Bermudez-Contreras, E., Clark, B. J. & Wilber, A. The neuroscience of spatial navigation and the relationship to artificial intelligence. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 14, 63 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kriegeskorte, N. & Douglas, P. K. Cognitive computational neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1148–1160 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Summerfield, C. & Botvinick, M. Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence. Neuron 95, 245–258 (2017).
Google Scholar
Brette, R. Brains as computers: metaphor, analogy, theory or fact?. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 878729 (2022).
Google Scholar
Smith, C. U. M. Descartes and modern neuroscience. Perspect. Biol. Med. 42, 356–371 (1999).
Google Scholar
Smith, C. U. M. Julien Offray de la Mettrie (1709-1751). J. Hist. Neurosci. 11, 110–124 (2002).
Google Scholar
Ifrah, G. The Universal History of Computing: From the Abacus to the Quantum Computer (Wiley, 2001).
Szolovits, P. in On Knowledge Base Management Systems (eds Brodie, M. L. & Mylopoulos, J.) 339–352 (Springer, 1986); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4980-1_28
Sarker, I. H. Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2, 420 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sharma, N., Jain, V. & Mishra, A. An analysis of convolutional neural networks for image classification. Procedia Comput. Sci. 132, 377–384 (2018).
Google Scholar
Goldberg, Y. A primer on neural network models for natural language processing. J. Artif. Intell. Res. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4992 (2016).
Sun, X., Khedr, H. & Shoukry, Y. Formal verification of neural network controlled autonomous systems. In Proc. 22nd ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC 2019) (eds Ozay, N. & Prabhakar, P.) 147–156 (ACM, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1145/3302504.3311802
Aspray, W. John von Neumann’s contributions to computing and computer science. Ann. Hist. Comput. 11, 189–195 (1989).
Google Scholar
Smith, W. & Pang, A. Simulation study of decoupled architecture computers. IEEE Trans. Comput. C 35, 692–702 (1986).
Google Scholar
Zador, A. et al. Catalyzing next-generation Artificial Intelligence through NeuroAI. Nat. Commun. 14, 1597 (2023).
Google Scholar
Stiefel, K. M. & Coggan, J. S. The energy challenges of artificial superintelligence. Front. Artif. Intell. 6, 1240653 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rahimi Azghadi, M. et al. Complementary metal-oxide semiconductor and memristive hardware for neuromorphic computing. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2, 1900189 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lamm, E. & Unger, R. Biological Computation (Chapman & Hall, 2011); https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420087963
Benenson, Y. Biocomputers: from test tubes to live cells. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 675–685 (2009).
Google Scholar
Smirnova, L. et al. Organoid intelligence (OI): the new frontier in biocomputing and intelligence-in-a-dish. Front. Sci. 1, 1017235 (2023).
Google Scholar
Corrò, C., Novellasdemunt, L. & Li, V. S. W. A brief history of organoids. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 319, C151–C165 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cai, H. et al. Brain organoid reservoir computing for artificial intelligence. Nat. Electron. 6, 1032–1039 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sharf, T. et al. Functional neuronal circuitry and oscillatory dynamics in human brain organoids. Nat. Commun. 13, 4403 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kim, H., Lee, Y.-J., Kwon, Y. & Kim, J. Efficient generation of brain organoids using magnetized gold nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 13, 21240 (2023).
Google Scholar
Smirnova, L. & Hartung, T. The promise and potential of brain organoids. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 13, 2302745 (2024).
Google Scholar
Higgins, I., Racanière, S. & Rezende, D. Symmetry-based representations for artificial and biological general intelligence. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 16, 836498 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hole, K. J. & Ahmad, S. A thousand brains: toward biologically constrained AI. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 743 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hartung, T., Morales Pantoja, I. E. & Smirnova, L. Brain organoids and organoid intelligence from ethical, legal and social points of view. Front. Artif. Intell. 6, 1307613 (2024).
Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, H. & George, A. Miller, language, and the computer metaphor and mind. Hist. Psychol. 2, 37–64 (1999).
Google Scholar
Nagarajan, N. & Stevens, C. F. How does the speed of thought compare for brains and digital computers?. Curr. Biol. 18, R756–R758 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hodges, A. Alan Turing: The Enigma: The Book That Inspired the Film The Imitation Game (Princeton Univ. Press, 2014).
Wilkinson, J. H. Turing, Alan M. in Encyclopedia of Computer Science 1803–1804 (John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2003); https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1074100.1074883
Turing, A. M. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950).
