Nunez-Nieto, X., Solla, M., Gomez-Perez, P. & Lorenzo, H. GPR signal characterization for automated landmine and UXO detection based on machine learning techniques. Remote Sensing. 6(10), 9729–9748 (2014).
Google Scholar
Giovanneschi, F., Mishra, K. V., Gonzalez-Huici, M. A., Eldar, Y. C. & Ender, J. H. G. Dictionary learning for adaptive GPR landmine classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57(12), 10036–10055 (2019).
Google Scholar
Moalla, M., Frigui, H., Karem, A. & Bouzid, A. Application of convolutional and recurrent neural networks for buried threat detection using ground penetrating radar data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 58(10), 7022–7034 (2020).
Google Scholar
Giannakis, I., Giannopoulos, A. & Warren, C. A machine learning scheme for estimating the diameter of reinforcing bars using ground penetrating radar. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 18(3), 461–465 (2021).
Google Scholar
Giannakis, I., Giannopoulos, A. & Warren, C. A machine learning-based fast-forward solver for ground penetrating radar with application to full-waveform inversion. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57(7), 4417–4426 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, H. et al. Detection and localization of rebar in concrete by deep learning using ground penetrating radar. Autom. Constr. 118, 1–12 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lei, W. et al. Underground cylindrical objects detection and diameter identification in GPR B-scans via the CNN-LSTM framework. Electronics 9(11), 1804 (2020).
Google Scholar
El-Mahallawy, M. S. & Hashim, M. Material classification of underground utilities from GPR images using DCT-based SVM approach. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 10(6), 1542–1546 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Huston, D. & Xia, T. Underground object characterization based on neural networks for ground penetrating radar data. SPIE Nondestruct. Charact. Monit. Adv. Mater. Aerosp. Civil Infrastruct. 9804, 10–18 (2016).
Daniel, D. J. System design. In Ground penetrating radar 13–36 (Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1049/PBRA015E_ch2.
Google Scholar
Annan, A. P. Electromagnetic principles of ground penetrating radar. In Ground penetrating radar theory and applications 1–40 (Elsevier, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53348-7.00001-6.
Google Scholar
Liu, T., Su, Y. & Huang, C. Inversion of ground penetrating radar data based on neural networks. Remote Sens. 10(5), 730 (2018).
Google Scholar
Özdemir, C., Demirci, Ş, Yiğit, E. & Yılmaz, B. A review on migration methods in b-scan ground penetrating radar imaging. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 1–16 (2014).
Ozdemir, C., Demirci, Ş, Yigit, E. & Kavak, A. A hyperbolic summation method to focus B-scan ground penetrating radar images: An experimental study with a stepped frequency system. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 49(3), 671–676 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sharma, P., Kumar, B., Singh, D. & Gaba, S. P. Critical analysis of background subtraction techniques on real GPR data. Def. Sci. J. 67(5), 559–571 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pasolli, E., Melgani, F. & Donelli, M. Automatic analysis of GPR images: A pattern-recognition approach. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47(7), 2206–2217 (2009).
Google Scholar
Dou, Q., Wei, L., Magee, D. R. & Cohn, A. G. Real-time hyperbola recognition and fitting in GPR data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55(1), 51–62 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jin, Y. & Duan, Y. Wavelet scattering network-based machine learning for ground penetrating radar imaging: Application in pipeline identification. Remote Sens. 12(21), 3655 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sakaguchi, R. T., Morton, K. D., Collins, L. M. & Torrione, P. A. Recognizing subsurface target responses in ground penetrating radar data using convolutional neural networks. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9454(94541A), 458–467 (2015).
Kumlu, D. & Erer, I. The multiscale directional neighborhood filter and its application to clutter removal in GPR data. SIViP 12(7), 1237–1244 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Ouyang, S., Liu, Q., Liao, K. & Zhou, L. Buried target detection method for ground penetrating radar based on deep learning. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 16(1), 018503 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lei, W. et al. Automatic hyperbola detection and fitting in GPR B-scan image. Autom. Constr. 106, 102839 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ahmadi, R. & Fathianpour, N. Estimating geometrical parameters of cylindrical targets detected by ground-penetrating radar using template matching algorithm. Arab. J. Geosci. 10(6), 140–152 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pasolli, E., Melgani, F. & Donelli, M. Gaussian process approach to buried object size estimation in GPR images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 7(1), 141–145 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ozkaya, U. et al. GPR B scan image analysis with deep learning methods. Measurement 165, 107770 (2020).
