McClure, EC et al. Artificial intelligence fills citizen science and charges ecological surveillance. Patterns (New York, New York) 1100109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100109 (2020).
Lotfian, M., Ingensand, J. & Brovelli, MA Citizen Science and Machine Learning Partnership: Benefits, Risks and Future Challenges on Engagement, Data Collection, Data Quality. Sustainability 138087, https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13148087 (2021).
Chandler, M. et al. Citizen science contributions to international biodiversity surveillance. Biological Conservation 213280–294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004 (2017).
Besson, M. et al. Towards fully automated surveillance of ecological communities. Ecology Letter twenty five2753–2775, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14123 (2022).
Tuia, D. et al. Machine learning perspective for wildlife conservation. Natural Communication 13792, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-022-27980-y (2022).
Willi, M. et al. Deep learning and citizen science are used to identify animal species in camera trap images. Method evol 1080–91, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13099 (2019).
Wang, Z., Cui, J. & Zhu, Y. Review of plant leaf recognition. Artif Intel Rev 564217–4253, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10462-022-10278-2 (2023).
Maider, P. et al. Flora Incognita App – Interactive plant species identification. Method evol 121335–1342, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13611 (2021).
Hansen, OLP et al. Species-level image classification using convolutional neural networks allows for the identification of insects from habitual images. Ecology and evolution 10737–747, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5921 (2020).
Theivaprakasham, H. Identification of Indian butterflies using deep convolutional neural networks. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology twenty four329–340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2020.11.015 (2021).
Gomez Villa, A., Salazar, A. & Vargas, F. Ecological Informatics 4124–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.07.004 (2017).
Norzade, MS et al. Deep learning automatically identifies, counts and explains wildlife in camera trap images. Proceedings of the United States Academy of Sciences 115E5716 – E5725, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719367115 (2018).
Unger, S., Rollins, M., Tietz, A. & Dumais, H. Abuse as an attractive tool for identifying living things in outdoor activities. Journal of Biological Education 55537–547, https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1739114 (2021).
Balta, Z. Deep learning in Earth Conservation Biology. Biologia futura 74359–367, https://doi.org/10.1007/S42977-023-00200-4 (2023).
Brereton, T., Roy, DB, Middlebrook, I., Botham, M. & Warren, M. Development of the UK butterfly indicator and evaluation in 2010. Journal of Insect Conservation 15139–151, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10841-010-9333-Z (2011).
Van Swaay, C., Warren, M. & Loïs, G. Biotope use and European butterfly trends. J Insect Conserv 10189–209, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10841-006-6293-4 (2006).
Thomas, JA monitors changes in insect abundance and distribution using butterflies and other groups of indicators. Philosophical deals of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biology 360339–357, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1585 (2005).
Andal, M. et al. Bird efficiency as a bioindicator for other taxa in mountain farmland. Ecological indicators 158111569, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111569 (2024).
Gerlach, J., Samways, M. & Pryke, J. Terrestrial invertebrates as Bioindicators: An overview of available taxa. J Insect Conserv 17831–850, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10841-013-9565-9 (2013).
Van Swai, C. et al. EU Butterfly Indicator for Grassland Species: 1990-2017: Technical Report. Butterfly Conservation Europe & Eable/EBMS (www.butterfly-monitoring.net) (2019).
Roy, DB, Rothery, P., Brereton, T., Kühn, E. &Settele. j. Design of a systematic research scheme for monitoring British butterflies (2005).
Talon, D. & Lease, L. Surveillance for butterfly maintenance. With the conservation of North American butterflies. Edited by J.C. Daniels, pp. 35–57 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2015) Efforts to support the relief of charismatic microfaunas edited.
Schlegel, J. & Rupf, R. Attitudes towards potential animal flagship species in conservation: A survey of students from various educational institutions. Journal for Nature Conservation 18278–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2009.12.002 (2010).
Chang, Q., Qu, H., Wu, P. &Yi, J. Fine-grained butterflies and Moth classification using deep convolutional neural networks (2017).
Nie, L., Wang, K., Fan, X. & Gao, Y. Recognition of fine, dense butterflies using deep residual networks: new baselines and benchmarks. International Conference on Digital Image Computing 2017: Technology and Applications (DICTA), pp. 1–7 (IEEE 2017).
Mattins, RF, Sarobin, MVR, Aziz, AA & Srivarshan, S. Object detection and classification of butterflies using efficient CNN and pre-trained deep convolutional neural networks. Multi-compatible tool Appl; https://doi.org/10.1007/S11042-023-17563-4 (2023).
Isaac, NJB et al. The challenges are distance sampling and monitoring butterfly populations. Method evol 2585–594, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00109.x (2011).
Koch, W., Hogeweg, L., Nilsen, Eb, O'hara, RB & Finstad, Ag Civic Science photography. Royal Society Open Science 10221063, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221063 (2023).
Arazy, O. & Malkinson, D. Observer-based bias framework in biodiversity monitoring in citizen science: a semi-unstructured biodiversity monitoring protocol. front. Ecole. Evol. 9https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.693602 (2021).
Tu, Z. et al. Maxvit: Multi-axis Vision Transformer (2022).
Den, J. et al. Imagenet: Large-scale hierarchical image database. in 2009 IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference,pp. 248–255 (IEEE 2009).
Barkmann, F. Image-based butterfly species identification using convolutional neural networks. Available at https://ulb-dok.uibk.ac.at/urn/urn:nbn:at:at-ubi:1-172379 (2025).
Friederike Barkmann, Andreas Lindner, Ronald Würflinger, Helmut Höttinger & Johannes Rüdisser. Machine learning training data: Over 500,000 images of butterflies and moths with species labels. https://doi.org/10.25452/figshare.plus.29135618 (2025).
Höttinger, H. & Pennerstorfer, J. Rote Liste Der TagschmetterlingeÖsterreichs (Lepid: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea). Listen to gefährdetertiere Österreichs on route. Checklisten, gefährdungsanalysen, Handlungsbedarf. Teil 1: Säugetiere, Vögel, Heuschrecken, Wasserkäfer, Netzflügler, Schnabelfliegen, Tagfalter. , K. Zulka, pp. 313–354 (bundesministerium fürand-forstwirtschaft, umwelt und 2005).
Huemer, P. Die SchmetterlingeÖsterreichs (Lepidaceae). Systematische und Faunistice CheckListe (Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck, 2013).
Wiemers, M. et al. Updated checklist of European butterflies (Lepididae, Papillionoidea). Zookeys9–45, https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.811.28712 (2018).
Karsholt, O. & Razowski, J. European calpidites: Distribution checklist (Brill, 1996).
Paszke, A. et al. Pytorch: A deep, imperative style, high-performance learning library. in Advances in neural information processing systemsH. Edited by Wallach, et al. , vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc 2019).
Li, S. et al. Pytorch's Distribution: Experience with Accelerated Parallel Training of Data (2020).
Gugar, S. et al. Acceleration: Large-scale training and reasoning made it simple, efficient and adaptable (2022).
Buda, M., Maki, A. & Mazurowski, Systematic study of class imbalance problems in Massachusetts, Massachusetts, Systematic study of class imbalance problems in convolutional neural networks. Neural Networks: Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society 106249–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011 (2018).
Barkmann, F. & Lindner, A. maxvit_butterfly_identification; https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/5986.
