Historically, claims of ownership over in-game works or user-generated works (IGC or UGC) have been overruled by “take it or leave it” end-user license agreements, the dreaded EULAs that no one reads. I was. Generally, this means that players give up ownership of their creations by switching on the game. (Mine Craft A rare exception here. The EULA has long given the player ownership of his IGC, and there have been relatively few community outcasts. )
AI adds new complexity. Both US and UK law stipulate that only humans can claim authorship when it comes to copyright.So for a game like AI dungeonthe platform allows players to essentially “write” stories with the help of chatbots, but can obscure ownership claims: Who owns the output? AI the company that developed it, or the user?
Alina Trapova, a professor of law at University College London who specializes in AI and copyrights, said, “Recently, especially with prompt engineering, the extent to which individuality and free and creative choices as players are reflected. There’s been a lot of debate about whether or not,” he said.I have written several papers on AI dungeon copyright issues. For now, this gray area is avoided by his EULA. AI dungeonis particularly ambiguous. It says users can use the content they create “almost as they please.” When I emailed Latitude to ask if they could turn my Mr. Magoo nightmare into a play, book, or movie, the support line immediately responded, “Yes, you can use You have full ownership of the content you create. AI dungeon. “
Still, games like AI dungeon (and games people have made with ChatGPT, etc. love in the classroom) is built on a model of scraping human creativity to generate unique content. A fanfiction writer finds ideas in writing tools like his Sudowrite, which uses GPT-3, his OpenAI predecessor to GPT-4.
Things get even more complicated when someone pays the $9.99 per month required to include Stable Diffusion, a text-to-image generator. AI dungeon story. Stability AI, which runs Stable Diffusion, is facing lawsuits from visual artists and media company Getty Images.
As generative AI systems grow, the term “plagiarism machine” is starting to become popular. Players of games that use GPT-3 or Stable Diffusion may be using other people’s work to create something in the game. Latitude’s position seems to be very similar to that of Stability AI. In other words, you are the owner of what you get out of the tool, because what the tool produces does not infringe copyright. (Latitude did not respond to questions about these concerns.)
Image-driven stories cannot currently be shared with others AI dungeon‘s story-sharing feature, but this feature offers a window into the future where game developers can start using third-party AI tools, or allow players to generate in-game maps and NPC dialogue. . One of the consequences he said was not taken into consideration, Trapova said, is that the data for these tools could be collected from across the creative industry. This “increases the risk,” she argues, increasing the likelihood of infringement and the number of litigants. (Stability AI and her OpenAI did not respond to inquiries on this point.)
