Shakhatreh, H. et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): A survey on civil applications and key research challenges. IEEE Access 7, 48572–48634 (2019).
Motlagh, A. M., Taleb, T., Afolabi, I. & Akgol, O. Optimization approaches for civil applications of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or aerial drones: A survey. Comput. Oper. Res. 132, 105343 (2021).
Greenwood, W. W., Lynch, J. P. & Zekkos, D. Applications of UAVs in civil infrastructure. J. Infrastruct. Syst. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000464 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nowatzki J., Unmanned aircraft system (UAS) technology and applications in agriculture, Handbook of Farm, Dairy and Food Machinery Engineering (3rd Edition), 149-156, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814803-7.00007-5 (2019).
Kellermann, R., Biehle, T. & Fischer, L. Drones for parcel and passenger transportation: A literature review. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2, 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100088 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yaacoub, J. A., Noura, H., Salman, O. & Chebab, A. Security analysis of drones systems: Attacks, limitations, and recommendations. Internet of Things 11(2542–6605), 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100218 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z. & Jiang, Y. Design and implementation for a UAV-based streaming media system. Ad Hoc Netw. 156, 103443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103443 (2024).
Google Scholar
Azarhava, H., Abdollahi, M. P. & Musevi, Niya J. Placement and Power Assignment for Hierarchical UAV Networks Under Hovering Fluctuations in mmWave Communications. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.70002 (2024).
Zhao, Y., Zhang, K., Ling, Ch., Guo, J. & Sun, B. A novel method combining strata movement and UAV infrared remote sensing technology to evaluate mining ground damage. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-024-00737-2 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. A sharding blockchain-based UAV system for search and rescue missions. Front. Comp. Sci. 19, 193805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-3467-8 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Weakly supervised dual-mask marginal segmentation and variable path planning method for bean weed based on UAV remote sensing. Comput. Electron. Agric. 230, 109786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109786 (2025).
Google Scholar
Santos B., Gavinhos P., Almeida P.G., Nery D., Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Transport Pavement Inspection. In: Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Xue, J., Indraratna, B. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics (ICTG) 2024, Volume 1. ICTG 2024. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 402. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8213-0_1
Su, J., Zhu, X., Li, S. & Chen, W.-H. AI meets UAVs: A survey on AI empowered UAV perception systems for precision agriculture. Neurocomputing 518, 7369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.11.020 (2023).
Google Scholar
Khan, M. A., Menouar, H., Eldeeb, A., Abu-Dayya, A. & Salim, F. D. On the detection of unauthorized drones – techniques and future perspectives: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 22(12), 11439–11455. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3171293 (2022).
Google Scholar
Palossi, D. et al. Fully onboard AI-powered human-drone pose estimation on ultralow-power autonomous flying nano-UAVs. IEEE Internet Things J. 9(3), 1913–1929. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3091643 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tepylo, N., Straubinger, A. & Laliberte, J. Public perception of advanced aviation technologies: A review and roadmap to acceptance. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 138, 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100899 (2023).
Google Scholar
Czyż Z., Jakubczak P., Podolak P., Skiba K., Karpiński P., Droździel-Jurkiewicz M., Wendeker M., Deformation measurement system for UAV components to improve their safe operation. 25(4), https://doi.org/10.17531/ein/172358 (2023).
Puchalski, R. & Giernacki, W. UAV Fault Detection Methods. State-of-the-Art, Drones 6(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6110330 (2022).
Nan F., Sun S., Foehn P., Scaramuzza D., Nonlinear MPC for Quadrotor Fault-Tolerant Control. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 7(2), 5047-5054, https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3154033.
Asadi, D., Ahmadi, K. & Nabavi, S. Y. Fault-tolerant trajectory tracking control of a quadcopter in presence of a motor fault. Int. J. Aeronaut. Sp. Sci. 23(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00412-9 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lone A., Zhu Q., Nemati H., Mercorelli P., Dynamic Inversion-Enhanced U-Control of Quadrotor Trajectory Tracking, Drones, 8(10), 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8100599.
