Predictive model for treatment outcome of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation based on machine learning and model interpretation | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Machine Learning


  • Aluru JS, Barsouk A, Saginala K, Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease. Med Sci (Basel). 2022;10:32.

    Google Scholar

  • Huang AL, Dalbianco JP, Levine RA, Hun JW. Secondary mitral regurgitation: cardiac remodeling, diagnosis, and management. heart of the structure. 2022;7:100129.

    Google Scholar

  • Vahanian A et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease: Developed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery (EACTS) Valvular Heart Disease Management Task Force. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561–632.

  • Coates AJS Management of secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with other heart failure: A joint position statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1254–69.

    Google Scholar

  • Fiore A, Singh SSA, Nappi F. Learning from the controversy and reconsidering randomized trials of secondary mitral regurgitation. R.C.M. 2022;23:88.

  • Toru Okuno Surgical versus transcatheter repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: Comparison of propensity score matched cohorts. J Thoracic Cardiovascular Surg 2023;165:2037–2046.e4.

  • Norley PE, et al. The role of surgery for secondary mitral regurgitation and heart failure in the era of transcatheter mitral valve therapy. Cardiovascular Medicine Chaplain. 2022;23:87.

    Google Scholar

  • Lander MM et al Mitral valve intervention in heart failure. Jack: Heart failure. 2023;11:1055–69.

    Google Scholar

  • Ludwig S, et al. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement versus pharmacotherapy for secondary mitral regurgitation: A propensity score matched comparison. Circulation: cardiovascular interventions. 2023;16:e013045.

    Google Scholar

  • Coates AJS Management of secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with other heart failure: A joint position statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1254.

    Google Scholar

  • Asger AW, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Secondary mitral regurgitation in heart failure: pathophysiology, prognosis, and therapeutic considerations. J Am Col Cardiol. 2015;65:1231–48.

    Google Scholar

  • Stolz L, et al. Anatomy and outcomes of secondary mitral regurgitation subtypes undergoing transcatheter mitral valve end-to-end repair. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021;14:110–1.

    Google Scholar

  • Brown K et al. Using artificial intelligence to detect rheumatic heart disease by echocardiography: Focus on mitral regurgitation. J Am Heart Society 2024;13:e031257.

    Google Scholar

  • Sadeghpour A, et al. An automated machine learning-based quantitative multiparametric approach for severity grading of mitral regurgitation. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2025;18:1–12.

    Google Scholar

  • Bozil S, et al. Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems in cardiovascular diseases. Anatole J. Cardiol. 2024;28:74.

    Google Scholar

  • Javaid A et al. Healthcare 2032: The future of cardiovascular disease prevention with machine learning and digital health technologies. Am J Previous Cardiol. 2022;12:100379.

    Google Scholar

  • Pettit RW, Flem R, Chen C, Amos CI. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for clinical outcome prediction. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2021;5:729.

    Google Scholar

  • Talwar A, López-Olivo MA, Huang Y, Yin L, Apalas RR. Performance of advanced machine learning algorithms hyperlogistic regression in readmission prediction: A meta-analysis. Exploratory Res Clin Social Farm. 2023;11:100317.

    Google Scholar

  • Lundberg SM, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017.

  • Fisher A, Rudin C, Dominici F. All models are wrong, but many are useful. Learn the importance of variables by studying entire classes of predictive models simultaneously. J Mach Learning Institute 2019;20:177.

    Google Scholar

  • Friedman JH. Approximating Greedy Functions: Gradient Boosting Machines. Annals Statistics 2001;29:1189–232.

    Google Scholar

  • Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C. “Why should I trust you?”: Explaining classifier predictions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1135–1144. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

  • Stolz L, Dordi PM, Sannino A, Hausreiter J, Grayburn PA. Evolving concepts of secondary mitral regurgitation phenotypes: Lessons from the M-TEER trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2024;17:659–68.

    Google Scholar

  • Patel H, Desai M, Tuzcu EM, Griffin B, Kapadia S. Pulmonary hypertension in mitral regurgitation. J Am Heart Association: Cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease. 2014;3:e000748.

    Google Scholar

  • Wu JR, Moser DK, DeWalt DA, Rayens MK, Dracup K. Health literacy mediates the relationship between age and health outcomes in heart failure patients. Circulation: Heart failure. 2016;9:e002250.

    Google Scholar

  • Davison BA, et al. Worsening heart failure after hospitalization for acute heart failure. Jack: Heart failure. 2015;3:395–403.

    Google Scholar

  • Jung Y, Lee K, Shin S, Lee W. Effects of a multicomponent fall prevention program on balance, gait, and fear of falling in hospitalized patients after stroke. J Physical Therapy Science. 2015;27:1865.

    Google Scholar

  • Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 2016.

  • Saeys Y, Inza I, Larrañaga P. Review of feature selection methods in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2507–17.

    Google Scholar

  • Bolón-Canedo V, Sánchez-Maroño N, Alonso-Betanzos A. Recent advances and new challenges in feature selection in the context of big data. Knowledge-based system. 2015;86:33–45.

    Google Scholar



  • Source link