Bowman, D. M. J. S. & Sharples, J. J. Taming the flame, from local to global extreme wildfires. Science 381 (6658), 616–619 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bowman, D. M. J. S. et al. Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1 (3), 0058 (2017).
Lindenmayer, D. B. & Taylor, C. New Spatial analyses of Australian wildfires highlight the need for new fire, resource, and conservation policies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117 (22), 12481–12485 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhao, J. et al. Forest fire size amplifies postfire land surface warming. Nature 633 (8031), 828–834 (2024).
Google Scholar
El Garroussi, S., Di Giuseppe, F., Barnard, C. & Wetterhall, F. Europe faces up to tenfold increase in extreme fires in a warming climate. Npj Clim. Atmospheric Sci. 7 (1), 30 (2024).
Feurdean, A. et al. Fire has been an important driver of forest dynamics in the Carpathian mountains during the holocene. Ecol. Manag. 389, 15–26 (2017).
Korená Hillayová, M. et al. Ongoing Climatic change increases the risk of wildfires. Case study: Carpathian Spruce forests. J. Environ. Manage. 337, 117620 (2023).
Google Scholar
Elmqvist, T. et al. Changing Wildfires: Policy Options for a Fire-literate and Fire-adapted Europe [Internet]. EASAC; May [cited 2025 Jun 19]. Report No.: EASAC policy report 48. (2025). Available from: https://easac.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/EASAC_Wildfires_final_290525.pdf
European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Forest fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2023. [Internet]. LU: Publications Office. [cited 2025 May 25]. Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/ (2024). https://doi.org/10.2760/8027062
Bytnerowicz, A. Forests in the Carpathian Mountains and Their Management. In: Kozak J, Ostapowicz K, Bytnerowicz A, Wyżga B, editors. The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; [cited 2022 Mar 19]. pp. 185–90. (Environmental Science and Engineering). Available from: http://link.springer.com/ (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_14
Nikolov, C. et al. Post-disaster forest management and bark beetle outbreak in Tatra National park, Slovakia. Mt. Res. Dev. 34 (4), 326–335 (2014).
Kołaczek, P. et al. Towards the Understanding the impact of fire on the lower montane forest in the Polish Western Carpathians during the holocene. Quat Sci. Rev. 229, 106137 (2020).
Doerr, S. H. & Santín, C. Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: perceptions versus realities in a changing world. Philos. Trans. R Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371 (1696), 20150345 (2016).
Sisak, L., Riedl, M. & Dudik, R. Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic—Their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use. Land. Use Policy. 50, 390–398 (2016).
Lestienne, M. et al. Development of high diversity Beech forest in the Eastern Carpathians. J. Biogeogr. 50 (4), 699–714 (2023).
Mráz, P. & Ronikier, M. Biogeography of the carpathians: evolutionary and Spatial facets of biodiversity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 119 (3), 528–559 (2016).
Pearce, D. W. The economic value of forest ecosystems. Ecosyst. Health. 7 (4), 284–296 (2001).
Mo, L. et al. Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential. Nature 624 (7990), 92–101 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hanewinkel, M., Cullmann, D. A., Schelhaas, M. J., Nabuurs, G. J. & Zimmermann, N. E. Climate change May cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nat. Clim. Change. 3 (3), 203–207 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kholiavchuk, D., Gurgiser, W. & Mayr, S. Carpathian forests: past and recent developments. Forests 15 (1), 65 (2023).
Stankevich, S., Zaitseva, E., Kozlova, A. & Andreiev, A. Wildfire Risk Assessment Using Earth Observation Data: A Case Study of the Eastern Carpathians at the Slovak-Ukrainian Frontier. In: Van Gulijk C, Zaitseva E, Kvassay M, editors. Reliability Engineering and Computational Intelligence for Complex Systems [Internet]. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; [cited 2025 Jun 3]. pp. 131–43. (Studies in Systems, Decision and Control; vol. 496). Available from: https://link.springer.com/ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40997-4_9
Jain, P. et al. A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management. Environ. Rev. 28 (4), 478–505 (2020).
Ma, W., Feng, Z., Cheng, Z., Chen, S. & Wang, F. Identifying forest fire driving factors and related impacts in China using random forest algorithm. Forests 11 (5), 507 (2020).
