Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B. & Cianchetti, M. Soft robotics: technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci. Robot. 1, eaah3690 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pfeifer, R., Lungarella, M. & Iida, F. Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science 318, 1088–1093 (2007).
Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. Embodied Cognition (Routledge, 2019).
Bongard, J., Cho, K., Park, Y.-L. & Shepherd, R. Future Directions Workshop on Embodied Intelligence (US Department of Defense, 19–20 May 2024).
Chicca, E., Stefanini, F., Bartolozzi, C. & Indiveri, G. Neuromorphic electronic circuits for building autonomous cognitive systems. Proc. IEEE 102, 1367–1388 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bartolozzi, C., Indiveri, G. & Donati, E. Embodied neuromorphic intelligence. Nat. Commun. 13, 1024 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zador, A. et al. Catalyzing next-generation artificial intelligence through neuroai. Nat. Commun. 14, 1597 (2023).
Google Scholar
Vanhoucke, V. The state of robot learning. Medium https://vanhoucke.medium.com/the-state-of-robot-learning-639dafffbcf8 (2024).
Hoffmann, M. & Patni, S. P. Embodied AI in machine learning—is it really embodied? Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.10705 (2025).
Duan, J., Yu, S., Tan, H. uiL. i, Zhu, H. & Tan, C. A survey of embodied AI: from simulators to research tasks. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 6, 230–244 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Parr, T., Cisek, P., Clark, A. & Friston, K. Generating meaning: active inference and the scope and limits of passive AI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 28, 97–112 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chiel, H. J. & Beer, R. D. The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends Neurosci. 20, 553–557 (1997).
Google Scholar
Holmgren, C. D. et al. Visual pursuit behavior in mice maintains the pursued prey on the retinal region with least optic flow. eLife 10, e70838 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lungarella, M. & Sporns, O. Mapping information flow in sensorimotor networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e144 (2006).
Google Scholar
Pfeifer, R. & Scheier, C. Sensory—motor coordination: the metaphor and beyond. Robot. Auton. Syst. 20, 157–178 (1997).
Google Scholar
Müller, V. C. & Hoffmann, M. What is morphological computation? On how the body contributes to cognition and control. Artif. Life 23, 1–24 (2017).
Google Scholar
McGeer, T. Passive dynamic walking. Int. J. Robot. Res. 9, 62–82 (1990).
Google Scholar
Liao, J. C. Neuromuscular control of trout swimming in a vortex street: implications for energy economy during the karman gait. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 3495–3506 (2004).
Google Scholar
Füchslin, R. M. et al. Morphological computation and morphological control: steps toward a formal theory and applications. Artif. Life 19, 9–34 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. & Müller, V. C. in Representation and Reality in Humans, Other Living Organisms and Intelligent Machines (eds Dodig-Crnkovic, G. & Giovagnoli, R.) 335–345 (Springer, 2017).
Hauser, H., Nanayakkara, T. & Forni, F. Leveraging morphological computation for controlling soft robots: learning from nature to control soft robots. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 43, 114–129 (2023).
Google Scholar
Iida, F. & Giardina, F. On the timescales of embodied intelligence for autonomous adaptive systems. Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 6, 95–122 (2023).
Google Scholar
Verschure, P. F. M. J., Voegtlin, T. & Douglas, R. J. Environmentally mediated synergy between perception and behaviour in mobile robots. Nature 425, 620–624 (2003).
Google Scholar
Tuthill, J. C. & Azim, E. Proprioception. Curr. Biol. 28, R194–R203 (2018).
Google Scholar
Barnes, G. R. & Marsden, J. F. Anticipatory control of hand and eye movements in humans during oculo-manual tracking. J. Physiol. 539, 317–330 (2002).
Google Scholar
Polk, A., Litwin-Kumar, A. & Doiron, B. Correlated neural variability in persistent state networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6295–6300 (2012).
Google Scholar
Shidara, M., Aigner, T. G. & Richmond, B. J. Neuronal signals in the monkey ventral striatum related to progress through a predictable series of trials. J. Neurosci. 18, 2613–2625 (1998).
Google Scholar
Michaiel, A. M., Abe, E. T. T. & Niell, C. M. Dynamics of gaze control during prey capture in freely moving mice. eLife 9, e57458 (2020).