Google Scholar
Harnad, S. The Turing Test is not a trick: Turing indistinguishability is a scientific criterion. ACM SIGART Bull. 3, 9–10 (1992).
Google Scholar
Muggleton, S. Alan Turing and the development of artificial intelligence. AI Commun. 27, 3–10 (2014).
Google Scholar
McCulloch, W. S. & Pitts, W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 5, 115–133 (1943).
Google Scholar
Kay, L. E. From logical neurons to poetic embodiments of mind: Warren S. McCulloch’s Project in neuroscience. Sci. Context 14, 591–614 (2001).
Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 65, 386–408 (1958).
Google Scholar
Du, K.-L., Leung, C.-S., Mow, W. H. & Swamy, M. N. S. Perceptron: learning, generalization, model selection, fault tolerance, and role in the deep learning era. Mathematics 10, 4730 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Z.-H. in Machine Learning 103–128 (Springer, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1967-3_5
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533–536 (1986).
Google Scholar
Owens, J. D. et al. GPU computing. Proc. IEEE 96, 879–899 (2008).
Google Scholar
Cui, H., Zhang, H., Ganger, G. R., Gibbons, P. B. & Xing, E. P. GeePS: scalable deep learning on distributed GPUs with a GPU-specialized parameter server. In Proc. Eleventh European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys 2016) (eds Cadar, C. et al.) 1–16 (ACM, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1145/2901318.2901323
Law, H. Bell Labs and the ‘neural’ network, 1986-1996. BJHS Themes 8, 143–154 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gupta, D. & Rani, R. A study of big data evolution and research challenges. J. Inf. Sci. 45, 322–340 (2019).
Google Scholar
Malhotra, G., Evans, B. D. & Bowers, J. S. Hiding a plane with a pixel: examining shape-bias in CNNs and the benefit of building in biological constraints. Vision Res. 174, 57–68 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lindsay, G. W. Convolutional neural networks as a model of the visual system: past, present and future. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 33, 2017–2031 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lipton, Z. C., Berkowitz, J. & Elkan, C. A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.00019 (2015).
Tarwani, K. M. & Edem, S. Survey on recurrent neural network in natural language processing. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 48, 301–304 (2017).
Google Scholar
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ray, P. P. ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 3, 121–154 (2023).
Google Scholar
Korteling, J. E., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G. C., Blankendaal, R. A. M., Boonekamp, R. C. & Eikelboom, A. R. Human versus artificial intelligence. Front. Artif. Intell. 4, 622364 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zador, A. M. A critique of pure learning and what artificial neural networks can learn from animal brains. Nat. Commun. 10, 3770 (2019).
Google Scholar
Laughlin, S. B. & Sejnowski, T. J. Communication in neuronal networks. Science 301, 1870–1874 (2003).
Google Scholar
Lake, B. M., Linzen, T. & Baroni, M. Human few-shot learning of compositional instructions. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.04587 (2019).
Maass, W., Natschläger, T. & Markram, H. Real-time computing without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Comput. 14, 2531–2560 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kováč, L. The 20 W sleep-walkers. EMBO Rep. 11, 2 (2010).
Google Scholar
Schuman, C. D. et al. Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 10–19 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mead, C. Neuromorphic electronic systems. Proc. IEEE 78, 1629–1636 (1990).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Wang, Z. & Liu, D. A comprehensive review of stability analysis of continuous-time recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25, 1229–1262 (2014).
Google Scholar
Young, A., Dean, M., Plank, J. & Rose, G. A review of spiking neuromorphic hardware communication systems. IEEE Access 7, 135606–135620 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pan, W., Zhao, F., Han, B., Dong, Y. & Zeng, Y. Emergence of brain-inspired small-world spiking neural network through neuroevolution. iScience 27, 108845 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zambrano, D. & Bohte, S. M. Fast and efficient asynchronous neural computation with adapting spiking neural networks. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.02053 (2016).
Hsu, J. IBM’s new brain [News]. IEEE Spectr. 51, 17–19 (2014).
Google Scholar
Akopyan, F. et al. TrueNorth: design and tool flow of a 65 mW 1 million neuron programmable neurosynaptic chip. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 34, 1537–1557 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. Basic neural units of the brain: neurons, synapses and action potential. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.01703 (2019).