Guo, F. et al. What drives forest fire in fujian, china?? Evidence from logistic regression and random forests. Int. J. Wildland Fire. 25 (5), 505 (2016).
Reyes-Bueno, F. & Loján-Córdova, J. Assessment of three machine learning techniques with Open-Access geographic data for forest fire susceptibility Monitoring—Evidence from Southern Ecuador. For 13 (474), 2022 (2022).
Pourghasemi, H. R., Gayen, A., Lasaponara, R. & Tiefenbacher, J. P. Application of learning vector quantization and different machine learning techniques to assessing forest fire influence factors and Spatial modelling. Environ. Res. 184, 109321 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ghorbanzadeh, O. et al. Spatial prediction of wildfire susceptibility using field survey GPS data and machine learning approaches. Fire 2 (3), 43 (2019).
Ngoc Thach, N. et al. Spatial pattern assessment of tropical forest fire danger at Thuan Chau area (Vietnam) using GIS-based advanced machine learning algorithms: A comparative study. Ecol. Inf. 46, 74–85 (2018).
Pham, B. T. et al. Performance evaluation of machine learning methods for forest fire modeling and prediction. Symmetry 12 (6), 1022 (2020).
Google Scholar
Oliveira, S., Oehler, F., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Camia, A. & Pereira, J. M. C. Modeling Spatial patterns of fire occurrence in mediterranean Europe using multiple regression and random forest. Ecol. Manag. 275, 117–129 (2012).
Mohajane, M. et al. Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest fire mapping in a mediterranean area. Ecol. Indic. 129, 107869 (2021).
Tonini, M. et al. A machine Learning-Based approach for wildfire susceptibility mapping. The case study of the Liguria region in Italy. Geosciences 10 (3), 105 (2020).
Google Scholar
Milanović, S. et al. Forest fire probability mapping in Eastern serbia: logistic regression versus random forest method. Forests 12 (1), 5 (2020).
Gigović, L., Pourghasemi, H. R., Drobnjak, S. & Bai, S. Testing a new ensemble model based on SVM and random forest in forest fire susceptibility assessment and its mapping in serbia’s Tara National park. Forests 10 (5), 408 (2019).
Ciesielski, M. et al. Contribution of anthropogenic, vegetation, and topographic features to forest fire occurrence in Poland. IForest – Biogeosciences For. 15 (4), 307–314 (2022).
Chicas, S. D. & Østergaard Nielsen, J. Who are the actors and what are the factors that are used in models to map forest fire susceptibility? A systematic review. Nat. Hazards. 114 (3), 2417–2434 (2022).
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer US; [cited 2022 Sep 7]. (Springer Texts in Statistics). Available from: https://link.springer.com/ (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1
Keys GW DAVID. MACHINE LEARNING AT SCALE WITH H2O: a practical guide to building effective machine learning… models on an enterprise system. S.l.: PACKT PUBLISHING LIMITED; 2022.
Bao, M. et al. Research trends in wildland fire prediction amidst climate change: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Forests 15 (7), 1197 (2024).
Hasnaoui, Y. et al. Integrated Remote Sensing and Deep Learning Models for Flash Flood Detection Based on Spatio-temporal Land Use and Cover Changes in the Mediterranean Region. Environ Model Assess [Internet]. May 9 [cited 2025 Jun 6]; Available from: https://link.springer.com/ (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-025-10035-z
Hasnaoui, Y. et al. Enhanced machine learning models development for flash flood mapping using Geospatial data. Euro-Mediterr J. Environ. Integr. 9 (3), 1087–1107 (2024).
Hasnaoui, Y., Tachi, S. E., Bouguerra, H. & Yaseen, Z. M. Transfer learning-based deep learning models for flood and erosion detection in coastal area of Algeria. Earth Sci. Inf. 18 (2), 380 (2025).
Adámek, M., Jankovská, Z., Hadincová, V., Kula, E. & Wild, J. Drivers of forest fire occurrence in the cultural landscape of central Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 33 (11), 2031–2045 (2018).
Parisien, M. A. et al. Spatial patterns of forest fires in canada, 1980–1999. Int. J. Wildland Fire. 15 (3), 361 (2006).
Turco, M. et al. (ed Carcaillet, C.) Decreasing fires in mediterranean Europe. PLOS ONE 11 3 e0150663 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fares, S. et al. Characterizing potential wildland fire fuel in live vegetation in the mediterranean region. Ann. Sci. 74 (1), 1 (2017).
Verdú, F., Salas, J. & Vega-García, C. A multivariate analysis of biophysical factors and forest fires in spain, 1991–2005. Int. J. Wildland Fire. 21 (5), 498 (2012).
Pourghasemi, H. R., Sadhasivam, N., Kariminejad, N. & Collins, A. L. Gully erosion Spatial modelling: role of machine learning algorithms in selection of the best controlling factors and modelling process. Geosci. Front. 11 (6), 2207–2219 (2020).
Tedim, F., Xanthopoulos, G. & Leone, V. Forest Fires in Europe. In: Wildfire Hazards, Risks and Disasters [Internet]. Elsevier; [cited 2022 May 23]. pp. 77–99. (2015). Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780124104341000051
Ganteaume, A. et al. A review of the main driving factors of forest fire ignition over Europe. Environ. Manage. 51 (3), 651–662 (2013).
Google Scholar
Guyette, R. P., Muzika, R. M. & Dey, D. C. Dynamics of an Anthropogenic Fire Regime. Ecosyst Vol 5 Pages 472–486 2002 [Internet]. ; Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/ (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0115-7
Knorr, W., Kaminski, T., Arneth, A. & Weber, U. Impact of human population density on fire frequency at the global scale. Biogeosciences 11 (4), 1085–1102 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ganteaume, A. & Jappiot, M. What causes large fires in Southern France. Ecol. Manag. 294, 76–85 (2013).
Wang, Z., Zhang, X. & Xu, B. Spatio-Temporal features of china’s urban fires: an investigation with reference to gross domestic product and humidity. Sustainability 7 (7), 9734–9752 (2015).
Kolanek, A., Szymanowski, M. & Raczyk, A. Human activity affects forest fires: the impact of anthropogenic factors on the density of forest fires in Poland. Forests 12 (6), 728 (2021).
Vacchiano, G., Foderi, C., Berretti, R., Marchi, E. & Motta, R. Modeling anthropogenic and natural fire ignitions in an inner-alpine Valley. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 18 (3), 935–948 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tian, X., Zhao, F., Shu, L. & Wang, M. Distribution characteristics and the influence factors of forest fires in China. Ecol. Manag. 310, 460–467 (2013).
Kaim, D., Radeloff, V., Szwagrzyk, M., Dobosz, M. & Ostafin, K. Long-Term changes of the Wildland–Urban interface in the Polish Carpathians. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 7 (4), 137 (2018).
Sobala, M. & Rahmonov, O. The human impact on changes in the forest range of the Silesian beskids (Western Carpathians). Resources 9 (12), 141 (2020).
Meddour-Sahar, O., Meddour, R., Leone, V., Lovreglio, R. & Derridj, A. Analysis of forest fires causes and their motivations in Northern algeria: the Delphi method. IForest – Biogeosciences For. 6 (5), 247–254 (2013).
Zhang, G., Wang, M. & Liu, K. Forest fire susceptibility modeling using a convolutional neural network for Yunnan Province of China. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 10 (3), 386–403 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Feng, Z., Chen, S., Zhao, Z. & Wang, F. Application of the artificial neural network and support vector machines in forest fire prediction in the Guangxi autonomous region, China. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2020, 1–14 (2020).
Shao, Y. et al. Mapping china’s forest fire risks with machine learning. Forests 13 (6), 856 (2022).
Xie, L. et al. Wildfire risk assessment in Liangshan prefecture, China based on an integration machine learning algorithm. Remote Sens. 14 (18), 4592 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, W., Zhao, F., Wang, Y., Huang, X. & Ye, J. Seasonal differences in the Spatial patterns of wildfire drivers and susceptibility in the Southwest mountains of China. Sci. Total Environ. 869, 161782 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pang, Y. et al. Forest fire occurrence prediction in China based on machine learning methods. Remote Sens. 14 (21), 5546 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xiong, Q. et al. Fire from policy, human interventions, or biophysical factors? Temporal–spatial patterns of forest fire in Southwestern China. Ecol. Manag. 474, 118381 (2020).
