Kalinin, S. V. et al. Automated and autonomous experiments in electron and scanning probe microscopy. ACS Nano 15, 12604–12627 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kusne, A. G. et al. On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 5966 (2020).
Google Scholar
Darvish, K. et al. ORGANA: a robotic assistant for automated chemistry experimentation and characterization. Matter 8, 101897 (2025).
Google Scholar
Pyzer-Knapp, E. O. et al. Accelerating materials discovery using artificial intelligence, high performance computing and robotics. Npj Comput. Mater. 8, 84 (2022).
Google Scholar
Abolhasani, M. & Kumacheva, E. The rise of self-driving labs in chemical and materials sciences. Nat. Synth. 2, 483–492 (2023).
Google Scholar
Epps, R. W., Volk, A. A., Ibrahim, M. Y. S. & Abolhasani, M. Universal self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of materials and molecules. Chem 7, 2541–2545 (2021).
Google Scholar
Delgado-Licona, F., Addington, D., Alsaiari, A. & Abolhasani, M. Engineering principles for self-driving laboratories. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2, 277–280 (2025).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Autonomous microfluidic experimentation for exploring reaction inference and synthesizing double perovskite nanoplatelets. Nat. Commun. 17, 4514 (2026).
Google Scholar
Delgado-Licona, F. et al. Flow-driven data intensification to accelerate autonomous inorganic materials discovery. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2, 436–446 (2025).
Google Scholar
Epps, R. W. et al. Artificial chemist: an autonomous quantum dot synthesis bot. Adv. Mater. 32, 2001626 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. et al. Autonomous reaction pareto-front mapping with a self-driving catalysis laboratory. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 240–250 (2024).
Google Scholar
Burger, B. et al. A mobile robotic chemist. Nature 583, 237–241 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gongora, A. E. et al. A Bayesian experimental autonomous researcher for mechanical design. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz1708 (2020).
Google Scholar
Szymanski, N. J. et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials. Nature 624, 86–91 (2023).
Google Scholar
MacLeod, B. P. et al. Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8867 (2020).
Google Scholar
Slattery, A. et al. Automated self-optimization, intensification, and scale-up of photocatalysis in flow. Science 383, eadj1817 (2024).
Google Scholar
Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B. & Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624, 570–578 (2023).
Google Scholar
Steiner, S. et al. Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language. Science 363, eaav2211 (2019).
Google Scholar
Koscher, B. A. et al. Autonomous, multiproperty-driven molecular discovery: From predictions to measurements and back. Science 382, eadi1407 (2023).
Google Scholar
Volk, A. A. et al. AlphaFlow: autonomous discovery and optimization of multi-step chemistry using a self-driven fluidic lab guided by reinforcement learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 1403 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xu, J. et al. Autonomous multi-robot synthesis and optimization of metal halide perovskite nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 16, 7841 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. et al. An autonomous lab for data-driven homogeneous catalysis. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-74425-x (2026).
Canty, R. B. & Abolhasani, M. Reproducibility in automated chemistry laboratories using computer science abstractions. Nat. Synth. 3, 1327–1339 (2024).
Google Scholar
Coley, C. W., Eyke, N. S. & Jensen, K. F. Autonomous discovery in the chemical sciences part I: progress. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 22858–22893 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gromski, P. S., Henson, A. B., Granda, J. M. & Cronin, L. How to explore chemical space using algorithms and automation. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 119–128 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. & Abolhasani, M. Autonomous chemical science and engineering enabled by self-driving laboratories. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 36, 100831 (2022).
Google Scholar
Montoya, J. H. et al. Toward autonomous materials research: recent progress and future challenges. Appl. Phys. Rev. 9, 011405 (2022).
Google Scholar
Seifrid, M. et al. Autonomous chemical experiments: challenges and perspectives on establishing a self-driving lab. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 2454–2466 (2022).
Google Scholar
Christensen, M. et al. Automation isn’t automatic. Chem. Sci. 12, 15473–15490 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gil, D. & Moler, K. A. Accelerating science with AI. Science 390, 965–965 (2025).
