Machine learning uncovers dominant fractions of heavy metal(loid)s in global soils

Machine Learning


  • Bagnall, D. K., Shanahan, J. F., Flanders, A., Morgan, C. L. S. & Honeycutt, C. W. Soil health considerations for global food security. Agron. J. 113, 4581–4589 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, D. et al. Global soil pollution by toxic metals threatens agriculture and human health. Science 388, 316–321 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, R. et al. Heavy metal concentrations in rice that meet safety standards can still pose a risk to human health. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 84 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, D. et al. Metal contamination and bioremediation of agricultural soils for food safety and sustainability. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 366–381 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coban, O., De Deyn, G. B. & van der Ploeg, M. Soil microbiota as game-changers in restoration of degraded lands. Science 375, abe0725 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q. et al. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 642, 690–700 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. et al. Molecular-level understanding of metal ion retention in clay-rich materials. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 461–476 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Imseng, M. et al. Fate of Cd in Agricultural Soils: A Stable Isotope Approach to Anthropogenic Impact, Soil Formation, and Soil-Plant Cycling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 1919–1928 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway, B. J. Heavy Metals in Soils: Trace Metals and Metalloids in Soils and Their Bioavailability (Springer, Berlin, 2012).

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Experimental and molecular simulation study of HCl-modified SiO2 nanofluid in coal wettability. Powder Technol 469, 121887 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. et al. Uncovering soil heavy metal pollution hotspots and influencing mechanisms through machine learning and spatial analysis. Environ. Pollut. 370, 125901 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. et al. Escalating arsenic contamination throughout Chinese soils. Nat. Sustain. 7, 766–775 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. et al. Climate and Vegetation As Primary Drivers for Global Mercury Storage in Surface Soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10665–10675 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, J. et al. Fractionation, source, and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in cropland soils across a 100-year reclamation chronosequence in an estuary, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 807, 151725 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, C. et al. Global and regional patterns of soil metal(loid) mobility and associated risks. Nat. Commun. 16, 2947 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek, J., Baran, A. & Bubak, A. Mobility, bioaccumulation in plants, and risk assessment of metals in soils. Sci. Total Environ. 882, 163574 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. et al. Dynamic Behaviors of Newly Deposited Atmospheric Heavy Metals in the Soil-Pak Choi System. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 12734–12744 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. et al. Predicting Heavy Metal Adsorption on Soil with Machine Learning and Mapping Global Distribution of Soil Adsorption Capacities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 14316–14328 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, C. et al. Spectral-Based Machine Learning Enables Rapid and Large-Scale Adsorption Capacity Prediction of Heavy Metals in Soil. ACS ES&T Eng 4, 2657–2667 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Angon, P. B. et al. Sources, effects and present perspectives of heavy metals contamination: Soil, plants and human food chain. Heliyon 10, e28357 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, W., Yuan, J. & Zeng, G. Introduction of heavy metals contamination in the water and soil: a review on source, toxicity and remediation methods. Green Chem. Lett. Rev 17, 2404235 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Lu, N., Wei, Y. & Zhu, D. Relationship between Heavy Metal Content in Polluted Soil and Soil Organic Matter and pH in Mining Areas. IOP Conf. Ser.:Mater. Sci. Eng. 394, 052081 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Król, A., Mizerna, K. & Bożym, M. An assessment of pH-dependent release and mobility of heavy metals from metallurgical slag. J. Hazard. Mater. 384, 121502 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basti, S., Sahu, C., Pati, S. S. & Sahu, S. K. Impact of organic carbon on heavy metals of river sediments and aquatic ecosystems: A review. Environ. Qual. Manag. 34, e22253 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, C. et al. Heavy metal behaviour at mineral-organo interfaces: Mechanisms, modelling and influence factors. Environ. Int. 131, 104995 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. et al. pH-dependent overestimation of heavy metals mobility risk in soils: Implications for soil quality assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 501, 140792 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, A. G. & Violante, A. Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2, 15–27 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyziol, J. Effect of physical properties and cation exchange capacity on sorption of heavy metals onto peats. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 11 (2002).

  • Inglezakis, V., Zorpas, A., Loizidou, M. & Grigoropoulou, H. The effect of competitive cations and anions on ion exchange of heavy metals. Sep. Purif. Technol. 46, 202–207 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • William Kajjumba, G., Emik, S., Öngen, A., Kurtulus Özcan, H. & Aydın, S. Modelling of adsorption kinetic processes—Errors, theory and application. In Advanced Sorption Process Applications (ed. Edebali, S.) (IntechOpen, 2019). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80495.