Shahsavari, M., Thomas, D., Van Gerven, M., Brown, A. & Luk, W. Advancements in spiking neural network communication and synchronization techniques for event-driven neuromorphic systems. Array 20, 100323 (2023).
Google Scholar
Balafrej, I., Alibart, F. & Rouat, J. P-CRITICAL: a reservoir autoregulation plasticity rule for neuromorphic hardware. Neuromorph. Comput. Eng. 2, 024007 (2022).
Google Scholar
Davies, M. et al. Loihi: a neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning. IEEE Micro 38, 82–99 (2018).
Google Scholar
Huynh, P. K. et al. Implementing spiking neural networks on neuromorphic architectures: a review. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.08897 (2022).
Zhang, M. et al. Rectified linear postsynaptic potential function for backpropagation in deep spiking neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 33, 1947–1958 (IEEE, 2022).
Lee, J. H., Delbruck, T. & Pfeiffer, M. Training deep spiking neural networks using backpropagation. Front. Neurosci. 10, 508 (2016).
Google Scholar
Guo, W., Fouda, M. E., Eltawil, A. M. & Salama, K. N. Efficient training of spiking neural networks with temporally-truncated local backpropagation through time. Front. Neurosci. 17, 1047008 (2023).
Google Scholar
Neftci, E. O., Mostafa, H. & Zenke, F. Surrogate gradient learning in spiking neural networks: bringing the power of gradient-based optimization to spiking neural networks. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 36, 51–63 (2019).
Google Scholar
Prezioso, M. et al. Spike-timing-dependent plasticity learning of coincidence detection with passively integrated memristive circuits. Nat. Commun. 9, 5311 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dong, Y., Zhao, D., Li, Y. & Zeng, Y. An unsupervised STDP-based spiking neural network inspired by biologically plausible learning rules and connections. Neural Netw. 165, 799–808 (2023).
Google Scholar
Deng, S., Lin, H., Li, Y. & Gu, S. Surrogate module learning: reduce the gradient error accumulation in training spiking neural networks. In Proc. 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Krause, A. et al.) 7645–7657 (PMLR, 2023).
Alam El Din, D.-M. et al. Human neural organoid microphysiological systems show the building blocks necessary for basic learning and memory. Commun. Biol. 8, 1237 (2025).
Google Scholar
Robbins, A. et al. Goal-directed learning in cortical organoids. Cell Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2026.116984 (2026).
Tessadori, J., Bisio, M., Martinoia, S. & Chiappalone, M. Modular neuronal assemblies embodied in a closed-loop environment: toward future integration of brains and machines. Front. Neural Circuits 6, 99 (2012).
Google Scholar
Osaki, T. et al. Complex activity and short-term plasticity of human cerebral organoids reciprocally connected with axons. Nat. Commun. 15, 2945 (2024).
Google Scholar
Huang, Q. et al. Shell microelectrode arrays (MEAs) for brain organoids. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq5031 (2022).
Google Scholar
Habibollahi, F., Kagan, B. J., Burkitt, A. N. & French, C. Critical dynamics arise during structured information presentation within embodied in vitro neuronal networks. Nat. Commun. 14, 5287 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sumi, T. et al. Biological neurons act as generalization filters in reservoir computing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2217008120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yamamoto, H. et al. Modular architecture facilitates noise-driven control of synchrony in neuronal networks. Sci. Adv. 9, eade1755 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kagan, B. J. et al. In vitro neurons learn and exhibit sentience when embodied in a simulated game-world. Neuron 110, 3952–3969.e8 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kapałczyńska, M. et al. 2D and 3D cell cultures—a comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures. Arch. Med. Sci. 14, 910–919 (2018).
Eichmüller, O. L. & Knoblich, J. A. Human cerebral organoids—a new tool for clinical neurology research. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 18, 661–680 (2022).
Google Scholar
Qian, X., Song, H. & Ming, G. Brain organoids: advances, applications and challenges. Dev. Camb. Engl. 146, dev166074 (2019).
Smirnova, L., Morales Pantoja, I. E. & Hartung, T. Organoid intelligence (OI) – The ultimate functionality of a brain microphysiological system. ALTEX 40, 191–203 (2023).
Google Scholar
Trujillo, C. A. & Muotri, A. R. Brain organoids and the study of neurodevelopment. Trends Mol. Med. 24, 982–990 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, S. & Chang, M.-Y. Application of human brain organoids—opportunities and challenges in modeling human brain development and neurodevelopmental diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 12528 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alberini, C. M. Not just neurons: the diverse cellular landscape of learning and memory. Neuron 113, 1664–1679 (2025).