Google Scholar
M. J. Kratsios, D. O. Sacks, & M. A. Rubio. America’s AI Action Plan (The White House, 2025).
Torres-Acosta, M. A., Lye, G. J. & Dikicioglu, D. Automated liquid-handling operations for robust, resilient, and efficient bio-based laboratory practices. Biochem. Eng. J. 188, 108713 (2022).
Google Scholar
Harre, M., Tilstam, U. & Weinmann, H. Breaking the new bottleneck: automated synthesis in chemical process research and development. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 3, 304–318 (1999).
Google Scholar
Waltz, D. & Buchanan, B. G. Automating science. Science 324, 43–44 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kim, Y. et al. Self-driving laboratories with artificial intelligence: an overview of process systems engineering perspective. Comput. Chem. Eng. 203, 109266 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tobias, A. V. & Wahab, A. Autonomous ‘self-driving’ laboratories: a review of technology and policy implications. R. Soc. Open. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.250646 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tom, G. et al. Self-driving laboratories for chemistry and materials science. Chem. Rev. 124, 9633–9732 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lindsey, J. S. A retrospective on the automation of laboratory synthetic chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 17, 15–45 (1992).
Google Scholar
Andrew Corkan, L. & Lindsey, J. S. Experiment manager software for an automated chemistry workstation, including a scheduler for parallel experimentation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 17, 47–74 (1992).
Google Scholar
Plouvier, J.-C., Andrew Corkan, L. & Lindsey, J. S. Experiment planner for strategic experimentation with an automated chemistry workstation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 17, 75–94 (1992).
Google Scholar
Andrew Corkan, L., Plouvier, J.-C. & Lindsey, J. S. Application of an automated chemistry workstation to problems in synthetic chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 17, 95–105 (1992).
Google Scholar
King, R. D. et al. The automation of science. Science 324, 85–89 (2009).
Google Scholar
Angello, N. H. et al. Closed-loop optimization of general reaction conditions for heteroaryl suzuki-miyaura coupling. Science 378, 399–405 (2022).
Google Scholar
Orouji, N. et al. Autonomous catalysis research with human–AI–robot collaboration. Nat. Catal. 8, 1135–1145 (2025).
Google Scholar
Langner, S. et al. Beyond ternary OPV: high-throughput experimentation and self-driving laboratories optimize multicomponent systems. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907801 (2020).
Google Scholar
Volk, A. A., Campbell, Z. S., Ibrahim, M. Y. S., Bennett, J. A. & Abolhasani, M. Flow chemistry: a sustainable voyage through the chemical universe en route to smart manufacturing. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 13, 45–72 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mukhin, N., Jha, P. & Abolhasani, M. The role of flow chemistry in self-driving labs. Matter 8, 102205 (2025).
Google Scholar
Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L. & Cronin, L. Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. Nature 559, 377–381 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hou, W. et al. Automatic generation of 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis digitization using ChemSCAD. ACS Cent. Sci. 7, 212–218 (2021).
Google Scholar
Waldron, C. et al. An autonomous microreactor platform for the rapid identification of kinetic models. React. Chem. Eng. 4, 1623–1636 (2019).
Google Scholar
McMullen, J. P. & Jensen, K. F. Rapid determination of reaction kinetics with an automated microfluidic system. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 15, 398–407 (2011).
Google Scholar
Gómez-Bombarelli, R. et al. Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 268–276 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shen, R., Luo, G. & Su, A. Bayesian optimization for chemical synthesis in the era of artificial intelligence: advances and applications. Processes 13, 2687 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Z., Li, X. & Zare, R. N. Optimizing chemical reactions with deep reinforcement learning. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 1337–1344 (2017).
Google Scholar
Snapp, K. L. et al. Superlative mechanical energy absorbing efficiency discovered through self-driving lab-human partnership. Nat. Commun. 15, 4290 (2024).
Google Scholar
Canty, R. B. et al. Science acceleration and accessibility with self-driving labs. Nat. Commun. 16, 3856 (2025).
Google Scholar
Vescovi, R. et al. Towards a modular architecture for science factories. Digit. Discov. 2, 1980–1998 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rauschen, R., Guy, M., Hein, J. E. & Cronin, L. Universal chemical programming language for robotic synthesis repeatability. Nat. Synth. 3, 488–496 (2024).
