Abbas M, Jam FA, Khan TI (2024) Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 21:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-024-00444-7/METRICS
Google Scholar
Abdaljaleel M, Barakat M, Alsanafi M, et al. (2024) A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Sci Rep. 14:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8
Google Scholar
Abdalla RAM (2024) Examining awareness, social influence, and perceived enjoyment in the TAM framework as determinants of ChatGPT. Personalization as a moderator. J Open Innov: Technol Mark Complex 10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100327
Google Scholar
Acosta-Enriquez BG, Arbulú Ballesteros MA, Huamaní Jordan O et al. (2024a) Analysis of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychol 12:255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z
Acosta-Enriquez BG, Arbulú Ballesteros MA, Arbulu Perez Vargas CG et al. (2024b) Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students. Int J Educ Integr 20:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
Adamopoulou E, Moussiades L (2020) Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Mach Learn Appl 2:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MLWA.2020.100006
Google Scholar
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, 1st edition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall
Al Darayseh A (2023) Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 4:100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132
Google Scholar
Al Shloul T, Mazhar T, Abbas Q, et al. (2024) Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students’ performance in education. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 6:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219
Google Scholar
Al-Abdullatif AM (2023) Modeling students’ perceptions of chatbots in learning: integrating technology acceptance with the value-based adoption model. Educ Sci 13:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111151
Google Scholar
Al-Adwan AS, Li N, Al-Adwan A, et al. (2023) Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms. Educ Inf Technol 28:15381–15413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3
Albayati H (2024) Investigating undergraduate students’ perceptions and awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance perspective study. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 6:100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203
Google Scholar
Algerafi MAM, Zhou Y, Alfadda H, Wijaya TT (2023) Understanding the Factors Influencing Higher Education Students’ Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Based Robots. IEEE Access 11:99752–99764. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314499
Google Scholar
Alhwaiti M (2023) Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence application in the post-Covid Era and its impact on faculty members’ occupational well-being and teaching self efficacy: a path analysis using the UTAUT 2 Model. Appl Artif Intell 37:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2175110
Google Scholar
Almogren AS, Al-Rahmi WM, Dahri NA (2024) Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: A smart education perspective. Heliyon 10:e31887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31887
Google Scholar
Almulla MA (2024) Investigating influencing factors of learning satisfaction in AI ChatGPT for research: University students perspective. Heliyon 10:e32220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32220
Google Scholar
Alyoussef IY (2023) Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: The role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model. Heliyon 9:e13751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13751
Google Scholar
Arthur F, Salifu I, Abam Nortey S (2025) Predictors of higher education students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT: the moderating roles of age, gender and experience. Interact Learn Environ 33:993–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2362805
Google Scholar
Ayaz A, Yanartaş M (2020) An analysis on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology theory (UTAUT): Acceptance of electronic document management system (EDMS). Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2:100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100032
Google Scholar
Baig MI, Yadegaridehkordi E (2024) ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. Int J Educ Res 127:102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411
Google Scholar
Bandura A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 37:122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Google Scholar
Bastiansen MHA, Kroon AC, Araujo T (2022) Female chatbots are helpful, male chatbots are competent? Publizistik 67:601–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-022-00762-8
Google Scholar
Bathaee Y (2018) The artificial intelligence black box and the failure of intent and causation. Harv J Law Technol 31:890–934
Bergdahl J, Latikka R, Celuch M, et al. (2023) Self-determination and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: Cross-national and longitudinal perspectives. Telemat Inform 82:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102013
Google Scholar
Bhullar PS, Joshi M, Chugh R (2024) ChatGPT in higher education – a synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Educ Inf Technol 29:21501–21522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x
Google Scholar
Bhutoria A (2022) Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 3:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2022.100068
Google Scholar
Bilquise G, Ibrahim S, Salhieh SM (2024) Investigating student acceptance of an academic advising chatbot in higher education institutions. Educ Inf Technol 29:6357–6382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12076-x
Google Scholar
Boubker O (2024) From chatting to self-educating: Can AI tools boost student learning outcomes. Expert Syst Appl 238:121820. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2023.121820
Google Scholar
