Multidimensional data analysis and classification using SMIAL

Machine Learning


  • Du, X. et al. Hyperspectral retinal imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and age-related macular degeneration: a review. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 12, 157 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, S. N., Ceulemans, H., Boyd, J. D. & Carpenter, A. E. Image-based profiling for drug discovery: due for a machine-learning upgrade?. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 145–159 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. et al. Label-free assessment of key biological autofluorophores: material characteristics and opportunities for clinical applications. Adv. Mater. e2403761. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202403761 (2024).

  • Knab, A., Giardina, C., Grey, S. T., Goldys, E. M. & Campbell, J. M. Illuminating immunity: a systematic review of immune cell autofluorescence. J. Biophotonics 18, e202400576 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, S., Anwer, A. G., Knab, A. Bhargava, A. & Goldys, E. M. AutoMitoNetwork: Software for analyzing mitochondrial networks in autofluorescence images to enable label-free cell classification. Cytometry 1552–4930. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24889 (2024).

  • More, S. S., Beach, J. M., McClelland, C., Mokhtarzadeh, A. & Vince, R. In vivo assessment of retinal biomarkers by hyperspectral imaging: early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 10, 4492–4501 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. et al. Emerging clinical applications in oncology for non-invasive multi- and hyperspectral imaging of cell and tissue autofluorescence. J. Biophotonics e202300105. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202300105 (2023).

  • Campbell, J. M. et al. Clinical applications of non-invasive multi and hyperspectral imaging of cell and tissue autofluorescence beyond oncology. J. Biophotonics 16, e202200264 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, A. et al. Current advances in imaging spectroscopy and its state-of-the-art applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 238, 122172 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, M. & Amigo, J. M. Pre-processing of hyperspectral images. Essential steps before image analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 117, 138–148 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, A. E. et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7, R100 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. A. et al. Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1757–1774 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. et al. Pancreatic islet characterisation by the hyperspectral Assessment of autofluorescence: a non-invasive, label-free measure of viability. Proc. SPIE 11655, Label-free Biomedical Imaging and Sensing (LBIS) 2021, 1165506 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2578220.

  • Campbell, J. M. et al. Non-destructive, label free identification of cell cycle phase in cancer cells by multispectral microscopy of autofluorescence. BMC Cancer 19, 1242 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. et al. Multispectral autofluorescence characteristics of reproductive aging in old and young mouse oocytes. Biogerontology 23, 237–249 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, L. et al. The CellPhe toolkit for cell phenotyping using time-lapse imaging and pattern recognition. Nat. Commun. 14, 1854 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudjihartono, N., Fadason, T., Kempa-Liehr, A. W. & O’Sullivan, J. M. A review of feature selection methods for machine learning-based disease risk prediction. Front. Bioinform. 2, 927312 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. et al. Phenotypic image analysis software tools for exploring and understanding big image data from cell-based assays. Cell Syst. 6, 636–653 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramoff, M., Magalhães, P. & Ram, S. J. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int. 11, 36–42 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pau, G., Fuchs, F., Sklyar, O., Boutros, M. & Huber, W. EBImage—an R package for image processing with applications to cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics 26, 979–981 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert, L. W. et al. Hyperspectral Data Analysis in R: The hsdar Package. J. Stat. Softw. 89, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v089.i12 (2019).

  • Stirling, D. R., Carpenter, A. E. & Cimini, B. A. CellProfiler Analyst 3.0: accessible data exploration and machine learning for image analysis. Bioinformatics 37, 3992–3994 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laksameethanasan, D., Tan, R., Toh, G. W. & Loo, L.-H. CellXpress: a fast and user-friendly software platform for profiling cellular phenotypes. BMC Bioinform. 14, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-S16-S4 (2013).

  • Elliott, K., Berry, J. C., Kim, H. & Bart, R. S. A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity. Plant Methods 18, 86 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-de-Mariscal, E. et al. DeepImageJ: a user-friendly environment to run deep learning models in ImageJ. Nat. Methods 18, 1192–1195 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccinini, F. et al. Advanced Cell Classifier: user-friendly machine-learning-based software for discovering phenotypes in high-content imaging data. Cell Syst. 4, 651–655.e5 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyngdoh, R. B. et al. AVHYAS: A Free and Open Source QGIS Plugin for Advanced Hyperspectral Image Analysis. 2021 International Conference on Emerging Techniques in Computational Intelligence (ICETCI), 71–76 (Hyderabad, India, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETCI51973.2021.9574057.

  • Horgan, C. C. & Bergholt, M. S. spectrai: A deep learning framework for spectral data. J. Spectral Imaging. 11, a7 (2022).