Google Scholar
Strieth-Kalthoff, F. et al. Delocalized, asynchronous, closed-loop discovery of organic laser emitters. Science 384, eadk9227 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pendleton, I. M. et al. Experiment specification, capture and laboratory automation technology (ESCALATE): a software pipeline for automated chemical experimentation and data management. MRS Commun. 9, 846–859 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bai, J. et al. A dynamic knowledge graph approach to distributed self-driving laboratories. Nat. Commun. 15, 462 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pascazio, L. et al. Chemical species ontology for data integration and knowledge discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 63, 6569–6586 (2023).
Google Scholar
Walsh, D. J. et al. Community resource for innovation in polymer technology (CRIPT): a scalable polymer material data structure. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 330–338 (2023).
Google Scholar
Guevarra, D. et al. Orchestrating nimble experiments across interconnected labs. Digit. Discov. 2, 1806–1812 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sim, M. et al. ChemOS 2.0: An orchestration architecture for chemical self-driving laboratories. Matter https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2024.04.022 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, W. et al. IvoryOS: an interoperable web interface for orchestrating Python-based self-driving laboratories. Nat. Commun. 16, 5182 (2025).
Google Scholar
Scheffler, M. et al. FAIR data enabling new horizons for materials research. Nature 604, 635–642 (2022).
Google Scholar
Adesiji, A. D., Wang, J., Kuo, C.-S. & Brown, K. A. Benchmarking self-driving labs. Digit. Discov. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DD00337G (2026).
Google Scholar
Volk, A. A. & Abolhasani, M. Performance metrics to unleash the power of self-driving labs in chemistry and materials science. Nat. Commun. 15, 1378 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kopetz, H. & Steiner, W. in Real-Time Systems: Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications (eds Kopetz, H. & Steiner, W.) 325–341 (Springer, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11992-7_13.
Soori, M., Arezoo, B. & Dastres, R. Internet of things for smart factories in industry 4.0, a review. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 3, 192–204 (2023).
Google Scholar
Remote controlled life sciences lab. Emerald Cloud Lab https://www.emeraldcloudlab.com/ (2026).
Hogan, A. The semantic web: two decades on. Semantic Web 11, 169–185 (2020).
Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T. & Hall, W. The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 96–101 (2006).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Self-driving AMADAP laboratory: accelerating the discovery and optimization of emerging perovskite photovoltaics. MRS Bull. 49, 1284–1294 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ruan, Y. et al. An automatic end-to-end chemical synthesis development platform powered by large language models. Nat. Commun. 15, 10160 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mahmud, S., Kutlu, M. & Alan, A. T. Optimizing multi-agent system swarm performance through explainable AI. In 2025 11th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMRE64970.2025.10976319 (IEEE, 2025).
Tian, F. et al. An outlook on the opportunities and challenges of multi-agent AI systems. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18397 (2025).
Ghafarollahi, A. & Buehler, M. J. SciAgents: automating scientific discovery through bioinspired multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning. Adv. Mater. 37, 2413523 (2025).
Google Scholar
Song, T. et al. A multiagent-driven robotic AI chemist enabling autonomous chemical research on demand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 12534–12545 (2025).
Google Scholar
Darvish, K. et al. MATTERIX: toward a digital twin for robotics-assisted chemistry laboratory automation. Nat. Comput. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-025-00924-4 (2025).
Google Scholar
Juchli, D. in Smart Biolabs of the Future (eds Beutel, S. & Lenk, F.) 147–174; https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2022_204 (Springer, 2022).
Hannelius, T., Salmenpera, M. & Kuikka, S. Roadmap to adopting OPC UA. In 2008 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics 756–761 (IEEE, 2008); https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2008.4618203.
Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation. Standards. IVI Foundation https://ivifoundation.org/About-IVI/default.html (2001).
H. M. N. H. Irving, H. Freiser, & T. S. West. Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature (Pergamon, 1978).
xdl 2.0.1.dev12+g8fdf586b documentation. XDL Documentation https://croningroup.gitlab.io/chemputer/xdl/ (2022).
Autoprotocol. Autoprotocol.org http://autoprotocol.org/ (2023).
Kearnes, S. M. et al. The open reaction database. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 18820–18826 (2021).