Kerle N., Nex F., Gerke M., Duarte D., Vetrivel A., UAV-based structural damage mapping: A review, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol.9(1), 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9010014
Hassani, S. & Dackermann, U. A systematic review of advanced sensor technologies for non-destructive testing and structural health monitoring. Sensors 23(4), 2204. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042204 (2023).
Google Scholar
Al-Haddad, L. A., Jaber, A. A., Al-Haddad, S. A. & Al-Muslim, Y. M. Fault diagnosis of actuator damage in UAVs using embedded recorded data and stacked machine learning models. J. Supercomput. 80(3), 3005–3024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05584-7 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lee J.-Y., Lee W.-T., Ko S.-H., Oh H., Fault Classification and Diagnosis of UAV motor Based on Estimated Nonlinear Parameter of Steady-State Model, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 10(1), 22–31, 2021, https://doi.org/10.18178/IJMERR.10.1.22-31
Schmidt, D. K. Stability augmentation and active flutter suppression of a flexible flying-wing drone. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 39(3), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001484 (2016).
Google Scholar
Okasha M., Kralev J., Islam M., Design and Experimental Comparison of PID, LQR and MPC Stabilizing Controllers for Parrot Mambo Mini-Drone, Aerospace, 9(6), https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9060298.
Hedjar, R. & Al Zuair, M. A. Robust altitude stabilization of VTOL-UAV for payloads delivery. IEEE Access 7, 73583–73592. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919701 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhu, H. J., Meng, X. G. & Sun, M. Forward flight stability in a drone-fly. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58762-5 (1975).
Google Scholar
Rohi, G., Ejofodomi, O. & Ofualagba, G. Autonomous monitoring, analysis, and countering of air pollution using environmental drones. Heliyon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03252 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mac, T. T., Copot, C., Keyser, R. & Ionescu, C. M. The development of an autonomous navigation system with optimal control of an UAV in partly unknown indoor environment. Mechatronics 49, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.11.014 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Zhao, Z., Wang, Z. & Wang, X. Fault detection and identification method for quadcopter based on airframe vibration signals. Sensors 21(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020581 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ghazali, M. H. M. & Rahiman, W. Vibration-based fault detection in drone using artificial intelligence. IEEE Sensors J. 22(9), 8439–8448. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3163401 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ge, Ch., Dunno, K., Singh, M. A., Yuan, L. & Lu, L. Development of a drone’s vibration, shock, and atmospheric profiles. Appl. Sci. 11(11), 5176. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115176 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rao, M. E., Simon, J., Moll, J. & Schutz, M.-F. Real-time onboard propeller fault diagnosis of autonomous delivery drones through vibration analysis. Struct. Health Monit. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217251327224 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bondyra, A., Kołodziejczak, M., Kulikowski, R. & Giernacki, W. An acoustic fault detection and isolation system for multirotor UAV. Energies 15, 3955. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15113955 (2022).
Google Scholar
Puchalski, R., Ha, Q., Giernacki, W., Nguyen, A. H. D. & Nguyen, L. V. Padre—A repository for research on fault detection and isolation of unmanned aerial vehicle propellers. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 110, 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-024-02101-7 (2024).
Google Scholar
Al-Haddad, L. A. et al. UAV propeller fault diagnosis using deep learning of non-traditional \(\chi ^2\)-selected Taguchi method-tested Lempel-Ziv complexity and Teager-Kaiser energy features. Sci. Rep. 14, 18599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69462-9 (2024).
Google Scholar
Łępicka, M., Górski, G., Grądzka-Dahlke, M., Litak, G. & Ambrożkiewicz, B. Analysis of tribological behaviour of titanium nitride-coated stainless steel with the use of wavelet-based methods. Arch. Appl. Mech. 91(11), 4475–4483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-021-02016-x (2021).
