AI search engine for content marketing

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing search engines. While Google and Bing are merging AI chat, good startup providers are also emerging.

Here are four AI-driven search engines for content creators.

AI search engine for writers

Perplexed Generate streamlined AI-based search results with source citations. It also suggests “related” queries that help with follow-up questions or ideas about another article.

—

Waldo An AI research assistant that creates summaries and detailed summaries. Enter your question in the search box and the tool will generate a research synopsis. Select a section in the synopsis and Waldo will either generate an answer by citing sources and summarizing, or continue the search when prompted. The tool also lets you create a handy CSV download of her.

Keep expanding Waldo’s section or add your own. A condensed answer with the source is then created.

Waldo compiles all sections and exports them to Google Docs. Authors can edit this document into articles. The result is well-researched and structured content.

Waldo’s only downside is that prices start at $139 (no CSV functionality).

—

consensus is an AI-driven search engine focused on research papers. It helps you find relevant studies based on your query. Consensus is similar to Google Scholar for the general public as it translates content into everyday language.

The tool claims to provide unbiased expert answers on any topic by year of publication.

Categorize search results as follows:

• A “highly cited” article contains many citations. The tool warns that “highly cited” doesn’t necessarily mean the findings are accurate, it just indicates the impact of the research.

• The ‘Systematic Review’ source contains more research in full text.

• The ‘meta-analysis’ results include combined data from many studies. The analysis is as good as the underlying research.

• The “Rigorous Journal” resource is ranked in the top 50% of journals by review tool SciScore.

Consensus is very useful for creating credible and well-researched content or finding data for linkable assets such as infographics and whitepapers. This is the only transparent option for evaluating citations on this list.

Consensus is free at the time of writing. A pro membership is also reportedly in the works.

—

Como is a search engine that returns single article-like answers with citations. Komo does not explain how these sources are discovered or selected.

Komo can provide a brief summary of opinions and perspectives on the topic for further research. In my experience, this tool never gives a clear answer, but instead produces a different perspective.

The Explore button at the bottom of each answer contains related photos, videos and additional links.

next to Explore[検索]Buttons facilitate follow-up questions. This tool provides writers with a high degree of understanding of a topic from multiple angles.

mostly helpful

All four search engines provide citations and links for their results. However, many of those sources are secondary rather than original, such as blog posts referencing third-party research. Because of this, the author has to move from list to list to find the first study.

These search engines will give you an idea of ​​how AI search will work in the future. These aren’t all that different from Google’s results, except that the AI ​​summarizes each source instead of showing verbatim snippets.

I suspect (but can’t confirm) that the four search engines are trying to offer their own perspective on the query topic. All four companies offered different approaches, even to seemingly factual questions, instead of repeating the same answers from the same sources as is the case with traditional search engines.