Google Scholar
Deng, J. et al. ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. 2009 IEEE Conf. Computer Vis. Pattern Recognit. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wang, A. et al. GLUE: a multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07461 (2019).
Oates, P. M. & Harvey, C. F. A colorimetric reaction to quantify fluid mixing. Exp. Fluids 41, 673–683 (2006).
Google Scholar
Plutschack, M. B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K. & Seeberger, P. H. The hitchhiker’s guide to flow chemistry. Chem. Rev. 117, 11796–11893 (2017).
Google Scholar
Holland, I. & Davies, J. A. Automation in the life science research laboratory. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 571777 (2020).
Google Scholar
Autor, D. H. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econ. Perspect. 29, 3–30 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. Artificial intelligence (AI): multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 57, 101994 (2021).
Eshraghian, F., Hafezieh, N., Farivar, F. & de Cesare, S. AI in software programming: understanding emotional responses to GitHub Copilot. Inf. Technol. People 38, 1659–1685 (2024).
Google Scholar
Goethals, F. & Ziegelmayer, J. L. Anxiety buffers and the threat of extreme automation: a terror management theory perspective. Inf. Technol. People 35, 96–118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hung, L. et al. Autonomous laboratories for accelerated materials discovery: a community survey and practical insights. Digit. Discov. 3, 1273–1279 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gaidimas, M. A. et al. Computer vision for high-throughput materials synthesis: a tutorial for experimentalists. Digit. Discov. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DD00384A (2026).
Google Scholar
Sadeghi, S. et al. Engineering a sustainable future: harnessing automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence with self-driving laboratories. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12, 12695–12707 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nikolaev, P. et al. Autonomy in materials research: a case study in carbon nanotube growth. Npj Comput. Mater. 2, 1–6 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Autonomous discovery of optically active chiral inorganic perovskite nanocrystals through an intelligent cloud lab. Nat. Commun. 11, 2046 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wagner, J. et al. The evolution of materials acceleration platforms: toward the laboratory of the future with AMANDA. J. Mater. Sci. 56, 16422–16446 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nambiar, A. M. K. et al. Bayesian optimization of computer-proposed multistep synthetic routes on an automated robotic flow platform. ACS Cent. Sci. 8, 825–836 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vogler, M. et al. Autonomous battery optimization by deploying distributed experiments and simulations. Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2403263 (2024).
Google Scholar
Brocklehurst, C. E. et al. MicroCycle: an integrated and automated platform to accelerate drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 67, 2118–2128 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zaki, M., Prinz, C. & Ruehle, B. A self-driving lab for nano- and advanced materials synthesis. ACS Nano 19, 9029–9041 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hamilton company. Anal. Chem. 47, 1044A–1044A (1975).
Rocha, C., Dias, J., Moreira, A. P., Veiga, G. & Costa, P. A kinesthetic teaching approach for automating micropipetting repetitive tasks. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 118, 651–663 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ruzicka, J. & Hansen, E. H. Flow injection analysis with intermittent flow. Patent no. US4315754A (1982).
HAMILTON. Anal. Chem. 55, 537A (1983).
About. Laboratory Robotics Interest Group (LRIG) https://www.lrig.org/home/about.
ISLAR’98 Sixteenth Annual International Symposium on Laboratory Automation and Robotics Held in Boston. J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 3, 90–91 (1998).
Hallock, N. Creative combustion: a history of the association for laboratory automation. SLAS Technol. 10, 423–431 (2005).
Thurow, K. & Junginger, S. in Devices and Systems for Laboratory Automation 1–39 (John Wiley and Sons, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527829446.ch1.
Hahn, H. Introduction to automated chemistry analyzers — FS3700. OI Analytical Webinars (2020); https://www.xylem.com/siteassets/brand/oi-analytical/resources/presentations/oia-presentation-automated-chemistry-analyzers-training-fs3700.pdf.
The history of automated liquid handling. LabAutopedia https://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc/labautopedia-history-of-automated-liquid-handling.html (2009).
Shimizu, Y. Capacitive liquid level sensor for automatic chemical analyzer. Patent US4818492A (1989).
From innovation to repetition — a history of pipetting. Singer Instruments https://www.singerinstruments.com/resource/from-innovation-to-repetition-a-history-of-pipetting/ (2026).
