Thank you for sharing this very insightful conversation. What particularly resonated with me was the reminder that we need to stay very conscious in how we work with an AI agent: What exactly do I want to analyse? What do I want to produce? Which assumptions, criteria, and boundaries should guide the work? And then, step by step, we have to keep checking: * Is this accurate? * Does it fit the context? * Does it still sound like me? * Is this really what I want to say? Because at the end of the day, AI is not a human counterpart. It can support analysis, structure, and reflection, but it cannot replace judgment, responsibility, purpose, authenticity, or lived experience. I found this especially valuable from a leadership perspective: in an AI-driven world, retaining one’s own voice is not a soft issue. It is part of professional judgment, leadership integrity, and the ability to make sense of complex situations rather than simply accepting an output because it sounds convincing. A very thoughtful and valuable discussion. Thank you, Professor Deborah Ancona and Senior Lecturer Katherine W. Isaacs, for highlighting an issue that will become increasingly important as AI becomes more deeply integrated into leadership, decision-making, and professional practice.
