Olson, G. B. Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science 277, 1237–1242 (1997).
Google Scholar
Olson, G. B. Designing a new material world. Science 288, 993–998 (2000).
Google Scholar
Oganov, A. R., Pickard, C. J., Zhu, Q. & Needs, R. J. Structure prediction drives materials discovery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 331–348 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zunger, A. Inverse design in search of materials with target functionalities. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 0121 (2018).
Google Scholar
Han, X.-Q. et al. AI-driven inverse design of materials: past, present and future. Chin. Phys. Lett. 42, 027403 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bilodeau, C., Jin, W., Jaakkola, T., Barzilay, R. & Jensen, K. F. Generative models for molecular discovery: recent advances and challenges. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 12, e1608 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pugliese, R., Badini, S., Frontoni, E. & Regondi, S. Generative artificial intelligence for advancing discovery and design in biomateriomics. Intell. Comput. 4, 0117 (2025).
Google Scholar
Oganov, A. R. & Glass, C. W. Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244704 (2006).
Google Scholar
Woodley, S. M. & Catlow, R. Crystal structure prediction from first principles. Nat. Mater. 7, 937–946 (2008).
Google Scholar
Mnih, V. Playing Atari with deep reinforcement learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5602 (2013).
Christiano, P. F. et al. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, (2017).
Kingma, D. P. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114 (2013).
Goodfellow, I. et al. Generative adversarial nets. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 27, (2014).
Van Den Oord, A., Kalchbrenner, N. & Kavukcuoglu, K. Pixel recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning 1747–1756 (PMLR, 2016).
Ho, J., Jain, A. & Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6840–6851 (2020).
Gregoire, J. M., Zhou, L. & Haber, J. A. Combinatorial synthesis for ai-driven materials discovery. Nat. Synth. 2, 493–504 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mathew, K. et al. Atomate: a high-level interface to generate, execute, and analyze computational materials science workflows. Comput. Mater. Sci. 139, 140–152 (2017).
Google Scholar
Choudhary, K. et al. The joint automated repository for various integrated simulations (JARVIS) for data-driven materials design. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 1–13 (2020).
Google Scholar
Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOW: an automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery. Comput. Mater. Sci. 58, 218–226 (2012).
Google Scholar
Deng, B. et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1031–1041 (2023).
Google Scholar
Batatia, I. et al. A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00096 (2023).
Yang, H. et al. MatterSim: a deep learning atomistic model across elements, temperatures and pressures. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04967 (2024).
Park, Y., Kim, J., Hwang, S. & Han, S. Scalable parallel algorithm for graph neural network interatomic potentials in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 4857–4868 (2024).
Google Scholar
Musil, F. et al. Physics-inspired structural representations for molecules and materials. Chem. Rev. 121, 9759–9815 (2021).
Google Scholar
Reiser, P. et al. Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistry. Commun. Mater. 3, 93 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 145301 (2018).
Google Scholar
Okabe, R. et al. Virtual node graph neural network for full phonon prediction. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 522–531 (2024).
Google Scholar
Luo, S., Li, T., Wang, X., Faizan, M. & Zhang, L. High-throughput computational materials screening and discovery of optoelectronic semiconductors. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 11, e1489 (2021).
Google Scholar
Carrete, J., Li, W., Mingo, N., Wang, S. & Curtarolo, S. Finding unprecedentedly low-thermal-conductivity half-Heusler semiconductors via high-throughput materials modeling. Phys. Rev. X 4, 011019 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H. High-throughput design of magnetic materials. Electron. Struct. 3, 033001 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kabiraj, A., Kumar, M. & Mahapatra, S. High-throughput discovery of high Curie point two-dimensional ferromagnetic materials. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 35 (2020).
Google Scholar
Le, T. C. & Winkler, D. A. Discovery and optimization of materials using evolutionary approaches. Chem. Rev. 116, 6107–6132 (2016).
Google Scholar
Allahyari, Z. & Oganov, A. R. Coevolutionary search for optimal materials in the space of all possible compounds. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 55 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wu, S. et al. Identification of post-pyrite phase transitions in SiO2 by a genetic algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 83, 184102 (2011).