Bot, K. & Borges, J. G. A systematic review of applications of machine learning techniques for wildfire management decision support. Inventions 7 (1), 15 (2022).
Özcan, Z., Caglayan, İ. & Kabak, Ö. A comprehensive taxonomy for forest fire risk assessment: bridging methodological gaps and proposing future directions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 196 (9), 825 (2024).
Google Scholar
Singh, H. et al. Trending and emerging prospects of physics-based and ML-based wildfire spread models: a comprehensive review. J. Res. 35 (1), 135 (2024).
Andrianarivony, H. S. & Akhloufi, M. A. Machine learning and deep learning for wildfire spread prediction: A review. Fire 7 (12), 482 (2024).
Khan, S. M. et al. A systematic review of disaster management systems: approaches, challenges, and future directions. Land 12 (8), 1514 (2023).
Kuhn, M. & Johnson, K. Feature Engineering and Selection: a Practical Approach for Predictive Models297 (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2020). /CRC data science series).
Gregorutti, B., Michel, B. & Saint-Pierre, P. Correlation and variable importance in random forests. Stat. Comput. 27 (3), 659–678 (2017).
Google Scholar
Svetnik, V., Liaw, A., Tong, C. & Wang, T. Application of Breiman’s Random Forest to Modeling Structure-Activity Relationships of Pharmaceutical Molecules. In: Roli F, Kittler J, Windeatt T, editors. Multiple Classifier Systems [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2004 [cited 2024 Jan 26]. pp. 334–43. (Kanade T, Kittler J, Kleinberg JM, Mattern F, Mitchell JC, Naor M, et al., editors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol. 3077). Available from: http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25966-4_33
Bajocco, S. & Ricotta, C. Evidence of selective burning in Sardinia (Italy): which land-cover classes do wildfires prefer? Landsc. Ecol. 23 (2), 241–248 (2008).
Oliveira, S., Moreira, F., Boca, R., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. & Pereira, J. M. C. Assessment of fire selectivity in relation to land cover and topography: a comparison between Southern European countries. Int. J. Wildland Fire. 23 (5), 620 (2014).
Päätalo, M. L. Factors Influencing Occurrence and Impacts of Fires in Northern European Forests. Silva Fenn 322 Rev Artic [Internet]. ; (1998). Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/eb55/77aae3ed8ba5c01c11512485022a045876fb.pdf
Tong, X. et al. Revisiting the coupling between NDVI trends and cropland changes in the Sahel drylands: A case study in Western Niger. Remote Sens. Environ. 191, 286–296 (2017).
Google Scholar
Santana, N. Fire recurrence and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) dynamics in Brazilian savanna. Fire 2 (1), 1 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mellik, A. & HEOL – Heves vármegyei Hírportál. [cited 2024 Jul 29]. Robbanás, bálatűz, pusztító vihar – megdolgoztatta a tűzoltókat 2020. (2024). Available from: https://www.heol.hu/helyi-kek-hirek/2021/01/robbanas-balatuz-pusztito-vihar-megdolgoztatta-a-tuzoltokat-2020
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Taming wildfires in the context of climate change: The case of Greece (OECD Environment Policy Paper No. 43). [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/06/taming-wildfires-in-the-context-of-climate-change-the-case-of-greece_754f2c60/cfb797a7-en.pdf
Hlásny, T., Trombik, J., Dobor, L., Barcza, Z. & Barka, I. Future climate of the carpathians: climate change hot-spots and implications for ecosystems. Reg. Environ. Change. 16 (5), 1495–1506 (2016).
Cai, J., Luo, J., Wang, S. & Yang, S. Feature selection in machine learning: A new perspective. Neurocomputing 300, 70–79 (2018).
Masoudi-Sobhanzadeh, Y., Motieghader, H., Omidi, Y. & Masoudi-Nejad, A. A machine learning method based on the genetic and world competitive contests algorithms for selecting genes or features in biological applications. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 3349 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tavakkoli Piralilou, S. et al. A Google Earth engine approach for wildfire susceptibility prediction fusion with remote sensing data of different Spatial resolutions. Remote Sens. 14 (3), 672 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Fan, X., Zhao, Z. & Jiang, X. Dynamic fire risk classification prediction of stadiums: Multi-Dimensional machine learning analysis based on intelligent perception. Appl. Sci. 12 (13), 6607 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, N., Xu, Y. & Wang, S. Interpretable boosting tree ensemble method for multisource Building fire loss prediction. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 225, 108587 (2022).
