Document reveals Microsoft’s relationship with New Zealand education and expectations for AI in schools

AI News


Students attend a class on artificial intelligence at a school in Utrecht, Netherlands.

Students attend a class on artificial intelligence at a school in Utrecht, Netherlands.
photograph: ANP via AFP

US tech giant Microsoft has pushed the Department of Education to introduce an artificial intelligence (AI) program aimed at continuous live reporting of children and teachers in classrooms.

The emails released under the Official Information Act reveal important ties and high expectations between the two partners for greater use of AI, including helping nervously diverse students.

But efforts that began at the highest levels of government departments ended in whining as officials ignored them.

In 2020, just as the American giant began moving to build a massive data center here, the government secretly signed a deal with Microsoft to do a “lighthouse” project in 2020.

To begin with, the government’s chief digital officer (GCDO) asked about a dozen department chiefs to come up with ideas for working with Microsoft, according to newly released documents.

“These lighthouse projects are important to Microsoft’s leadership and broader relationship with Microsoft,” GCDO Paul James wrote in a February 2020 email.

“This is a real opportunity to gain world-leading support for a difficult problem.”

The Education AI Project is one of two projects selected.

Although it was said to be of “national significance,” the project was not publicized at the time.

Collaborative team considers using AI for nervously diverse students

The joint team then explored how AI can be leveraged using “existing ministry data sets” to deliver personalized learning to neurotically diverse students, and how AI can be used to drive decision-making processes. We started looking into ways to strengthen it.

The ministry then settled on using projects in the United States and New Zealand to provide a “foundation” for its broader AI and data science education strategy.

“It was clear that the team saw this as a significant opportunity to impact the New Zealand education system,” Microsoft’s National Technology Officer Russell Craig said in July 2020. In a letter to the ministry, he said:

But by the end of 2021, the project was “in a black hole,” with none of the seven-strong steering group of senior managers having time to attend meetings or even work, the project leader said.

Google approached the ministry around this time for “similar opportunities for research-based work,” but no one took up, “so again nothing happened.”

The Ministry of Education finally refused [https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RWDECo

Microsoft’s other proposal]Adds Operation Constellation of Real-Time Data Collection and Analysis in Schools to its ‘Lighthouse’ project, citing trust issues.

Critics question why Microsoft needs to be pursued by New Zealand government

Critics question why a trillion-dollar U.S. company needs help from the government.

A non-binding government memorandum of understanding signed in 2017 gave Microsoft a special role in national digital development. The deal was not made public until an RNZ investigation earlier this year.

This memorandum was updated in February 2020 to include a lighthouse project. This was followed by the announcement of his over $100 million data center project by the government and Microsoft in May 2020. Three months later, in August, Microsoft received ministerial approval to purchase land for its Auckland data center.

Microsoft’s revenue in the country has more than quintupled since 2018, surpassing $1 billion. We pay very little taxes here, but we pay a lot of fees to our US parent company. The company, which once employed about 150 people locally, laid off some in April.

Microsoft referred RNZ’s questions to the ministry.

The ‘lighthouse’ project was supposed to be ‘transformative’ and had far-reaching benefits, but neither went forward (the second project was with the Department of Business, Innovation and Employment), according to documents. is described.

That was despite a fair amount of input coming in.

Just one day after GCDO asked for ideas, Secretary of Education Iona Halstead responded by proposing using Microsoft AI for administration, personalized learning, and learning support for children with higher needs.

“We are able to influence demand for the New Zealand-based Microsoft cloud. [data centre] Through our school software license agreement,” she told James.

The ministry may move Te Lito’s entire data repository to Microsoft’s cloud, he added.

Her chief digital officer, Stewart Wakefield, led a new AI project for the department.

The emails show that Microsoft wanted to involve its global team and get more data from students, and “test data was lacking,” Russell Craig said.

The ministry consulted no one but Microsoft and GCDO.

That’s because it didn’t work.

A separate OIA has revealed that there is no formal body giving advice on AI, and the gap will persist until at least early 2023.

The lighthouse project was supposed to involve non-governmental organizations, but that didn’t happen this time.

A coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) advocacy groups said earlier this month that the government had failed to accommodate nervously diverse children in schools. ADHD (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), autism, giftedness, and dyslexia are all examples of neurodiversity.

MEXT raises concerns over project

In October 2020, the Home Office’s top digital inclusion manager, Adrian Moore, said there was “initial strong interest” in promoting the AI ​​lighthouse project, but the pandemic may have taken away the focus. said there is.

The following month, the Ministry of Education raised “concerns about ethics, data sovereignty and data privacy, among others.”

By December, the ministry had rejected Project Constellation, saying there were “concerns that it would not fit into the trust model.”

The original AI Lighthouse project still attracted “genuine enthusiasm” and “attention to the use of education system data,” according to the email, and there was talk about “the scale of this in China.”

By March 2021, the new steering group was considering “avoiding vendor lock-in by working exclusively with Microsoft.”

The group agreed to explore how AI could assist students with math and calculations.

However, by November 2021 the project was finished.

There is no substitute. “There are currently no AI projects,” the ministry told RNZ on Thursday.

This is despite an MOU in 2020 that promised the ministry and GCDO to work with Microsoft to consider “creating programs that apply AI and other digital capabilities.”

Microsoft moves forward despite projects being canned

Microsoft pushed ahead regardless.

The company obtained foreign investment approval earlier this year to purchase more land for another data center. Partners with spy agencies on cybersecurity tools. This is expected to benefit greatly from the government’s cloud-first policy, which has instructed public institutions to always prioritize cloud computing over traditional data storage, which was updated just last month.

The company encourages “hypothesis and design testing by neurotic students” to come up with “a more comprehensive product.”

The Ministry of Education said on Thursday that the Education Digital Data Board (EDDB), a committee set up jointly with the Higher Education Commission and the New Zealand Qualifications Agency, has “announced the upcoming We’re putting AI in the agenda,” he said. )”.

Timeline

  • February 2020 – Government chief digital officer asks CEO for ideas for ‘lighthouse’ project with Microsoft
  • Late February – Updated Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to promote the “Lighthouse” project
  • in May – Government and Microsoft announce construction of massive new data center
  • August – Microsoft obtains approval to purchase land for data center
  • March 2020 to November 2021 – Seven senior managers from Microsoft and Ministry of Education working on joint AI ‘lighthouse’ project, eventually abandoned



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *