science and technology
However, journals allow texts produced using large-scale language models as long as their usage is documented.
One of the oldest and most read scientific journals in the world, Naturestrongly refused to publish any images, illustrations or videos created in any way using generative artificial intelligence.
In a statement issued on June 7, Nature‘s editorial board said it came to this decision after months of research, arguing that generative AI challenges fundamental scientific integrity issues such as transparency, verification and attribution. Consent, privacy and copyright infringement were also cited as major factors.
“The publishing process, as far as both science and art are concerned, is underpinned by a shared commitment to integrity.” Nature wrote in a statement. “As researchers, editors and publishers, we all need to know the sources of our data and images and be able to verify that they are accurate and true. We have not provided access to the source for such verification.”
From now on, I will receive requests from photographers, artists, and filmmakers, Nature Journals specifically allow such images in articles related to AI.
A startling confession natural A decision to allow authors to include text created using large language models such as ChatGPT. Any such use should be documented in the methodology or acknowledgments section of the paper. Authors must also provide the source of all data generated through AI prompts. It’s not always straightforward because of the known large language models to create the source. Finally, large language models are accepted as authors.
The 153-year-old publication’s decision follows thousands of scientific journals’ decision in January to ban the use of large-scale language models, most explicitly ChatGPT, in their published papers. is somewhat in contrast toThe move was led by the journal chemistry, springer natureand Elsevier The main reason is that large language models cannot sign the liability forms required of authors, and their errors can permeate the literature.
However, the ban reflects the latest demand for publishers to limit their use of AI-generated images. In May, thousands of journalists and artists signed an open letter launched by artist and activist Molly Crabapple and the Center for Investigative Reporting on the Arts, urging the news editorial office to seek human rather than “vampire-like” AI image generators. selected illustrators and demanded that they remain true to the founding principles of journalism. .
Nature In his statement, he tapped into this sense of change, acknowledging that while the technology holds great promise, it is also upending long-established conventions in science, art, and publishing. “These practices, in some cases, took centuries to develop.” Naturewritten by the editor of “All of these achievements are in danger of collapsing if AI is not handled with care.”
Other trending articles:
London’s National Portrait Gallery refutes rumors Kate Middleton pressured Prince William and Prince Harry to remove portraits
French archaeologist blames loss of 7,000-year-old standing stone at site ‘destroyed’ to build home improvement store
Excavations at an ancient Roman fort in Spain have uncovered a 2,000-year-old rock carved with a human face and phallus.
Looking for an art tour in New York this summer? Here are four perfect itineraries that combine nature and culture
Art buyers stop in Zurich on their way to Art Basel to discover a dizzying array of exhibitions and a market in transition: it’s now the buyer’s game
Researchers find megalodon tooth necklace in wreckage of Titanic – but this rare object will probably have to stay on the ocean floor
Archaeologists in Peru use AI to discover ancient land-carved geoglyphs of killer whales, two-headed snakes and other creatures
Is time travel real? Here are 6 intriguing evidence from art history
Nicholas Party Celebrates Rosalva Cagliera, Queen of Rococo Pastel, in New Flick Installation
Follow Artnet News on Facebook:
Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest conversation-forward news, eye-popping interviews, and incisive critical views.