Google Scholar
Tom, R. et al. Inverse design of tetracene polymorphs with enhanced singlet fission performance by property-based genetic algorithm optimization. Chem. Mater. 35, 1373–1386 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jennings, P. C., Lysgaard, S., Hummelshøj, J. S., Vegge, T. & Bligaard, T. Genetic algorithms for computational materials discovery accelerated by machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 46 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Lv, J., Zhu, L. & Ma, Y. Calypso: a method for crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2063–2070 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Lv, J., Zhu, L. & Ma, Y. Crystal structure prediction via particle-swarm optimization. Phys. Rev. B 82, 094116 (2010).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. First-principles structural design of superhard materials. J. Chem. Phys. 138, 114101 (2013).
Google Scholar
Fan, T.-E., Liu, T.-D., Zheng, J.-W., Shao, G.-F. & Wen, Y.-H. Structural optimization of Pt–Pd–Au trimetallic nanoparticles by discrete particle swarm algorithms. J. Mater. Sci. 50, 3308–3319 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kiyohara, S. & Mizoguchi, T. Searching the stable segregation configuration at the grain boundary by a Monte Carlo tree search. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241741 (2018).
Google Scholar
Banik, S. et al. A continuous action space tree search for inverse design (CASTING) framework for materials discovery. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 177 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dieb, T. M. et al. MDTS: automatic complex materials design using Monte Carlo tree search. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18, 498–503 (2017).
Google Scholar
Shahriari, B., Swersky, K., Wang, Z., Adams, R. P. & De Freitas, N. Taking the human out of the loop: a review of Bayesian optimization. Proc. IEEE 104, 148–175 (2015).
Google Scholar
Shields, B. J. et al. Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature 590, 89–96 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lei, B. et al. Bayesian optimization with adaptive surrogate models for automated experimental design. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 194 (2021).
Google Scholar
Honarmandi, P., Attari, V. & Arroyave, R. Accelerated materials design using batch Bayesian optimization: a case study for solving the inverse problem from materials microstructure to process specification. Comput. Mater. Sci. 210, 111417 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wakabayashi, Y. K. et al. Bayesian optimization with experimental failure for high-throughput materials growth. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 180 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xian, Y. et al. Compositional design of multicomponent alloys using reinforcement learning. Acta Mater. 274, 120017 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ma, R., Zhang, H. & Luo, T. Exploring high thermal conductivity amorphous polymers using reinforcement learning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 15587–15598 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brown, N. K., Garland, A. P., Fadel, G. M. & Li, G. Deep reinforcement learning for the rapid on-demand design of mechanical metamaterials with targeted nonlinear deformation responses. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 126, 106998 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rosafalco, L. et al. Reinforcement learning optimisation for graded metamaterial design using a physical-based constraint on the state representation and action space. Sci. Rep. 13, 21836 (2023).
Google Scholar
Szymanski, N. J. et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials. Nature 624, 86–91 (2023).
Google Scholar
Epps, R. W. et al. Artificial chemist: an autonomous quantum dot synthesis bot. Adv. Mater. 32, 2001626 (2020).
Google Scholar
Volk, A. A. et al. Alphaflow: autonomous discovery and optimization of multi-step chemistry using a self-driven fluidic lab guided by reinforcement learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 1403 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gómez-Bombarelli, R. et al. Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 268–276 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mal, S., Seal, G. & Sen, P. MagGen: a graph-aided deep generative model for inverse design of permanent magnets. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 3221–3228 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ren, Z. et al. An invertible crystallographic representation for general inverse design of inorganic crystals with targeted properties. Matter 5, 314–335 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jørgensen, P. B. et al. Machine learning-based screening of complex molecules for polymer solar cells. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241735 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pei, Z. et al. Machine-learning microstructure for inverse material design. Adv. Sci. 8, 2101207 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zeng, C., Khan, Z. & Post, N. L. Data-efficient and interpretable inverse materials design using a disentangled variational autoencoder. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06740 (2024).
Yao, Z. et al. Inverse design of nanoporous crystalline reticular materials with deep generative models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 76–86 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fallani, A., Medrano Sandonas, L. & Tkatchenko, A. Inverse mapping of quantum properties to structures for chemical space of small organic molecules. Nat. Commun. 15, 6061 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhu, R., Nong, W., Yamazaki, S. & Hippalgaonkar, K. WyCryst: Wyckoff inorganic crystal generator framework. Matter 7, 3469–3488 (2024).
Google Scholar
Luo, Y., Liu, C. & Ji, S. Towards symmetry-aware generation of periodic materials. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, (2024).
