Libbrecht, M. W. & Noble, W. S. Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 321–332 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fulco, C. P. et al. Activity-by-contact model of enhancer–promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations. Nat. Genet. 51, 1664–1669 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ying, P. et al. Genome-wide enhancer-gene regulatory maps link causal variants to target genes underlying human cancer risk. Nat. Commun. 14, 5958 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sokolova, K., Chen, K. M., Hao, Y., Zhou, J. & Troyanskaya, O. G. Deep learning sequence models for transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 25, 105–122 (2024).
Google Scholar
Novakovsky, G., Dexter, N., Libbrecht, M. W., Wasserman, W. W. & Mostafavi, S. Obtaining genetics insights from deep learning via explainable artificial intelligence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 125–137 (2023). This Review provides a detailed description of interpretation methods for sequence-to-expression models.
Google Scholar
Capitanchik, C., Wilkins, O. G., Wagner, N., Gagneur, J. & Ule, J. From computational models of the splicing code to regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Nat. Rev. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-024-00774-2 (2024).
La Fleur, A., Shi, Y. & Seelig, G. Decoding biology with massively parallel reporter assays and machine learning. Genes Dev. 38, 843–865 (2024).
Google Scholar
van Helden, J., Andre, B. & Collado-Vides, J. Extracting regulatory sites from the upstream region of yeast genes by computational analysis of oligonucleotide frequencies. J. Mol. Biol. 281, 827–842 (1998).
Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y. & Haffner, P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 2278–2324 (1998).
Google Scholar
Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 (2017).
Eraslan, G., Avsec, Z., Gagneur, J. & Theis, F. J. Deep learning: new computational modelling techniques for genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 389–403 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stormo, G. D. Modeling the specificity of protein–DNA interactions. Quant. Biol. 1, 115–130 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J. & Troyanskaya, O. G. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model. Nat. Methods 12, 931–934 (2015). Describing DeepSEA, this pioneering paper uses a convolutional neural network to predict the effects of non-coding variants on epigenomic tracks using only DNA sequence as input.
Google Scholar
Alipanahi, B., Delong, A., Weirauch, M. T. & Frey, B. J. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 831–838 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kelley, D. R., Snoek, J. & Rinn, J. L. Basset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks. Genome Res. 26, 990–999 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kelley, D. R. et al. Sequential regulatory activity prediction across chromosomes with convolutional neural networks. Genome Res. 28, 739–750 (2018).
Google Scholar
Avsec, Z. et al. Effective gene expression prediction from sequence by integrating long-range interactions. Nat. Methods 18, 1196–1203 (2021). Describing Enformer, this study was among the first to effectively use transformers to capture long-distance enhancer–promoter interactions, enabling the prediction of epigenomic and expression tracks across multiple cell types.
Google Scholar
Karollus, A., Mauermeier, T. & Gagneur, J. Current sequence-based models capture gene expression determinants in promoters but mostly ignore distal enhancers. Genome Biol. 24, 56 (2023). This article highlights some limitations of current transformer sequence-to-expression models.
Google Scholar
He, A. Y., Palamuttam, N. P. & Danko, C. G. Training deep learning models on personalized genomic sequences improves variant effect prediction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618510 (2024).
Linder, J., Srivastava, D., Yuan, H., Agarwal, V. & Kelley, D. R. Predicting RNA-seq coverage from DNA sequence as a unifying model of gene regulation. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-02053-6 (2025). This paper describes Borzoi, the current state-of-the-art transformer-based model that predicts RNA-seq, among other tracks, by capturing transcription, splicing and poly-adenylation signals.
Toneyan, S. & Koo, P. K. Interpreting cis-regulatory interactions from large-scale deep neural networks. Nat. Genet. 56, 2517–2527 (2024).
Google Scholar
Penzar, D. et al. LegNet: a best-in-class deep learning model for short DNA regulatory regions. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad457 (2023).
Rafi, A. M. et al. A community effort to optimize sequence-based deep learning models of gene regulation. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02414-w (2024).
Google Scholar
Cochran, K. et al. Dissecting the cis-regulatory syntax of transcription initiation with deep learning. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.28.596138 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dudnyk, K., Cai, D., Shi, C., Xu, J. & Zhou, J. Sequence basis of transcription initiation in the human genome. Science 384, eadj0116 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, A. Y. & Danko, C. G. Dissection of core promoter syntax through single nucleotide resolution modeling of transcription initiation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.13.583868 (2024).
