Fusco, M. R. & Ogilvy, C. S. Surgical and endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms. Int. Anesthesiol Clin. 53, 146–165 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wiebers, D. O. et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 362, 103–110 (2003).
Google Scholar
Gabriel, R. A. et al. Ten-year detection rate of brain arteriovenous malformations in a large, multiethnic, defined population. Stroke 41, 21–26 (2010).
Google Scholar
Vlak, M. H., Algra, A., Brandenburg, R. & Rinkel, G. J. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 10, 626–636 (2011).
Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J. K., Benet, A. & Lawton, M. T. Management of small incidental intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 28, 389–396 (2017).
Google Scholar
International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms–risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl. J. Med. 339, 1725–1733 (1998).
Google Scholar
Japan Investigators, U. C. A. S. et al. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl. J. Med. 366, 2474–2482 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sonobe, M., Yamazaki, T., Yonekura, M. & Kikuchi, H. Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVe study, Japan. Stroke 41, 1969–1977 (2010).
Google Scholar
Beck, J., Rohde, S., Berkefeld, J., Seifert, V. & Raabe, A. Size and location of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms measured by 3-dimensional rotational angiography. Surg. Neurol. 65, 18–25 (2006). discussion 25–27.
Google Scholar
Weir, B. et al. The aspect ratio (dome/neck) of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 99, 447–451 (2003).
Google Scholar
Kassell, N. F. & Torner, J. C. Size of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 12, 291–297 (1983).
Google Scholar
Lee, G. J., Eom, K. S., Lee, C., Kim, D. W. & Kang, S. D. Rupture of very small intracranial aneurysms: Incidence and clinical characteristics. J. Cerebrovasc. Endovasc Neurosurg. 17, 217–222 (2015).
Google Scholar
Juchler, N., Schilling, S., Bijlenga, P., Kurtcuoglu, V. & Hirsch, S. Shape Trumps size: Image-based morphological analysis reveals that the 3D shape discriminates intracranial aneurysm disease status better than aneurysm size. Front. Neurol. 13, 809391 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nahed, B. V. et al. Hypertension, age, and location predict rupture of small intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 57, 676–683 (2005). discussion 676–683.
Google Scholar
Pettersson, S. D. et al. Predictors for rupture of small (< 7 mm) intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 182, 184–192e14 (2024).
Google Scholar
Duan, Z. et al. Morphological parameters and anatomical locations associated with rupture status of small intracranial aneurysms. Sci. Rep. 8, 6440 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kashiwazaki, D., Kuroda, S., Sapporo, S. A. H. & Study Group. Size ratio can highly predict rupture risk in intracranial small (< 5 mm) aneurysms. Stroke 44, 2169–2173 (2013).
Google Scholar
Berg, P., Saalfeld, S., Voß, S., Beuing, O. & Janiga, G. A review on the reliability of hemodynamic modeling in intracranial aneurysms: Why computational fluid dynamics alone cannot solve the equation. Neurosurg. Focus. 47, E15 (2019).
Google Scholar
Berg, P. et al. Does the DSA reconstruction kernel affect hemodynamic predictions in intracranial aneurysms? An analysis of geometry and blood flow variations. J. Neurointerv Surg. 10, 290–296 (2018).
Google Scholar
Oʼmeara, B., Rahal, J. P., Lauric, A. & Malek, A. M. Benefit of a sharp computed tomography angiography reconstruction kernel for improved characterization of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 10 Suppl 1, 97–105; discussion 105 (2014).
Schneiders, J. J. et al. Intracranial aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: The impact on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 34, 121–128 (2013).
Google Scholar
Berg, P. et al. Multiple aneurysms anatomy challenge 2018 (MATCH): Phase I: Segmentation. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 9, 565–581 (2018).
Google Scholar
Valen-Sendstad, K. et al. Real-World variability in the prediction of intracranial aneurysm wall shear stress: The 2015 international aneurysm CFD challenge. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 9, 544–564 (2018).
Google Scholar
Metaxa, E. et al. Characterization of critical hemodynamics contributing to aneurysmal remodeling at the basilar terminus in a rabbit model. Stroke 41, 1774–1782 (2010).
Google Scholar
Xiang, J. et al. Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 42, 144–152 (2011).
