Designing metamaterials with programmable nonlinear responses and geometric constraints in graph space

Machine Learning


  • Cui, H. et al. Design and printing of proprioceptive three-dimensional architected robotic metamaterials. Science 376, 1287–1293 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. et al. Nanolattices: an emerging class of mechanical metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701850 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipov, E. T., Tachi, T. & Paulino, G. H. Origami tubes assembled into stiff, yet reconfigurable structures and metamaterials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12321–12326 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela, C. M. et al. Supersonic impact resilience of nanoarchitected carbon. Nat. Mater. 20, 1491–1497 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaedler, T. A. et al. Ultralight metallic microlattices. Science 334, 962–965 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, X., Spadaccini, C. M. & Greer, J. R. Responsive materials architected in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 683–701 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, M. F. The properties of foams and lattices. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 364, 15–30 (2006).

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X. et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344, 1373–1377 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meza, L. R., Das, S. & Greer, J. R. Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices. Science 345, 1322–1326 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, T. et al. Obtaining auxetic and isotropic metamaterials in counterintuitive design spaces: an automated optimization approach and experimental characterization. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., Shen, J., Zhou, S., Huang, X. & Xie, Y. M. Design of lattice structures with controlled anisotropy. Mater. Des. 93, 443–447 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, H. et al. Three-dimensional printing of piezoelectric materials with designed anisotropy and directional response. Nat. Mater. 18, 234–241 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, K. C. & Gershenfeld, N. Reversibly assembled cellular composite materials. Science 341, 1219–1221 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, C. E. et al. Ultralight, strong, and self-reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials. Sci. Robot. 9, eadi2746 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, S. J., Moore, A., Tagare, S., Cheung, K. & Kramer-Bottiglio, R. Deployable cuboctahedrons for adaptive space infrastructure. In 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 75–81 (IEEE, 2024); https://doi.org/10.1109/RoboSoft60065.2024.10521988

  • Huang, Z., Panozzo, D. & Zorin, D. Optimized shock-protecting microstructures. ACM Trans. Graph. 43, 181 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. et al. Buckling of elastomeric beams enables actuation of soft machines. Adv. Mater. 27, 6323–6327 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, N. J. et al. Three-dimensional trampolinelike behavior in an ultralight elastic metamaterial. Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 024015 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastek, J.-H., Kumar, S., Telgen, B., Glaesener, R. N. & Kochmann, D. M. Inverting the structure–property map of truss metamaterials by deep learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2111505119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Tan, S., Zheng, L. & Kochmann, D. M. Inverse-designed spinodoid metamaterials. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 73 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B. et al. Computational discovery of microstructured composites with optimal stiffness–toughness trade-offs. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk4284 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. et al. De novo atomistic discovery of disordered mechanical metamaterials by machine learning. Adv. Sci. 11, 2304834 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luan, S., Chen, E., John, J. & Gaitanaros, S. A data-driven framework for structure–property correlation in ordered and disordered cellular metamaterials. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi1453 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Y., He, Q. & Zhao, X. Designing complex architectured materials with generative adversarial networks. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4169 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, S. C. & Buehler, M. J. Nature-inspired architected materials using unsupervised deep learning. Commun. Eng. 1, 37 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van’T Sant, S., Thakolkaran, P., Martínez, J. & Kumar, S. Inverse-designed growth-based cellular metamaterials. Mech. Mater. 182, 104668 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Kumar, S. & Kochmann, D. M. Data-driven topology optimization of spinodoid metamaterials with seamlessly tunable anisotropy. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 383, 113894 (2021).

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastek, J.-H. & Kochmann, D. M. Inverse design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1466–1475 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurizi, M., Gao, C. & Berto, F. Inverse design of truss lattice materials with superior buckling resistance. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 247 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, A. J., Jin, K. & Buehler, M. J. Designing architected materials for mechanical compression via simulation, deep learning, and experimentation. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 80 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakolkaran, P., Espinal, M. A., Dhulipala, S., Kumar, S. & Portela, C. M. Experiment-informed finite-strain inverse design of spinodal metamaterials. Extreme Mech. Lett. 74, 102274 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Indurkar, P. P., Karlapati, S., Shaikeea, A. J. D. & Deshpande, V. S. Predicting deformation mechanisms in architected metamaterials using GNN. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09427 (2022).

  • Zhou, Z., Kearnes, S., Li, L., Zare, R. N. & Riley, P. Optimization of molecules via deep reinforcement learning. Sci. Rep. 9, 10752 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simm, G. N. C., Pinsler, R., Csányi, G. & Hernández-Lobato, J. M. Symmetry-aware actor-critic for 3D molecular design. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12747 (2020).

  • Xu, M., Powers, A., Dror, R., Ermon, S. & Leskovec, J. Geometric latent diffusion models for 3D molecule generation. In Proc. 40th International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 202 (eds Krause, A. et al.) 38592–38610 (PMLR, 2023).

  • Zhou, C., Wang, X. & Zhang, M. Unifying generation and prediction on graphs with latent graph diffusion. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02518 (2024).