Bouteraa M, Bin-Nashwan SA, Al-Daihani M, et al. (2024) Understanding the diffusion of AI-generative (ChatGPT) in higher education: Does students’ integrity matter. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 14:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBR.2024.100402
Google Scholar
Budhathoki T, Zirar A, Njoya ET, Timsina A (2024) ChatGPT adoption and anxiety: a cross-country analysis utilising the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT. Stud High Educ 49:831–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2333937
Camilleri MA (2024) Factors affecting performance expectancy and intentions to use ChatGPT: Using SmartPLS to advance an information technology acceptance framework. Technol Forecast Soc Change 201:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123247
Google Scholar
Chan A (2023) GPT-3 and InstructGPT: technological dystopianism, utopianism, and “Contextual” perspectives in AI ethics and industry. AI Ethics 3:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00148-6
Google Scholar
Chang H, Liu B, Zhao Y, et al (2024) Research on the acceptance of ChatGPT among different college student groups based on latent class analysis. Interact Learn Environ 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2331646
Chaudhry IS, Sarwary SAM, El Refae GA, Chabchoub H (2023) Time to Revisit Existing Student’s Performance Evaluation Approach in Higher Education Sector in a New Era of ChatGPT — A Case Study. Cogent Educ 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210461
Chen D, Liu W, Liu X (2024) What drives college students to use AI for L2 learning? Modeling the roles of self-efficacy, anxiety, and attitude based on an extended technology acceptance model. Acta Psychol 249:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104442
Google Scholar
Chiu TKF, Xia Q, Zhou X, et al. (2023) Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 4:100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2022.100118
Google Scholar
Colby KM, Weber S, Hilf FD (1971) Artificial Paranoia. Artif Intell 2:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(71)90002-6
Google Scholar
Collins C, Dennehy D, Conboy K, Mikalef P (2021) Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Int J Inf Manag 60:102383. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2021.102383
Google Scholar
Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q 19:189–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
Google Scholar
Cooper G (2023) Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. J Sci Educ Technol 32:444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Google Scholar
Dahri NA, Yahaya N, Al-Rahmi WM, et al. (2024) Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon 10:e29317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29317
Google Scholar
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Google Scholar
Davis FD, Venkatesh V (1996) A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. Int J Hum Comput Stud 45:19–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
Google Scholar
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35:982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Google Scholar
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 22:1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Google Scholar
De Muth JE (2014) Basic Statistics and Pharmaceutical Statistical Applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group
Dehghani H, Mashhadi A (2024) Exploring Iranian English as a foreign language teachers’ acceptance of ChatGPT in English language teaching: Extending the technology acceptance model. Educ Inf Technol 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12660-9
Demir-Kaymak Z, Turan Z, Unlu-Bidik N, Unkazan S (2024) Effects of midwifery and nursing students’ readiness about medical Artificial intelligence on Artificial intelligence anxiety. Nurse Educ Pr 78:103994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103994
Google Scholar
Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Coeckelbergh M, et al. (2023) Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Inf Fusion 99:101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFFUS.2023.101896
Google Scholar
Duong CD, Bui DT, Pham HT, et al (2023) How effort expectancy and performance expectancy interact to trigger higher education students’ uses of ChatGPT for learning. Interact Technol Smart Educ. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0096
Elbanna S, Armstrong L (2024) Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: adapting for the future. Manag Sustain: Arab Rev 3:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-03-2023-0016
Google Scholar
Ellis AR, Slade E (2023) A new era of learning: considerations for ChatGPT as a tool to enhance statistics and data science education. J Stat Data Sci Educ 31:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2223609
Google Scholar
Espartinez AS (2024) Exploring student and teacher perceptions of ChatGPT use in higher education: A Q-Methodology study. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100264
Google Scholar
Farhi F, Jeljeli R, Aburezeq I, et al. (2023) Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180
Google Scholar
Farrokhnia M, Banihashem SK, Noroozi O, Wals A (2024) A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innov Educ Teach Int 61:460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Google Scholar
Fergus S, Botha M, Ostovar M (2023) Evaluating academic answers generated using ChatGPT. J Chem Educ 100:1672–1675. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00087
Google Scholar
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and Statistics. J Mark Res 18:382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Google Scholar
Foroughi B, Senali MG, Iranmanesh M, et al (2023) Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for educational purposes: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Int J Hum Comput Interact 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495
von Garrel J, Mayer J (2023) Artificial Intelligence in studies—use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10:799. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7