Google Scholar
Syta, A., Czarnigowski, J., Jakliński, P. & Marwan, N. Detection and identification of cylinder misfire in small aircraft engine in different operating conditions by linear and non-linear properties of frequency components. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confederat. 223, 113763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113763 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ambrożkiewicz, B. et al. The influence of the radial internal clearance on the dynamic response of self-aligning ball bearings. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 171, 180954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108954 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jedliński, Ł, Syta, A., Gajewski, J. & Jonak, J. Nonlinear analysis of cylindrical gear dynamics under varying tooth breakage. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confederat. 190, 110721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110721 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ambroziak, L., Ołdziej, D. & Koszewnik, A. Multirotor Motor Failure Detection with Piezo Sensor. Sensors 23(2), 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23021048 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, G. et al. Fault diagnosis of drone motors driven by current signal data with few samples. Meas. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad3d00 (2024).
Google Scholar
de Jesus Rangel-Magdaleno, J.; Ureña-Ureña, J.; Hernández, A.; Perez-Rubio, C., Detection of unbalanced blade on UAV by means of audio signal. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC), Ixtapa, Mexico, 7–9 November 2018; pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/ROPEC.2018.8661459
Jaber, A. A. & Al-Haddad, L. A. Integration of discrete wavelet and fast fourier transforms for quadcopter fault diagnosis. Exp. Techniq. 48(5), 865–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-024-00702-3 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Mustapha, F., Ishak, M. R., Rahim, S. A. & Mustapha, M. Data-driven methods for damage detection and identification of UAV: A review. J. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Aviat. 54(4), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.6125/JoAAA.20221254(4).04 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rodruguez, M. A., Melgar, S. G., Cordero, A. S. & Marques, J. M. A. A critical review of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) use in architecture and urbanism: Scientometric and bibliometric analysis. Appl. Sci. 11(21), 9966 (2021).
Kerle, N., Nex, F., Gerke, M., Duarte, D. & Vetrivel, A. UAV-based structural damage mapping: A review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inform. 9(1), 14 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sun, S., Cioffi, G., De Visser, C. & Scaramuzza, D. Autonomous quadrotor flight despite rotor failure with onboard vision sensors: Frames vs. events. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6(2), 580–587 (2021).
Medeiros, R. L., Lima Filho, A. C., Ramos, J. G., Nascimento, T. P. & Brito, A. V. A novel approach for speed and failure detection in brushless DC motors based on chaos. IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. 66(11), 8751–8759 (2018).
Ahmad, F., Bhandari, A., Kumar, P. & Patil, P. P. Modeling and mechanical vibration characteristics analysis of a quadcopter propeller using FEA. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 577(1), 012022 (2019).
Ambrożkiewicz, B. et al. Diagnostics of unmanned aerial vehicle with recurrence based approach of piezo-element voltage signals. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68197-x (2024).
Google Scholar
Koszewnik, A. et al. Nonlinear recurrence analysis of piezo sensor placement for unmanned aerial vehicle motor failure diagnosis. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58606-6 (2024).
Google Scholar
Konieczny, J., Łatas, W. & Stojek, J. Application of analysis of variance to determine important features of signals for diagnostic classifiers of displacement pumps. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56498-0 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jegadeeshwaran, R. & Sugumaran, V. Fault diagnosis of automobile hydraulic brake system using statistical features and support vector machines. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 52–53(1), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.08.007 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ding, M., Bressler, S. L., Yang, W. & Liang, H. Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: Data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biol. Cybern. 83(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004229900137 (2000).
Google Scholar
Furman, Ł, Duch, W., Minati, L. & Tołpa, K. Short-time Fourier transform and embedding method for recurrence quantification analysis of EEG time series. Eur. Phys. J. Special Top. 232(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00683-7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Samanta, B. & Al-Balushi, K. R. Artificial neural network based fault diagnostics of rolling element bearings using time-domain features. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 17(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2001.1462 (2003).