  • Zeni, C. et al. A generative model for inorganic materials design. Nature 639, 624–632 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, W. et al. Automatic truss design with reinforcement learning. In Proc. 32nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 3659–3667 (International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2023); https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/407

  • Luo, R., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Xiao, W. & Zhao, X. A reinforcement learning method for layout design of planar and spatial trusses using kernel regression. Appl. Sci. 12, 8227 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupwiwat, C., Hayashi, K. & Ohsaki, M. Multi-objective optimization of truss structure using multi-agent reinforcement learning and graph representation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 129, 107594 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dold, D. & Aranguren Van Egmond, D. Differentiable graph-structured models for inverse design of lattice materials. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 4, 101586 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Zhang, X., Chen, T. & Watanabe, I. Deep learning in mechanical metamaterials: from prediction and generation to inverse design. Adv. Mater. 35, 2302530 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. et al. Data‐driven design for metamaterials and multiscale systems: a review. Adv. Mater. 36, 2305254 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Chen, T.-T., Guo, X., Samitsu, S. & Watanabe, I. Controllable inverse design of auxetic metamaterials using deep learning. Mater. Des. 211, 110178 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Chen, T.-T., Jiang, X., Naito, M. & Watanabe, I. Deep-learning-based inverse design of three-dimensional architected cellular materials with the target porosity and stiffness using voxelized Voronoi lattices. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 24, 2157682 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. et al. Deep generative modeling for mechanistic-based learning and design of metamaterial systems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 372, 113377 (2020).

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. et al. Guided diffusion for fast inverse design of density-based mechanical metamaterials. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13570 (2024).

  • Wang, H. et al. GraphGAN: Graph representation learning with generative adversarial nets. In Proc. 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2508–2515 (AAAI, 2018).

  • Liu, Q., Allamanis, M., Brockschmidt, M. & Gaunt, A. L. Constrained graph variational autoencoders for molecule design. In Proc. 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Bengio, S. et al.) 78067815 (Curran Associates, 2019).

  • Ha, C. S. et al. Rapid inverse design of metamaterials based on prescribed mechanical behavior through machine learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 5765 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Karapiperis, K., Kumar, S. & Kochmann, D. M. Unifying the design space and optimizing linear and nonlinear truss metamaterials by generative modeling. Nat. Commun. 14, 7563 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., Hu, W., Leskovec, J. & Jegelka, S. How powerful are graph neural networks? Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.00826 (2018).

  • Lew, A. J. & Buehler, M. J. Single-shot forward and inverse hierarchical architected materials design for nonlinear mechanical properties using an Attention-Diffusion model. Mater. Today 64, 10–20 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K., Sun, R. & Daraio, C. Growth rules for irregular architected materials with programmable properties. Science 377, 975–981 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetta, J. et al. Elastic textures for additive fabrication. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 135 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makatura, L. et al. Procedural metamaterials: a unified procedural graph for metamaterial design. ACM Trans. Graph. 42, 168 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurizi, M., Gao, C. & Berto, F. Predicting stress, strain and deformation fields in materials and structures with graph neural networks. Sci Rep. 12, 21834 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A. & Klimov, O. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347 (2017).

  • Huang, G. et al. Snapshot Ensembles: train 1, get M for free. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.00109 (2017).

  • Pasini, D. & Guest, J. K. Imperfect architected materials: mechanics and topology optimization. MRS Bull. 44, 766–772 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaesener, R. N. et al. Predicting the influence of geometric imperfections on the mechanical response of 2D and 3D periodic trusses. Acta Mater. 254, 118918 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemke, P. et al. The defect sensitivity of brittle truss-based metamaterials. Mater. Des. 239, 112776 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. D. & Fleck, N. A. The imperfection sensitivity of isotropic two-dimensional elastic lattices. J. Appl. Mech. 75, 051011 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, B., Van Der Auwear, H. & De Langhe, K. Challenges in NVH for electric vehicles. In Proc. FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress Vol. 191 (eds SAE-China & FISITA) 675–685 (Springer, 2013).

  • Muhammad & Lim, C. W. Phononic metastructures with ultrawide low frequency three-dimensional bandgaps as broadband low frequency filter. Sci Rep. 11, 7137 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P. P., Bonatti, C., Tancogne-Dejean, T. & Mohr, D. Graph-based metamaterials: deep learning of structure-property relations. Mater. Des. 223, 111175 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, B. et al. Inverse design of mechanical metamaterials with target nonlinear response via a neural accelerated evolution strategy. Adv. Mater. 34, 2206238 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R., Sun, X. & Narasimhan, K. A Generalized algorithm for multi-objective reinforcement learning and policy adaptation. In Proc. 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Wallach, H. M. et al.) 14636–14647 (Curran Associates, 2019).

  • Buterez, D., Janet, J. P., Kiddle, S. J., Oglic, D. & Lió, P. Transfer learning with graph neural networks for improved molecular property prediction in the multi-fidelity setting. Nat. Commun. 15, 1517 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boley, J. W. et al. Shape-shifting structured lattices via multimaterial 4D printing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 20856–20862 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorléans, V., Delille, R., Notta-Cuvier, D., Lauro, F. & Michau, E. Time–temperature superposition in viscoelasticity and viscoplasticity for thermoplastics. Polym. Test. 101, 107287 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurizi, M. Designing metamaterials with programmable nonlinear responses and geometric constraints in graph space. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28773806 (2025).

  • Maurizi, M. & Xu, D. marcomau06/GraphMetaMat: GraphMetaMat. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15498444 (2025).



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *