.jpg)
Image source: Getty
That was the 2025 G7 Summit in Canada Convened A time of deepening geopolitical instability and rapid technological change. The 2025 UN Declaration coincides with the Ottawa-led agenda as the year of international quantum science and technology It was promised Further discussion of artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum technology, and the ability to enable economic and social benefits.
Before 2023, before G7 Discussion AI and quantum technologies focused on AI risks, with positive tone changes seen at the 2025 summit, viewing technology as a tool to support businesses and improve public sector efficiency. The focus has shifted from the safety risks of AI aimed at enabling economic growth to real-world applications. This is support With 10 million (US$7.3 million) of eligible funds for AI and energy solutions, and driving to optimize energy usage between data centers and infrastructure. To enable smooth ai-adoption in the public sector, one of the results of the summit is “G7 Govai Grand Challenge.”
The same goes for the summit commit To enhance access to Startups' advanced computing infrastructure, G7 countries are involved in leading their respective AI agendas. For example, the European Union employs the most comprehensive in the world. AI ACT Regulate technology. Meanwhile, Canada Announced AI integration across public servicesUK We predicted £45 billion of annual savings Through AI-enabled governance in the public sector. However, these initiatives are not about engaging in the broader security aspects of AI and military implications.
Frontline AI
AI is rapidly embedded as countries compete to develop capabilities Military Planssurveillance systems, and Autonomous weapons. The state is testing and rolling out AI-driven technology in live competition zonesfundamentally changes operational doctrine. The current geopolitical landscape no longer points out the threats emanating from AI forces, but it confirms that we are already in one. The use of AI on the battlefield, from Gaza to the Black Sea, is a living reality.
The use of AI on the battlefield, from Gaza to the Black Sea, is a living reality.
One of Initial expansion The AI environment in combat environment took place in the Middle East in 2021. Habsora AI System During a conflict in the Gaza Strip. The system synthesized a large amount of intelligence data to generate targets for airstrikes, raising serious concerns about civilian safety, and underscored the ethical dilemma that allowed autonomous systems to select and engage with targets. Israel's Continuous use AI systems, “Lavender” And “daddy” was inefficient in terms of target identification accuracy and then occurred Ethical concerns On the use of AI in war.
In recent years, continued geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, the ongoing Russian-Ukraine war, and the recent military conflict between India and Pakistan have highlighted the increasing use of AI-powered wars, particularly drones and other autonomous technologies.
The Russian-Ukraine War was partly driven by AI-enabled drone warfare, and the war has become a test site for the same thing. Both are involved in a Daily race Innovate with unmanned systems that control the battlefield, sea and sky. During the war there are Ukrainian naval drones target Russian warships, including Ivan Khurs, Sergey Kotov and Oleneogorskiy Gornyak, are spreading the conflict deep into Russian waters.
I saw the crisis in India and Pakistan this year First instance Beyond traditional military tactics, both military forces use drones in cross-border operations. The operation marks a Important turns Israeli-backed military dynamics of India and Pakistan Harop Drone And Reuters, developed locally in India Drones such as Nagastra 1was used to neutralize the Turkish-made Kamikaze drone deployed by Pakistan. India has brought about significant changes for a long time Dependence on foreign support A UAV for building indigenous drone systems. Platforms like Haru's Cat Warrior and Herd System It allowed the Indian army to develop AI-driven combat capabilities.
Multilateral effort and AI
Despite these real-time deployments and escalating humanitarian concerns, the multilateral forums have Limited roles Essentially confronting the militarization of AI. Even the EU AI laws that we have heard a lot I'll omit it AI applications used in defense and national security contexts.
When AI transforms traditional war systems, these developments are largely occurring Policy Vacuum No monitoring of multilateral norms or frameworks. This conquered the ethical implications of the deployment of such weapons. Multilateral forums such as the G7 have meaningfully discussed and do not counter the legal and ethical aspects of Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS).
Despite these real-time deployments and escalating humanitarian concerns, multilateral forums play a limited role in effectively confronting the militarization of AI.
The G7, primarily as an economic group, may not be the most appropriate organisation to regulate the military aspects of AI, but it can be built on some of the existing initiatives aimed at regulating AI in warfare, especially as it involves the weight of the most powerful nations in the world. Existing global initiatives, including the AI Action Summit in Paris, which includes discussions on AI applications, and efforts by the United Nations Institute of Disarmament (UNIDIR). Especially in 2023 Netherlands Summit Similarly for the responsible use of military AI Summit Seoul in 2024 was an important forum with a special focus on the militarization of AI.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has become a member state Set clear regulations and prohibitions Autonomous Weapon Systems by 2026 Agreement for the futureadopted at a future summit in September 2024, providing procedures to avoid weaponization of emerging technologies and calling for a continuous assessment of risks related to military use of AI. Rather than lacking these debates, multilateral frameworks such as the G7 could help support these initiatives and work to reduce regulations and other gaps on AI militarization.
Shareee Malhotra Associate Director of Observer Research Foundation – Strategic Research Program.
Avinnea Ghosal I am a research intern at the Observer Research Foundation.
The views expressed above belong to the author. ORF research and analysis is now available on Telegram! Click here to access curated content (blogs, longforms, interviews).