Google Scholar
Temlioglu, E. & Erer, I. A novel convolutional autoencoder-based clutter removal method for buried threat detection in Ground-Penetrating Radar. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60(5103313), 1–13 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, J., Xue, W., Rong, X. & Yu, Y. A clutter suppression method based on improved principal component selection rule for ground penetrating radar. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M. 53, 29–39 (2017).
Google Scholar
Shehab, M. A. et al. Subspace clutter removal techniques in GPR images. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M. 82, 139–147 (2019).
Google Scholar
Verma, P. K., Gaikwad, A. N., Singh, D. & Nigam, M. Analysis of clutter reduction techniques for through wall imaging in UWB range. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B 17, 29–48 (2009).
Google Scholar
Temlioglu, E. & Erer, I. Clutter removal in ground-penetrating radar images using morphological component analysis. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 13(12), 1802–1806 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, R. et al. Denoising method of ground-penetrating radar signal based on independent component analysis with multifractal spectrum. Measurement 192, 110886 (2022).
Google Scholar
Smitha, N. & Singh, V. Target detection using supervised machine learning algorithms for GPR Data. Sens. Imaging. 21(1), 11 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yoldemir, B. & Mehmet Sezgin, M. Peak scatter-based buried object identification using GPR-EMI dual sensor system. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 34(4), 339–353 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lu, Q., Pu, J. & Liu, Z. Feature extraction and automatic material classification of underground objects from ground penetrating radar data. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2014, 1–10 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kumar, B. S., Sahoo, A. K. & Maiti, S. Integrated feature investigation and classification methods for discrimination of subsurface objects in GPR imagery. IEEE Sens. J. 24(7), 11003–11013. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3368749 (2024).
Google Scholar
Queiroz, F., Vieira, D. & Travassos, X. Analyzing the relevant features of GPR scattered waves in time-and frequency-domain. Res. Nondestruct. Eval. 24(2), 105–123 (2013).
Google Scholar
Yurt, R. et al. Buried object characterization by data-driven surrogates and regression-enabled hyperbolic signature extraction. Sci. Rep. 13, 5717 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Han, L., Robinson, M. & Gallagher, A. A gans-based deep learning framework for automatic subsurface object recognition from ground penetrating radar data. IEEE Access. 9, 39009–39018 (2021).
Google Scholar
Giannopoulos, A. Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax. Constr. Build. Mater. 19(10), 755–762 (2005).
Google Scholar
Warren, C., Giannopoulos, A. & Giannakis, I. gprMax: Open source software to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation for ground penetrating radar. Comput. Phys. Commun. 209, 163–170 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liu, B. et al. GPRInvNet: Deep learning-based ground- penetrating radar data inversion for tunnel linings. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 59(10), 8305–8325 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. GPRI2Net: A deep-neural-network-based ground penetrating radar data inversion and object identification framework for consecutive and long survey lines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–20 (2022).
Hou, L., Zhang, Q. & Du, Y. Width estimation of hidden cracks in tunnel lining based on time-frequency analysis of GPR data and back propagation neural network optimized by genetic algorithm. Autom. Construct. 162, 105394 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ji, Y. et al. Deep neural network-based permittivity inversions for ground penetrating radar data. IEEE Sens. J. 21(6), 8172–8183 (2021).
Google Scholar
Feng, J., Yang, L., Wang, H. et al. Subsurface pipes detection using DNN-based back projection on GPR data. in 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, HI, USA 266–275 (2021).
Feng, J., Yang, L. & Xiao, J. Subsurface object 3D modeling based on ground penetration radar using deep neural network. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 37(6), 04023030 (2023).