Google Scholar
Trujillo, C. A. et al. Complex oscillatory waves emerging from cortical organoids model early human brain network development. Cell Stem Cell 25, 558–569.e7 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yakoub, A. M. & Sadek, M. Analysis of synapses in cerebral organoids. Cell Transplant. 28, 1173–1182 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sakaguchi, H. et al. Self-organized synchronous calcium transients in a cultured human neural network derived from cerebral organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 13, 458–473 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chakka, L. R. J. & Maniruzzaman, M. Organoid intelligence: training lab-grown mini-brains to learn and compute with AI. AAPS Open 11, 4 (2025).
Google Scholar
Jordan, F. D., Kutter, M., Comby, J.-M., Brozzi, F. & Kurtys, E. Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research in wetware computing. Front. Artif. Intell. 7, 1376042 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kagan, B. J. The CL1 as a platform technology to leverage biological neural system functions. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 3, 724–725 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rountree, C. et al. Long-term potentiation and closed-loop learning in paired brain organoids for CNS drug discovery. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.03.663054 (2025).
Kagan, B. J. Two roads diverged: pathways toward harnessing intelligence in neural cell cultures. Cell Biomater. 1, 100156 (2025).
Google Scholar
Alwosheel, A., van Cranenburgh, S. & Chorus, C. G. Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis. J. Choice Model. 28, 167–182 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gawlikowski, J. et al. A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, 1513–1589 (2023).
Google Scholar
Puderbaugh, M. & Emmady, P. D. Neuroplasticity. StatPearls (2025); https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557811/
von Bernhardi, R., Bernhardi, L. E. & Eugenín, J. What is neural plasticity?. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1015, 1–15 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F. & Merabet, L. B. The plastic human brain cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 377–401 (2005).
Google Scholar
Sorscher, B., Ganguli, S. & Sompolinsky, H. Neural representational geometry underlies few-shot concept learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200800119 (2022).
Google Scholar
Khajehnejad, M. et al. Dynamic network plasticity and sample efficiency in biological neural cultures: a comparative study with deep reinforcement learning. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 6, 0336 (2025).
Google Scholar
Madhavan, M. et al. Induction of myelinating oligodendrocytes in human cortical spheroids. Nat. Methods 15, 700–706 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lancaster, M. A. & Knoblich, J. A. Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2329–2340 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mayhew, C. N. & Singhania, R. A review of protocols for brain organoids and applications for disease modeling. STAR Protoc. 4, 101860 (2023).
Google Scholar
Marx, V. Reality check for organoids in neuroscience. Nat. Methods 17, 961–964 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cakir, B. et al. Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system. Nat. Methods 16, 1169–1175 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Wan, Z. & Kamm, R. D. Vascularized organoids on a chip: strategies for engineering organoids with functional vasculature. Lab Chip 21, 473–488 (2021).
Google Scholar
Aung, A., Kumar, V., Theprungsirikul, J., Davey, S. K. & Varghese, S. An engineered tumor-on-a-chip device with breast cancer-immune cell interactions for assessing T-cell recruitment. Cancer Res. 80, 263–275 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Bijonowski, B. & Kurniawan, N. Vascularizing organoids to promote long-term organogenesis on a chip. Organoids 2, 239–255 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mohapatra, R., Leist, M., von Aulock, S. & Hartung, T. Guidance for Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt)—a draft for stakeholder discussion and background documentation. ALTEX 42, 376–396 (2025).
Miedel, M. T. et al. Validation of microphysiological systems for interpreting patient heterogeneity requires robust reproducibility analytics and experimental metadata. Cell Rep. Methods 5, 101028 (2025).
Google Scholar
Schröter, M. et al. Functional imaging of brain organoids using high-density microelectrode arrays. MRS Bull. 47, 530–544 (2022).
Google Scholar
Passaro, A. P. & Stice, S. L. Electrophysiological analysis of brain organoids: current approaches and advancements. Front. Neurosci. 14, 622137 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schröter, M. et al. Advances in large-scale electrophysiology with high-density microelectrode arrays. Lab Chip 25, 4844–4885 (2025).
Google Scholar
Farisco, M. et al. A method for the ethical analysis of brain-inspired AI. Artif. Intell. Rev. 57, 133 (2024).