Google Scholar
Goel, A. & Buonomano, D. V. Temporal interval learning in cortical cultures is encoded in intrinsic network dynamics. Neuron 91, 320–327 (2016).
Google Scholar
Khona, M. & Fiete, I. R. Attractor and integrator networks in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 744–766 (2022).
Google Scholar
Howard, M. W., Shankar, K. H., Aue, W. R. & Criss, A. H. A distributed representation of internal time. Psychol. Rev. 122, 24–53 (2015).
Google Scholar
Axenie, C. Antifragile control systems in neuronal processing: a sensorimotor perspective. Biol. Cybernet. 119, 7 (2025).
Google Scholar
Nakajima, K., Hauser, H., Li, T. & Pfeifer, R. Information processing via physical soft body. Sci. Rep. 5, 10487 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ribar, L. & Sepulchre, R. Neuromorphic control: designing multiscale mixed-feedback systems. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 41, 34–63 (2021).
Google Scholar
Parsa, A. et al. Universal mechanical polycomputation in granular matter. In Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 193–201 (ACM, 2023).
Craighero, L. An embodied approach to fetal and newborn perceptual and sensorimotor development. Brain Cogn. 179, 106184 (2024).
Google Scholar
Robles, L. & Ruggero, M. A. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol. Rev. 81, 1305–1352 (2001).
Google Scholar
Saal, H. P., Birznieks, I. & Johansson, R. S. Fingertip viscoelasticity enables human tactile neurons to encode loading history alongside current force. eLife 12, RP89616 (2025).
Google Scholar
Covell, D. M. Top-Down & Bottom-Up Approaches to Robot Design (West Virginia Univ., 2022).
Ballard, D. H. Animate vision. Artif. Intell. 48, 57–86 (1991).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Fan, R., Guo, J., Ni, H. & Bhutta, M. U. M. In-sensor visual perception and inference. Intell. Comput. 2, 0043 (2023).
Google Scholar
Aloimonos, J., Weiss, I. & Bandyopadhyay, A. Active vision. Int. J. Comput. Vision 1, 333–356 (1988).
Google Scholar
Stokes, D. Perception and its Modalities (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).
Katsuki, F. & Constantinidis, C. Bottom-up and top-down attention: different processes and overlapping neural systems. Neuroscientist 20, 509–521 (2014).
Google Scholar
Solari, F., Chessa, M. & Sabatini, S. P. Design strategies for direct multi-scale and multi-orientation feature extraction in the log-polar domain. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 33, 41–51 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ballard, D. H. & Hayhoe, M. M. Modelling the role of task in the control of gaze. Visual Cogn. 17, 1185–1204 (2009).
Google Scholar
Noë, A. Action in Perception (MIT Press, 2004).
Biswas, D. et al. Closed-loop control of active sensing movements regulates sensory slip. Curr. Biol. 28, 4029–4036 (2018).
Google Scholar
Greis, L. M., Ringler, E., Whiting, M. J. & Szabo, B. Lizards lack speed-accuracy trade-offs in a quantitative foraging task when unable to sample the reward. Behav. Process. 202, 104749 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chittka, L., Skorupski, P. & Raine, N. E. Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 400–407 (2009).
Google Scholar
Derosiere, G., Thura, D., Cisek, P. & Duque, J. Trading accuracy for speed over the course of a decision. J. Neurophysiol. 126, 361–372 (2021).
Google Scholar
de Froment, A. J., Rubenstein, D. I. & Levin, S. A. An extra dimension to decision-making in animals: the three-way trade-off between speed, effort per-unit-time and accuracy. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003937 (2014).
Google Scholar
Payvand, M., Nair, M. V., Müller, L. K. & Indiveri, G. A neuromorphic systems approach to in-memory computing with non-ideal memristive devices: from mitigation to exploitation. Faraday Discuss. 213, 487–510 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shankar, S. Energy estimates across layers of computing: from devices to large-scale applications in machine learning for natural language processing, scientific computing, and cryptocurrency mining. In IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1109/HPEC58863.2023.10363573 (IEEE, 2023).
Brette, R. et al. Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: a review of tools and strategies. J. Comput. Neurosci. 23, 349–398 (2007).
Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. E. et al. Neuromorphic intermediate representation: a unified instruction set for interoperable brain-inspired computing. Nat. Commun. 15, 8122 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bartolozzi, C. & Indiveri, G. Synaptic dynamics in analog VLSI. Neural Comput. 19, 2581–2603 (2007).
Google Scholar
Qiao, N., Bartolozzi, C. & Indiveri, G. Automatic gain control of ultra-low leakage synaptic scaling homeostatic plasticity circuits. In Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference 156–159 https://doi.org/10.1109/BioCAS.2016.7833755 (IEEE, 2016).
Indiveri, G. & Sandamirskaya, Y. The importance of space and time for signal processing in neuromorphic agents. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 36, 16–28 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. E., Conradt, J. & Lindeberg, T. Covariant spatio-temporal receptive fields for spiking neural networks. Nature Commun. 16, 8231 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sepulchre, R., Drion, G. & Franci, A. Control across scales by positive and negative feedback. Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 2, 89–113 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zidan, M. A., Chen, A., Indiveri, G. & Lu, W. D. Memristive computing devices and applications. J. Electroceram. 39, 4–20 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mehonic, A. et al. Roadmap to neuromorphic computing with emerging technologies. APL Mater. 12, 10 (2024).
Google Scholar
Salenius, S. & Hari, R. Synchronous cortical oscillatory activity during motor action. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 678–684 (2003).
Google Scholar
Delorme, A. & Thorpe, S. J. Face identification using one spike per neuron: resistance to image degradations. Neural Netw. 14, 795–803 (2001).
Google Scholar
Sauseng, P. & Klimesch, W. What does phase information of oscillatory brain activity tell us about cognitive processes? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 32, 1001–1013 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hasselmo, M. E. Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 351–359 (1999).
Google Scholar
Maass, W., Natschläger, T. & Markram, H. Real-time computing without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Comput. 14, 2531–2560 (2002).
Google Scholar
Gilra, A. & Gerstner, W. Predicting non-linear dynamics by stable local learning in a recurrent spiking neural network. eLife 6, 1–43 (2017).
Google Scholar
Maryada et al. Stable recurrent dynamics in heterogeneous neuromorphic computing systems using excitatory and inhibitory plasticity. Nat. Commun. 16, 5522 (2025).
Boahen, K. A. Point-to-point connectivity between neuromorphic chips using address-events. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 47, 416–34 (2000).
Umbach, G., Tan, R., Jacobs, J., Pfeiffer, B. E. & Lega, B. Flexibility of functional neuronal assemblies supports human memory. Nat. Commun. 13, 6162 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kreiser, R., Renner, A., Sandamirskaya, Y. & Pienroj, P. Pose estimation and map formation with spiking neural networks: towards neuromorphic SLAM. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2159–2166 (IEEE, 2018).
Durrant-Whyte, H. & Bailey, T. Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 13, 99–110 (2006).
Google Scholar
Bick, C., Goodfellow, M., Laing, C. R. & Martens, E. A. Understanding the dynamics of biological and neural oscillator networks through exact mean-field reductions: a review. J. Math. Neurosci. 10, 9 (2020).
Google Scholar
Beek, P. J., Peper, C. E. & Stegeman, D. F. Dynamical models of movement coordination. Hum. Mov. Sci. 14, 573–608 (1995).
Google Scholar
Ward, L. M. Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 553–559 (2003).
Google Scholar
Thandiackal, R. et al. Emergence of robust self-organized undulatory swimming based on local hydrodynamic force sensing. Sci. Robot. 6, eabf6354 (2021).
Google Scholar
Donati, E., Corradi, F., Stefanini, C. & Indiveri, G. A spiking implementation of the lamprey’s central pattern generator in neuromorphic VLSI. In Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference 512–515 https://doi.org/10.1109/BioCAS.2014.6981775 (IEEE, 2014).
Gutierrez-Galan, D., Dominguez-Morales, J., Perez-Peña, F., Jimenez-Fernandez, A. & Linares-Barranco, A. Neuropod: a real-time neuromorphic spiking CPG applied to robotics. Neurocomputing 381, 10–19 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cho, J.-H., Pae, D.-S., Lim, M.-T. & Kang, T.-K. A real-time obstacle avoidance method for autonomous vehicles using an obstacle-dependent gaussian potential field. J. Adv. Transport. 2018, 1–15 (2018).