Google Scholar
Naqvi, S. et al. Transfer learning reveals sequence determinants of the quantitative response to transcription factor dosage. Cell Genom. 5, 100780 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zrimec, J. et al. Deep learning suggests that gene expression is encoded in all parts of a co-evolving interacting gene regulatory structure. Nat. Commun. 11, 6141 (2020).
Google Scholar
Agarwal, V. & Shendure, J. Predicting mRNA abundance directly from genomic sequence using deep convolutional neural networks. Cell Rep. 31, 107663 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lee, B. H. & Rhie, S. K. Molecular and computational approaches to map regulatory elements in 3D chromatin structure. Epigenet. Chromat. 14, 14 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. MLSNet: a deep learning model for predicting transcription factor binding sites. Brief Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae489 (2024).
Avsec, Z. et al. Base-resolution models of transcription-factor binding reveal soft motif syntax. Nat. Genet. 53, 354–366 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. et al. Base-resolution prediction of transcription factor binding signals by a deep learning framework. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009941 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brennan, K. J. et al. Chromatin accessibility in the Drosophila embryo is determined by transcription factor pioneering and enhancer activation. Dev. Cell 58, 1898–1916.e9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gasperini, M., Tome, J. M. & Shendure, J. Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 292–310 (2020).
Google Scholar
Marr, L. T., Jaya, P., Mishra, L. N. & Hayes, J. J. Whole-genome methods to define DNA and histone accessibility and long-range interactions in chromatin. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 50, 199–212 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Xia, F., Yin, Q. & Jiang, R. Chromatin accessibility prediction via a hybrid deep convolutional neural network. Bioinformatics 34, 732–738 (2018).
Google Scholar
Minnoye, L. et al. Cross-species analysis of enhancer logic using deep learning. Genome Res. 30, 1815–1834 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279–283 (2011).
Google Scholar
Noguchi, S. et al. FANTOM5 CAGE profiles of human and mouse samples. Sci. Data 4, 170112 (2017).
Google Scholar
Min, X. et al. Predicting enhancers with deep convolutional neural networks. BMC Bioinform. 18, 478 (2017).
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Shi, W. & Wasserman, W. W. Genome-wide prediction of cis-regulatory regions using supervised deep learning methods. BMC Bioinform. 19, 202 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cappelletti, L. et al. Boosting tissue-specific prediction of active cis-regulatory regions through deep learning and Bayesian optimization techniques. BMC Bioinform. 23, 154 (2022).
Google Scholar
Serebreni, L. & Stark, A. Insights into gene regulation: from regulatory genomic elements to DNA–protein and protein–protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 70, 58–66 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, S. & Wysocka, J. Deciphering the multi-scale, quantitative cis-regulatory code. Mol. Cell 83, 373–392 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J. et al. Deep learning sequence-based ab initio prediction of variant effects on expression and disease risk. Nat. Genet. 50, 1171–1179 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, K. M., Wong, A. K., Troyanskaya, O. G. & Zhou, J. A sequence-based global map of regulatory activity for deciphering human genetics. Nat. Genet. 54, 940–949 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, H. & Guan, Y. Fast decoding cell type-specific transcription factor binding landscape at single-nucleotide resolution. Genome Res. 31, 721–731 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kaiser, L. et al. One model to learn them all. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05137 (2017).
Vandenhende, S. et al. Multi-task learning for dense prediction tasks: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 3614–3633 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kathail, P. et al. Current genomic deep learning models display decreased performance in cell type-specific accessible regions. Genome Biol. 25, 202 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sasse, A. et al. Benchmarking of deep neural networks for predicting personal gene expression from DNA sequence highlights shortcomings. Nat. Genet. 55, 2060–2064 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lakkapragada, A., Sleiman, E., Surabhi, S. & Wall, D. P. Mitigating negative transfer in multi-task learning with exponential moving average loss weighting strategies. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12999 (2022).