Pullanagari, R. R., Kereszturi, G. & Yule, I. Integrating airborne hyperspectral, topographic, and soil data for estimating pasture quality using recursive feature elimination with random forest regression. Remote Sens. 10 (7), 1117 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gao, B. et al. Prediction and driving factors of forest fire occurrence in Jilin province, China. J. Res. 35 (1), 21 (2024).
Yang, Y., Zhang, G., Zhu, G., Yuan, D. & He, M. Prediction of fire source heat release rate based on machine learning method. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 54, 104088 (2024).
Bozdağ, A., Dokuz, Y. & Gökçek, Ö. B. Spatial prediction of PM10 concentration using machine learning algorithms in ankara, Turkey. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114635 (2020).
Google Scholar
Coughlan, R. et al. Using machine learning to predict fire-ignition occurrences from lightning forecasts. Meteorol. Appl. 28 (1), e1973 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shirazi, Z., Wang, L. & Bondur, V. G. Modeling conditions appropriate for wildfire in South East China – A machine learning approach. Front. Earth Sci. 9, 622307 (2021).
Javed, K., Babri, H. A. & Saeed, M. Feature selection based on Class-Dependent densities for High-Dimensional binary data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24 (3), 465–477 (2012).
Rudd, J. M. & Priestley, J. L. A Comparison of Decision Tree with Logistic Regression Model for Prediction of Worst Non- Financial Payment Status in Commercial Credit. ; (2017). Available from: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1004&context=dataphdgreylit
Yoo, W., Ference, B. A., Cote, M. L. & Schwartz, A. A comparison of logistic regression, logic regression, classification tree, and random forests to identify effective Gene-Gene and Gene-Environmental interactions. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2 (7), 268 (2012).
Google Scholar
Couronné, R., Probst, P. & Boulesteix, A. L. Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment. BMC Bioinform. 19 (1), 270 (2018).
Molnar, C. Interpretable Machine Learning – A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable. 9.5 Shapley Values [Internet]. (2022). Available from: https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/shapley.html#general-idea
Gramegna, A. & Giudici, P. SHAP and LIME: an evaluation of discriminative power in credit risk. Front. Artif. Intell. 4, 752558 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chiaburu, T., Haußer, F. & Bießmann, F. Uncertainty in XAI: human perception and modeling approaches. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 6 (2), 1170–1192 (2024).
Fernandez-Anez, N. et al. Current wildland fire patterns and challenges in europe: A synthesis of National perspectives. Air Soil. Water Res. 14, 117862212110281 (2021).
Korontzi, S., McCarty, J., Loboda, T., Kumar, S. & Justice, C. Global distribution of agricultural fires in croplands from 3 years of moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) data: GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF AGRICULTURAL FIRE. Glob Biogeochem. Cycles. 20 (2), na–na (2006).
Hall, J. V. et al. Environmental and political implications of underestimated cropland burning in Ukraine. Environ. Res. Lett. 16 (6), 064019 (2021).
Google Scholar
Matsala, M. et al. War drives forest fire risks and highlights the need for more ecologically-sound forest management in post-war Ukraine. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 4131 (2024).
Google Scholar
Prăvălie, R. et al. NDVI-based ecological dynamics of forest vegetation and its relationship to climate change in Romania during 1987–2018. Ecol. Indic. 136, 108629 (2022).
Dobrowski, S. Z. A Climatic basis for microrefugia: the influence of terrain on climate. Glob Change Biol. 17 (2), 1022–1035 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mihăilă, D., Bistricean, P. I., Lazurca, L. G. & Briciu, A. E. Climatic water deficit and surplus between the Carpathian mountains and the Dniester river (1961–2012). Environ. Monit. Assess. 189 (11), 545 (2017).