Google Scholar
Milde, M. B., Dietmüller, A., Blum, H., Indiveri, G. & Sandamirskaya, Y. Obstacle avoidance and target acquisition in mobile robots equipped with neuromorphic sensory-processing systems. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2017.8050984 (IEEE, 2017).
Gava, L., Monforte, M., Bartolozzi, C. & Glover, A. How late is too late? A preliminary event-based latency evaluation. In 2022 8th International Conference on Event-Based Control, Communication, and Signal Processing (EBCCSP) (IEEE, 2022).
DeWeerth, S. P., Nielsen, L., Mead, C. A. & Åström, K. J. A simple neuron servo. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2, 248–251 (1991).
Google Scholar
Paredes-Vallés, F. et al. Fully neuromorphic vision and control for autonomous drone flight. Sci. Robot. 9, eadi0591 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sandamirskaya, Y., Kaboli, M., Conradt, J. & Celikel, T. Neuromorphic computing hardware and neural architectures for robotics. Sci. Robot. 7, eabl8419 (2022).
Google Scholar
Laschi, C. & Cianchetti, M. Soft robotics: new perspectives for robot bodyware and control. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2, 3 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rus, D. & Tolley, M. T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521, 467–475 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hegde, C. et al. Sensing in soft robotics. ACS Nano 17, 15277–15307 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sarker, A., Ul Islam, T. & Islam, M. R. A review on recent trends of bioinspired soft robotics: actuators, control methods, materials selection, sensors, challenges, and future prospects. Adv. Intell. Syst. 7, 2400414 (2025).
Google Scholar
Stella, F., Achkar, M. M., Della Santina, C. & Hughes, J. Synergy-based robotic quadruped leveraging passivity for natural intelligence and behavioural diversity. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 386–399 (2025).
Google Scholar
Shintake, J., Cacucciolo, V., Floreano, D. & Shea, H. Soft robotic grippers. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707035 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ahmed, F. et al. Decade of bio-inspired soft robots: a review. Smart Mater. Struct. 31, 073002 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xavier, M. S. et al. Soft pneumatic actuators: a review of design, fabrication, modeling, sensing, control and applications. IEEE Access 10, 59442–59485 (2022).
Google Scholar
Abondance, S., Teeple, C. B. & Wood, R. J. A dexterous soft robotic hand for delicate in-hand manipulation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5, 5502–5509 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y. et al. Soft mobile robots: a review of soft robotic locomotion modes. Curr. Robot. Rep. 2, 371–397 (2021).
Google Scholar
Su, H. et al. Pneumatic soft robots: challenges and benefits. Actuators 11, 92 (2022).
Guo, Y., Liu, L., Liu, Y. & Leng, J. Review of dielectric elastomer actuators and their applications in soft robots. Adv. Intell. Syst. 3, 2000282 (2021).
Google Scholar
An, X., Cui, Y., Sun, H., Shao, Q. & Zhao, H. Active-cooling-in-the-loop controller design and implementation for an SMA-driven soft robotic tentacle. IEEE Trans. Robot. 39, 2325–2341 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lee, J. E., Sun, Y.-C. & Naguib, H. E. Multifunctional soft actuator hybrids: a review. RSC Appl. Polym. 3, 767–792 (2025).
Google Scholar
Della Santina, C., Duriez, C. & Rus, D. Model-based control of soft robots: a survey of the state of the art and open challenges. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 43, 30–65 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yik, J. et al. The neurobench framework for benchmarking neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems. Nat. Commun. 16, 1545 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lopez-Paz, D. & Ranzato, M. Gradient episodic memory for continual learning. In Proc. 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 6470–6479 (Curran Associates, 2017).
Aguilar, J. et al. A review on locomotion robophysics: the study of movement at the intersection of robotics, soft matter and dynamical systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 110001 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hawkes, E. W., Blumenschein, L. H., Greer, J. D. & Okamura, A. M. A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci. Robot. 2, eaan3028 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pagliarani, N. et al. Towards a bioinspired soft robotic gripper for gentle manipulation of mushrooms. In IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry 170–175 (IEEE, 2023).
Ahn, M. et al. Robel: robotics benchmarks for learning with low-cost robots. In Conference on Robot Learning 1300–1313 (PMLR, 2020).