Schwessinger, R., Deasy, J., Woodruff, R. T., Young, S. & Branson, K. M. Single-cell gene expression prediction from DNA sequence at large contexts. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.26.550634 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lal, A. et al. Decoding sequence determinants of gene expression in diverse cellular and disease states. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.09.617507 (2025).
Novakovsky, G., Saraswat, M., Fornes, O., Mostafavi, S. & Wasserman, W. W. Biologically relevant transfer learning improves transcription factor binding prediction. Genome Biol. 22, 280 (2021).
Google Scholar
de Almeida, B. P. et al. Targeted design of synthetic enhancers for selected tissues in the Drosophila embryo. Nature 626, 207–211 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bravo Gonzalez-Blas, C. et al. Single-cell spatial multi-omics and deep learning dissect enhancer-driven gene regulatory networks in liver zonation. Nat. Cell Biol. 26, 153–167 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hingerl, J. C. et al. scooby: modeling multi-modal genomic profiles from DNA sequence at single-cell resolution. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.19.613754 (2024).
Google Scholar
Drusinsky, S., Whalen, S. & Pollard, K. S. Deep-learning prediction of gene expression from personal genomes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.27.605449 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kathail, P., Bajwa, A. & Ioannidis, N. M. Leveraging genomic deep learning models for non-coding variant effect prediction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11158 (2024).
Murphy, A. E., Beardall, W., Rei, M., Phuycharoen, M. & Skene, N. G. Predicting cell type-specific epigenomic profiles accounting for distal genetic effects. Nat. Commun. 15, 9951 (2024).
Google Scholar
Waszak, S. M. et al. Population variation and genetic control of modular chromatin architecture in humans. Cell 162, 1039–1050 (2015).
Google Scholar
Agarwal, V. et al. Massively parallel characterization of transcriptional regulatory elements. Nature 639, 411–420 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Functional assessment of human enhancer activities using whole-genome STARR-sequencing. Genome Biol. 18, 219 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sahu, B. et al. Sequence determinants of human gene regulatory elements. Nat. Genet. 54, 283–294 (2022).
Google Scholar
Deng, C. et al. Massively parallel characterization of regulatory elements in the developing human cortex. Science 384, eadh0559 (2024).
Google Scholar
Trauernicht, M., Martinez-Ara, M. & van Steensel, B. Deciphering gene regulation using massively parallel reporter assays. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 90–91 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gallego Romero, I. & Lea, A. J. Leveraging massively parallel reporter assays for evolutionary questions. Genome Biol. 24, 26 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. & VanDusen, N. J. Massively parallel reporter assays for high-throughput in vivo analysis of cis-regulatory elements. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10040144 (2023).
Movva, R. et al. Deciphering regulatory DNA sequences and noncoding genetic variants using neural network models of massively parallel reporter assays. PLoS ONE 14, e0218073 (2019).
Google Scholar
de Almeida, B. P., Reiter, F., Pagani, M. & Stark, A. DeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of synthetic enhancers. Nat. Genet. 54, 613–624 (2022). This study applied a convolutional neural network model to predict enhancer activity in a plasmid-based assay to understand the grammatical rules of enhancers in Drosophila melanogaster cells.
Google Scholar
Barbadilla-Martínez, L. et al. The regulatory grammar of human promoters uncovered by MPRA-trained deep learning. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.602649 (2024).
Google Scholar
Duttke, S. H. et al. Position-dependent function of human sequence-specific transcription factors. Nature 631, 891–898 (2024).
Google Scholar
de Boer, C. G. & Taipale, J. Hold out the genome: a roadmap to solving the cis-regulatory code. Nature 625, 41–50 (2024).
Google Scholar
de Boer, C. G. et al. Deciphering eukaryotic gene-regulatory logic with 100 million random promoters. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 56–65 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vaishnav, E. D. et al. The evolution, evolvability and engineering of gene regulatory DNA. Nature 603, 455–463 (2022). This study was one of the first to design functional synthetic sequences and investigate regulatory evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using sequence-to-expression models.
Google Scholar
Akhtar, W. et al. Chromatin position effects assayed by thousands of reporters integrated in parallel. Cell 154, 914–927 (2013).
Google Scholar
Klein, J. C. et al. A systematic evaluation of the design and context dependencies of massively parallel reporter assays. Nat. Methods 17, 1083–1091 (2020).