Google Scholar
Antofie, T., Naumann, G., Spinoni, J. & Vogt, J. Estimating the water needed to end the drought or reduce the drought severity in the Carpathian region. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19 (1), 177–193 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dominguez, M. T. & Marosi-Kiss, M. Forest Fires in the Carpathian Mountains Analysis of Policy Responses at the Regional and National Level [Internet]. Regional Academy on the United Nations (UNEP); 2016 [cited 2025 Jun 17]. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/656da60f524a0e672c799489/t/67fd6b7e8bc839559432ebd4/1744661375357/unep_final_research_project_1_.pdf
Regulation & EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2. (December 2021 establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 and (EU) No 1307/2013 [Internet]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/2115/oj/eng
Regulation, E. U. 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 [Internet]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/2116/oj/eng
The Code of Ukraine about Administrative Offences of December 7. 1984 No. 8073-X [Internet]. Available from: https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=8653
Criminal Code of Ukraine of April 5. 2341-III [Internet]. Jun 17, 2025. (2001). No Available from: https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/ukr/2001/criminal-code-of-the-republic-of-ukraine-en_html/Ukraine_Criminal_Code_as_of_2010_EN.pdf
Gelabert, P. J. et al. Assessing human-caused wildfire ignition likelihood across Europe [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 17]. Available from: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-143/
Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December. 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism Text with EEA relevance [Internet]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2013/1313/oj/eng
European Commission. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on progress on implementation of article 6 of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (Decision No 1313/2013/EU) [Internet]. European Commission; [cited 2025 Jun 17]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=COM%3A2024%3A130%3AFIN&utm_source=chatgpt.com
Bita-Nicolae, C., Florescu, L. I., Purice, D. & Kaya, O. Riparian Woody plant communities in the Romanian carpathians: species diversity and community structure of Salix and Hippophaë communities. Ecol. Evol. 14 (5), e11361 (2024).
Google Scholar
Regulation, E. U. 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869 (Text with EEA relevance) [Internet]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1991&qid=1722240349976
Quinn, J. A. & Woodward, S. L. Earth’s Landscape: An Encyclopedia of the World’s Geographic Features (ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, California, 2015).
Ptácek, P., Létal, A., Ruffini, F. V. & Renner, K. Atlas of the Carpathian macroregion [Internet]. Europa Regional, 17.2009(2); (2011). Available from: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-47996-2
The Status of the Carpathians [Internet]. WWF – Carpathian Ecoregion Initiative; 2001 [cited 2022 Mar 7]. Available from: https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/ceri_statusofthecarpathians_wwfdcp2001.pdf
Werners, S. et al. Future Imperfect: Climate Change and Adaptation in the Carpathians [Internet]. GRID-Arendal; [cited 2022 Mar 7]. (2014). Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/adaptation/pdf/Climate%20change%20and%20adaptation%20in%20the%20Carpathians.pdf
Climate of the Carpathian Region [Internet]. European Commission Joint Research Centre (EC – JRC). Institute for Environment and Sustainability; (2010). Available from: https://www.met.hu/doc/palyazatok/CARPATCLIM_tender-OJEU_2010.S_110-166082.pdf
Perzanowski, K. & Jerzy, S. W. W. F. Temperate Coniferous Forest – Eastern Europe: Czech Republic, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine. (2022). Available from: https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/pa0504
UNEP, editor. Carpathians Environment Outlook 200717–88 (UNEP, 2007).
MODIS Collection 6. and Collection 6.1 Active Fire Product User’s Guide Version 1.0 [Internet]. pp. 48–9. Available from: https://modis-fire.umd.edu/files/MODIS_C6_C6.1_Fire_User_Guide_1.0.pdf
EARTHDATA – Open Access for Open Science, FIRMS – Frequently Asked Questions [Internet]. Available from: https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/faq/firms-faq#ed-modis-fire-size
Arnone, E., Francipane, A., Scarbaci, A., Puglisi, C. & Noto, L. V. Effect of raster resolution and polygon-conversion algorithm on landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ. Model. Softw. 84, 467–481 (2016).
Tian, Y., XiaO, C., Liu, Y. & Wu, L. Effects of raster resolution on landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study of Shenzhen. Sci. China Ser. E Technol. Sci. 51 (S2), 188–198 (2008).
Google Scholar
Avand, M., Kuriqi, A., Khazaei, M. & Ghorbanzadeh, O. DEM resolution effects on machine learning performance for flood probability mapping. J. Hydro-Environ Res. 40, 1–16 (2022).