Google Scholar
Cebral, J. R., Mut, F., Weir, J. & Putman, C. Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 32, 145–151 (2011).
Google Scholar
Cebral, J. R. & Meng, H. Counterpoint: Realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics–closing the gap. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 396–398 (2012).
Google Scholar
Robertson, A. M. & Watton, P. N. Computational fluid dynamics in aneurysm research: Critical reflections, future directions. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 992–995 (2012).
Google Scholar
Nordahl, E. R. et al. Morphological and hemodynamic changes during cerebral aneurysm growth. Brain Sci. 11, 520 (2021).
Google Scholar
Leemans, E. L. et al. Comparing morphology and hemodynamics of stable-versus-growing and grown intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 40, 2102–2110 (2019).
Google Scholar
Karnam, Y., Mut, F., Robertson, A. M., Kaneko, N. & Cebral, J. R. Competing pathways of intracranial aneurysm growth: Linking regional growth distribution and hemodynamics. J. Neurosurg. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS241208 (2025).
Google Scholar
Meng, H., Tutino, V. M., Xiang, J. & Siddiqui, A. High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: Toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35, 1254–1262 (2014).
Google Scholar
Saalfeld, S., Berg, P., Neugebauer, M. & Preim, B. Reconstruction of 3D Surface Meshes for Blood Flow Simulations of Intracranial Aneurysms (Bremen, 2015).
Antiga, L. et al. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 46, 1097–1112 (2008).
Google Scholar
Saalfeld, S. et al. Semiautomatic neck curve reconstruction for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment based on morphological parameters. Int. J. CARS. 13, 1781–1793 (2018).
Google Scholar
Robertson, A. M., Sequeira, A. & Owens, R. G. in Rheological Models for Blood. 211–241 (eds Cardiovascular Mathematics, L., Quarteroni, A. & Veneziani, A.) (Springer Milan, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1152-6_6
Li, B. et al. Reliability of using generic flow conditions to quantify aneurysmal haemodynamics: A comparison against simulations incorporating boundary conditions measured in vivo. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 225, 107034 (2022).
Google Scholar
Voß, S., Niemann, U., Saalfeld, S., Janiga, G. & Berg, P. Impact of workflow variability on image-based intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics. Comput. Biol. Med. 190, 110018 (2025).
Google Scholar
Cebral, J. R. et al. Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: Computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 32, 27–33 (2011).
Google Scholar
Chnafa, C. et al. Vessel calibre and flow splitting relationships at the internal carotid artery terminal bifurcation. Physiol. Meas. 38, 2044–2057 (2017).
Google Scholar
Korte, J. et al. Is accurate lumen segmentation more important than outlet boundary condition in Image-Based blood flow simulations for intracranial aneurysms? Cardiovasc. Eng. Tech. 14, 617–630 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xiang, J., Tutino, V. M., Snyder, K. V. & Meng, H. CFD: Computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination? The role of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35, 1849–1857 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yeo, I. K. A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry. Biometrika 87, 954–959 (2000).
Google Scholar
McFadden, D. Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behaviour of individuals: Some recent developments. (1977). https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:474
Xiang, J. et al. Rupture resemblance score (RRS): Toward risk stratification of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using hemodynamic-morphological discriminants. J. Neurointerv Surg. 7, 490–495 (2015).
Google Scholar
Detmer, F. J. et al. Development and internal validation of an aneurysm rupture probability model based on patient characteristics and aneurysm location, morphology, and hemodynamics. Int. J. CARS. 13, 1767–1779 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ali, M. et al. Haemorrhagic stroke and brain vascular malformations in women: Risk factors and clinical features. Lancet Neurol. 23, 625–635 (2024).
Google Scholar
Claassen, J. & Park, S. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 400, 846–862 (2022).
Google Scholar
Etminan, N. et al. Worldwide incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage according to region, time period, blood pressure, and smoking prevalence in the population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 76, 588–597 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. Anterior communicating artery aneurysms: Anatomical considerations and microsurgical strategies. Front. Neurol. 11, 1020 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rinaldo, L., Nesvick, C. L., Rabinstein, A. A. & Lanzino, G. Differences in size between unruptured and ruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms by location. World Neurosurg. 133, e828–e834 (2020).
Google Scholar
