Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature 537, 347–355 (2016).
Google Scholar
Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L. & Yates, J. R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. JAm. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994).
Google Scholar
Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized ppb-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).
Google Scholar
Chi, H. et al. Comprehensive identification of peptides in tandem mass spectra using an efficient open search engine. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1059–1061 (2018).
Google Scholar
Strauss, M. T. et al. AlphaPept: a modern and open framework for MS-based proteomics. Nat. Commun. 15, 2168 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kong, A. T., Leprevost, F. V., Avtonomov, D. M., Mellacheruvu, D. & Nesvizhskii, A. I. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry–based proteomics. Nat. Methods 14, 513–520 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yang, H., Chi, H., Zeng, W.-F., Zhou, W.-J. & He, S.-M. pNovo 3: precise de novo peptide sequencing using a learning-to-rank framework. Bioinformatics 35, 183–190 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ma, B. et al. PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 17, 2337–2342 (2003).
Google Scholar
Frank, A. & Pevzner, P. PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal. Chem. 77, 964–973 (2005).
Google Scholar
Yilmaz, M., Fondrie, W., Bittremieux, W., Oh, S. & Noble, W. S. De novo mass spectrometry peptide sequencing with a transformer model. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 162, 25514–25522 (2022).
Schulte, D. & Snijder, J. A handle on mass coincidence errors in de novo sequencing of antibodies by bottom-up proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 23, 3552–3559 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wen, B. & Zhang, B. PepQuery2 democratizes public MS proteomics data for rapid peptide searching. Nat. Commun. 14, 2213 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mann, M., Kumar, C., Zeng, W.-F. & Strauss, M. T. Artificial intelligence for proteomics and biomarker discovery. Cell Syst. 12, 759–770 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhou, X.-X. et al. pDeep: predicting MS/MS spectra of peptides with deep learning. Anal. Chem. 89, 12690–12697 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gessulat, S. et al. Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning. Nat. Methods 16, 509–518 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ma, C. et al. Improved peptide retention time prediction in liquid chromatography through deep learning. Anal. Chem. 90, 10881–10888 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhou, W.-J., Wei, Z.-H., He, S.-M. & Chi, H. pValid 2: a deep learning based validation method for peptide identification in shotgun proteomics with increased discriminating power. J. Proteom. 251, 104414 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zeng, W.-F. et al. AlphaPeptDeep: a modular deep learning framework to predict peptide properties for proteomics. Nat. Commun. 13, 7238 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, K. L. et al. MSBooster: improving peptide identification rates using deep learning-based features. Nat. Commun. 14, 4539 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yu, Y. & Li, M. Towards highly sensitive deep learning-based end-to-end database search for tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 85–95 (2025).
Tran, N. H., Zhang, X., Xin, L., Shan, B. & Li, M. De novo peptide sequencing by deep learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8247–8252 (2017).
Google Scholar
Qiao, R. et al. Computationally instrument-resolution-independent de novo peptide sequencing for high-resolution devices. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 420–425 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yilmaz, M. et al. Sequence-to-sequence translation from mass spectra to peptides with a transformer model. Nat. Commun. 15, 6427 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mao, Z., Zhang, R., Xin, L. & Li, M. Mitigating the missing-fragmentation problem in de novo peptide sequencing with a two-stage graph-based deep learning model. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1250–1260 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. π-PrimeNovo: an accurate and efficient non-autoregressive deep learning model for de novo peptide sequencing. Nat. Commun. 16, 267 (2025).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Li, D., Xiong, C. & Hoi, S. BLIP: bootstrapping language–image pre-training for unified vision–language understanding and generation. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 162, 12888–12900 (2022).
Zhao, J., Zhang, Z., Li, Y. & Cen, L. Multidimensional information assisted deep learning realizing flexible recognition of vortex beam modes. IEEE Photon. J. 13, 1–6 (2021).
Hayes, T. et al. Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads0018 (2024).
Zhao, J., Zhuang, W., Song, J., Li, Y. & Lu, S. Pre-training protein bi-level representation through span mask strategy on 3D protein chains. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 235, 1–15 (2024).
Zhou, G. et al. Uni-Mol: a universal 3D molecular representation learning framework. The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (2023).
Tran, N. H. et al. NovoBoard: a comprehensive framework for evaluating the false discovery rate and accuracy of de novo peptide sequencing. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 23, 100849 (2024).
Burq, M. et al. Tesorai Search: large pretrained model boosts identifications in mass spectrometry proteomics without the need for Percolator. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.19.606805 (2024).
Jun, A. et al. DDA-BERT: leveraging transformer architecture pre-training for data-dependent acquisition mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72246-6 (2026).
Wang, K.-F., Wu, Y.-Z. & Chi, H. A universal database reduction method based on the sequence tag strategy to facilitate large-scale database search in proteomics. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 483, 116966 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. Open-pNovo: de novo peptide sequencing with thousands of protein modifications. J. Proteome Res. 16, 645–654 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gavin, P. G. et al. Intestinal metaproteomics reveals host–microbiota interactions in subjects at risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 41, 2178–2186 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bassani-Sternberg, M. et al. Direct identification of clinically relevant neoepitopes presented on native human melanoma tissue by mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 7, 13404 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wang, P. et al. A large-scale proteogenomic atlas of pear. Mol. Plant 16, 599–615 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cao, Z., Qin, T., Liu, T.-Y., Tsai, M.-F. & Li, H. Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach. In Proc. 24th International Conference on Machine Learning 129–136 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2007).
