Chen, F. et al. Polarizability matters in enantio-selection. Nat. Commun. 15, 3394 (2024).
Google Scholar
Qin, J., Liu, Z., Ma, M. & Li, Y. Optimizing and extending ion dielectric polarizability database for microwave frequencies using machine learning methods. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 132 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Xie, X. Q., Hou, T. & Xu, X. Fast approaches for molecular polarizability calculations. J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 4443–4448 (2007).
Google Scholar
Berger, E. & Komsa, H.-P. Polarizability models for simulations of finite temperature Raman spectra from machine learning molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 043802 (2024).
Google Scholar
Thomas, M., Brehm, M., Fligg, R., Vöhringer, P. & Kirchner, B. Computing vibrational spectra from ab initio molecular dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 6608 (2013).
Google Scholar
Nakata, H., Fedorov, D. G., Yokojima, S., Kitaura, K. & Nakamura, S. Simulations of Raman spectra using the fragment molecular orbital method. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 3689–3698 (2014).
Google Scholar
Guha, S., Menéndez, J., Page, J. B. & Adams, G. B. Empirical bond polarizability model for fullerenes. Phys. Rev. B 53, 13106–13114 (1996).
Google Scholar
Applequist, J. An atom dipole interaction model for molecular optical properties. Acc. Chem. Res. 10, 79–85 (1977).
Google Scholar
Bougeard, D. & Smirnov, K. S. Calculation of off-resonance Raman scattering intensities with parametric models. J. Raman Spectrosc. 40, 1704–1719 (2009).
Google Scholar
Li, W., Dong, H., Ma, J. & Li, S. Structures and spectroscopic properties of large molecules and condensed-phase systems predicted by generalized energy-based fragmentation approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 169–181 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Cheng, Z., Li, W. & Li, S. Generalized energy-based fragmentation approach for accurate binding energies and Raman spectra of methane hydrate clusters. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 35, 167–176 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhao, D. et al. Accurate and efficient prediction of post–Hartree–Fock polarizabilities of condensed-phase systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 6461–6470 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhao, D. et al. Fragment-based deep learning for simultaneous prediction of polarizabilities and NMR shieldings of macromolecules and their aggregates. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 2655–2665 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, T. et al. Ab initio characterization of protein molecular dynamics with AI2BMD. Nature 635, 1019–1027 (2024).
Google Scholar
Raghavachari, K. & Saha, A. Accurate composite and fragment-based quantum chemical models for large molecules. Chem. Rev. 115, 5643–5677 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liu, J. & He, X. Fragment-based quantum mechanical approach to biomolecules, molecular clusters, molecular crystals and liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 12341–12367 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. M. et al. Accurate molecular polarizabilities with coupled cluster theory and machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 3401–3406 (2019).
Google Scholar
Grisafi, A., Wilkins, D. M., Csányi, G. & Ceriotti, M. Symmetry-adapted machine learning for tensorial properties of atomistic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 036002 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Efficient and accurate simulations of vibrational and electronic spectra with symmetry-preserving neural network models for tensorial properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 7284–7290 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. Deep neural network for the dielectric response of insulators. Phys. Rev. B 102, 041121 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sommers, G. M., Andrade, M. F. C., Zhang, L., Wang, H. & Car, R. Raman spectrum and polarizability of liquid water from deep neural networks. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 10592–10602 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gastegger, M., Schütt, K. T. & Müller, K.-R. Machine learning of solvent effects on molecular spectra and reactions. Chem. Sci. 12, 11473–11483 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schütt, K., Unke, O. & Gastegger, M. In Equivariant Message Passing for the Prediction of Tensorial Properties and Molecular Spectra 9377–9388 (PMLR, 2021).
Zhang, Y., Jiang, J. & Jiang, B. Learning dipole moments and polarizabilities. In Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Machine Learning 453–465 (Elsevier, 2023).