Google Scholar
Badis, G. et al. Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors. Science 324, 1720–1723 (2009).
Google Scholar
Alexandari, A. M. et al. De novo distillation of thermodynamic affinity from deep learning regulatory sequence models of in vivo protein–DNA binding. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.11.540401 (2023).
Nair, S., Shrikumar, A., Schreiber, J. & Kundaje, A. fastISM: performant in silico saturation mutagenesis for convolutional neural networks. Bioinformatics 38, 2397–2403 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schreiber, J., Nair, S., Balsubramani, A. & Kundaje, A. Accelerating in silico saturation mutagenesis using compressed sensing. Bioinformatics 38, 3557–3564 (2022).
Google Scholar
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A. & Zisserman, A. Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6034 (2013).
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P. & Kundaje, A. Learning important features through propagating activation differences. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02685 (2017). Describing DeepLIFT, this study represents pioneering work on attribution methods for interrogating sequence-to-expression models.
Lundberg, S. & Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874 (2017).
Sundararajan, M., Taly, A. & Yan, Q. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01365 (2017).
Shrikumar, A. et al. Technical note on transcription factor motif discovery from importance scores (TF-MoDISco) version 0.5.6.5. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00416 (2018).
Janssens, J. et al. Decoding gene regulation in the fly brain. Nature 601, 630–636 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yuan, H. & Kelley, D. R. scBasset: sequence-based modeling of single-cell ATAC-seq using convolutional neural networks. Nat. Methods 19, 1088–1096 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S. & Guestrin, C. “Why Should I Trust You?”: explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1135–1144 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2016).
Novakovsky, G., Fornes, O., Saraswat, M., Mostafavi, S. & Wasserman, W. W. ExplaiNN: interpretable and transparent neural networks for genomics. Genome Biol. 24, 154 (2023).
Google Scholar
Seitz, E. E., McCandlish, D. M., Kinney, J. B. & Koo, P. K. Interpreting cis-regulatory mechanisms from genomic deep neural networks using surrogate models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 701–713 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, G., Sarkar, A., Carbonetto, P. & Stephens, M. A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 82, 1273–1300 (2020).
Google Scholar
Siraj, L. et al. Functional dissection of complex and molecular trait variants at single nucleotide resolution. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.05.592437 (2024).
Google Scholar
Shigaki, D. et al. Integration of multiple epigenomic marks improves prediction of variant impact in saturation mutagenesis reporter assay. Hum. Mutat. 40, 1280–1291 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. D. et al. Helicase-assisted continuous editing for programmable mutagenesis of endogenous genomes. Science 386, eadn5876 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yao, D. et al. Multicenter integrated analysis of noncoding CRISPRi screens. Nat. Methods 21, 723–734 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schraivogel, D. et al. Targeted Perturb-seq enables genome-scale genetic screens in single cells. Nat. Methods 17, 629–635 (2020).
Google Scholar
Eder, M., Moene, C. J. I., Dauban, L., Leemans, C. & van Steensel, B. Functional maps of a genomic locus reveal confinement of an enhancer by its target gene. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.26.609360 (2024).
Horton, C. A. et al. Short tandem repeats bind transcription factors to tune eukaryotic gene expression. Science 381, eadd1250 (2023).
Google Scholar
Reiter, F., de Almeida, B. P. & Stark, A. Enhancers display constrained sequence flexibility and context-specific modulation of motif function. Genome Res. 33, 346–358 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dey, K. K. et al. Evaluating the informativeness of deep learning annotations for human complex diseases. Nat. Commun. 11, 4703 (2020).
Google Scholar
Trevino, A. E. et al. Chromatin and gene-regulatory dynamics of the developing human cerebral cortex at single-cell resolution. Cell 184, 5053–5069.e23 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. K. et al. Single-cell multiome of the human retina and deep learning nominate causal variants in complex eye diseases. Cell Genom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100164 (2022).