  • Knab, A. et al. Towards label-free non-invasive autofluorescence multispectral imaging for melanoma diagnosis. J. Biophotonics e202300402. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202300402.

  • Rasti, B., Ulfarsson, M. & Ghamisi, P. Automatic hyperspectral image restoration using sparse and low-rank modeling. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 14, 2335–2339 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbub, S. B., Plöschner, M., Gosnell, M. E., Anwer, A. G. & Goldys, E. M. Statistically strong label-free quantitative identification of native fluorophores in a biological sample. Sci. Rep. 7, 15792 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. et al. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1–7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varga, L., Makowski, J. & Zell, A. Measuring the ripeness of fruit with hyperspectral imaging and deep learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.09808 (2021).

  • Grahn, H. & Geladi, P. Techniques and Applications of Hyperspectral Image Analysis (J. Wiley, 2007).

  • Wang, J., Xu, J., Zhao, C., Peng, Y. & Wang, H. An ensemble feature selection method for high-dimensional data based on sort aggregation. Syst. Sci. Control Eng. 7, 32–39 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, A. et al. VascuViz: a multimodality and multiscale imaging and visualization pipeline for vascular systems biology. Nat. Methods 19, 242–254 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, N. et al. AutoGluon-Tabular: robust and accurate AutoML for structured data. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.06505 (2020).

  • Ghamisi, P., Plaza, J., Chen, Y., Li, J. & Plaza, A. J. Advanced spectral classifiers for hyperspectral images: a review. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 5, 8–32 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, X. An overview of overfitting and its solutions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1168, 022022 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan, M. M., Luna, S. A. & Siddique, Z. Machine-learning-based disease diagnosis: a comprehensive review. Healthcare 10, 541 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alieva, M., Wezenaar, A., Wehrens, E. & Rios, A. Bridging live-cell imaging and next-generation cancer treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 23, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-023-00610-5 (2023).

  • Aung, L., Li, R., Prabhakar, B., Maker, A. & Li, P. Mitochondrial protein 18 (MTP18) plays a pro-apoptotic role in chemotherapy-induced gastric cancer cell apoptosis. Oncotarget 8, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17508. (2017).

  • Ponsioen, B. et al. Quantifying single-cell ERK dynamics in colorectal cancer organoids reveals EGFR as an amplifier of oncogenic MAPK pathway signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 1–14 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. et al. β-nicotinamide mononucleotide rescues the quality of aged oocyte and improves subsequent embryo development in pigs. PLoS ONE 18, e0291640 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo, Y.-J. et al. Particulate matter exposure during oocyte maturation: cell cycle arrest, ROS generation, and early apoptosis in mice. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 602097 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. et al. Longitudinal study-based dementia prediction for public health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14090983 (2017).

  • Murugan, A., Nair, S. A. H., Preethi, A. A. P. & Kumar, K. P. S. Diagnosis of skin cancer using machine learning techniques. Microprocess. Microsyst. 81, 103727 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. et al. Single cell, label free characterisation of human mesenchymal stromal cell stemness and future growth potential by autofluorescence multispectral imaging. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 20, 2283–2292 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. H. L. et al. Non-invasive assessment of urinary exfoliated proximal tubule cell multispectral autofluorescence may differentiate between causes of kidney transplant dysfunction. Kidney360 https://doi.org/10.34067/kid.0000000879 (2025).

  • Bemando, C., Miranda, E. & Aryuni, M. Machine-learning-based prediction models of coronary heart disease using naïve Bayes and random forest algorithms. In Proc. 2021 International Conference on Software Engineering & Computer Systems and 4th International Conference on Computational Science and Information Management (ICSECS-ICOCSIM) 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSECS52883.2021.00049 (2021).

  • Sharma, S. & Khanna, P. Computer-aided diagnosis of malignant mammograms using Zernike moments and SVM. J. Digit. Imaging 28, 77–90 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerraty, M., Bhargava, A., Senarathna, J., Mendelson, A. A. & Pathak, A. P. Advances in translational imaging of the microcirculation. Microcirculation 28, e12683 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senarathna, J. et al. In vivo phenotyping of the microvasculature in necrotizing enterocolitis with multicontrast optical imaging. Microcirculation 29, e12768 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, A., Popel, A. S. & Pathak, A. P. Vascular phenotyping of the invasive front in breast cancer using a 3D angiogenesis atlas. Microvasc. Res. 149, 104555 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y. et al. Multimodality imaging reveals angiogenic evolution in vivo during calvarial bone defect healing. Angiogenesis 27, 105–119 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatelos, S. K., Bhargava, A., Kim, E., Popel, A. S. & Pathak, A. P. Tumor ensemble-based modeling and visualization of emergent angiogenic heterogeneity in breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 9, 5276 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senarathna, J. et al. HemoSYS: a toolkit for Image-based Systems Biology of Tumor Hemodynamics. Sci. Rep. 10, 2372 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, M. et al. CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging. Nat. methods 7, 747–754 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankaanpää, P. et al. BioImageXD: An open, general-purpose and high-throughput image-processing platform. Nat. methods 9, 683–689 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Natekar, P., Wang, Z., Arora, M., Hakozaki, H. & Schöneberg, J. Self-supervised deep learning uncovers the semantic landscape of drug-induced latent mitochondrial phenotypes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.13.557636 (2023).