Chen, Z., Ye, F., Fu, W., Ke, Y. & Hong, H. The influence of DEM Spatial resolution on landslide susceptibility mapping in the Baxie river basin, NW China. Nat. Hazards. 101 (3), 853–877 (2020).
Vadrevu, K. P. et al. Trends in vegetation fires in South and Southeast Asian countries. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 7422 (2019).
Google Scholar
Badal-Valero, E., Coll-Serrano, V. & Segura-Gisbert, J. Fire risk Sub-Module assessment under solvency II. Calculating the highest risk exposure. Mathematics 9 (11), 1279 (2021).
Xu, Q., Li, W., Liu, J. & Wang, X. A geographical similarity-based sampling method of non-fire point data for Spatial prediction of forest fires. Ecosyst. 10, 100104 (2023).
Batista, G. E. A. P. A., Prati, R. C. & Monard, M. C. A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 6 (1), 20–29 (2004).
Marchi, M. et al. ClimateEU, scale-free climate normals, historical time series, and future projections for Europe. Sci. Data. 7 (1), 428 (2020).
Google Scholar
Didan, K. MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices Monthly L3 Global 1km SIN Grid V061 [Internet]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center; 2021 [cited 2024 Jan 9]. Available from: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod13a3v061/
Didan, K. MODIS/Aqua Vegetation Indices Monthly L3 Global 1km SIN Grid V061 [Internet]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center; 2021 [cited 2024 Jan 9]. Available from: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/myd13a3v061/
Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A. & Guevara, E. Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4 [Internet]. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); (2008). Available from: https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org
Amatulli, G. et al. A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling. Sci. Data. 5 (1), 180040 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Glob Biogeochem. Cycles. 22 (1), 2007GB002952 (2008).
Center For International Earth Science Information Network-CIESIN-Columbia University. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11 [Internet]. Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC); 2017 [cited 2024 Jan 9]. Available from: https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/gpw-v4-population-density-rev11
ClimateEU Tutorial – Part1 – Location Query, Time Series, Basic Grids [Internet]. (2012). Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pQHpm-H4z0
Kovács, L. Feature selection algorithms in generalized additive models under concurvity. Comput. Stat. 39 (2), 461–493 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kuhn, M. & Johnson, K. Applied Predictive Modeling [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York; [cited 2022 Oct 26]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/ (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3
Murray, L. et al. Conf Appl Stat Agric [Internet]. 2012 Apr 29 [cited 2024 Mar 30]; Available from: https://newprairiepress.org/agstatconference/2012/proceedings/12
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S. & Vapnik, V. Gene selection for Cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46 (1/3), 389–422 (2002).
Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. R Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 58 (1), 267–288 (1996).
Google Scholar
Kwon, Y., Han, K., Suh, Y. J. & Jung, I. Stability selection for LASSO with weights based on AUC. Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 5207 (2023).
Google Scholar
LeDell, E. Distributed ML with H2O. Stanford MLSys Seminar Episode 23 [Internet]. Apr 29. (2021). Available from: https://youtu.be/UELpqMxDB1E
Click, C., Malohlava, M., Parmar, V., Roark, H. & Candel, A. Gradient Boosting Machine with H2O [Internet]. (2024). Available from: http://h2o.ai/resources/
Boehmke, B. & Greenwell, B. M. Hands-on Machine Learning with R (CRC, 2019). (Chapman & Hall/CRC the R series).
Chen, T., Guestrin, C. & XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining [Internet]. San Francisco California USA: ACM; 2016 [cited 2024 Sep 25]. pp. 785–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
Lundberg, S. & Lee, S. I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions [Internet]. arXiv; [cited 2024 Jul 5]. (2017). Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874
Aini, A. N., Dewantari, O. A., Mandala, D. P. A. & Bisri, M. B. F. An enhanced earthquake risk analysis using H3 Spatial indexing. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1245 (1), 012014 (2023).
Neira, M., Molinero, C., Marshall, S. & Arcaute, E. Urban segregation on multilayered transport networks: a random walk approach. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 8370 (2024).
Google Scholar
Christiaanse, J. C. et al. Distribution of global sea turtle nesting explained from regional-scale coastal characteristics. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 752 (2024).
Google Scholar