Geng, H. et al. RoboVerse: towards a unified platform, dataset and benchmark for scalable and generalizable robot learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.18904 (2025).
Yang, B., Zhang, J., Pong, V., Levine, S. & Jayaraman, D. REPLAB: a reproducible low-cost arm benchmark platform for robotic learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.07447 (2019).
Hassan, T., Cianchetti, M., Mazzolai, B., Laschi, C. & Dario, P. Active-braid, a bioinspired continuum manipulator. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2, 2104–2110 (2017).
Google Scholar
Taleb, N. N. Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder (Penguin, 2012).
Axenie, C. et al. Antifragility in complex dynamical systems. npj Complex. 1, 12 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Electronic skin from high-throughput fabrication of intrinsically stretchable lead zirconate titanate elastomer. Research 2020, 1085417 (2020).
Cross, K. P., Cook, D. J. & Scott, S. H. Rapid online corrections for proprioceptive and visual perturbations recruit similar circuits in primary motor cortex. eNeuro 11, https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0083-23.2024 (2024).
Gallego, G. et al. Event-based vision: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 154–180 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, S.-C. & Delbruck, T. Neuromorphic sensory systems. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 288–295 (2010).
Google Scholar
Maroto-Gómez, M. et al. A systematic literature review of decision-making and control systems for autonomous and social robots. Int. J. Social Robot. 15, 745–789 (2023).
Google Scholar
Heeringa, W., Della Santina, C. & Smit, G. Finfix: a soft gripper with contact-reactive reflex for high-speed pick and place of fragile objects. In IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics 1–7 (IEEE, 2023).
Rondoni, C. et al. Navigation benchmarking for autonomous mobile robots in hospital environment. Sci. Rep. 14, 18334 (2024).
Google Scholar
Das, R., Babu, S. P. M., Visentin, F., Palagi, S. & Mazzolai, B. An earthworm-like modular soft robot for locomotion in multi-terrain environments. Sci. Rep. 13, 1571 (2023).
Google Scholar
Thuruthel, T. G., Shih, B., Laschi, C. & Tolley, M. T. Soft robot perception using embedded soft sensors and recurrent neural networks. Sci. Robot. 4, eaav1488 (2019).
Google Scholar
Qu, J. et al. Advanced flexible sensing technologies for soft robots. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2401311 (2024).
Google Scholar
Shih, B. et al. Electronic skins and machine learning for intelligent soft robots. Sci. Robot. 5, eaaz9239 (2020).
Google Scholar
Won, P. et al. Transparent soft actuators/sensors and camouflage skins for imperceptible soft robotics. Adv. Mater. 33, 2002397 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cafiso, D., Lantean, S., Pirri, C. F. & Beccai, L. Soft mechanosensing via 3D printing: a review. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2200373 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tan, Y. J., Mengaldo, G. & Laschi, C. Artificial muscles for underwater soft robots: materials and their interactions. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 15, 45–61 (2024).
Google Scholar
Caasenbrood, B. J., Pogromsky, A. Y. & Nijmeijer, H. Dynamic modeling of hyper-elastic soft robots using spatial curves. IFAC Pap. OnLine 53, 9238–9243 (2020).
Google Scholar
Della Santina, C., Bicchi, A. & Rus, D. On an improved state parametrization for soft robots with piecewise constant curvature and its use in model based control. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5, 1001–1008 (2020).
Google Scholar
Boyer, F., Lebastard, V., Candelier, F. & Renda, F. Dynamics of continuum and soft robots: a strain parameterization based approach. IEEE Trans. Robot. 37, 847–863 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kazemipour, A., Fischer, O., Toshimitsu, Y., Wong, K. W. & Katzschmann, R. K. Adaptive dynamic sliding mode control of soft continuum manipulators. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 3259–3265 (IEEE, 2022).
Chen, Z. et al. Data-driven methods applied to soft robot modeling and control: a review. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 22, 2241–2256 (2024).
Google Scholar
Panzeri, S., Janotte, E., Pequeño-Zurro, A., Bonato, J. & Bartolozzi, C. Constraints on the design of neuromorphic circuits set by the properties of neural population codes. Neuromorph. Comput. Eng. 3, 012001 (2023).