Google Scholar
Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D. & Banjevic, D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 20(7), 1483–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012 (2006).
Google Scholar
Jan, S. U., Lee, Y.-D., Shin, J. & Koo, I. Sensor fault classification based on support vector machine and statistical time-domain features. IEEE Access 5, 8682–8690. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2705644 (2017).
Google Scholar
William, P. E. & Hoffman, M. W. Identification of bearing faults using time domain zero-crossings. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25(8), 3078–3088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.001 (2011).
Google Scholar
Buckley, T., Ghosh, B. & Pakrashi, V. A feature extraction and selection benchmark for structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 22(3), 2082–2127. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217221111141 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Dong, J. & Lee, W.-N. Fourier energy spectrum centroid: A robust and efficient approach for shear wave speed estimation in \(\omega\)-k space. Phys. Med. Biol. 70(2), 025023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ada686 (2025).
Google Scholar
Riaz, F., Hassan, A., Rehman, S., Niazi, I. K. & Dremstrup, K. EMD-based temporal and spectral features for the classification of EEG signals using supervised learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 24(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2441835 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kolbe, S., Gelman, L. & Ball, A. Novel prediction of diagnosis effectiveness for adaptation of the spectral kurtosis technology to varying operating conditions. Sensors 21(20), 6913. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21206913 (2021).
Google Scholar
Manor E., Martens W.L., Prediction of virtual sound source elevation improved by including input source spectral shape in the prediction equation, INTERNOISE 2014 – 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control, 110401, (2014).
Kos, M., Kačič, Z. & Vlaj, D. Acoustic classification and segmentation using modified spectral roll-off and variance-based features. Digit. Signal Process. Rev. J. 23(2), 659–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2012.10.008 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sha’abani, M. N. A. H., Fuad, N., Jamal, N. & Ismail, M. F. kNN and SVM Classification for EEG: A Review. Lecture Notes Electr. Eng. 632, 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2317-547 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lopez-Bernal, D., Balderas, D., Ponce, P. & Molina, A. Education 4.0: Teaching the basics of knn, lda and simple perceptron algorithms for binary classification problems. Future Internet 13(8), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13080193 (2021).
Google Scholar
Criminisi, A., Shotton, J. & Konukoglu, E. Decision forests: A unified framework for classification, regression, density estimation, manifold learning and semi-supervised learning. Foundat. Trends Comput. Graphics Vision 7(2–3), 81–227. https://doi.org/10.1561/0600000035 (2011).
Google Scholar
Imam, I. F. & Michalski, R. S. Learning decision trees from decision rules: A method and initial results from a comparative study. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 2(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00962072 (1993).
Google Scholar
Kavzoglu, T. & Teke, A. Predictive performances of ensemble machine learning algorithms in landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and natural gradient boosting (NGBoost). Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 47(6), 7367–7385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-06560-8 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hu, J. & Szymczak, S. A review on longitudinal data analysis with random forest. Brief. Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad002 (2023).
Google Scholar
Karpiński, R. et al. Diagnostics of articular cartilage damage based on generated acoustic signals using ANN\(-\)Part II: Patellofemoral joint. Sensors https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103765 (2022).
Google Scholar
Deepika, D. & Balaji, N. Effective heart disease prediction with Grey-wolf with Firefly algorithm-differential evolution (GF-DE) for feature selection and weighted ANN classification. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 25(12), 1409–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2022.2078966 (2022).
Google Scholar
Borges, J., Bastos, F., Correa, I., Batista, P. & Klautau, A. CAVIAR: Co-simulation of 6G communications, 3-D scenarios, and AI for digital twins. IEEE Internet Things J. 11(19), 31287–31300. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3418675 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, K.-Y. et al. An automated machine learning framework in unmanned aircraft systems: New insights into agricultural management practices recognition approaches. Remote Sensing 13(16), 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163190 (2021).
Google Scholar