Radford, A. et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 139, 8748–8763 (2021).
Yifan, W., Doersch, C., Arandjelović, R., Carreira, J. & Zisserman, A. Input-level inductive biases for 3D reconstruction. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 6176–6186 (IEEE, 2022).
Ridnik, T. et al. Asymmetric loss for multi-label classification. Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 82–91 (IEEE, 2021).
Cheng, K. et al. Metalab 2.0 enables accurate post-translational modifications profiling in metaproteomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 31, 1473–1482 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wen, B. et al. Assessment of false discovery rate control in tandem mass spectrometry analysis using entrapment. Nat. Methods 22, 1454–1463 (2025).
Potgieter, M. G. et al. Metanovo: an open-source pipeline for probabilistic peptide discovery in complex metaproteomic datasets. PLOS Comput. Biol. 19, 1011163 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wilburn, D. B. et al. Deep learning from harmonized peptide libraries enables retention time prediction of diverse post translational modifications. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.30.542978 (2023).
Jurtz, V. et al. NetMHCpan-4.0: improved peptide–MHC class I interaction predictions integrating eluted ligand and peptide binding affinity data. J. Immunol. 199, 3360–3368 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gfeller, D. et al. The length distribution and multiple specificity of naturally presented HLA-I ligands. J. Immunol. 201, 3705–3716 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sharma, K. et al. Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1819–1831 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wilhelm, M. et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature 509, 582–587 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zolg, D. P. et al. Building ProteomeTools based on a complete synthetic human proteome. Nat. Methods 14, 259–262 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chick, J. M. et al. A mass-tolerant database search identifies a large proportion of unassigned spectra in shotgun proteomics as modified peptides. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 743–749 (2015).
Google Scholar
Marcu, A. et al. HLA ligand atlas: a benign reference of HLA-presented peptides to improve T-cell-based cancer immunotherapy. J. Immunother. Cancer 9, 002071 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Wang, F., Chen, J., Zhou, Y. & Zou, H. Modulating the selectivity of affinity absorbents to multi-phosphopeptides by a competitive substitution strategy. J. Chromatogr. A 1461, 35–41 (2016).
Google Scholar
Piersma, S. R. et al. Feasibility of label-free phosphoproteomics and application to base-line signaling of colorectal cancer cell lines. J. Proteom. 127, 247–258 (2015).
Google Scholar
Marx, H. et al. A large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 557–564 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bekker-Jensen, D. B. et al. An optimized shotgun strategy for the rapid generation of comprehensive human proteomes. Cell Syst. 4, 587–599 (2017).
Google Scholar
Müller, J. B. et al. The proteome landscape of the kingdoms of life. Nature 582, 592–596 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kim, M.-S. et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 509, 575–581 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schuster, H. et al. The immunopeptidomic landscape of ovarian carcinomas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9942–9951 (2017).
Google Scholar
Racle, J. et al. Machine learning predictions of MHC-II specificities reveal alternative binding mode of class II epitopes. Immunity 56, 1359–1375 (2023).
Google Scholar
Guo, X., Trudgian, D. C., Lemoff, A., Yadavalli, S. & Mirzaei, H. Confetti: a multiprotease map of the HeLa proteome for comprehensive proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 13, 1573–1584 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Multi-protease strategy identifies three PE2 missing proteins in human testis tissue. J. Proteome Res. 16, 4352–4363 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sun, J. et al. Multiproteases combined with high-pH reverse-phase separation strategy verified fourteen missing proteins in human testis tissue. J. Proteome Res. 17, 4171–4177 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gueto-Tettay, C. et al. Multienzyme deep learning models improve peptide de novo sequencing by mass spectrometry proteomics. PLOS Comput. Biol. 19, 1010457 (2023).
Google Scholar
Marcu, A. et al. The HLA Ligand Atlas—a resource of natural HLA ligands presented on benign tissues. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/778944 (2020).
Prianichnikov, N. et al. MaxQuant software for ion mobility enhanced shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 19, 1058–1069 (2020).
Google Scholar
Meier, F. et al. Online parallel accumulation–serial fragmentation (pasef) with a novel trapped ion mobility mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 17, 2534–2545 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wigger, L. et al. Multi-omics profiling of living human pancreatic islet donors reveals heterogeneous beta cell trajectories towards type 2 diabetes. Nat. Metab. 3, 1017–1031 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, M. L. et al. Hydroxychloroquine inhibits the mitochondrial antioxidant system in activated T cells. iScience 24, 103509 (2021).
Zhao, J. pUniFind training set. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18976195 (2026).
Zhao, J. pUniFind. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19052067 (2026).
Zhao, J. et al. pUniFind: a unified, large-scale pretrained model for pushing the limits of mass spectra interpretation. Code Ocean https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.8567692.v1 (2026).
