Bathrellos, G. D., Chousianitis, K., Youssef, A. M. & Pradhan, B. Multi-hazard assessment modeling via multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study. Environ. Earth Sci. 78, 1–21 (2019).
Rahmati, O., Yousefi, S., Kalantari, Z., Uuemaa, E., Teimurian, T., Keesstra, S., Tien Bui, D. Multi-hazard exposure mapping using machine learning techniques:A case study from Iran. Remote Sens. 11(16), 1943 (2019).
Pourghasemi, H. R., Gayen, A., Edalat, M., Zarafshar, M. & Tiefenbacher, J. P. Is multi-hazard mapping effective in assessing natural hazards and integrated watershed management? Geosci. Front. 11 (4), 1203–1217 (2020a).
Cao, J. et al. Multi-geohazards susceptibility mapping based on machine learning—A case study in jiuzhaigou, China. Nat. Hazards. 102, 851–871 (2020).
Bordbar, M., Aghamohammadi, H., Pourghasemi, H. R. & Azizi, Z. Multi-hazard Spatial modeling via ensembles of machine learning and meta-heuristic techniques. Sci. Rep. 12 (1), 1451 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ullah, K., Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Wang, L. & Rahman, M. Multi-hazard susceptibility mapping based on convolutional neural networks. Geosci. Front. 13 (5), 101425 (2022).
Akbar, M., Bhat, M. S. & Khan, A. A. Multi-hazard susceptibility mapping for disaster risk reduction in Kargil-Ladakh region of Trans-Himalayan India. Environ. Earth Sci. 82 (2), 68 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pourghasemi, H. R., Pouyan, S., Bordbar, M., Golkar, F. & Clague, J. J. Flood, landslides, forest fire, and earthquake susceptibility maps using machine learning techniques and their combination. Nat. Hazards. 116 (3), 3797–3816 (2023).
Zeng, T. et al. Assessing the imperative of conditioning factor grading in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A critical inquiry. Catena 236, 107732 (2024).
Yalcin, A. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72 (1), 1–12 (2008).
Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Choi, S. M. Ubiquitous GIS-based forest fire susceptibility mapping using artificial intelligence methods. Remote Sens. 12 (10), 1689 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Galiano, V., Sanchez-Castillo, M., Chica-Olmo, M. & Chica-Rivas, M. J. O. G. R. Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: an evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines. Ore Geol. Rev. 71, 804–818 (2015).
Zhou, X., Lu, P., Zheng, Z., Tolliver, D. & Keramati, A. Accident prediction accuracy assessment for highway-rail grade crossings using random forest algorithm compared with decision tree. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 200, 106931 (2020).
Farhangi, F., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Nahvi, A. & Razavi-Termeh, S. V. Spatial modelling of accidents risk caused by driver drowsiness with data mining algorithms. Geocarto Int. 37 (9), 2698–2716 (2022).
Google Scholar
Probst, P., Wright, M. N. & Boulesteix, A. L. Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 9(3), e1301. (2019).
Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Naqvi, R. A. & Choi, S. M. Dust detection and susceptibility mapping by aiding satellite imagery time series and integration of ensemble machine learning with evolutionary algorithms. Environ. Pollut. 335, 122241 (2023b).
Google Scholar
Mallick, J., Alqadhi, S., Talukdar, S., AlSubih, M., Ahmed, M., Khan, R. A., Abutayeh, S. M. Risk assessment of resources exposed to rainfall induced landslide with the development of GIS and RS based ensemble metaheuristic machine learning algorithms. Sustainability 13(2), 457 (2021).
Alhijawi, B. & Awajan, A. Genetic algorithms: theory, genetic operators, solutions, and applications. Evol. Intel. 17 (3), 1245–1256 (2024).
Priyadarshi, R. & Kumar, R. R. Evolution of swarm intelligence: a systematic review of particle swarm and ant colony optimization approaches in modern research. Archives Comput. Methods Eng. 1–42. (2025).
Tyagi, N., Bhargava, D. & Ahlawat, A. Implementation of Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Inspired by the Social Behaviour of Birds. In 2024 4th International Conference on Technological Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICTACS) (pp. 750–754). IEEE. (2024), November.
Bahadori, N. et al. Wildfire susceptibility mapping using deep learning algorithms in two satellite imagery dataset. Forests 14 (7), 1325 (2023).
van Natijne, A. L., Bogaard, T. A., van Leijen, F. J., Hanssen, R. F. & Lindenbergh, R. C. World-wide InSAR sensitivity index for landslide deformation tracking. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 111, 102829 (2022).
Pourghasemi, H. R., Kornejady, A., Kerle, N. & Shabani, F. Investigating the effects of different landslide positioning techniques, landslide partitioning approaches, and presence-absence balances on landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena 187, 104364 (2020b).
Ranjgar, B., Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Foroughnia, F., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Perissin, D. Land subsidence susceptibility mapping using persistent scatterer SAR interferometry technique and optimized hybrid machine learning algorithms. Remote Sens. 13 (7), 1326 (2021).
Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Tian, B., Zhu, Y., He, J. & Zhang, T. How do the landslide and non-landslide sampling strategies impact landslide susceptibility assessment?—A catchment-scale case study from China. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 16 (3), 877–894 (2024).
Vörösmarty, G. & Dobos, I. Green purchasing frameworks considering firm size: a multicollinearity analysis using variance inflation factor. In Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal (Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 290–301). Taylor & Francis. (2020), October.
Yoo, W. et al. A study of effects of multicollinearity in the multivariable analysis. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 4 (5), 9 (2014).
Google Scholar
Masroor, M. et al. Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) machine learning algorithm for assessing environmental and socio-economic vulnerability to drought: A study in Godavari middle sub-basin, India. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk Assess. 37 (1), 233–259 (2023).
Wang, H., Wang, P., Deng, S. & Li, H. Improved relief weight feature selection algorithm based on relief and mutual information. Information 12 (6), 228 (2021).
Urbanowicz, R. J., Meeker, M., La Cava, W., Olson, R. S. & Moore, J. H. Relief-based feature selection: introduction and review. J. Biomed. Inform. 85, 189–203 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mandli, I. & Panchal, M. Selection of most relevant features from high dimensional data using ig-ga hybrid approach. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 3 (2), 827–830 (2014).
Demir, F., Turkoglu, M., Aslan, M. & Sengur, A. A new pyramidal concatenated CNN approach for environmental sound classification. Appl. Acoust. 170, 107520 (2020).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Chang, K. T., Merghadi, A., Yunus, A. P., Pham, B. T. & Dou, J. Evaluating scale effects of topographic variables in landslide susceptibility models using GIS-based machine learning techniques. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 12296 (2019).
Google Scholar
Probst, P. & Boulesteix, A. L. To tune or not to tune the number of trees in random forest. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18 (181), 1–18 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lin, L., Wang, Q. & Sadek, A. W. A novel variable selection method based on frequent pattern tree for real-time traffic accident risk prediction. Transp. Res. Part. C: Emerg. Technol. 55, 444–459 (2015).
Eberhart, R. & Kennedy, J. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks (Vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948). (1995), November.
Abdel-Basset, M., Abdel-Fatah, L. & Sangaiah, A. K. Metaheuristic algorithms: A comprehensive review. Computational Intell. Multimedia Big Data Cloud Eng. Applications, 185–231. (2018).
Amiri-Doumari, S., Karimipour, A., Nayebpour, S. N. & Hatamiafkoueieh, J. Integration of group method of data handling (GMDH) algorithm and population-based metaheuristic algorithms for Spatial prediction of potential groundwater. Environ. Earth Sci. 81 (20), 485 (2022).
Google Scholar
Deng, W., Yao, R., Zhao, H., Yang, X. & Li, G. A novel intelligent diagnosis method using optimal LS-SVM with improved PSO algorithm. Soft. Comput. 23, 2445–2462 (2019).
Holland, J. H. Genetic algorithms and the optimal allocation of trials. SIAM J. Comput. 2 (2), 88–105 (1973).
Google Scholar
Haldurai, L., Madhubala, T. & Rajalakshmi, R. A study on genetic algorithm and its applications. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 4 (10), 139–143 (2016).
Pandey, H. M., Chaudhary, A. & Mehrotra, D. A comparative review of approaches to prevent premature convergence in GA. Appl. Soft Comput. 24, 1047–1077 (2014).
Mirjalili, S., Song Dong, J., Sadiq, A. S. & Faris, H. Genetic Algorithm: Theory, Literature Review, and Application in Image ReconstructionTheories, Literature Reviews and Applications, 69–85 (Nature-Inspired Optimizers, 2020).
Konak, A., Coit, D. W. & Smith, A. E. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 (9), 992–1007 (2006).
Lambora, A., Gupta, K. & Chopra, K. Genetic algorithm-A literature review. In 2019 international conference on machine learning, big data, cloud and parallel computing (COMITCon) (pp. 380–384). IEEE. (2019), February.
Han, S. & Xiao, L. An improved adaptive genetic algorithm. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 140, p. 01044). EDP Sciences. (2022).
Razali, N. M. & Geraghty, J. Genetic algorithm performance with different selection strategies in solving TSP. In Proceedings of the world congress on engineering (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–6). Hong Kong, China: International Association of Engineers. (2011).
Nguyen, V. V., Pham, B. T., Vu, B. T., Prakash, I., Jha, S., Shahabi, H., & Tien Bui, D. Hybrid machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility modeling. Forests 10(2), 157 (2019).
Hosseini, F. S., Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Choi, S. M. & Jamshidi, M. Spatial prediction of physical and chemical properties of soil using optical satellite imagery: a state-of-the-art hybridization of deep learning algorithm. Front. Environ. Sci. (2023).
Marjanović, M. Comparing the performance of different landslide susceptibility models in ROC space. Landslide Science and Practice: Volume 1: Landslide Inventory and Susceptibility and Hazard Zoning, 579–584. (2013).
Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Choi, S. M. Groundwater potential mapping using an integrated ensemble of three bivariate statistical models with random forest and logistic model tree models. Water 11 (8), 1596 (2019).
