A UK university has announced it is developing a set of guidelines to ensure that its students and staff are proficient in AI.
The news comes as the field struggles to adapt its teaching and assessment methods to cope with the increasing use of generative artificial intelligence.
Vice-Chancellors of 24 Russell Group research-focused universities have signed the Code. This will allow universities to capitalize on AI opportunities while at the same time safeguarding academic rigor and integrity in higher education, they said.
We welcome this news, John KirkGroup Deputy CEO ITG said:
“Having dedicated plans to ensure the highest standards of teaching and learning in AI across universities is a smart move, ensuring that the next generation is better equipped to introduce additional skills into the workplace. In fact, this technology, if taken hold and deployed correctly, will strengthen the creative industry and help companies transform their marketing and customer interactions for the long term.
“While the lack of digital skills remains a headache for many businesses, having systems in place to better understand this high-impact technology is a step in the right direction. added Kirk.
MarTech expert Deployteq CEO Sjuul van der Leeuw added:
“Generative AI has tremendous potential to transform organizations and empower creative industries, and this effort will help students and faculty realize its full potential. The global race to adopt transformative technologies shows no signs of slowing down, so it is time for academics, businesses, and the It’s a positive attitude for generations to work together. Take a step.”
There was once talk of banning software like ChatGPT in schools to prevent cheating, but this guidance should teach students to use AI appropriately in learning, while It says it needs to raise awareness of the risks of plagiarism, bias and inaccuracy.
Staff also need to be trained to help students, many of whom are already using ChatGPT in their assignments. New ways of assessing students may emerge to reduce the risk of cheating.
All 24 Russell Group universities have revised their academic policies and guidance to reflect the emergence of generative AI. The new guidance says:
“These policies clarify to students and staff when the use of generative AI is inappropriate, assist them in making informed decisions, and ensure that students use these tools appropriately and when appropriate. The purpose is to make it possible to authorize its use.”
Developed in collaboration with AI and education experts, the principles represent the first step in what is expected to be a difficult period of change in higher education as the world is increasingly transformed by AI. increase.
Five core principles state that universities should help both students and staff become AI-savvy. Staff should be equipped to assist students in the successful use of generative AI tools. The department will incorporate “ethical” use of AI and adapt education and assessment to ensure equal access to AI. The university ensures that academic integrity is maintained. Share best practices as technology evolves.
Russell Group Chief Executive Officer Dr. Tim Bradshaw said:
“The transformative opportunities presented by AI are enormous and our universities are determined to seize them. It underscores our commitment to do so in a way that protects the integrity of high education.”
Professor Andrew Blass, Dean of the University of Manchester School of Health Sciences, said: What skills do you need to know how to tackle generative AI intelligently?
“From our perspective, it is clear that this cannot be imposed top-down, but can be achieved by working closely with our students to jointly create the guidance we provide. If so, it’s important to clearly explain to students why the restriction is in place, or people will find ways to get around it.”
Professor Michael Grove, Acting Vice-Chancellor (Educational Policy and Standards), University of Birmingham, said:
“The rapid rise of generative AI means that assessment practices need to be continually reviewed and re-evaluated, but should be viewed as an opportunity rather than a threat.
“We have an opportunity to rethink the role of assessment and how it can be used to enhance student learning and assess their own educational achievements.”
Education Secretary Gillian Keegan last month launched a campaign for evidence on the use of generative AI in education, asking for input on risks, ethical considerations and training of educators.
Recommended0 Recommendationwas announced in Education, Skills and Practice, Social Impact, Voices of Attention