  • Stringer, C. et al. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 100–106 (2021).

  • Gnutti, A., Guerrini, F., Adami, N., Migliorati, P. & Leonardi, R. A wavelet filter comparison on multiple datasets for signal compression and denoising. Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process. 32, 791–820 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasti, B., Sveinsson, J. R., Ulfarsson, M. O. & Benediktsson, J. A. Hyperspectral image denoising using first order spectral roughness penalty in wavelet domain. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 7, 2458–2467 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasti, B., Ulfarsson, M. O. & Ghamisi, P. Automatic hyperspectral image restoration using sparse and low-rank modeling. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 14, 2335–2339 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radovic, M., Ghalwash, M., Filipovic, N. & Obradovic, Z. Minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection approach for temporal gene expression data. BMC Bioinform. 18, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1423-9. (2017).

  • Franke, T. M., Ho, T. & Christie, C. A. The Chi-Square Test: often used and more often misinterpreted. Am. J. Eval. 33, 448–458 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, N. & Pratim Sengupta, P. Gini Inequality Index: Methods and Applications 1st edn (CRC Press, 2021).

  • He, X., Cai, D. & Niyogi, P. Laplacian score for feature selection. Conference: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18 (Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2005, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2005).

  • Robnik-Sikonja, M. & Kononenko, I. An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression. ICML ’97: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning 296–304 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1997).

  • Freitas, D., Lopes, L. G. & Morgado-Dias, F. Particle Swarm Optimisation: A Historical Review Up to the Current Developments. Entropy 22, 362 (2020).

  • Costa, S. I. R., Santos, S. A. & Strapasson, J. E. Fisher information distance: a geometrical reading. Discret. Appl. Math. 197, 59–69 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutroumbas, K.& Theodoridis, S. Pattern Recognition 4th edn (Elsevier Science & Technology, 2008).

  • Mittal, N. & Kumar, A. 20—Analysis of supervised feature selection in bioinformatics. in Blockchain Applications for Healthcare Informatics (ed. Tanwar, S.) 431–446 (Academic Press, 2022).

  • Sharma, A. & Paliwal, K. Rotational linear discriminant analysis technique for dimensionality reduction. In Proc. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering Vol. 20, 1336–1347 (IEEE, 2008).

  • Jolliffe, I. T. & Cadima, J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 374, 20150202 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngiam, J., Chen, Z., Bhaskar, S., Koh, P. & Ng, A. Sparse filtering. NIPS’11: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 1125–1133 (Curran Associates Inc., 2011).

  • Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning 8th edn (Information Science and Statistics) (Springer, 2006).

  • Bonaccorso, G. Machine Learning Algorithms: Popular Algorithms for Data Science and Machine Learning 1–514 (Packt Publishing Limited, 2018).

  • Lopez-Bernal, D., Balderas, D., Ponce, P. & Molina, A. Education 4.0: teaching the basics of KNN, LDA and simple perceptron algorithms for binary classification problems. Future Internet 13, 193 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. J. & Barnett, A. G. An introduction to Generalized Linear Models 4th edn (Generalized Linear Models) (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 2018).

  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. H. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, 2009).

  • Tharwat, A. Linear vs. quadratic discriminant analysis classifier: a tutorial. Int. J. Appl. Pattern Recognit. 3, 145–180 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, M. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 217–222 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. & Dubey, S. K. Comparative Analysis of K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means Algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 4, 35–39 (2013).

  • Datta, D., Mallick, P. K., Shafi, J., Choi, J. & Ijaz, M. F. Computational intelligence for observation and monitoring: a case study of imbalanced hyperspectral image data classification. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 8735201 (2022).

  • Lever, J., Krzywinski, M. & Altman, N. Points of significance: model selection and overfitting. Nat. Methods 13, 703–705 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafało, M. Cross validation methods: Analysis based on diagnostics of thyroid cancer metastasis. ICT Express 8, 183–188 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T.-T. Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern Recognit. 48, 2839–2846 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandini, M., Bagli, E. & Visani, G. Metrics for multi-class classification: an overview. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.05756 (2020).



  • Source link