Jaafari, A., Termeh, S. V. R. & Bui, D. T. Genetic and firefly metaheuristic algorithms for an optimized neuro-fuzzy prediction modeling of wildfire probability. J. Environ. Manage. 243, 358–369 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nami, M. H., Jaafari, A., Fallah, M. & Nabiuni, S. Spatial prediction of wildfire probability in the hyrcanian ecoregion using evidential belief function model and GIS. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 373–384 (2018).
Robinne, F. N., Parisien, M. A. & Flannigan, M. Anthropogenic influence on wildfire activity in alberta, Canada. Int. J. Wildland Fire. 25 (11), 1131–1143 (2016).
Google Scholar
Parisien, M. A. et al. The spatially varying influence of humans on fire probability in North America. Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (7), 075005 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lacroix, P., Handwerger, A. L. & Bièvre, G. Life and death of slow-moving landslides. Nat. Reviews Earth Environ. 1 (8), 404–419 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cantarino, I., Carrion, M. A., Goerlich, F. & Martinez Ibañez, V. A ROC analysis-based classification method for landslide susceptibility maps. Landslides 16, 265–282 (2019).
Shao, X., Ma, S., Xu, C. & Xu, Y. Insight into the characteristics and triggers of loess landslides during the 2013 heavy rainfall event in the Tianshui area, China. Remote Sens. 15 (17), 4304 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gjorup, D. F., Francelino, M. R., Michel, R. F. M., Senra, E. O. & Schaefer, C. E. G. Pedoclimate monitoring in the periglacial high mountain soils of the Atacama desert, Northern Chile. Permafrost Periglac. Process. 30 (4), 310–329 (2019).
Lee, S., Ryu, J. H., Won, J. S. & Park, H. J. Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng. Geol. 71 (3–4), 289–302 (2004).
de Luna, R. M. R., Garnés, S. J. D. A., Cabral, J. J., dos Santos, S. M. & D. S. P., & Groundwater overexploitation and soil subsidence monitoring on Recife plain (Brazil). Nat. Hazards. 86, 1363–1376 (2017).
Huang, J., Wu, P. & Zhao, X. Effects of rainfall intensity, underlying surface and slope gradient on soil infiltration under simulated rainfall experiments. Catena 104, 93–102 (2013).
Bouwer, H. Land subsidence and cracking due to ground-water depletion a. Groundwater 15 (5), 358–364 (1977).
Ghorbanzadeh, O., Blaschke, T., Aryal, J. & Gholaminia, K. A new GIS-based technique using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for land subsidence susceptibility mapping. J. Spat. Sci. 65 (3), 401–418 (2020).
Elmahdy, S. I., Mohamed, M. M., Ali, T. A., Abdalla, J. E. D. & Abouleish, M. Land subsidence and sinkholes susceptibility mapping and analysis using random forest and frequency ratio models in al Ain. UAE Geocarto Int. 37 (1), 315–331 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Pradhan, B., Chen, W., & Saro, L. Land subsidence susceptibility mapping in south korea using machine learning algorithms. Sensors 18(8), 2464 (2018).
Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B. & Jebur, M. N. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J. Hydrol. 512, 332–343 (2014).
Google Scholar
Al-Juaidi, A. E., Nassar, A. M. & Al-Juaidi, O. E. Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping using logistic regression and GIS conditioning factors. Arab. J. Geosci. 11, 1–10 (2018).
Alamoodi, A. H., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., Albahri, O. S., Chen, J., Chyad, M.A., & Aleesa, A. M. Machine learning-based imputation soft computing approach for large missing scale and non-reference data imputation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 151, 111236 (2021).
Huang, H. Y. et al. Power of data in quantum machine learning Nat. ArXiv Preprint (2021). arXiv:2011.01938, 12, 2631.
Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. & Choi, S. M. Effects of air pollution in spatio-temporal modeling of asthma-prone areas using a machine learning model. Environ. Res. 200, 111344 (2021b).
Google Scholar
Dasha, P. A comparative review of approaches for the evolutionary search to prevent premature convergence in GA. Appl. Soft Comput. 25, 1047–1077 (2023).
Pourghasemi, H. R. et al. Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 3203 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kim, C., Park, S. & Han, H. Multi-Hazard susceptibility mapping using machine learning approaches: A case study of South Korea. Remote Sens. 17 (10), 1660 (2025).
Pourhashemi, S., Asadi, M. A. Z. & Boroughani, M. Multi-hazard susceptibility mapping in the salt lake watershed. Environ. Challenges. 18, 101079 (2025).
Javidan, N. et al. Evaluation of multi-hazard map produced using maxent machine learning technique. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 6496 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiang, H., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Li, J. & Fang, Z. N. Does flooding get worse with subsiding land? Investigating the impacts of land subsidence on flood inundation from hurricane Harvey. Sci. Total Environ. 865, 161072 (2023).
Google Scholar
Abbate, A., Longoni, L., Ivanov, V. I. & Papini, M. Wildfire impacts on slope stability triggering in mountain areas. Geosciences 9 (10), 417 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. Effects of changes in soil properties caused by progressive infiltration of rainwater on rainfall-induced landslides. Catena 233, 107475 (2023).
Google Scholar