Kim, S., Noh, J., Gu, G. H., Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Jung, Y. Generative adversarial networks for crystal structure prediction. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 1412–1420 (2020).
Google Scholar
Long, T. et al. Constrained crystals deep convolutional generative adversarial network for the inverse design of crystal structures. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 66 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chenebuah, E. T., Nganbe, M. & Tchagang, A. B. A deep generative modeling architecture for designing lattice-constrained perovskite materials. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 198 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bastek, J.-H. & Kochmann, D. M. Inverse design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1466–1475 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fernandez-Zelaia, P. et al. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models for generative alloy design. Addit. Manuf. 94, 104478 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xie, T., Fu, X., Ganea, O.-E., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. Crystal diffusion variational autoencoder for periodic material generation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06197 (2021).
Lyngby, P. & Thygesen, K. S. Data-driven discovery of 2D materials by deep generative models. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 232 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ye, C.-Y., Weng, H.-M. & Wu, Q.-S. Con-CDVAE: a method for the conditional generation of crystal structures. Comput. Mater. Today 1, 100003 (2024).
Google Scholar
Park, J., Gill, A. P. S., Moosavi, S. M. & Kim, J. Inverse design of porous materials: a diffusion model approach. J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 6507–6514 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jiao, R. et al. Crystal structure prediction by joint equivariant diffusion. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 17464–17497 (2023).
Zeni, C. et al. A generative model for inorganic materials design. Nature 639, 624–632 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tangsongcharoen, K. et al. CrystalGRW: generative modeling of crystal structures with targeted properties via geodesic random walks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08998 (2025).
Yang, S. et al. Generative hierarchical materials search. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37, 38799–38819 (2025).
Jiao, R., Huang, W., Liu, Y., Zhao, D. & Liu, Y. Space group constrained crystal generation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03992 (2024).
Ruple, L., Torresi, L., Schopmans, H. & Friederich, P. Symmetry-aware Bayesian flow networks for crystal generation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03146 (2025).
Kelvinius, F. E. et al. WyckoffDiff—a generative diffusion model for crystal symmetry. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06485 (2025).
Levy, D. et al. SymmCD: symmetry-preserving crystal generation with diffusion models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03638 (2025).
Okabe, R. et al. Structural constraint integration in generative model for discovery of quantum material candidates. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02355-y (2025).
Xu, S. et al. Discovery of 2D materials via symmetry-constrained diffusion model. J. Phys. Chem. C 129, 6794 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lipman, Y., Chen, R. T., Ben-Hamu, H., Nickel, M. & Le, M. Flow matching for generative modeling. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747 (2022).
Song, Y., Dhariwal, P., Chen, M. & Sutskever, I. Consistency models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01469 (2023).
Luo, X. et al. CrystalFlow: a flow-based generative model for crystalline materials. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11693 (2024).
Vaswani, A. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 6000–6010 (2017).
Radford, A. et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog 1, 9 (2019).
Achiam, J. et al. GPT-4 technical report. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (2023).
Touvron, H. et al. Llama: open and efficient foundation language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13971 (2023).
Jiang, X. et al. Applications of natural language processing and large language models in materials discovery. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 79 (2025).
Google Scholar
Cao, Z., Luo, X., Lv, J. & Wang, L. Space group informed transformer for crystalline materials generation. Sci. Bull. 70, 3522–3533 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wei, L. et al. Crystal composition transformer: s-learning neural language model for generative and tinkering design of materials. Adv. Sci. 11, 2304305 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gruver, N. et al. Fine-tuned language models generate stable inorganic materials as text. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04379 (2024).
Kang, Y. & Kim, J. ChatMOF: an artificial intelligence system for predicting and generating metal-organic frameworks using large language models. Nat. Commun. 15, 4705 (2024).
Google Scholar
Choudhary, K. AtomGPT: atomistic generative pretrained transformer for forward and inverse materials design. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 6909–6917 (2024).
Google Scholar
Antunes, L. M., Butler, K. T. & Grau-Crespo, R. Crystal structure generation with autoregressive large language modeling. Nat. Commun. 15, 1–16 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kim, S., Schrier, J. & Jung, Y. Explainable synthesizability prediction of inorganic crystal polymorphs using large language models. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202423950 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. Beyond designer’s knowledge: generating materials design hypotheses via large language models. Acta Mater. 297, 121307 (2025).