Google Scholar
Geerling W, Mateer GD, Wooten J, Damodaran N (2023) ChatGPT has aced the test of understanding in college economics: now what? Am Econ 68:233–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345231169654
Google Scholar
Gefen D, Straub DW (1997) Gender differences in the perception and use of E-Mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Q 21:389–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/249720
Google Scholar
Geisser S (1974) A predictive approach to the Random Effect Model. Biometrika 61:101–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334290
Google Scholar
Geng C, Zhang Y, Pientka B, Si X (2023) Can ChatGPT pass an introductory level functional language programming course? ArXiv 1–13. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02230
Gidiotis I, Hrastinski S (2024) Imagining the future of artificial intelligence in education: a review of social science fiction. Learn Media Technol 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2024.2365829
Gill SS, Kaur R (2023) ChatGPT: Vision and challenges. Internet Things Cyber-Phys Syst 3:262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IOTCPS.2023.05.004
Google Scholar
Granić A, Marangunić N (2019) Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. Br J Educ Technol 50:2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Google Scholar
Granić A (2023) Technology Acceptance and Adoption in Education. In: Zawacki-Richter O, Jung I (eds) Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_11
Grassini S, Aasen ML, Møgelvang A (2024) Understanding University Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT: Insights from the UTAUT2 Model. Appl Artif Intell 38:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2024.2371168
Google Scholar
Guner H, Acarturk C (2020) The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Univers Access Inf Soc 19:311–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4
Google Scholar
Güner H, Er E, Akçapinar G, Khalil M (2024) From chalkboards to AI-powered learning: Students’ attitudes and perspectives on use of ChatGPT in educational settings. Technol Soc 27:386–404
Guo Y, Lee D (2023) Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. J Chem Educ 100:4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505
Google Scholar
Habibi A, Muhaimin M, Danibao BK, et al. (2023) ChatGPT in higher education learning: Acceptance and use. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2023.100190
Google Scholar
Hair JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C (2020) Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res 109:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
Google Scholar
Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31:2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Google Scholar
Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, et al (2021) Evaluation of the structural model. in: partial least squares structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Classroom Companion: Business. Springer, Cham, pp 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2022) Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Mark (AIM) 20:277–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Google Scholar
Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA (2016) Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Ind Manage Data Syst 116:2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model: A Multidiscip J 6:1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jo H, Park DH (2024) Effects of ChatGPT’s AI capabilities and human-like traits on spreading information in work environments. Sci Rep 14:7806. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57977-0
Google Scholar
Johnson DG, Verdicchio M (2017a) AI Anxiety. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 68:2267–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867
Google Scholar
Johnson DG, Verdicchio M (2017b) Reframing AI Discourse. Minds Mach 27:575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9417-6
Google Scholar
Johnson DG, Verdicchio M (2024) The sociotechnical entanglement of AI and values. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01852-5
Kajiwara Y, Kawabata K (2024) AI literacy for ethical use of chatbot: Will students accept AI ethics? Comput Educ: Artif Intell 6:100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100251
Google Scholar
Kampa RK (2023) Combining technology readiness and acceptance model for investigating the acceptance of m-learning in higher education in India. Asian Assoc Open Univ J 18:105–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2022-0149
Google Scholar
Karataş F, Abedi FY, Ozek Gunyel F, et al. (2024) Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT’s effect on foreign language learners. Educ Inf Technol 29:19343–19366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6
Google Scholar
Kasneci E, Seßler K, Küchemann S, et al. (2023) ChatGPT for Good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. EdArXiv 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/5er8f
Kaya F, Aydin F, Schepman A, et al. (2024) The roles of personality traits, AI Anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Int J Hum Comput Interact 40:497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
Google Scholar
Khechine H, Raymond B, Augier M (2020) The adoption of a social learning system: Intrinsic value in the UTAUT model. Br J Educ Technol 51:2306–2325. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12905
Google Scholar
Kim BJ, Kim MJ (2024) The influence of work overload on cybersecurity behavior: A moderated mediation model of psychological contract breach, burnout, and self-efficacy in AI learning such as ChatGPT. Technol Soc 77:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102543
Google Scholar
Klimova B, de Campos VPL (2024) University undergraduates’ perceptions on the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes: evidence from a university in Czech Republic. Cogent Educ 11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2373512