Google Scholar
de Jongh, D. et al. Organoids: a systematic review of ethical issues. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 13, 337 (2022).
Google Scholar
Friston, K. The sentient organoid? Front. Sci. 1, 1147911 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jeziorski, J. et al. Brain organoids, consciousness, ethics and moral status. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 144, 97–102 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kagan, B. J., Loeffler, A., Boyd, J. L. & Savulescu, J. Embodied neural systems can enable iterative investigations of morally relevant states. J. Neurosci. 44, e0431242024 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ororbia, A. & Friston, K. Mortal computation: a foundation for biomimetic intelligence. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.09589 (2024).
Molteni, M. Brain organoid pioneers fear inflated claims about biocomputing could backfire. STAT https://www.statnews.com/2025/11/17/brain-organoid-pioneers-fear-backlash-over-biocomputing/ (2025).
Kagan, B. J. et al. Toward a nomenclature consensus for diverse intelligent systems: call for collaboration. Innovation 5, 100658 (2024).
Boyd, J. L. & Lipshitz, N. Dimensions of consciousness and the moral status of brain organoids. Neuroethics 17, 5 (2024).
Google Scholar
Birch, J. & Browning, H. Neural organoids and the precautionary principle. Am. J. Bioeth. 21, 56–58 (2021).
Google Scholar
MacDuffie, K. E. et al. Donor perspectives on informed consent and use of biospecimens for brain organoid research. Stem Cell Rep. 18, 1389–1393 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mollaki, V. Ethical challenges in organoid use. BioTech 10, 12 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mittleman, B. Rethinking General Consent for Stem Cell-based Embryo Model Research (Stanford Law School, 2024); https://law.stanford.edu/publications/rethinking-general-consent-for-stem-cell-based-embryo-model-research/
Isasi, R. et al. Dynamic governance: a new era for consent for stem cell research. Stem Cell Rep. 19, 1233–1241 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kataoka, M., Ishida, S., Kobayashi, C., Lee, T.-L. & Sawai, T. Evaluating neuroprivacy concerns in human brain organoid research. Trends Biotechnol. 43, 491–493 (2025).
Google Scholar
Schabacker, D. S., Levy, L.-A., Evans, N. J., Fowler, J. M. & Dickey, E. A. Assessing cyberbiosecurity vulnerabilities and infrastructure resilience. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 61 (2019).
Google Scholar
Richardson, L. C., Connell, N. D., Lewis, S. M., Pauwels, E. & Murch, R. S. Cyberbiosecurity: a call for cooperation in a new threat landscape. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 99 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wei, B., Cheng, S. & Feng, Y. Neural personal information and its legal protection: evidence from China. J. Law Biosci. 12, lsaf006 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rainey, S. et al. Is the European Data Protection Regulation sufficient to deal with emerging data concerns relating to neurotechnology? J. Law Biosci. 7, lsaa051 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, S. et al. U.S. public perceptions of the sensitivity of brain data. J. Law Biosci. 11, lsad032 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jackson, E. Future challenges for UK regulation of brain organoid research. Med. Law Rev. 33, fwae047 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lin, X. Legal safeguards for organoid intelligence in economic law. Discov. Artif. Intell. 5, 304 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kataoka, M. et al. Beyond consciousness: ethical, legal and social issues in human brain organoid research and application. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 104, 151470 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lovell-Badge, R. et al. ISSCR Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: the 2021 update. Stem Cell Rep. 16, 1398–1408 (2021).
Google Scholar
Committee on Ethical, Legal and Regulatory Issues Associated with Neural Chimeras and Organoids, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, Policy and Global Affairs, & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The Emerging Field of Human Neural Organoids, Transplants and Chimeras: Science, Ethics and Governance 26078 (National Academies Press, 2021); https://doi.org/10.17226/26078
Mehonic, A. & Kenyon, A. J. Brain-inspired computing needs a master plan. Nature 604, 255–260 (2022).
Google Scholar
Intel builds world’s largest neuromorphic system to enable more sustainable AI. Intel (17 April 2024); https://newsroom.intel.com/artificial-intelligence/intel-builds-worlds-largest-neuromorphic-system-to-enable-more-sustainable-ai
Pelvig, D. P., Pakkenberg, H., Stark, A. K. & Pakkenberg, B. Neocortical glial cell numbers in human brains. Neurobiol. Aging 29, 1754–1762 (2008).
Google Scholar