Google Scholar
Indiveri, G. & Liu, S.-C. Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systems. Proc. IEEE 103, 1379–1397 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, G., Markram, H. & Tsodyks, M. Spike frequency adaptation and neocortical rhythms. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 761–770 (2002).
Google Scholar
Peron, S. P. & Gabbiani, F. Role of spike-frequency adaptation in shaping neuronal response to dynamic stimuli. Biol. Cybern. 100, 505–520 (2009).
Google Scholar
Berry II, M. J. & Meister, M. Refractoriness and neural precision. J. Neurosci. 18, 2200–2211 (1998).
Google Scholar
Weistuch, C., Mujica-Parodi, L. R. & Dill, K. The refractory period matters: unifying mechanisms of macroscopic brain waves. Neural Comput. 33, 1145–1163 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ermentrout, B. & Terman, D. H. Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience Vol. 35 (Springer, 2010).
Das, A., Chaffey, T. & Sepulchre, R. Oscillations in mixed-feedback systems. Syst. Control Lett. 166, 105289 (2022).
Google Scholar
Indiveri, G. et al. Neuromorphic silicon neuron circuits. Front. Neurosci. 5, 73 (2011).
Google Scholar
Reyes, A. et al. Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits. Nat. Neurosci.1, 279–285 (1998).
Google Scholar
Chakraborty, N. N., Das, H. & Rose, G. S. A mixed-signal short-term plasticity implementation for a current-controlled memristive synapse. In Proc. Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2023 179–182 (ACM, 2023).
Zucker, R. S. & Regehr, W. G. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64, 355–405 (2002).
Google Scholar
González, J. Distinguishing linear vs. non-linear integration in CA1 radial oblique dendrites: it’s about time. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 5, 44 (2011).
Osswald, M., Ieng, S.-H., Benosman, R. & Indiveri, G. A spiking neural network model of 3D perception for event-based neuromorphic stereo vision systems. Sci. Rep. 7, 40703 (2017).
Google Scholar
Risi, N., Aimar, A., Donati, E., Solinas, S. & Indiveri, G. A spike-based neuromorphic architecture of stereo vision. Front. Neurorobot. 14, 93 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, S. et al. Event-driven proto-object based saliency in 3D space to attract a robot’s attention. Sci. Rep. 12, 7645 (2022).
Google Scholar
D’Angelo, G. et al. Event-based eccentric motion detection exploiting time difference encoding. Front. Neurosci. 14, 451 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mahlknecht, F. et al. Exploring event camera-based odometry for planetary robots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7, 8651–8658 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Donati, E. & Indiveri, G. Neuromorphic implementation of spiking relational neural network for motor control. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems 89–93 https://doi.org/10.1109/AICAS48895.2020.9073829 (IEEE, 2020).
Zhao, J. et al. Closed-loop spiking control on a neuromorphic processor implemented on the iCub. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 10, 546–556 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stagsted, R. et al. Towards neuromorphic control: a spiking neural network based PID controller for UAV. In Robotics: Science and Systems https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2020.XVI.074 (MIT Press, 2020).
Stroobants, S., Dupeyroux, J. & De Croon, G. Design and implementation of a parsimonious neuromorphic PID for onboard altitude control for MAVs using neuromorphic processors. In Proc. International Conference on Neuromorphic Systems 1–7 (ACM, 2022).
Linares-Barranco, A., Perez-Peña, F., Jimenez-Fernandez, A. & Chicca, E. ED-BioRob: a neuromorphic robotic arm with FPGA-based infrastructure for bio-inspired spiking motor controllers. Front. Neurorobot. 14, 590163 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Monforte, M., Indiveri, G., Bartolozzi, C. & Donati, E. Learning inverse kinematics using neural computational primitives on neuromorphic hardware. npj Robot. 1, 1 (2023).
Google Scholar
DeWolf, T. et al. Neuromorphic control of a simulated 7-DOF arm using Loihi. Neuromorph. Comput. Eng. 3, 014007 (2023).
Google Scholar
Stradmann, Y. & Schemmel, J. Closing the loop: high-speed robotics with accelerated neuromorphic hardware. Front. Neurosci. 18, 1360122 (2024).
Google Scholar
Novo, A., Lobon, F., Garcia de Marina, H., Romero, S. & Barranco, F. Neuromorphic perception and navigation for mobile robots: a review. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 1–37 (2024).
Google Scholar
