Organization, W. H. O. Cancer. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (2025).
Yadav, A. K. & Singh, T. R. Computational approach for assessing the involvement of SMYD2 protein in human cancers using TCGA data. J. Genetic Eng. Biotechnol. 21, 122 (2023).
AlJarf, R., Rodrigues, C. H. M., Myung, Y., Pires, D. E. V. & Ascher, D. B. PiscesCSM: prediction of anticancer synergistic drug combinations. J. Cheminform. 16, 81 (2024).
Google Scholar
Manica, M. et al. Toward explainable anticancer compound sensitivity prediction via multimodal Attention-Based convolutional encoders. Mol. Pharm. 16, 4797–4806 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhong, L. et al. Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Sig Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 1–48 (2021).
Liu, B., Zhou, H., Tan, L., Siu, K. T. H. & Guan, X. Y. Exploring treatment options in cancer: tumor treatment strategies. Sig Transduct. Target. Ther. 9, 1–44 (2024).
Martin, R. L., Heifetz, A., Bodkin, M. J. & Townsend-Nicholson, A. High-Throughput Structure-Based drug design (HT-SBDD) using drug docking, fragment molecular orbital calculations, and molecular dynamic techniques. Methods Mol. Biol. 2716, 293–306 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pala, D. & Clark, D. E. Caught between a ROCK and a hard place: current challenges in structure-based drug design. Drug Discovery Today. 29, 104106 (2024).
Google Scholar
Batool, M., Ahmad, B. & Choi, S. A. Structure-Based drug discovery paradigm. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2783 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lin, X., Li, X. & Lin, X. A. Review on applications of computational methods in drug screening and design. Molecules 25, 1375 (2020).
Google Scholar
Duo, L. & Liu,Yu, R. Jianfeng, tang, Bencan & and hirst, J. D. Artificial intelligence for small molecule anticancer drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 19, 933–948 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National center for biotechnology information in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D20–D29 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zheng, S. et al. Machine learning–enabled virtual screening indicates the anti-tuberculosis activity of aldoxorubicin and Quarfloxin with verification by molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and biological evaluations. Brief. Bioinform. 26, bbae696 (2025).
Google Scholar
Dai, W., Li, L. & Guo, D. Integrating bioassay data for improved prediction of drug-target interaction. Biophys. Chem. 266, 106455 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schapin, N., Majewski, M., Varela-Rial, A., Arroniz, C. & Fabritiis, G. D. Machine learning small molecule properties in drug discovery. Artif. Intell. Chem. 1, 100020 (2023).
Paul, D. et al. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 26, 80–93 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, K. et al. Artificial intelligence in drug development. Nat. Med. 31, 45–59 (2025).
Google Scholar
Cai, L. et al. Machine learning for drug repositioning: recent advances and challenges. Curr. Res. Chem. Biology. 3, 100042 (2023).
Google Scholar
Urbina, F., Puhl, A. C. & Ekins, S. Recent advances in drug repurposing using machine learning. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 65, 74–84 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Chaudhary, K., Singla, D., Gautam, A. & Raghava, G. P. S. Designing of promiscuous inhibitors against pancreatic cancer cell lines. Sci. Rep. 4, 4668 (2014).
Google Scholar
He, S. et al. Machine learning enables accurate and rapid prediction of active molecules against breast cancer cells. Front Pharmacol 12, (2021).
Goel, M., Amawate, A., Singh, A., Bagler, G. & ToxinPredictor Computational models to predict the toxicity of molecules. Chemosphere 370, 143900 (2025).
Google Scholar
Setiya, A., Jani, V., Sonavane, U. & Joshi, R. MolToxPred: small molecule toxicity prediction using machine learning approach. RSC Adv. 14, 4201–4220 (2024).
Google Scholar
Menden, M. P. et al. Machine learning prediction of cancer cell sensitivity to drugs based on genomic and chemical properties. PLOS ONE. 8, e61318 (2013).
Google Scholar
Singh, H. et al. Prediction of anticancer molecules using hybrid model developed on molecules screened against NCI-60 cancer cell lines. BMC Cancer. 16, 77 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, G. H. & Huang, J. F. CDRUG: a web server for predicting anticancer activity of chemical compounds. Bioinformatics 28, 3334–3335 (2012).
Google Scholar
Al-Jarf, R., de Sá, A. G. C., Pires, D. E. V. & Ascher, D. B. pdCSM-cancer: using Graph-Based signatures to identify small molecules with anticancer properties. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 3314–3322 (2021).
Google Scholar
Balaji, P. D., Selvam, S., Sohn, H. & Madhavan, T. MLASM: machine learning based prediction of anticancer small molecules. Mol. Divers. 28, 2153–2161 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. PubChem’s bioassay database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D400–D412 (2012).
Google Scholar
Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical Language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28, 31–36 (1988).
Google Scholar
Bajusz, D., Rácz, A. & Héberger, K. Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations? J. Cheminform. 7, 20 (2015).
Google Scholar
Carracedo-Reboredo, P. et al. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19, 4538–4558 (2021).
Google Scholar
Galushka, M. et al. Prediction of chemical compounds properties using a deep learning model. Neural Comput. Applic. 33, 13345–13366 (2021).