Google Scholar
Kock N, Hadaya P (2018) Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Inf Syst J 28:227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Google Scholar
Koenig PD (2024) Attitudes toward artificial intelligence: combining three theoretical perspectives on technology acceptance. AI Soc 40:1333–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01987-z
Google Scholar
Kosar T, Ostojić D, Liu YD, Mernik M (2024) Computer Science Education in ChatGPT Era: Experiences from an experiment in a programming course for novice programmers. Mathematics 12:629. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12050629
Google Scholar
Kuhail MA, Alturki N, Alramlawi S, Alhejori K (2023) Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Educ Inf Technol 28:973–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
Google Scholar
Lai CY, Cheung KY, Chan CS (2023) Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation in ChatGPT adoption to support active learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 5:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178
Google Scholar
Li W (2024) A study on factors influencing designers’ behavioral intention in using AI-generated content for assisted design: perceived anxiety, perceived risk, and UTAUT. Int J Hum Comput Interact 41(2):1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2310354
Google Scholar
Lim JS, Zhang J (2022) Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency. Technol Soc 69:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2022.101965
Google Scholar
Lin Y, Yu Z (2025a) Learner perceptions of artificial intelligence-generated pedagogical agents in language learning videos: embodiment effects on technology acceptance. Int J Hum Comput Interact 41:1606–1627. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2359222
Google Scholar
Lin Y, Yu Z (2025b) An integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review modelling students’ technostress in higher education. Behav Inf Technol 44:631–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2332458
Google Scholar
Liu G, Ma C (2024) Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innov Lang Learn Teach 18:125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
Google Scholar
Lo CK (2023) What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A rapid review of the literature. Educ Sci 13:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Google Scholar
Lo CK, Hew KF, Jong MS (2024) The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Comput Educ 219:105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100
Google Scholar
Lund BD, Wang T (2023) Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Libr Hi Tech N. 40:26–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Google Scholar
Ma S, Lei L (2024) The factors influencing teacher education students’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence technology for information-based teaching. Asia Pac J Educ 44:94–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155
Google Scholar
MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Preacher KJ, Hong S (2001) Sample size in factor analysis: the role of model error. Multivar Behav Res 36:611–637. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
Google Scholar
Maheshwari G (2024) Factors influencing students’ intention to adopt and use ChatGPT in higher education: A study in the Vietnamese context. Educ Inf Technol 29:12167–12195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12333-z
Google Scholar
Malmström H, Stöhr C, Ou AW (2023) Chatbots and other AI for learning: A survey of use and views among university students in Sweden. Chalmers Stud Commun Learn High Educ 2023:1. https://doi.org/10.17196/cls.csclhe/2023/01
Google Scholar
Marangunić N, Granić A (2015) Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univers Access Inf Soc 14:81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Google Scholar
Memarian B, Doleck T (2023) ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations. Comput Hum Behav: Artif Hum 1:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022
Google Scholar
Menon D, Shilpa K (2023) “Chatting with ChatGPT”: Analyzing the factors influencing users’ intention to Use the Open AI’s ChatGPT using the UTAUT model. Heliyon 9:e20962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20962
Google Scholar
Molnar G, Szuts Z (2018) The Role of Chatbots in Formal Education. In: 2018 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY). IEEE, Subotica, Serbia, pp 000197–000202. https://doi.org/10.1109/SISY.2018.8524609
Montenegro-Rueda M, Fernández-Cerero J, Fernández-Batanero JM, López-Meneses E (2023) Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: a systematic review. Computers 12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
Google Scholar
Ng C (2023) Theories of Motivation and Empowerment in Open, Distance, and Digital Education. In: Zawacki-Richter O, Jung I (eds) Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_10
Nja CO, Idiege KJ, Uwe UE, et al. (2023) Adoption of artificial intelligence in science teaching: From the vantage point of the African science teachers. Smart Learn Environ 10:19–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00261-x
Google Scholar
Okonkwo CW, Ade-Ibijola A (2021) Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2:100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2021.100033
Google Scholar
OpenAI (2024) Hello GPT-4o. https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/. Accessed 1 May 2024
Pan Z, Xie Z, Liu T, Xia T (2024) Exploring the key factors influencing college students’ willingness to use AI coding assistant tools: an expanded technology acceptance model. Systems 12:176. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12050176
Google Scholar
Pang Q, Zhang M, Yuen KF, Fang M (2024) When the winds of change blow: an empirical investigation of ChatGPT’s usage behaviour. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2394783
Qadir J (2023) Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. In: 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