Huang, C. et al. Personal transcriptome variation is poorly explained by current genomic deep learning models. Nat. Genet. 55, 2056–2059 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, L., Fish, A. E. & Capra, J. A. Prediction of gene regulatory enhancers across species reveals evolutionarily conserved sequence properties. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006484 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kelley, D. R. Cross-species regulatory sequence activity prediction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008050 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kaplow, I. M. et al. Inferring mammalian tissue-specific regulatory conservation by predicting tissue-specific differences in open chromatin. BMC Genom. 23, 291 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kaplow, I. M. et al. Relating enhancer genetic variation across mammals to complex phenotypes using machine learning. Science 380, eabm7993 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hecker, N. et al. Enhancer-driven cell type comparison reveals similarities between the mammalian and bird pallium. Science 387, eadp3957 (2025).
Google Scholar
Taskiran, I. I. et al. Cell-type-directed design of synthetic enhancers. Nature 626, 212–220 (2024). In this paper, several approaches are used to construct cell-type-specific enhancers using sequence-to-expression models.
Google Scholar
Gosai, S. J. et al. Machine-guided design of cell-type-targeting cis-regulatory elements. Nature 634, 1211–1220 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lal, A., Garfield, D., Biancalani, T. & Eraslan, G. Designing realistic regulatory DNA with autoregressive language models. Genome Res. 34, 1411–1420 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sarkar, A., Tang, Z., Zhao, C. & Koo, P. K. Designing DNA with tunable regulatory activity using discrete diffusion. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.23.595630 (2024).
Google Scholar
Senior, A. W. et al. Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature 577, 706–710 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ji, Y., Zhou, Z., Liu, H. & Davuluri, R. V. DNABERT: pre-trained bidirectional encoder representations from transformers model for DNA-language in genome. Bioinformatics 37, 2112–2120 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dalla-Torre, H. et al. Nucleotide transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics. Nat. Methods 22, 287–297 (2025).
Google Scholar
Benegas, G., Batra, S. S. & Song, Y. S. DNA language models are powerful predictors of genome-wide variant effects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2311219120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, E. et al. HyenaDNA: long-range genomic sequence modeling at single nucleotide resolution. (2023).
Tang, Z., Somia, N., Yu, Y. & Koo, P. K. Evaluating the representational power of pre-trained DNA language models for regulatory genomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.29.582810 (2024).
Google Scholar
Isa Marin, F. et al. BEND: benchmarking DNA language models on biologically meaningful tasks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12570 (2023).
Friedman, R. Z. et al. Active learning of enhancer and silencer regulatory grammar in photoreceptors. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.21.554146 (2023).
Google Scholar
Duncan, A. G., Mitchell, J. A. & Moses, A. M. Improving the performance of supervised deep learning for regulatory genomics using phylogenetic augmentation. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae190 (2024).
Lee, N. K., Tang, Z., Toneyan, S. & Koo, P. K. EvoAug: improving generalization and interpretability of genomic deep neural networks with evolution-inspired data augmentations. Genome Biol. 24, 105 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rastogi, R., Reddy, A. J., Chung, R. & Ioannidis, N. M. Fine-tuning sequence-to-expression models on personal genome and transcriptome data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.23.614632 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fu, X. et al. A foundation model of transcription across human cell types. Nature 637, 965–973 (2025).
Google Scholar
Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein–DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).
Google Scholar
Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
Google Scholar
Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823–837 (2007).
Google Scholar
Shiraki, T. et al. Cap analysis gene expression for high-throughput analysis of transcriptional starting point and identification of promoter usage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15776–15781 (2003).
Google Scholar
Kruesi, W. S., Core, L. J., Waters, C. T., Lis, J. T. & Meyer, B. J. Condensin controls recruitment of RNA polymerase II to achieve nematode X-chromosome dosage compensation. eLife 2, e00808 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tsuchihara, K. et al. Massive transcriptional start site analysis of human genes in hypoxia cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 2249–2263 (2009).
Google Scholar
Policastro, R. A. & Zentner, G. E. Global approaches for profiling transcription initiation. Cell Rep. Methods https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100081 (2021).
van Arensbergen, J. et al. Genome-wide mapping of autonomous promoter activity in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 145–153 (2017).
Google Scholar
Arnold, C. D. et al. Genome-wide quantitative enhancer activity maps identified by STARR-seq. Science 339, 1074–1077 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bajwa, A., Rastogi, R., Kathail, P., Shuai, R. W. & Ioannidis, N. M. Characterizing uncertainty in predictions of genomic sequence-to-activity models. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.21.572730 (2023).
Google Scholar