Raimbault, N., Grisafi, A., Ceriotti, M. & Rossi, M. Using Gaussian process regression to simulate the vibrational Raman spectra of molecular crystals. N. J. Phys. 21, 105001 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. & Jiang, B. Universal machine learning for the response of atomistic systems to external fields. Nat. Commun. 14, 6424 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kapil, V., Kovács, D. P., Csányi, G. & Michaelides, A. First-principles spectroscopy of aqueous interfaces using machine-learned electronic and quantum nuclear effects. Faraday Discuss 249, 50–68 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xu, N. et al. Tensorial properties via the neuroevolution potential framework: fast simulation of infrared and Raman spectra. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 3273 (2024).
Eckhoff, M. & Behler, J. From molecular fragments to the bulk: development of a neural network potential for MOF-5. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3793–3809 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zaverkin, V., Holzmüller, D., Schuldt, R. & Kästner, J. Predicting properties of periodic systems from cluster data: a case study of liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 156, 114103 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schran, C., Brieuc, F. & Marx, D. Transferability of machine learning potentials: protonated water neural network potential applied to the protonated water hexamer. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 051101 (2021).
Google Scholar
Herbold, M. & Behler, J. Machine learning transferable atomic forces for large systems from underconverged molecular fragments. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 12979–12989 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chong, S. et al. Robustness of local predictions in atomistic machine learning models. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 8020–8031 (2023).
Google Scholar
El-Machachi, Z., Wilson, M. & Deringer, V. L. Exploring the configurational space of amorphous graphene with machine-learned atomic energies. Chem. Sci. 13, 13720–13731 (2022).
Google Scholar
Elola, M. D. & Ladanyi, B. M. Molecular dynamics study of polarizability anisotropy relaxation in aromatic liquids and its connection with local structure. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 15525–15541 (2006).
Google Scholar
Tuschel, D. Raman crystallography and the effect of Raman polarizability tensor element values. Spectroscopy 35, 5–12 (2020).
Hiener, D. C., Folmsbee, D. L., Langkamp, L. A. & Hutchison, G. R. Evaluating fast methods for static polarizabilities on extended conjugated oligomers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 23173–23181 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schran, C., Brezina, K. & Marsalek, O. Committee neural network potentials control generalization errors and enable active learning. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 104105 (2020).
Google Scholar
Erlebach, A., Nachtigall, P. & Grajciar, L. Accurate large-scale simulations of siliceous zeolites by neural network potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 174 (2022).
Google Scholar
Margraf, J. T. Science-driven atomistic machine learning. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202219170 (2023).
Google Scholar
Carrete, J., Montes-Campos, H., Wanzenböck, R., Heid, E. & Madsen, G. K. H. Deep ensembles vs committees for uncertainty estimation in neural-network force fields: comparison and application to active learning. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 204801 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Juraskova, V. & Duarte, F. Modelling chemical processes in explicit solvents with machine learning potentials. Nat. Commun. 15, 6114 (2024).
Google Scholar
Berger, E., Niemelä, J., Lampela, O., Juffer, A. H. & Komsa, H.-P. Raman spectra of amino acids and peptides from machine learning polarizabilities. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 64, 4601–4612 (2024).
Google Scholar
Feng, C., Xi, J., Zhang, Y., Jiang, B. & Zhou, Y. Accurate and interpretable dipole interaction model-based machine learning for molecular polarizability. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 1207–1217 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dawes, R., Dwyer, J. R., Qu, W. & Gough, K. M. QTAIM investigation of the electronic structure and large Raman scattering intensity of bicyclo-[1.1.1]-pentane. J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 13149–13157 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ángyán, J.G., Jansen, G., Loos, M., Hättig, C. & Hess, B.A. Distributed polarizabilities using the topological theory of atoms in molecules. In AIP Conference Proceedings Vol. 330 67–67 (AIP, 1995).
Macchi, P. & Krawczuk, A. The polarizability of organometallic bonds. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1053, 165–172 (2015).
Google Scholar
Doherty, D. C. & Hopfinger, A. J. Molecular modeling of polymers: molecular dynamics simulation of the rotator phase of C 21 H 44. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 661–664 (1994).
Google Scholar
Phillips, T. L. & Hanna, S. A comparison of computer models for the simulation of crystalline polyethylene and the long n-alkanes. Polymer 46, 11003–11018 (2005).