Google Scholar
Jia, S., Zhang, C. & Fung, V. LLMatDesign: autonomous materials discovery with large language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13163 (2024).
Ansari, M., Watchorn, J., Brown, C. E. & Brown, J. S. dZiner: rational inverse design of materials with AI agents. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03963 (2024).
Li, Y. et al. Transforming the synthesis of carbon nanotubes with machine learning models and automation. Matter 8, 101913 (2025).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. ScienceAgentBench: toward rigorous assessment of language agents for data-driven scientific discovery. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05080 (2024).
Cai, H. et al. SciAssess: benchmarking LLM proficiency in scientific literature analysis. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2335–2357 (ACL, 2025).
Wang, H. et al. Evaluating the performance and robustness of LLMs in materials science Q&A and property predictions. Digit. Discov. (2025).
Buehler, M. J. Generative retrieval-augmented ontologic graph and multiagent strategies for interpretive large language model-based materials design. ACS Eng. Au 4, 241–277 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jaech, A. et al. OpenAI o1 system card. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16720 (2024).
Wu, J. et al. Inverse design workflow discovers hole-transport materials tailored for perovskite solar cells. Science 386, 1256–1264 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yan, Q. et al. Solar fuels photoanode materials discovery by integrating high-throughput theory and experiment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3040–3043 (2017).
Google Scholar
Padhy, S. P. et al. Experimentally validated inverse design of multi-property Fe–Co–Ni alloys. iScience 27, 109723 (2024).
Google Scholar
Long, Y. et al. Inverse design of high-performance thermoelectric materials via a generative model combined with experimental verification. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17, 19856–19867 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhong, C. et al. Deep generative model for inverse design of high-temperature superconductor compositions with predicted Tc > 77 k. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 30029–30038 (2023).
Google Scholar
Han, X.-Q. et al. InvDesFlow: an AI-driven materials inverse design workflow to explore possible high-temperature superconductors. Chin. Phys. Lett. 42, 047301 (2025).
Google Scholar
Han, X.-Q., Guo, P.-J., Gao, Z.-F., Sun, H. & Lu, Z.-Y. InvDesFlow-AL: active learning-based workflow for inverse design of functional materials. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09203 (2025).
Choudhary, K. & DeCost, B. Atomistic line graph neural network for improved materials property predictions. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 185 (2021).
Google Scholar
Inizan, T. J. et al. System of agentic AI for the discovery of metal–organic frameworks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14110 (2025).
Ortega-Ochoa, R., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Vegge, T. & Buonassisi, T. A tomographic interpretation of structure–property relations for materials discovery. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18163 (2025).
Yan, Q. & Kanatzidis, M. G. High-performance thermoelectrics and challenges for practical devices. Nat. Mater. 21, 503–513 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fiebig, M., Lottermoser, T., Meier, D. & Trassin, M. The evolution of multiferroics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 1–14 (2016).
Google Scholar
Boonkird, A. et al. Are quantum materials economically and environmentally sustainable? Mater. Today 90, 241–248 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhou, X. et al. High-temperature superconductivity. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 462–465 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wei, J. et al. Review of current high-zT thermoelectric materials. J. Mater. Sci. 55, 12642–12704 (2020).
Google Scholar
Knaster, J., Moeslang, A. & Muroga, T. Materials research for fusion. Nat. Phys. 12, 424–434 (2016).
Google Scholar
Antoniuk, E. R. et al. Active learning enables extrapolation in molecular generative models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02059 (2025).
Riebesell, J. et al. Matbench discovery—a framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14920 (2023).
Szymanski, N. J. & Bartel, C. J. Establishing baselines for generative discovery of inorganic crystals. Mater. Horiz. (2025).
Xu, P., Ji, X., Li, M. & Lu, W. Small data machine learning in materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 42 (2023).
Google Scholar
Trepat, X. & Alert, R. How to bridge the gap between theory and experiments in biological physics. Nat. Phys. 19, 1738–1739 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kiselev, A., Kim, J. & Martin, O. J. in Adventures in Contemporary Electromagnetic Theory 531–548 (eds Mackay, T. G. & Lakhtakia, A.) (Springer, 2023).
Dagdelen, J. et al. Structured information extraction from scientific text with large language models. Nat. Commun. 15, 1418 (2024).
Google Scholar