Qin F, Li K, Yan J (2020) Understanding user trust in artificial intelligence‐based educational systems: Evidence from China. Br J Educ Technol 51:1693–1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12994
Google Scholar
Raghunathan B, Saftner D (1995) Perceptions of ethical behavior in the use of computerized information. Bus Prof Ethics J 14(2):47–76
Rahimi F, Talebi Bezmin Abadi A (2023) ChatGPT and publication ethics. Arch Med Res 54:272–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.03.004
Google Scholar
Rahman MDS, Sabbir MDM, Zhang J, et al. (2023) Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT: Does trust matter? Australas J Educ Technol 39:51–71. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8956
Google Scholar
Rawas S (2024) AI: the future of humanity. Discov Artif Intell 4:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00118-3
Google Scholar
Ray PP (2023) ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber-Phys Syst 3:121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IOTCPS.2023.04.003
Google Scholar
Romero-Rodríguez J-M, Ramírez-Montoya M-S, Buenestado-Fernández M, Lara-Lara F (2023) Use of ChatGPT at University as a tool for complex thinking: students’ perceived usefulness. J N. Approaches Educ Res 12:323–339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458
Google Scholar
Sagnier C, Loup-Escande E, Lourdeaux D, et al. (2020) User acceptance of virtual reality: an extended technology acceptance model. Int J Hum Comput Interact 36:993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
Google Scholar
Şahin F, Doğan E, Okur MR, Şahin YL (2022) Emotional outcomes of e-learning adoption during compulsory online education. Educ Inf Technol 27:7827–7849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10930-y
Google Scholar
Saif N, Khan SU, Shaheen I, et al. (2024) Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Comput Hum Behav 154:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097
Google Scholar
Saihi A, Ben-Daya M, Hariga M, As’ad R (2024) A Structural equation modeling analysis of generative AI chatbots adoption among students and educators in higher education. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 7:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100274
Google Scholar
Salifu I, Arthur F, Arkorful V et al. (2024) Economics students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT in higher education: a hybrid structural equation modelling-artificial neural network approach. Cogent Soc Sci 10:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2300177
Google Scholar
Sallam M, Elsayed W, Al-Shorbagy M, et al. (2024) ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: a study among university students in the UAE. Front Educ 9:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1414758
Google Scholar
Salloum SA, Qasim Mohammad Alhamad A, Al-Emran M, et al. (2019) Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access 7:128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467
Google Scholar
Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF (2021) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In: Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg AE (eds) Handbook of Market Research. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
Schepman A, Rodway P (2020) Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 1:100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014
Google Scholar
Shaengchart Y (2024) Factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT usage among higher education students in Bangkok. Thail Adv Knowl Exec 2(4):1–14. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4592118
Shao C, Nah S, Makady H, McNealy J (2024) Understanding user attitudes towards AI-enabled technologies: an integrated model of self-efficacy, TAM, and AI Ethics. Int J Hum Comput Interact 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2331858
Sohn K, Kwon O (2020) Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products. Telemat Inform 47:101324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324
Google Scholar
Stahl BC, Eke D (2024) The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology. Int J Inf Manag 74:102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2023.102700
Google Scholar
Stöhr C, Ou AW, Malmström H (2024) Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100259
Google Scholar
Stojanov A (2023) Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledgeable other: an autoethnographic study. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 20:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-023-00404-7/FIGURES/1
Google Scholar
Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 36:111–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
Google Scholar
Strzelecki A (2023) To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
Taani O, Alabidi S (2024) ChatGPT in education: benefits and challenges of ChatGPT for mathematics and science teaching practices. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 1-30 https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2357341
Tang X, Yuan Z, Qu S (2025) Factors influencing university students’ behavioural intention to use generative artificial intelligence for educational purposes based on a revised UTAUT2 Model. J Comput Assist Learn 41:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13105
Google Scholar
Tayan O, Hassan A, Khankan K, Askool S (2024) Considerations for adapting higher education technology courses for AI large language models: A critical review of the impact of ChatGPT. Mach Learn Appl 15:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MLWA.2023.100513
Google Scholar
Tiwari CK, Bhat MA, Khan ST, et al. (2024) What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interact Technol Smart Educ 21:333–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2023-0061
Google Scholar
Tlili A, Shehata B, Adarkwah MA, et al. (2023) What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn Environ 10:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Google Scholar