Google Scholar
Ryckaert, J.-P., McDonald, I. R. & Klein, M. L. Disorder in the pseudohexagonal rotator phase of n-alkanes: molecular-dynamics calculations for tricosane. Mol. Phys. 67, 957–979 (1989).
Google Scholar
Nosé, S. [Ubar] I. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol. Phys. 100, 191–198 (2002).
Google Scholar
Nosé, S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol. Phys. 52, 255–268 (1984).
Google Scholar
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
Google Scholar
Sun, H., Ren, P. & Fried, J. The COMPASS force field: parameterization and validation for phosphazenes. Comput. Theor. Polym. Sci. 8, 229–246 (1998).
Google Scholar
Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS—a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gastegger, M., Behler, J. & Marquetand, P. Machine learning molecular dynamics for the simulation of infrared spectra. Chem. Sci. 8, 6924–6935 (2017).
Google Scholar
Goedecker, S., Teter, M. & Hutter, J. Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 54, 1703 (1996).
Google Scholar
Hartwigsen, C., Gœdecker, S. & Hutter, J. Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn. Phys. Rev. B 58, 3641 (1998).
Google Scholar
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Google Scholar
Lippert, G., Hutter, J. & Parrinello, M. A hybrid Gaussian and plane wave density functional scheme. Mol. Phys. 92, 477–488 (1997).
Google Scholar
Kühne, T. D. et al. CP2K: an electronic structure and molecular dynamics software package – Quickstep: efficient and accurate electronic structure calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 194103 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fan, Z., Chen, W., Vierimaa, V. & Harju, A. Efficient molecular dynamics simulations with many-body potentials on graphics processing units. Comput. Phys. Commun. 218, 10–16 (2017).
Google Scholar
Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).
Google Scholar
Musil, F. et al. Physics-inspired structural representations for molecules and materials. Chem. Rev. 121, 9759–9815 (2021).
Google Scholar
Langer, M. F., Goeßmann, A. & Rupp, M. Representations of molecules and materials for interpolation of quantum-mechanical simulations via machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 41 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fan, Z. et al. Neuroevolution machine learning potentials: combining high accuracy and low cost in atomistic simulations and application to heat transport. Phys. Rev. B 104, 104309 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fan, Z. Improving the accuracy of the neuroevolution machine learning potential for multi-component systems. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34, 125902 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fan, Z. et al. GPUMD: A package for constructing accurate machine-learned potentials and performing highly efficient atomistic simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 157, 114801 (2022).
Google Scholar
Song, K. et al. General-purpose machine-learned potential for 16 elemental metals and their alloys. Nat. Commun. 15, 10208 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fang, M. et al. Transferability of machine learning models for predicting Raman spectra. J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 2286–2294 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bannwarth, C., Ehlert, S. & Grimme, S. GFN2-xTB—an accurate and broadly parametrized self-consistent tight-binding quantum chemical method with multipole electrostatics and density-dependent dispersion contributions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1652–1671 (2019).
Google Scholar
Caldeweyher, E. et al. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 154122 (2019).
Google Scholar
Caldeweyher, E., Bannwarth, C. & Grimme, S. Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model. J. Chem. Phys. 147, 034112 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tkatchenko, A. & Scheffler, M. Accurate molecular van der Waals interactions from ground-state electron density and free-atom reference data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 073005 (2009).
Google Scholar
Blair, S. A. & Thakkar, A. J. Relating polarizability to volume, ionization energy, electronegativity, hardness, moments of momentum, and other molecular properties. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 074306 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hermann, J., DiStasio, R. A. & Tkatchenko, A. First-principles models for van der Waals interactions in molecules and materials: concepts, theory, and applications. Chem. Rev. 117, 4714–4758 (2017).
Google Scholar
Heid, E., Szabadi, A. & Schröder, C. Quantum mechanical determination of atomic polarizabilities of ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 10992–10996 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lu, T. & Chen, F.-W. Comparison of computational methods for atomic charges. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 28, 1–18 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).
Google Scholar