Beugelsdijk, T. J. Association for Laboratory Automation. Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/19961227031521/http:/labautomation.org/ (1996).
Bär, H., Hochstrasser, R. & Papenfuß, B. SiLA: basic standards for rapid integration in laboratory automation. SLAS Technol. 17, 86–95 (2012).
Google Scholar
Unified Architecture — Landingpage. OPC Foundation https://opcfoundation.org/about/opc-technologies/opc-ua/ (2026).
Crook, M. ALA &SBS: two towers of excellence to become one. JALA J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 15, 9–9 (2010).
Google Scholar
SiLA2. GitLab https://gitlab.com/SiLA2?sort=created_desc (2024).
Bahr, M. N., Morris, M. A., Tu, N. P. & Nandkeolyar, A. Recent advances in high-throughput automated powder dispensing platforms for pharmaceutical applications. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 24, 2752–2761 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bahr, M. N. et al. Collaborative evaluation of commercially available automated powder dispensing platforms for high-throughput experimentation in pharmaceutical applications. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 22, 1500–1508 (2018).
Google Scholar
Winicov, H. et al. Chemical process optimization by computer — a self-directed chemical synthesis system. Anal. Chim. Acta 103, 469–476 (1978).
Google Scholar
Di Bella, C. W. & Stevens, W. F. Process optimization by nonlinear programming. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 4, 16–20 (1965).
Google Scholar
Morgan, S. L. & Deming, S. N. Simplex optimization of analytical chemical methods. Anal. Chem. 46, 1170–1181 (1974).
Google Scholar
Berridge, J. C. Unattended optimisation of reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separations using the modified simplex algorithm. J. Chromatogr. A 244, 1–14 (1982).
Google Scholar
Lindsey, J. S., Corkan, L. A., Erb, D. & Powers, G. J. Robotic work station for microscale synthetic chemistry: on-line absorption spectroscopy, quantitative automated thin-layer chromatography, and multiple reactions in parallel. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 940–950 (1988).
Google Scholar
Kleeman, W. P. & Bailey, L. C. Simplex optimization of the blue tetrazolium assay procedure for α-ketol steroids. J. Pharm. Sci. 74, 655–659 (1985).
Google Scholar
Reiko, M., Mumio, I. & Mitsuru, U. Simplex optimization of reaction condition using laboratory robotic system. 藥學雜誌 107, 683–689 (1987).
Isenhour, T. L. Robotics in the laboratory. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25, 292–295 (1985).
Google Scholar
Hoskins, J. C. & Himmelblau, D. M. Artificial neural network models of knowledge representation in chemical engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 12, 881–890 (1988).
Google Scholar
Jan M. Zytkow, J. Z. Automated Discovery in a Chemistry Laboratory. In AAAI’90 Proc. 8th National conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2, 889–894 (AAAI, 1990); https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1865609.1865633.
Sasaki, M. A fully automated clinical laboratory: the history of the systemic and robotic automated clinical laboratory at the kochi medical school. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 21, 159–168 (1993).
Google Scholar
Lindsey, J. S. & Dixon, J. M. Performance of search algorithms in the examination of chemical reaction spaces with an automated chemistry workstation. JALA J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 9, 364–374 (2004).
Google Scholar
Krishnadasan, S., Brown, R. J. C., deMello, A. J. & deMello, J. C. Intelligent routes to the controlled synthesis of nanoparticles. Lab. Chip 7, 1434–1441 (2007).
Google Scholar
Segal, M. An operating system for the biology lab. Nature 573, S112–S113 (2019).
Google Scholar
Strateos. Strateos Company Fact Sheet https://go.strateos.com/hubfs/Website%20URLs/Media%20Kit/Strateos_CompanyFactSheet_Oct2021%20V2.pdf (2021).
Williams, K. et al. Cheaper faster drug development validated by the repositioning of drugs against neglected tropical diseases. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141289 (2015).
Google Scholar
Walter, H., Basset, G., Beierlein, T., Von Mühlenen, A. & Nisato, G. Combinatorial approach for fast screening of functional materials. J. Polym. Sci. Part. B Polym. Phys. 48, 1587–1593 (2010).
Google Scholar
Trobe, M. & Burke, M. D. The molecular industrial revolution: automated synthesis of small molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 4192–4214 (2018).
