Slashdot reader rtfa0987 found this on the front page of this article. San Jose Mercury News. “Silicon Valley is poised to cash in on someone else’s product once again, it’s gathering data on an unprecedented scale, and it’s already spawning lawsuits and congressional hearings.
Chatbots and other forms of generative artificial intelligence that have emerged on the tech scene in the last few months have a vast amount of material collected from the internet, including books, scripts, research papers, news articles, photographs, art, music, and code. supplied and produced. User-prompted answers, images, or sounds… but they are cumbersome, controversial, and pose a very serious problem. Most of the bot baits are copyrighted property…
New AI intellectual property issues extend beyond art to include film and television, photography, music, news media, and computer coding. Critics say the tech giants have stepped in between producers and consumers in the commercial marketplace to siphon money and sell TV scripts, artwork, books, movies, music, photography, journalism, and innovative innovations. I am concerned that it will remove the financial incentive to create software. “It could be catastrophic,” said Daniel Coffey, CEO of the News and Media Alliance, which represents about 2,000 US news publishers, including the news agency. “It could destroy our industry.”
Like other Silicon Valley innovations such as internet search, social media, and food delivery, this new technology is quickly gaining ground among consumers and businesses, long before regulators and legislators gather information. It has the potential to stick and become loved by users. Knowledge and political will to impose restrictions and mitigate harm. “We might need a bill,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose), who heard testimony on copyright and generative AI last month as a member of the House Judiciary Committee. “Content creators have rights, and we need to think about how those rights are respected.”
Anger over content theft is on the rise. Photo giant Getty is also suing Stability AI. Hollywood screenwriters went on strike last month, raising fears that movie studios will start using scripts written in chatbots that reference screenwriters’ previous work. The recording industry has filed a complaint with federal authorities alleging that copyrighted music is being used to train AI.
This article contains some unique perspectives.
- There is a technical solution proposed by the software engineer and CEO of Dazzle Labs, a startup building a platform to manage personal data.of mercury news It boils down to, “Content creators can annotate their work with terms of use that must be followed by companies crawling the web for AI material.”
- “We believe the law supports the use of copyrighted material in training generative AI,” said Eric Goldman, professor of law at the University of Santa Clara. It’s built upon.We’re all free to use parts of previous work.What generative AI does is accelerate that process.But it’s the same process.It’s All are part of the evolution of our society’s knowledge storehouse…”