TÜBİTAK (2023) Üniversitelerin Alan Bazında Yetkinlik Analizi, Ankara. https://tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/2023-09/2023-yetkinlik-raporu.pdf
Tupper M, Hendy IW, Shipway JR (2024) Field courses for dummies: To what extent can ChatGPT design a higher education field course? Innovations in Education and Teaching International 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2316716
Uddin SMJ, Albert A, Tamanna M, et al. (2024) ChatGPT as an educational resource for civil engineering students. Comput Appl Eng Educ 32:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22747
Google Scholar
Usher M, Barak M (2024) Unpacking the role of AI ethics online education for science and engineering students. Int J STEM Educ 11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00493-4
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res 11:342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V (2022) Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Ann Oper Res 308:641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46:186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V, Morris MG (2000) Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q 24:115–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 39:273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36:157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27:425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Google Scholar
Wallace RS (2009) The Anatomy of A.L.I.C.E. In: Epstein R, Roberts G, Beber G (eds) Parsing the Turing Test. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_13
Wang C, Dai J, Zhu K, et al. (2024a) Understanding the continuance intention of college students toward New E-learning spaces based on an integrated model of the TAM and TTF. Int J Hum Comput Interact 40:8419–8432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2291609
Google Scholar
Wang C, Chen X, Hu Z, et al. (2025) Deconstructing University learners’ adoption intention towards AIGC technology: a mixed- methods study using ChatGPT as an example. J Comput Assist Learn 41:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13117
Google Scholar
Wang S, Wang F, Zhu Z, et al. (2024c) Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Syst Appl 252:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2024.124167
Google Scholar
Wang Y, Liu C, Tu Y-F (2021) Factors affecting the adoption of AI-based applications in higher education: an analysis of teachers perspectives using structural equation modeling. Technol Soc 24:116–129. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032860
Wang Y-Y, Wang Y-S (2022) Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: an initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interact Learn Environ 30:619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887
Google Scholar
Wang Y-Y, Chuang Y-W (2024) Artificial intelligence self-efficacy: Scale development and validation. Educ Inf Technol 29:4785–4808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12015-w
Google Scholar
Wang C, Li X, Liang Z, et al (2024b) The roles of social perception and AI anxiety in individuals’ attitudes toward ChatGPT in education. Int J Hum Comput Interact 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2365453
Wardat Y, Tashtoush MA, AlAli R, Jarrah AM (2023) ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia J Math, Sci Technol Educ 19:em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
Google Scholar
Weizenbaum J (1966) ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun ACM 9:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168
Google Scholar
Woo DJ, Wang D, Guo K, Susanto H (2024) Teaching EFL students to write with ChatGPT: Students’ motivation to learn, cognitive load, and satisfaction with the learning process. Educ Inf Technol 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12819-4
Xing Y (2024) Exploring the use of ChatGPT in learning and instructing statistics and data analytics. Teach. Stat 46:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12367
Google Scholar
Yilmaz R, Karaoglan Yilmaz FG (2023) Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of ChatGPT for programming learning. Comput Hum Behav: Artif Hum 1:100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBAH.2023.100005
Google Scholar
YÖK (2024a) YÖKACADEMIC. In: YÖK Academic Search. https://akademik.yok.gov.tr/AkademikArama/. Accessed 10 May 2024
YÖK (2024b) Ethics Guide of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in the Scientific Research and Publication Process of Higher Education Institutions. In: Council of Higher Education. https://www.yok.gov.tr/en/Sayfalar/news/2024/cohe-has-prepared-the-ethics-guide-of-generative-artificial-intelligence-use.aspx. Accessed 10 May 2024
Zhai C, Wibowo S, Li LD (2024) The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learn Environ 11:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Google Scholar
Zhang C, Schießl J, Plößl L, et al. (2023) Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 20:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
Google Scholar
Zhang S, Zhao X, Zhou T, Kim JH (2024a) Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 21:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0
Google Scholar
Zhang Y, Yang X, Tong W (2024b) University students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT profiles and their relation to ChatGPT intentions. Int J Hum Comput Interact 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2331882
Zhou L, Xue S, Li R (2022) Extending the technology acceptance model to explore students’ intention to use an online education platform at a university in China. Sage Open 12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085259
Google Scholar
Zhou A, Tsai W-HS, Men LR (2024) Optimizing AI social chatbots for relational outcomes: the effects of profile design, communication strategies, and message framing. Int J Bus Commun 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884241229223
Zou M, Huang L (2023) To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model. Front Psychol 14:259531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531
Google Scholar