Google Scholar
Prabhu, G. R. D. & Urban, P. L. The dawn of unmanned analytical laboratories. TrAC. Trends Anal. Chem. 88, 41–52 (2017).
Google Scholar
Deneault, J. R. et al. Toward autonomous additive manufacturing: Bayesian optimization on a 3D printer. MRS Bull. 46, 566–575 (2021).
Google Scholar
Elder, S. et al. Cross-platform bayesian optimization system for autonomous biological assay development. SLAS Technol. 26, 579–590 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rooney, M. B. et al. A self-driving laboratory designed to accelerate the discovery of adhesive materials. Digit. Discov. 1, 382–389 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kanda, G. N. et al. Robotic search for optimal cell culture in regenerative medicine. eLife 11, e77007 (2022).
Google Scholar
MacLeod, B. P. et al. A self-driving laboratory advances the Pareto front for material properties. Nat. Commun. 13, 995 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ha, T. et al. AI-driven robotic chemist for autonomous synthesis of organic molecules. Sci. Adv. 9, eadj0461 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lunt, A. M. et al. Modular, multi-robot integration of laboratories: an autonomous workflow for solid-state chemistry. Chem. Sci. 15, 2456–2463 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rapp, J. T., Bremer, B. J. & Romero, P. A. Self-driving laboratories to autonomously navigate the protein fitness landscape. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 97–107 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vogler, M. et al. Brokering between tenants for an international materials acceleration platform. Matter 6, 2647–2665 (2023).
Google Scholar
Toong, H. D. & Gupta, A. Personal computers. Sci. Am. 247, 86–107 (1982).
Google Scholar
Joque, J. The invention of the object: object orientation and the philosophical development of programming languages. Philos. Technol. 29, 335–356 (2016).
Google Scholar
Makino, H. Development of the SCARA. J. Robot. Mechatron. 26, 5–8 (2014).
Google Scholar
O’Regan, G. A Brief History of Computing (ed. O’Regan, G.) 143–154 (Springer, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66599-9_13.
Introduction to the IETF. IETF https://www.ietf.org/about/introduction/ (2014).
Kogatam, S. The birth, evolution and future of microprocessor. Academia https://www.academia.edu/91702498/The_Birth_Evolution_and_Future_of_Microprocessor (2014).
Pahlavan, K. & Krishnamurthy, P. Evolution and impact of Wi-Fi technology and applications: a historical perspective. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 28, 3–19 (2021).
Google Scholar
Specification Downloads. IVI Foundation https://ivifoundation.org/specifications/default.html (2001).
Colgate, J. E., Wannasuphoprasit, W. & Peshkin, M. A. in ASME 1996 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 433–439 (ASME, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE1996-0367.
Voelz, V. A., Pande, V. S. & Bowman, G. R. Folding@home: achievements from over 20 years of citizen science herald the exascale era. Biophys. J. 122, 2852–2863 (2023).
Google Scholar
Collobert, R. Bengio, S. & Mariéthoz, J. Torch: A Modular Machine Learning Software Library https://infoscience.epfl.ch/bitstreams/7513f344-91b6-427d-a020-7836b150a150/download (2002).
Gutiérrez, J. A. On the Use of IEEE Std. 802.15.4 to enable wireless sensor networks in building automation. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 14, 295–301 (2007).
Google Scholar
Goldsborough, P. A tour of TensorFlow. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01178 (2016).
Ketkar, N. in Deep Learning with Python: A Hands-on Introduction (ed. Ketkar, N.) 97–111 (Apress, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2766-4_7.
Jia, Y. et al. Caffe: convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In Proc. 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia 675–678 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2014); https://doi.org/10.1145/2647868.2654889.
onnx/onnx. Open Neural Network Exchange (GitHub, 2026); https://github.com/onnx/onnx.
Unwala, I., Taqvi, Z. & Lu, J. Thread: An IoT protocol. In 2018 IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech); https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenTech.2018.00037 (IEEE, 2018).
Armoni, M. Tensor Processing Units (TPU): A Technical Analysis and Their Impact on Artificial Intelligence https://tech4future.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Tensor-Processing-Units-TPU-Paper-ENG.pdf (2024).