Yap, C. W. PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1466–1474 (2011).
Google Scholar
RDKit Open-Source Cheminformatics Software. https://www.rdkit.org/.
Sanner, M. F. Python: a programming Language for software integration and development. J. Mol. Graph Model. 17, 57–61 (1999).
Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kursa, M. B. & Rudnicki, W. R. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–13 (2010).
Steuer, R., Kurths, J., Daub, C. O., Weise, J. & Selbig, J. The mutual information: detecting and evaluating dependencies between variables. Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl 2), S231–240 (2002).
Google Scholar
SONG, Y. & LU, Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry. 27, 130–135 (2015).
Google Scholar
Biau, G. & Scornet, E. A random forest guided tour. TEST 25, 197–227 (2016).
Google Scholar
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).
Google Scholar
Ke, G. et al. Curran associates, Inc.,. LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, (2017).
Kleinbaum, D. G. & Klein, M. Introduction to logistic regression. In Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning Text (eds. Kleinbaum, D. G. & Klein, M.) 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1742-3_1 (Springer, 2010).
Kramer, O. K-Nearest neighbors. In Dimensionality Reduction with Unsupervised Nearest Neighbors (ed. Kramer, O.) 13–23 (Springer, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38652-7_2.
Google Scholar
Mahajan, P., Uddin, S., Hajati, F. & Moni, M. A. Ensemble learning for disease prediction: A review. Healthc. (Basel). 11, 1808 (2023).
Rodríguez-Pérez, R. & Bajorath, J. Interpretation of machine learning models using Shapley values: application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 34, 1013–1026 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S. & Guestrin, C. ‘Why Should I Trust You?’: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.04938 (2016).
Polishchuk, P. Interpretation of quantitative Structure–Activity relationship models: past, present, and future. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 57, 2618–2639 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. & Lee, S. I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874 (2017).
Karim, M. R. et al. Explainable AI for bioinformatics: methods, tools and applications. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad236 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Pérez, R. & Bajorath, J. Interpretation of compound activity predictions from complex machine learning models using local approximations and Shapley values. J. Med. Chem. 63, 8761–8777 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pantziarka, P., Capistrano, I., De Potter, R., Vandeborne, A., Bouche, G. & L. & An open access database of licensed cancer drugs. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 627574 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yadav, A. K., Singh, T. R. & and Novel inhibitors design through structural investigations and simulation studies for human PKMTs (SMYD2) involved in cancer. Mol. Simul. 47, 1149–1158 (2021).
Google Scholar
Vamathevan, J. et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 463–477 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rehman, A. U. et al. Role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing drug discovery. Fundamental Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2024.04.021 (2024).
Singh, S., Gupta, H., Sharma, P. & Sahi, S. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted approaches in drug screening. Artif. Intell. Chem. 2, 100039 (2024).
Pudjihartono, N., Fadason, T., Kempa-Liehr, A. W. & O’Sullivan, J. M. A review of feature selection methods for machine Learning-Based disease risk prediction. Front. Bioinform. 2, 927312 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. An effective multi-step feature selection framework for clinical outcome prediction using electronic medical records. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 25, 84 (2025).
Boldini, D., Grisoni, F., Kuhn, D., Friedrich, L. & Sieber, S. A. Practical guidelines for the use of gradient boosting for molecular property prediction. J. Cheminform. 15, 73 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shaker, B. et al. LightBBB: computational prediction model of blood–brain-barrier penetration based on LightGBM. Bioinformatics 37, 1135–1139 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Mucs, D., Norinder, U., Svensson, F. & LightGBM An effective and scalable algorithm for prediction of chemical Toxicity–Application to the Tox21 and mutagenicity data sets. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 4150–4158 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, C., Lei, X. & Liu, L. Predicting Metabolite–Disease associations based on LightGBM model. Front. Genet. 12, 660275 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kırboğa, K. K., Abbasi, S. & Küçüksille, E. U. Explainability and white box in drug discovery. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 102, 217–233 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nolte, T. M., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Hendriks, A., Jan & van de Meent, D. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for green algae growth Inhibition by polymer particles. Chemosphere 179, 49–56 (2017).
Google Scholar
Guo, H. et al. Tailoring Chemical Molecular Representation to Specific Tasks via Text Prompts. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.11403 (2024).
Bertato, L., Chirico, N. & Papa, E. QSAR models for the prediction of dietary biomagnification factor in fish. Toxics 11, 209 (2023).
Google Scholar
Morak-Młodawska, B., Jeleń, M., Martula, E. & Korlacki, R. Study of lipophilicity and ADME properties of 1,9-Diazaphenothiazines with anticancer action. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 6970 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, T. & Manz, T. A. Bond orders of the diatomic molecules. RSC Adv. 9, 17072–17092.
Du, X. et al. Insights into Protein–Ligand interactions: mechanisms, models, and methods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 144 (2016).
Google Scholar
Escayola, S., Bahri-Laleh, N. & Poater, A. % V Bur index and steric maps: from predictive catalysis to machine learning. Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 853–882 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kehrein, J., Bunker, A., Luxenhofer, R. & POxload Machine learning estimates drug loadings of polymeric micelles. Mol. Pharm. 21, 3356–3374 (2024).
Google Scholar