  • Gu, S., Kang, X., Wang, L., Lichtfouse, E. & Wang, C. Clay mineral adsorbents for heavy metal removal from wastewater: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 17, 629–654 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. A., Wissocq, A., Benedetti, M. F. & Latrille, C. Thallium (Tl) sorption onto illite and smectite: Implications for Tl mobility in the environment. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 230, 1–16 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, W. et al. Warming-Induced Vegetation Greening May Aggravate Soil Mercury Levels Worldwide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 15078–15089 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio, L. et al. SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. Soil 7, 217–240 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, L. C., Egreja Filho, F. B., Linhares, L. A., Windmoller, C. C. & Yoshida, M. I. Accumulation and oxidation of elemental mercury in tropical soils. Chemosphere 134, 181–191 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, D. et al. Mercury speciation, transformation, and transportation in soils, atmospheric flux, and implications for risk management: A critical review. Environ. Int. 126, 747–761 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. et al. Global Distribution of Mercury in Foliage Predicted by Machine Learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 15629–15637 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, C. et al. Understanding the Global Distribution of Groundwater Sulfate and Assessing Population at Risk. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 21002–21014 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayotte, J. D., Medalie, L., Qi, S. L., Backer, L. C. & Nolan, B. T. Estimating the High-Arsenic Domestic-Well Population in the Conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 12443–12454 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgiazzi, A., Ballabio, C., Panagos, P., Jones, A. & Fernández-Ugalde, O. LUCAS Soil, the largest expandable soil dataset for Europe: a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 69, 140–153 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tørseth, K. et al. Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 5447–5481 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo Vicente, J. et al. HBM4EU results support the Chemicals’ Strategy for Sustainability and the Zero-Pollution Action Plan. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 248, 114111 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagos, P., Jones, A., Lugato, E. & Ballabio, C. A Soil Monitoring Law for Europe. Glob. Chall. 9, 2400336 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F. H. M. et al. CROPGRIDS: a global geo-referenced dataset of 173 crops. Sci. Data 11, 413 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Cao, X., Li, S. & Jie, N. A 31-year (1990–2020) global gridded population dataset generated by cluster analysis and statistical learning. Sci. Data 11, 124 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malasani, C. R. et al. Modeling of mercury deposition in India: evaluating emission inventories and anthropogenic impacts. Environ. Sci.:Processes Impacts 26, 1999–2009 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vudamala, K. et al. Comparative Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination and Pollution Trends in Indian Estuarine Sediments: Insights from East and West Coasts of India. ACS ES&T Water 5, 2760–2777 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetashree, Wicke, B. & Liang, S. Parsing India’s mercury crisis: A socioeconomic take reveals the defining role of domestic consumerism. J. Cleaner Prod. 463, 142742 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. et al. Mercury in the natural environment: Biogeochemical cycles and associated health risks. J. Geochem. Explor. 267, 107594 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutou, A. & Wang, J. Influence-Balanced XGBoost: Improving XGBoost for Imbalanced Data Using Influence Functions. IEEE Access 12, 193473–193486 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauret, G. et al. Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J. Environ. Monit. 1, 57–61 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. K., Mai, N. N., Tian, K. & Xia, Y. Isochronous Temporal Metric for Neighbourhood Analysis in Classification Tasks. SN Comput Sci 4, 807 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. et al. Topological representations of crystalline compounds for the machine-learning prediction of materials properties. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 28 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, S. M. & Rinklebe, J. Geochemical fractions of chromium, copper, and zinc and their vertical distribution in floodplain soil profiles along the Central Elbe River, Germany. Geoderma 228-229, 142–159 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogusz, A. & Oleszczuk, P. Sequential extraction of nickel and zinc in sewage sludge- or biochar/sewage sludge-amended soil. Sci. Total Environ. 636, 927–935 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, J. et al. New magnetic proxies to reveal source and bioavailability of heavy metals in contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 479, 135665 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. et al. Unstable geogenic arsenic in reclaimed coastal soils poses environmental risks. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 633 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theng, D. & Bhoyar, K. K. Feature selection techniques for machine learning: a survey of more than two decades of research. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 66, 1575–1637 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. & Singh, M. Batch reinforcement learning approach using recursive feature elimination for network intrusion detection. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 136, 109013 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chennamaneni, P. R., Echambadi, R., Hess, J. D. & Syam, N. Diagnosing harmful collinearity in moderated regressions: A roadmap. Int. J. Res. Mark. 33, 172–182 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., Yuan, Y. & Xu, S. Improving GBDT performance on imbalanced datasets: An empirical study of class-balanced loss functions. Neurocomputing 634, 129896 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N. et al. Geochemical-integrated machine learning approach predicts the distribution of cadmium speciation in European and Chinese topsoils. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 548 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, X. et al. Machine learning and SHAP value interpretation for predicting comorbidity of cardiovascular disease and cancer with dietary antioxidants. Redox Biology 79, 103470 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, T. et al. Classification of arsenic contamination in soil across the EU by vis-NIR spectroscopy and machine learning. Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. 134, 104158 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, C. T., Mason, R. P., Chan, H. M., Jacob, D. J. & Pirrone, N. Mercury as a Global Pollutant: Sources, Pathways, and Effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 4967–4983 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Obrist, D., Dastoor, A., Jiskra, M. & Ryjkov, A. Vegetation uptake of mercury and impacts on global cycling. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 269–284 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastoor, A. et al. Arctic mercury cycling. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 270–286 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. D. et al. Quantifying soil accumulation of atmospheric mercury using fallout radionuclide chronometry. Nat. Commun. 15, 5430 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, D. et al. Human perturbations to mercury in global rivers. Sci. Adv. 11, eadw0471.

  • van den Hoogen, J. et al. Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale. Nature 572, 194–198 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, T. et al. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29554202 (2025).



  • Source link