Google Scholar
Feng, J. et al. Robotic inspection of underground utilities for construction survey using a ground penetrating radar. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 37(1), 04022049 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yurt, R., Torpi, H., Mahouti, P., Kızılay, A. & Koziel, S. Buried object characterization using ground penetrating radar assisted by data-driven surrogate-models. IEEE Access 11, 13309–13323 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bourdi, T., Rhazi, J. E., Boone, F. & Ballivy, G. Modelling dielectric-constant values of concrete: An aid to shielding effectiveness prediction and ground-penetrating radar wave technique interpretation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 45(40), 405401 (2012).
Google Scholar
Helton, J. C. & Davis, F. J. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Rel. Eng. Syst. Saf. 81(1), 23–36 (2003).
Google Scholar
Kim, P. MATLAB Deep Learning with Machine Learning (Appress, 2017).
Google Scholar
Allen, J. B. & Rabiner, L. R. A unified approach to short-time Fourier analysis and synthesis. Proc. IEEE 65(11), 1558–1564 (1977).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. Short time Fourier transformation and deep neural networks for motor imagery brain computer interface recognition. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 30(23), e4413 (2018).
Google Scholar
Calik, N., Belen, M. A. & Mahouti, P. Deep learning base modified MLP model for precise scattering parameter prediction of capacitive feed antenna. Int. J. Numer. Model. 33(2), e2682 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y.-P. & Vaidyanathan, P. A Kaiser window approach for the design of prototype filters of cosine modulated filterbanks. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 5(6), 132–134 (1998).
Google Scholar
Ioffe, S. & Szegedy, C. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. in CoRR 1–11 arXiv:1502.03167, (2015).
Hsiao, T.-Y., Chang, Y.-C. & Chiu, C.-T. Filter-based deep-compression with global average pooling for convolutional networks. 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (SiPS) 247–251 (IEEE, 2018).
Barkataki, N., Tiru, B. & Sarma, U. A CNN model for predicting size of buried objects from GPR B-scans. J. Appl. Geophys. 200, 104620 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hosseinzadeh, S. & Shaghaghi, M. GPR data regression and clustering by the fuzzy support vector machine and regression. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M. 93, 175–184 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mahouti, P. Design optimization of a pattern reconfigurable microstrip antenna using differential evolution and 3D EM simulationbased neural network model. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 29(8), e21796 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. P. & Koziel, S. Two-stage framework for efficient Gaussian process modeling of antenna input characteristics. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62(2), 706–713 (2013).
Google Scholar
Melkumyan, A. & Ramos, F. Multi-kernel Gaussian processes. Twenty-second international joint conference on artificial intelligence. (2011).
Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980v9, (2017).
Abuhishmeh, K. & Jalali, H. H. Risk assessment of infrastructure using a modified adaptive neurofuzzy system: Theoretical application to sewer mains. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 15(2), 04024005 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Singh, U. K. & Pradhan, B. Ground penetrating radar in coastal hazard mitigation studies using deep convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 14(19), 4899 (2022).
Google Scholar
Feng, D., Liu, S., Yang, J., Wang, X. & Wang, X. The noise attenuation and stochastic clutter removal of ground penetrating radar based on the K-SVD dictionary learning. IEEE Access 9, 74879–74890 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xue, W., Dai, X., Zhu, J., Luo, Y. & Yang, Y. A noise suppression method of ground penetrating radar based on EEMD and permutation entropy. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 16(10), 1625–1629 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hu, H. et al. A study of automatic recognition and localization of pipeline for ground penetrating radar based on deep learning. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 19, 1–5 (2022).
Turk, A. S. UWB performance analysis of PDTEM horn antenna designed for multi-sensor adaptive hand-held GPR. In 11th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics [ANTEM 2005] 1–4 (2005).
Turk, A. S. Ultra-wideband TEM horn design for ground penetrating impulse radar systems. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 41(5), 333–336 (2004).
Google Scholar
Turk, A. S. et al. Ultra-wide band antenna designs and numerical system modelling for forward-looking GPR. Near Surf. Geophys. 13(3), 261–267 (2015).
Google Scholar
Turk, A. S., Keskin, A. K. & Senturk, M. D. Dielectric loaded TEM horn-fed ridged horn antenna design for ultrawideband ground-penetrating impulse radar. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 23(5), 1479–1488 (2015).
Google Scholar
